ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT02827656Updated Jul 12, 2016

Comapring Luteal Phase Support in IVF Patients Who Are at High Risk for Developing OHSS

An interventional study of Decapeptyl and hCG luteal support in Infertility, sponsored by Meir Medical Center. Status unknown. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 40 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-07-12.

Sponsored by Meir Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Jun 2016), so the status shown — last known as Not yet recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 40 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to compare two luteal support protocols in In vitro fertilization patients (IVF) and are at risk of developing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). We would like to determine whether luteal Decapeptyl on days 3, 6,9 post ovulation triggering is as good as low dose hCG on day 3 post triggering..

Read the detailed description

This is randomized clinical trial studying two luteal support protocols of In vitro fertilization patients (IVF) treated by a GnRH antagonist (GnRH ant) protocol and are at risk of developing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). The randomization procedure will be performed by a third party in the hospital by using a randomization table: patients fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria and giving their informed consent will be randomized into one of two arms. This study does not include any intervention affecting the ovarian stimulation and is solely intended to test the post ova pickup period.

One arm will be treated by luteal Decapeptyl on days 3, 6,9 post ovulation triggering. Second arm will be treated by low dose hCG on day 3 post triggering. All patients to be recruited are treated for acceptable IVF indications in Meir medical center (MMC) and their registry is computerized in the general system of MMC. For the purpose of the study we will use the only the data of patients recruited to the study and were giving their informed consent. Each patient recruited will have a unique study identity (ID) . The patients' information will be pooled from the computerized file into an Excel spread sheet: in this Excel file the names will be erased and only the unique study ID will appear. The information regarding the coding key will be kept as a hard copy in a locked room inside the IVF unit in a special study folder. The study was approved by MMC institutional Helsinki board.

The data retrieved for each patients is not unique for the study but includes the basic variables monitored in every IVF cycle : Estradiol serum levels (E2), Progesterone serum levels (P), number of follicles as counted by trans-vaginal ultrasound, endometrial thickness as measured by trans-vaginal ultrasound, Follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) dosing, number of stimulation days, number of eggs retrieved, fertilization rate, blastulation rate, number of embryos transferred, embryo quality, positive pregnancy test, implantation rate, presence of a clinical pregnancy, presence of OHSS. Since these are mandatory variables in the treatment we do not expect any missing data. In addition to these mandatory data the study patients will be performing two additional blood tests on day 3 post ovum pickup and on the transfer day itself (day 5 post ovum pickup) including Estradiol serum levels (E2) and Progesterone serum levels (P).

Outcome measures: Day of transfer Progesterone serum levels, OHSS rate, implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate.

Sample size calculation based on Kol S et al 2015, regarding the day of transfer Progesterone level (pooled standard deviation: 40nmol/L), alpha of 5%, 80% power, then a non-inferiority study will require 22 patients in each group and a total of 44 patients. Once including an expected 10% chance of freeze all in this population we will include 50 patients.

Statistical analysis: Analysis of data was performed using the SPSS 23.0 computer package (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Normally distributed data were analyzed by student t test . χ2 or Fisher's exact test will be used for comparisons of rates and proportions. All P values were tested as two-sided and considered significant at less than 0.05.

02

Conditions studied

  • Infertility

Keywords

  • Fertilization in vitro
  • Luteal Phase
  • ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome
03

In context

Infertility

2,540 studies on the registry are indexed under Infertility; 405 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 50 is below the median of 120 across 1,722 interventional studies indexed under Infertility.

Browse Infertility studies →

Lead sponsor

Meir Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 400 studies on the registry; 25 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 40 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • IVF treatment
  • GnRH antagonist protocol
  • GnRH agonist triggering of ovulation
  • High risk for OHSS as expressed by either E2 serum level >2500 pg/ml

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • background maternal morbidity
  • Any protocol other than GnRH antagonist protocol
  • hCG triggering of ovulation
  • E2 serum level >4500 pg/ml
  • Aspiration of >25 ova
  • Embryo transfer prior to day 5
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Decapeptyl support

    S.C single luteal Decapeptyl 0.1 mg on days 3, 6,9 post ovulation triggering

    Drug: Decapeptyl

  • Active comparator
    hCG luteal support

    S.C single luteal S.C recombinant hCG 50 micrograms on days 3 ovulation triggering

    Drug: hCG luteal support

Interventions

  • luteal support as described and vaginal progesterone 200 mg 3 times a day

  • DrughCG luteal support

    luteal support as described and vaginal progesterone 200 mg 3 times a day

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Progesterone serum level

    Time frame: day 5 post ovum pickup

Secondary outcomes

  1. positive pregnancy test

    Time frame: 9-12 days post embryo transfer

  2. implantation rate

    Time frame: 30-33 days post embryo transfer

  3. clinical pregnancy rate

    clinical pregnancy is considered as a presence of a viable embryo (heart activity present)

    Time frame: 30-33 days post embryo transfer

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Devroey P, Polyzos NP, Blockeel C. An OHSS-Free Clinic by segmentation of IVF treatment. Hum Reprod. 2011 Oct;26(10):2593-7. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der251. Epub 2011 Aug 9. PubMed 21828116 ↗
  • Youssef MA, Van der Veen F, Al-Inany HG, Mochtar MH, Griesinger G, Nagi Mohesen M, Aboulfoutouh I, van Wely M. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist versus HCG for oocyte triggering in antagonist-assisted reproductive technology. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 31;2014(10):CD008046. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008046.pub4. PubMed 25358904 ↗
  • Whelan JG 3rd, Vlahos NF. The ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2000 May;73(5):883-96. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(00)00491-x. PubMed 10785212 ↗
  • Humaidan P, Bredkjaer HE, Bungum L, Bungum M, Grondahl ML, Westergaard L, Andersen CY. GnRH agonist (buserelin) or hCG for ovulation induction in GnRH antagonist IVF/ICSI cycles: a prospective randomized study. Hum Reprod. 2005 May;20(5):1213-20. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh765. Epub 2005 Mar 10. PubMed 15760966 ↗
  • Griesinger G, Schultz L, Bauer T, Broessner A, Frambach T, Kissler S. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome prevention by gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist triggering of final oocyte maturation in a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol in combination with a "freeze-all" strategy: a prospective multicentric study. Fertil Steril. 2011 May;95(6):2029-33, 2033.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.01.163. Epub 2011 Mar 2. PubMed 21371705 ↗
  • Kol S, Breyzman T, Segal L, Humaidan P. 'Luteal coasting' after GnRH agonist trigger - individualized, HCG-based, progesterone-free luteal support in 'high responders': a case series. Reprod Biomed Online. 2015 Dec;31(6):747-51. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.09.001. Epub 2015 Sep 9. PubMed 26507279 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Aug 2016, a primary completion of Aug 2017 and a completion of Dec 2017. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 6, 2016
First posted
Jul 11, 2016
Start
Aug 2016
Primary completionEst.
Aug 2017
CompletionEst.
Dec 2017
Last update
Jul 12, 2016
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 12, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02827656
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 11, 2016
Start date
Aug 2016
Primary completion
Aug 2017 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2017 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 12, 2016

Study contacts

Anat Klement, MD
Contact
anat.klement@gmail.com
Helsinki Committee MMC
Contact
97297471588
Amir Wiser, MD
principal investigator · MMC

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Jun 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Triptorelin

Start the discussion