CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02839538Updated Jul 21, 2016

Comparative Study of the Analgesic Effect of Spinal Anesthesia or Infiltration Anesthesia for Hemorrhoidectomy

A Phase 4 interventional study of Local Infiltration and Subarachnoidal block in Postoperative Pain, sponsored by Federal University of São Paulo. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-07-21.

Sponsored by Federal University of São Paulo · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Background and Objectives: Postoperative analgesia and early recovery are relevant for hospital discharge after hemorrhoidectomy. This study investigated the postoperative analgesic effect with local infiltration compared with spinal block.

Methods: This randomized study included 40 patients aged 18 to 60 years old. Local group (LG) received local infiltration under general anaesthesia; spinal group (SG) received a subarachnoid block. LG received general anaesthesia with propofol, atracurium and propofol infusion as well as a local infiltration of 20 ml 0.75% ropivacaine. SG received 2 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine. Analgesic supplementation was with 50µg of fentanyl for LG and 1% lidocaine for SG. There were assessed: postoperative pain intensity, sphincter relaxation, motor blockade of lower limbs, time to discharge, analgesic dose over 1 week and adverse effects.

Read the detailed description

This is a prospective, randomized study, including 40 patients between 18 and 60 years, of both genders, ASA 1 or 2.

Patients in group 1( n= 19 ) will be submitted to spinal block and group 2 (n=21) to local infiltration. The spinal block will be performed with 10 mg of 0.5% bupivacaine. The infiltration will be performed with 10 ml of 0.75% ropivacaine on each side.

Will be evaluated: intensity of pain on a numerical scale from 0 to 10 every 30 minutes, relaxation of the sphincter muscles, intensity of pain after the operation every 30 minutes until reached the criteria for discharge, motor blocked of the lower limbs every 30 minutes, BP, HR, SO2, FR, other items that determine the conditions of discharge (urine output, nausea and vomiting), time to hospital discharge, and duration of analgesia.

Adverse effects and complications will be noted.

02

Conditions studied

  • Postoperative Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • infiltration
  • hemorrhoidectomy
  • postoperative pain
03

In context

Pain, Postoperative

5,093 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain, Postoperative; 1,140 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 40 is below the median of 75 across 4,344 interventional studies indexed under Pain, Postoperative.

Browse Pain, Postoperative studies →

Lead sponsor

Federal University of São Paulo is the lead sponsor of 427 studies on the registry; 22 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Will be included 40 patients, ASA physical status 1 or 2 undergoing hemorrhoidectomy after approval by the Ethics Committee and signed Consent Form.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • There will be excluded patients with associated diseases (fistula, fissure) infection at the puncture site, using anticoagulants or analgesics (up to 2 weeks before the procedure) and pregnant.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
40 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    local Infiltration

    Induction of General Anesthesia with Propofol(2mg/Kg) and Atracurium(0,5mg/Kg) . Pulmonary ventilation with laryngeal mask and Propofol infusion ( 100mcg/Kg/min.) After , Infiltration of 0.75% ropivacaine (10 ml) each side block injection of local anesthetic at perianal. If necessary, fentanyl endovenous injection (50 mcg).

    Procedure: Local Infiltration

  • Other
    Subarachnoidal block

    Sedation with midazolam 2 mg. After , Spinal block with 10 mg of hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine. Injection of anesthetic at subarachnoidal space with Quincke needle 27G. If pain, local infiltration with lidocaine 1% (5 ml) in wound.

    Procedure: Subarachnoidal block

Interventions

  • ProcedureLocal Infiltration

    Injection at perianal region with ropivacaine 0.75%(20ml)

    Also known as: local anesthesia

  • ProcedureSubarachnoidal block

    Injection at subarachnoidal space with bupivacaine 0.5% ( 2ml)

    Also known as: spinal anesthesia

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain intensity

    Numerical score

    Time frame: 24 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to discharge

    Time frame: 24 hours

Other outcomes

  1. Duration of motor blockade

    Time frame: 24 hours

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Borges LA, da Cunha Leal P, Rey Moura EC, Sakata RK. Randomized clinical study on the analgesic effect of local infiltration versus spinal block for hemorrhoidectomy. Sao Paulo Med J. 2017 May-Jun;135(3):247-252. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2017.0001260117. Epub 2017 May 29. PubMed 28562733 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 21, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02839538
Lead sponsor
Federal University of São Paulo
Responsible party
Luis Antonio Borges (MD, Federal University of São Paulo) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 21, 2016
Start date
Dec 2014
Primary completion
Nov 2015
Completion
Nov 2015
Last update
Jul 21, 2016

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion