CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT02837679Updated Apr 29, 2020

Oncogeriatric Intervention and Follow-up at Home

An interventional study of Geriatric Follow up in Neoplasms, Geriatric Assessment and Lung Neoplasms, sponsored by Aarhus University Hospital. Status unknown at 1 site in Denmark. Open to participants aged 70 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-04-29.

Sponsored by Aarhus University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Apr 2020), so the status shown — last known as Active, not recruiting — may be out of date.

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 5 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2016, registered Jun 2016).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
350
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
70 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The study is a randomized study of patients living in four municipalities in Eastern Jutland. After geriatric assessment half of the patients will be offered a tailor-made intervention in their homes. The follow-up will last for at least 90 days and include treatment of the patients' multimorbidity, e.g. of dehydration, anaemia, infections, and malnutrition. The other half of the patients, the results of the assessment and recommendations will be given to the patients and their general practitioner.

The primary efficacy variables are accomplishment of planned cancer treatment, reduction of complications and admissions to hospital and increased quality of life,.

If geriatric assessment and a tailor-made follow-up result in a better quality of life with less complications and admissions the offer may be extended to a longer period, younger age groups and other cancer diagnoses.

Read the detailed description

Cancer of the head and neck (HNC), lung (LC), upper gastrointestinal channel (CUGI) and colo-rectal cancer (CRC) accounts for approximately 40% of cancer incidence in elderly people (defined as ≥70 years) in Denmark (DK). The four cancers account for more than 50% of the annual cancer-related deaths in DK. Incidence and mortality of cancer increases with age. Comorbidity (simultaneous presence of several medical conditions) are more present in older cancer patients than in younger This means that older cancer patients are more vulnerable by physiological, psychological and social means than younger. Older cancer patients frequent develop side effects of cancer treatment than younger cancer patients.

Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA), is a comprehensive investigation and assessment of various aspects of a person's health, carried out by a multidisciplinary team in order to identify, quantify problems and follow up on the identified problems. CGA comprises collecting information on comorbidity, polypharmacy, physical, psychological and cognitive problems, nutritional status and social support. Problems in these areas implies a worse prognosis in terms of survival, response to treatment and side effects of cancer treatment .

CGA have shown to be able to identify novel health problems in about half of elderly patients with cancer. It has previously been shown that the focused palliative care of patients with lung cancer with a focus on optimization of medication and follow up on unresolved problems increases the quality of life, eases depressive symptoms and increases survival. CGA is shown to be an effective base for intervention in order to increase the survival of the elderly in general (with no known cancer), in order to increase the physical and cognitive status, and to reduce the need for changes in housing facilities. Geriatric intervention based on CGA called Comprehensive Geriatric Care (CGC).

Frailty is a condition that occurs as a result of declining physiological reserve, causing vulnerability to health stressors. One way of defining frailty is based on CGA, where patients are divided into "frail" "vulnerable/pre-frail" and "fit" by performing CGA :

Frail: patients who meet one or more of the following: dependence in Activities of Daily Living (ADL), severe comorbidity, cognitive dysfunction, depression, malnutrition, or more than 7 different fixed daily preparations on time for CGA, (multivitamin not included).

Fit patients: independent in ADL and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL), no or minimal comorbidity, Cognitively intact and no nutritional problems.

Vulnerable / pre-frail patients: Neither Fit nor frail. Frailty is a potentially reversible mode. It is known that elderly patients may develop frailty during cancer treatment.

From a previously conducted study of 217 elderly patients with HNC, LC, and CRC CUGI, we know that a large part of the patients are frail (52%) or vulnerable (35%). Only 13% are fit . But we do not know the effect of providing geriatric follow-up to this population with regards to complications of cancer treatment, including the ability to be able accomplish cancer treatment as planned and the possibility of reducing hospital stay.

A study carried out on patients discharged from the Emergency Department or Geriatric wards, have shown that it is possible to reduce the admission time by offering CGA related to admission and add follow-up with the CGC compared to only providing CGA for patients in the hospital. In the study, hospitalization was reduced by 55% It has not previously been shown if CGA in an outpatient setting and subsequent Geriatric follow up on the problems identified can reduce hospitalization time and increase the proportion who accomplish cancer treatment per protocol in older cancer patients until 1 status examination compared to patients who only get CGA in the outpatient setting, but do not get geriatric follow-up afterwards.

It's oncology practice at first outpatient attendance to define what type of cancer a patient must have, this includes both the type of treatment, the aim of treatment (neoadjuvant, adjuvant, curative or palliative (life-prolonging / palliative)), dose of treatment and duration of treatment before status examination.

Intervention CGC is an intervention that is tailored to the individual patient based on the problem areas identified by CGA and the problems that occur within 90 days of enrollment. It can include home visits, visits to Aarhus University Hospital (AUH) in outpatient settings, scheduled and on demand and telephone contact. Patients will be followed for 90 days of enrollment or until reference to specialized palliative care treatment or death. The geriatric intervention may consist of liquid treatment, blood transfusion, oral or intravenous antibiotic administration, oxygen therapy, pain management, social intervention, nutritional intervention and lifeline telephone number The geriatric intervention will be different from patient to patient. There may be many or few contacts of various kinds. During the 90 days the number and nature of contacts (telephone / attendance / home visits) will be recorded as the interventions that are performed will be registered (medication changes, social work, nutrition efforts and efforts to optimize Physical functioning) Contact between the oncogeriatric team and the patient can be taken at the initiative of oncogeriatric team, patient or relatives. The oncogeriatric team can initiate treatment or refer to another department, if necessary.

Controls For the control group, the result and the recommendations of the CGA, which has been given to patients regarding. for example medication changes, social intervention (eg. adaptation of home care), physical optimization for example. training and nutrition recommendations will be summarized for the patient and with the patient's acceptance sent to the practitioner. Otherwise, no follow-upis performed in the period by oncogeriatric team.

After 3 months, the intervention group and control Group are tested by CGA and quality of life questionnaires in order to compare with baseline results and comparing the control group with the intervention group.

Blinding It is not possible to blind subjects to randomization. Likewise, it is not possible to blind the geriatric team in charge of the follow-up for the result of the randomization. The person that test subjects after 3 months is blinded to the randomization. Oncologists do not get information about randomization.

02

Conditions studied

  • Neoplasms
  • Geriatric Assessment
  • Lung Neoplasms
  • Colorectal Neoplasms
  • Head and Neck Neoplasms
  • Gastrointestinal Neoplasms
  • Geriatrics
  • Polypharmacy
  • Quality of Life
03

In context

Neoplasms

9,365 studies on the registry are indexed under Neoplasms; 2,486 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 350 is above the median of 50 across 7,250 interventional studies indexed under Neoplasms.

Browse Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Aarhus University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 289 studies on the registry; 79 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
70 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

70 years or older with cancer of the head and neck, upper gastro intestinal cancer, colo-rectal cancer or Lung cancer, refered to Aarhus University Hospital for evaluation regarding oncological treatment on the Oncology Department at Aarhus University

  • Living in following municipalities: Odder (excl. of the island of Thunø), Faurskov, Skanderborg og Aarhus
  • frail or vulnerable by CGA
  • Signed informed consent. For incapacitated patients: informed consent by relatives

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • evaluated 'fit´ by CGA
  • Referred to specialized palliative care at time of first visit at the Oncology department
  • Do not wish to participate
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
350 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention

    Geriatric follow up

    Other: Geriatric Follow up

  • No intervention
    Control

    Usual care

Interventions

  • OtherGeriatric Follow up
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Success rate of admittance to initial planned oncological treatment

    Oncological specialist evaluates if treatment is completed as planned or if eventual deviations are of minor or major character

    Time frame: An average of 12 weeks

  2. Change in Quality of life (QoL)

    Participants with a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)-score of 25 and above are tested using European Organisation of Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Questionnaire (C30) in combination with Elderly questionnaire (ELD14).

    Time frame: 90 days

  3. Change in Quality of life

    Participants with a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)-score below 25 are tested using "Depression List"

    Time frame: 90 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. 90-day survival

    Are patients still alive 90 days after geriatric contact?

    Time frame: Within 90 days from first geriatric contact

  2. Physical performance, chair-stand-test

    Physical performance is measured using chair-stand-test

    Time frame: Changes in physical performance from first geriatric contact to 90 days after

  3. Physical performance, Barthel-100

    Physical performance is measured using Barthel-100

    Time frame: Changes in physical performance from first geriatric contact to 90 days after

  4. Physical performance, FAQ-IADL

    Physical performance is measured using Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ)-IADL

    Time frame: Changes in physical performance from first geriatric contact to 90 days after

  5. Length of hospital stay

    Sum of hospital bed days in study period

    Time frame: Within 90 days from first geriatric contact

Other outcomes

  1. 1-year mortality

    time to death within 1 year from geriatric contact

    Time frame: Within 1 year from first geriatric contact

  2. 3-year mortality

    time to death within 3 years from geriatric contact

    Time frame: Within 3 year from first geriatric contact

  3. 5-year mortality

    time to death within 5 years from geriatric contact

    Time frame: Within 5 year from first geriatric contact

  4. Health costs per patient

    Costs used per patient at the hospital, in home care, by the GP and the pharmacy within 90 days after Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment

    Time frame: Outcome measure will be assessed from time of first geriatric contact and 90 days on (0-90 days)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Aarhus University Hospital
    Aarhus, 8000, Denmark
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 29, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02837679
Lead sponsor
Aarhus University Hospital
Collaborators
Danish Cancer Society
Responsible party
Marianne Ørum (MD, Aarhus University Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 19, 2016
Start date
Jan 2016
Primary completion
Sep 2019
Completion
Jan 2023 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 29, 2020

Study contacts

Marianne Ørum, MD
principal investigator · Aarhus University Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Apr 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion