ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT02835703Updated Sep 7, 2018

Clinical Assessment of Perfusion Techniques During Repair of Coarctation With Aortic Arch Hypoplasia in Infants

An interventional study of Surgical repair of coarctation of aorta in Coarctation of Aorta, sponsored by Meshalkin Research Institute of Pathology of Circulation. Status unknown at 1 site in Russian Federation. Open to participants aged Up to 1 Year. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-09-07.

Sponsored by Meshalkin Research Institute of Pathology of Circulation · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Sep 2018), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
45
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
Up to 1 Year
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate safety and efficacy of three main perfusion methods in surgical repair of coarctation of aorta with aortic arch hypoplasia in infants.

Read the detailed description

Three perfusion techniques of visceral protection will be assessed - deep hypothermic circulatory arrest, selective antegrade cerebral perfusion and double arterial cannulation (perfusion of brachiocephalic artery with thoracic descending aorta by two arterial cannulas)

02

Conditions studied

  • Coarctation of Aorta

Keywords

  • Congenital heart disease
  • Coarctation of aorta
  • Aortic arch hypoplasia
  • Cerebral selective antegrade perfusion
  • Double arterial cannulation
03

In context

Aortic Coarctation

49 studies on the registry are indexed under Aortic Coarctation; 16 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 45 is close to the median of 45 across 19 interventional studies indexed under Aortic Coarctation.

Browse Aortic Coarctation studies →

Lead sponsor

Meshalkin Research Institute of Pathology of Circulation is the lead sponsor of 119 studies on the registry; 9 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 1 Year
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • coarctation with severe aortic arch hypoplasia (distal aortic arch z-score \< -2)
  • coarctation of aorta with septal defects

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • coarctation with mild aortic arch hypoplasia (distal aortic arch z-score > -2)
  • complex congenital heart diseases including aortic arch hypoplasia (e.g. transposition of great arteries, double oulet right ventricle, atrioventricular septal defect, Shone's complex)
  • univentricular and duct-dependent heart defects
  • aortic valve and/or mitral valve stenosis/hypoplasia (aortic valve or mitral valve z-score \< -2.0)
  • left ventricular dysfunction (left ventricle \< 60%)
  • congenital renal or central nervous system anomalies
  • related infectious diseases
  • prematurity (gestational age \< 37 weeks)
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
45 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Deep hypothermic arrest

    Surgical repair of coarctation of aorta under deep hypothermic circulatory arrest

    Procedure: Surgical repair of coarctation of aorta

  • Active comparator
    Selective antegrade cerebral perfusion

    Surgical repair of coarctation of aorta using selective antegrade cerebral perfusion

    Procedure: Surgical repair of coarctation of aorta

  • Active comparator
    Double arterial cannulation

    Surgical repair of coarctation of aorta using cerebral antegrade perfusion with descending aortic cannulation

    Procedure: Surgical repair of coarctation of aorta

Interventions

  • ProcedureSurgical repair of coarctation of aorta

    Surgical repair of coarctation of aorta with aortic arch hypoplasia under CPB

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Adverse events in early postoperative period

    Number of participants with adverse events that are related to treatment (including hospital mortality, renal injury (pRIFLE criteria), neurological complications (confirmed by CT or MRI) )

    Time frame: 30 days after surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Degree of inotropic support (inotropic score)

    Time frame: through ICU stay, an average of 3 weeks

  2. Intraoperative blood loss (ml)

    Time frame: intraoperatively

  3. Temperature of cooling (C)

    Time frame: intraoperatively

  4. Duration of CPB (min)

    Time frame: intraoperatively

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • State Research Institute of CIrculation Pathology Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
    Novosibirsk, 630055, Russian Federation
    Recruiting
    • Yuriy Y Kulyabin, MD · Contacty.y.coolyabin@gmail.com · +79538889890
    • Yuriy Y Kulyabin, MD · Principal investigator
    • Yuriy N Gorbatykh, MD, PhD · Sub investigator
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Kulyabin YY, Bogachev-Prokophiev AV, Soynov IA, Omelchenko AY, Zubritskiy AV, Gorbatykh YN. Clinical Assessment of Perfusion Techniques During Surgical Repair of Coarctation of Aorta With Aortic Arch Hypoplasia in Neonates: A Pilot Prospective Randomized Study. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Winter;32(4):860-871. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2020.04.015. Epub 2020 May 22. PubMed 32446921 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Jul 2016 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2018, 29 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 6, 2016
First posted
Jul 18, 2016
StartActual
Jul 2016
Primary completionEst.
Dec 2018
CompletionEst.
Aug 2019
Last update
Sep 7, 2018
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 7, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02835703
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 18, 2016
Start date
Jul 2016
Primary completion
Dec 2018 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 2019 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 7, 2018

Study contacts

Yuriy Y Kulyabin, MD
Contact
y.y.coolyabin@gmail.com
+79538889890

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Sep 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion