CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT02832024Updated Dec 4, 2019

Clinical Study of Stent Versus Direct Atherectomy Versus Angioplasty to Treat Lower Limb In-stent Restenosis

An interventional study of plaque excision system and stent in Atherosclerosis and In-stent Arterial Restenosis, sponsored by Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing. Status unknown at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-12-04.

Sponsored by Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified May 2019), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a randomized study comparing Stent Versus Direct Atherectomy Versus Angioplasty to Treat Lower Limb In-stent Restenosis (superficial femoral or popliteal artery).

Read the detailed description

This is a randomized study comparing Stent Versus Direct Atherectomy Versus Angioplasty to Treat Lower Limb In-stent Restenosis (superficial femoral or popliteal artery).

02

Conditions studied

  • Atherosclerosis
  • In-stent Arterial Restenosis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • stents
  • atherectomy
  • femoral artery
  • popliteal artery
  • In-stent Restenosis
03

In context

Atherosclerosis

1,567 studies on the registry are indexed under Atherosclerosis; 264 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 120 is above the median of 106 across 882 interventional studies indexed under Atherosclerosis.

Browse Atherosclerosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing is the lead sponsor of 346 studies on the registry; 217 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Provides written informed consent Willing to comply with follow-up evaluations at specified times Has claudication or rest pain due to peripheral arterial In-stent restenosis Disease located within the femoropopliteal artery Patient has a In-stent restenosis lesion(s) with >50% stenosis documented angiographically Patient has symptoms of peripheral arterial disease classified as Rutherford Category 2 or greater.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

They were excluded if they had one or more of the following: 1. Acute or subacute lower limb ischemia; 2. Severe calcification lesions; 3. Total occlusions lesions more significant than 10 cm or total occlusion lesions with a suspicion of subintimal wire recanalization 4. untreated ipsilateral iliac artery stenosis>70%, or the distal runoff artery \<1 root; 5. Previously lower extremity intervention or surgical graft artery bypass; 6. Severe renal insufficiency, creatinine level greater than 2.5 mg/dL; 7. The patient's platelet count is less than 100,000/uL, antiplatelet or anticoagulant contraindications to required medications; 8. Patients with immune system diseases or malignant tumours; 9. ongoing active infection 10. decompensated congestive heart failure or acute coronary syndrome; 11. Unwillingness to return for future follow-up visits

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
120 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Intervention: Stents

    Stents group

    Device: stent

  • Active comparator
    Intervention: Atherectomy

    Direct Atherectomy group

    Device: plaque excision system

  • Active comparator
    Intervention: Balloon

    Balloon group

    Device: Balloon

Interventions

  • Deviceplaque excision system
  • Devicestent
  • DeviceBalloon
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Primary Patency Rate

    Primary patency is defined as no significant reduction of flow detectable by Duplex ultrasound through the index lesion and no further clinically driven target vessel revascularization performed in the interim. Significant reduction of flow is binary restenosis defined as the diameter stenosis \>50% with a peak systolic velocity ratio \>2.4 as measured by Duplex ultrasound.

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Technical success

    Technical success is defined as residual stenosis less than 30% by final angiography and/or a flow-limiting dissection.

    Time frame: 1 day

  2. freedom from clinically-driven TLR

    it is defined as freedom from clinically-driven target lesion revascularization

    Time frame: 12 months

  3. Major Adverse Events

    Major adverse events included death, index limb ischemia, index limb amputation, clinically driven target lesion revascularization, and significant embolic events, which were defined as causing end-organ damage.

    Time frame: 12 months

  4. Limb Salvage Rate

    Limb Salvage is defined as the freedom from secondary major amputation

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Yongquan G, Lianrui G, Lixing Q, Xuefeng L, Zhu T, Shijun C, Yingfeng W, Jianming G, Jian Z, Zhonggao W. Plaque excision in the management of lower-limb ischemia of atherosclerosis and in-stent restenosis with the SilverHawk atherectomy catheter. Int Angiol. 2013 Aug;32(4):362-7. PubMed 23822938 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 4, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02832024
Lead sponsor
Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 13, 2016
Start date
Jan 2016
Primary completion
Dec 2019 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2020 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 4, 2019

Study contacts

li yang
Contact
17198643706
Gu yongquan
Contact
+186-010-83198647

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in May 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion