ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT02801500CTREGUpdated Sep 21, 2017

Superior Bilioenteric Anastomosis by Magnetic Compressive Technique

An interventional study of Magnetic Compressive Anastomosis and Manual Anastomosis in Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma, Bile Duct Injury and Choledochal Cyst, sponsored by First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong University. Status unknown at 2 sites in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-09-21.

Sponsored by First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Sep 2017), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
70
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the magnetic compressive anastomosis has a better outcomes than traditional manual anastomosis on superior bilioenteric anastomosis.

Read the detailed description

The superior bilioenteric anastomosis is one of the most common and difficult operations in Hepatobiliary Surgery. The traditional manual anastomosis has become one of the main prognosis factors because of the length of suture time, the difficulty of operation, the high incidence of anastomotic leakage and stricture. Magnetic compressive anastomosis can realize the fast anastomosis, reduce the difficulty, and reduce the incidence of anastomotic leakage and stricture. Currently, the majority of studies of magnetic compressive bilioenteric anastomosis are merely confined within clinical case report and single-center, small sample, retrospective study, thus they are lack of convictive evidence of evidence-based medicine for the security, reliability and convince.

This study is a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial. To evaluate the security, reliability and convince of magnetic compressive superior bilioenteric anastomosis, this study compared the incidence of anastomotic leakage and stricture between magnetic compressive anastomosis and traditional manual anastomosis among patients who need superior bilioenteric anastomosis operation. The study design plan to enroll 70 patients and divide into Study Group (Group A: Magnetic compressive anastomosis) and Control Group (Group B: traditional manual anastomosis) as 1:1 ratio randomly by stratification factors. The incidence of anastomotic leakage and stricture, length of bilioenteric anastomosis time, value of serum bilirubin, length of discharge time of magnetic device and mean time of hospital stay will be evaluated. The patients will drop out of the study if adverse events happen, active request for dropping out, new-onset severe disease or death. The primary and secondary end point will be observed by regular follow-up.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma
  • Bile Duct Injury
  • Choledochal Cyst
  • Biliary Calculi

Keywords

  • bilioenteric anastomosis
03

In context

Klatskin Tumor

82 studies on the registry are indexed under Klatskin Tumor; 27 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 70 is above the median of 55 across 56 interventional studies indexed under Klatskin Tumor.

Browse Klatskin Tumor studies →

Lead sponsor

First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong University is the lead sponsor of 314 studies on the registry; 87 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with age between 18 to 75
  • Patients' gender was not limited
  • Patients who were well-diagnosed and had the indication for superior bilioenteric anastomosis.
  • Patients whose lifetimes will be longer than 12 months.
  • Patients who are willing to join this clinical trial and form voluntarily.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Woman during pregnancy or lactation or anyone with mental disorder
  • The wall of hepatic duct or jejunum was too thick so that the attractive force of magnetic device cannot meet the requirements of compression.
  • Any anatomical variation in bile ducts system or the inner diameter is too small so that the magnetic device cannot place in.
  • Any foreign body has been implanted in body, such as heart pacemaker.
  • Surgical , including:

C with hepatic encephalopathy Anyone with heart, lung, kidney dysfunction or other organ dysfunction, and cannot tolerate surgery.Hepatic ducts stone disease, who was diagnosed as Acute Cholangitis of Severe Type, especially complicated with bacteremia or septic shock. End stage disease, complicated with biliary cirrhosis or portal hypertension.Patients with long-term obstructive jaundice, dehydration, electrolyte disturbance or coagulation defects; Patients have the tendency or history of bleeding.

  • Any other disease in perioperation periods which needs MRI examination in the next 8 weeks post operation.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Child-Pugh class

A score of how well the liver works in people with liver disease such as cirrhosis: class A is mild, B moderate and C severe.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
70 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Magnetic Compressive Anastomosis

    A magnetic device will be used during bilioenteric anastomosis.

    Device: Magnetic Compressive Anastomosis

  • Active comparator
    Traditional Manual Anastomosis

    A handsewn technique will be used during bilioenteric anastomosis.

    Procedure: Manual Anastomosis

Interventions

  • DeviceMagnetic Compressive Anastomosis

    The magnetic compressive anastomosis device will be used to complete the anastomosis during bilioenteric anastomosis.

  • ProcedureManual Anastomosis

    A handsewn technique will be used to complete the anastomosis during bilioenteric anastomosis.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Bilioenteric anastomotic leakage

    Time frame: 1 month post operation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Length of bilioenteric anastomosis time

    Time frame: during operation

  2. Number of patients who have discharged the device on the date expected.

    Time frame: 1 to 4 weeks postoperation

  3. Number of patients who have been diagnosed as discharge disorder of magnetic device

    Time frame: less than 1 week or more than 4 weeks

  4. average length of postoperative hospital stay

    Time frame: 3 months

  5. Times of pathological examination of bile duct's remnant of Klatskin' tumor

    Time frame: during operation

  6. Bilioenteric anastomotic stricture

    Time frame: Time Frame: 1,3,6,12-month post operation

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
  • First Affiliated Hospital of Xian JiaotongUniversity
    Xi'an, Shaanxi 710061, China
    Recruiting
  • The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University
    Xi'an, Shaanxi 710061, China
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Sicklick JK, Camp MS, Lillemoe KD, Melton GB, Yeo CJ, Campbell KA, Talamini MA, Pitt HA, Coleman J, Sauter PA, Cameron JL. Surgical management of bile duct injuries sustained during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: perioperative results in 200 patients. Ann Surg. 2005 May;241(5):786-92; discussion 793-5. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000161029.27410.71. PubMed 15849514 ↗
  • House MG, Cameron JL, Schulick RD, Campbell KA, Sauter PK, Coleman J, Lillemoe KD, Yeo CJ. Incidence and outcome of biliary strictures after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg. 2006 May;243(5):571-6; discussion 576-8. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000216285.07069.fc. PubMed 16632990 ↗
  • Frattaroli FM, Reggio D, Guadalaxara A, Illomei G, Pappalardo G. Benign biliary strictures: a review of 21 years of experience. J Am Coll Surg. 1996 Nov;183(5):506-13. PubMed 8912621 ↗
  • Yan JQ, Peng CH, Ding JZ, Yang WP, Zhou GW, Chen YJ, Tao ZY, Li HW. Surgical management in biliary restricture after Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy for bile duct injury. World J Gastroenterol. 2007 Dec 28;13(48):6598-602. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i48.6598. PubMed 18161934 ↗
  • Avaliani M, Chigogidze N, Nechipai A, Dolgushin B. Magnetic compression biliary-enteric anastomosis for palliation of obstructive jaundice: initial clinical results. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009 May;20(5):614-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2009.01.019. PubMed 19393505 ↗
  • Chopita N, Vaillaverde A, Cope C, Bernedo A, Martinez H, Landoni N, Jmelnitzky A, Burgos H. Endoscopic gastroenteric anastomosis using magnets. Endoscopy. 2005 Apr;37(4):313-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-861358. PubMed 15824939 ↗
  • Stepanov EA, Vasil'ev GS, Nikolaev VV. [The treatment of intestinal fistulae in children by applying a by-pass anastomosis using magnetic devices]. Khirurgiia (Mosk). 1992 Nov-Dec;(11-12):93-5. Russian. PubMed 1294807 ↗
  • Fan C, Ma J, Zhang HK, Gao R, Li JH, Yu L, Wu Z, Lv Y. Sutureless intestinal anastomosis with a novel device of magnetic compression anastomosis. Chin Med Sci J. 2011 Sep;26(3):182-9. doi: 10.1016/s1001-9294(11)60046-1. PubMed 22207929 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Jul 2017 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2018, 11 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 29, 2016
First posted
Jun 16, 2016
StartActual
Jul 1, 2017
Primary completionEst.
Jun 2018
CompletionEst.
Jun 2019
Last update
Sep 21, 2017
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 21, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02801500
Collaborators
Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Tang-Du Hospital, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 16, 2016
Start date
Jul 1, 2017
Primary completion
Jun 2018 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2019 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 21, 2017

Study contacts

Yi Lv, MD,PHD
Contact
luyi169@126.com
0086-13991200581

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Sep 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion