An interventional study of closed PKP under topical anesthesia and open-sky PKP under retrobulbar anesthesia in Corneal Opacity, Keratitis, Herpetic and Corneal Ulcer, sponsored by Wenzhou Medical University. Status unknown at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 90 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-07-07.
Sponsored by Wenzhou Medical University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) is an open-sky surgery that fundamentally has not changed for more than 100 years. Because conventional PKP is associated with the potential for the development of devastating complications such as expulsive suprachoroidal hemorrhage and endophthalmitis, we modified the technique to one that is a closed surgery under topical anesthesia with the anterior chamber maintained to achieve favorable results. Topical anesthesia is an attractive alternative to traditional injection local anesthesia since the potentially serious complications associated with retrobulbar and peribulbar anesthesia can be avoided. The closed PKP procedure with the stable anterior chamber essentially changes the open nature of conventional PKP. The advantages, i.e., decreased surgical risks, postoperative complications, and surgical difficulties, make PKP viable in most complicated cases.
37 studies on the registry are indexed under Corneal Opacity; 5 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 60 is above the median of 27 across 20 interventional studies indexed under Corneal Opacity.
Browse Corneal Opacity studies →Wenzhou Medical University is the lead sponsor of 94 studies on the registry; 8 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Relapsed: the illness came back after treatment had worked. Refractory: it did not respond to treatment, or stopped responding while still on it.
Relapsed and refractory
Relapsed: the illness came back after treatment had worked. Refractory: it did not respond to treatment, or stopped responding while still on it.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
a closed corneal transplantation under topical anesthesia with the anterior chamber maintained
Procedure: closed PKP under topical anesthesia · Drug: Anti-Rejection Agents · Drug: Anti-Inflammatory Agents
an open-sky corneal transplantation under retrobulbar anesthesia
Procedure: open-sky PKP under retrobulbar anesthesia · Drug: Anti-Rejection Agents · Drug: Anti-Inflammatory Agents
Anti-Rejection Agents for both groups
Procedure: closed PKP under topical anesthesia · Procedure: open-sky PKP under retrobulbar anesthesia
Anti-Inflammatory Agents for both groups
Procedure: closed PKP under topical anesthesia · Procedure: open-sky PKP under retrobulbar anesthesia
a closed corneal transplantation under topical anesthesia with the anterior chamber maintained
an open-sky corneal transplantation under retrobulbar anesthesia
Anti-Rejection Agents for both groups
Anti-Inflammatory Agents for both groups
best corrected visual acuity
Time frame: preoperative
best corrected visual acuity
Time frame: 1 week after PKP
best corrected visual acuity
Time frame: 2 weeks after PKP
best corrected visual acuity
Time frame: 1 month after PKP
best corrected visual acuity
Time frame: 3 months after PKP
best corrected visual acuity
Time frame: 6 months after PKP
Endothelial cell density
Time frame: 1 week after PKP
Endothelial cell density
Time frame: 2 weeks after PKP
Endothelial cell density
Time frame: 1 month after PKP
Endothelial cell density
Time frame: 3 months after PKP
Endothelial cell density
Time frame: 6 months after PKP
The record gives a start of Dec 2015, a primary completion of Dec 2016 and a completion of Dec 2016. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is status unknown, as verified in Jul 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Wenzhou Medical University