An observational study in Patients Treated With Methadone, sponsored by Meir Medical Center. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Israel. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 99 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-23.
Sponsored by Meir Medical Center · Observational
Continuous infusion of short-acting synthetic opioids, primarily remifentanil, is widely used for anesthesia and analgesia in ventilated patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) due to its short half-life, which is independent of hepatic or renal clearance, which may be reduced or unpredictable in these patients [1,2]. However, prolonged exposure results in rapid development of drug tolerance, opioid-induced hyperalgesia (OIH), and severe iatrogenic opioid withdrawal syndrome (IOWS) with abrupt discontinuation or rapid down-titration of the drug [1-3]. IOWS is characterized by withdrawal symptoms including delirium, restlessness, increased blood pressure, onset of sharp pain, increased respiratory and heart rates, and consequently increased metabolic demand. All of the above are undesirable and potentially dangerous in critically ill patients, and may compromise the chances of successful respiratory withdrawal in these patients [2,4].
To alleviate these symptoms and facilitate successful respiratory withdrawal, a long-acting opioid, such as methadone, can be used as a bridge. The use of a long-acting opioid may help prevent opioid withdrawal syndrome. Clinical protocols exist for the use of enteral methadone (oral or via gavage) for this purpose [2,4,5]. Methadone is a fully synthetic μ-opioid receptor agonist with high gastrointestinal bioavailability (>80%) and a long half-life (15-60 hours) [2,6]. This pharmacokinetic profile provides sustained plasma concentrations that avoid the sharp troughs associated with infusion of a short-acting opiate [5,6]. Furthermore, methadone acts as a non-competitive antagonist at the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor [6,7]. By reducing central NMDA-mediated sensitization, methadone reduces OIH and attenuates acute tolerance that develops during chronic exposure to remifentanil, making it an effective pharmacological "bridger" in intensive care [2,5,7]. Methadone's activity at the NMDA receptor also has an analgesic effect that is not mediated through opioid receptors. Methadone is not cleared renally, so renal failure, which is common in critically ill patients, does not affect its clearance. Even in situations of hepatic insufficiency, very severe liver damage is required to have an effect on methadone clearance, an additional advantage of its use in critically ill patients. In addition, compared to other opioids (such as OxyContin or Fentanyl), methadone does not produce a significant euphoric feeling, which reduces its potential for addiction.
Although methadone is an old and well-known substance, and despite its advantages as discussed above, along with the existence of treatment protocols [4,5], the use of methadone in the intensive care unit remains limited due to concerns about the potential for the development of fatal cardiac arrhythmias with its use [1,8]. Methadone inhibits the delayed rectifier potassium current (I_Kr) by blocking the anthraquinone-related gene (hERG) potassium channel, which may delay ventricular repolarization, prolong the corrected QT interval (QTc), and predispose patients to dangerous arrhythmias such as torsades de pointes (TdP [1,8,9]. Furthermore, many patients in intensive care receive other medications that may prolong the QTc interval (macrolide or fluoroquinolone antibiotics, antipsychotics for the treatment of delirium such as haloperidol or Zyprexa, gastrointestinal motility agents such as peramin or erythromycin, etc.) and/or have other disorders that may prolong the QTc interval, such as hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia, or hypocalcemia.
However, current perceptions regarding Methadone-induced arrhythmias are largely derived from patients receiving methadone maintenance therapy (MMT) in outpatient settings for the treatment of chronic opioid use disorder [1,3,8]. These outpatient treatment groups differ substantially from critically ill patients in intensive care undergoing short-term opiate withdrawal protocols [1,8,9]. MMT regimens routinely use high, sometimes escalating doses of methadone (often >100-120 mg/day) over years, these patients often take other unregulated illicit substances in addition to their "legal" methadone treatment (opioid drugs, drugs from other classes, or prescription drugs taken illegally), and these patients often have other metabolic disorders resulting from their general poor condition (malnutrition, dehydration, untreated electrolyte abnormalities, and other chronic diseases). [1,8,9]. In contrast, protocols for administering methadone to patients in intensive care include significantly lower doses of the drug administered for a relatively short period of time (days to weeks, in exceptional cases months, typical doses of 20-60 mg per day for most patients), patients are under continuous cardiac monitoring (ECG monitor, in some cases, as in our unit, there is also continuous monitoring of the QTc interval throughout the day), monitoring of potassium, magnesium and calcium values and clinical pharm
Meir Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 400 studies on the registry; 25 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
ICU patients who were treated with methadone during ICU stay
Inclusion Criteria: ICU patients from 1.2022 to 10.2026 who were treated with methadone during ICU stay -
Exclusion Criteria: Patients who recieved methadone prior to ICU admission, or when data regarding QTc interval or arrythmia are missing
-
Drug: ICU patients treated with methadone
ICU patients treated with methadone
QTc prolongation
Fatal ventricular arrythmia
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Plan to share: Undecided
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Start is estimated for Jan 2027; primary completion for Jan 2028, 12 months later.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.