CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02835391Updated Sep 1, 2017

PerClot Compared to Usual Care in Gynaecology Procedures

An interventional study of PerClot and Floseal, Surgicel, Surgiflo, Arista in Endometriosis, Ovarian Cyst and Menorrhagia, sponsored by CryoLife Europa. Completed at 1 site in Spain. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-09-01.

Sponsored by CryoLife Europa · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
90
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This study is a post market, multi-centre, randomised study evaluating PerClot compared to usual care. PerClot is a CE marked device and is currently used as a haemostat in gynaecological surgery throughout Europe. The purpose of this study is to collect additional post market data on its use in this indication.

Read the detailed description

This study is a post market, multi-centre, randomised study evaluating PerClot compared to usual care.

All subjects in this randomized study will undergo a laparoscopic or open gynecological procedure such as hysterectomy, cystectomy, myomectomy, endometrial excision or ablation. Subjects will be randomized to receive PerClot or usual care.

This research will utilize a multi-center, prospective, randomized controlled study. The study will be conducted in2 study sites in Europe. An assumed sample of 90 subjects will be enrolled to evaluate the time to haemostasis. The enrollment of subjects to receive treatment will be based upon specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Subjects will be randomized on a 1:1 basis to receive either PerClot or usual care. Data collected from both arms will be compared.

Usual care will be at the discretion of the surgeon and may include any other haemostat or diathermy/electrocautery.

02

Conditions studied

  • Endometriosis
  • Ovarian Cyst
  • Menorrhagia
  • Cancer
  • Uterine Fibroids
03

In context

Leiomyoma

490 studies on the registry are indexed under Leiomyoma; 81 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 90 is above the median of 62 across 345 interventional studies indexed under Leiomyoma.

Browse Leiomyoma studies →

Lead sponsor

CryoLife Europa is the lead sponsor of 4 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Subject is ≥ 18 years of age
  • Subject is undergoing gynecological procedure
  • Subject is willing and able to comply with the protocol and follow up period
  • Subject is willing and able to give written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

    • Subject with a history of pelvic or abdominal radiotherapy (within 8 weeks)

      • Subject is pregnant or actively breastfeeding
      • Subject has a ruptured ectopic pregnancy
      • Subject has a medical history of abnormal coagulopathy or bleeding
      • Subject has a sensitivity to starch or starch derived materials
      • Subject has active or potential infection at the surgical site
      • Subject is currently enrolled in another study
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
90 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    PerClot

    PerClot® Polysaccharide Hemostatic System (PerClot) is a medical device composed of absorbable polysaccharide particles (AMPs) and delivery applicators. Investigators will have the option to choose 3g or 5g dependent on the requirements of the patient

    Device: PerClot

  • Active comparator
    Usual Care

    Usual care will consist of any other haemostat the Investigator would normally use in the control of bleeding i.e arista, Floseal, surgical, surgiflo. If the Investigator would not normally use a haemostat to control bleeding then electrocautery or diathermy may be used in this arm

    Device: Floseal, Surgicel, Surgiflo, Arista · Procedure: Electrocautery/Diatermy

Interventions

  • DevicePerClot

    Haemostatic device for the control of bleeding from capillary, venous or arteriolar vessels by pressure, ligature or other conventional means is either ineffective or impractical.

  • DeviceFloseal, Surgicel, Surgiflo, Arista

    Haemostatic device for the control of bleeding

  • ProcedureElectrocautery/Diatermy

    Procedure for the control of bleeding

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. achievement of haemostasis (yes/no).

    visual observation of cessation of bleeding

    Time frame: measured up to 10 minutes after application

Secondary outcomes

  1. Absence of re-intervention for post-operative bleeding

    No return to OR for bleeding

    Time frame: within 30 days of initial surgery

Other outcomes

  1. Absence of proven infection

    No positive culture of blood results which indicate infection

    Time frame: within 30 days of initial surgery

  2. Absence of bleeding related adverse events

    No adverse events which are specifically caused by bleeding

    Time frame: within 30 days of initial surgery

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Bellvitge Hospital
    Barcelona, 08907, Spain
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 1, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02835391
Lead sponsor
CryoLife Europa
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 18, 2016
Start date
Nov 2015
Primary completion
Jul 2017
Completion
Aug 2017
Last update
Sep 1, 2017

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion