An interventional study of Wrist Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in Scaphoid Fracture, sponsored by Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust. Status unknown at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 16 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-08-08.
Sponsored by Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic
Given that: 1) various clinical complications may arise from a misdiagnosed scaphoid fracture; and 2) clinical and radiographic diagnosis of scaphoid fracture is often challenging, particularly at the time of presentation, this study aims to evaluate whether the use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in the investigation of patients presenting with a suspected scaphoid fracture, with negative findings from the initial conventional radiography (4-view plain x-ray), leads to improved levels of efficiency, quality of care and patient experience.
This study is a single centre randomised, non-blinded, prospective study. Participants will be randomised, following the initial negative conventional radiography, to either: no further imaging at A\&E (consistent with current clinical practice); or 2) wrist MRI. The study considers a follow-up period of 6 months.
The scaphoid bone is an obliquely orientated bone on the radial (thumb) side of the wrist, between the distal carpal row and the radius. Wrist injury is a common presentation to the Emergency Department (ED) in the UK. Amongst these patients, the scaphoid is the most commonly fractured carpal bone, accounting for 51-90% of carpal fractures and between 2-7% of all fractures.
Given that: 1) various clinical complications may arise from a misdiagnosed scaphoid fracture; and 2) clinical and radiographic diagnosis of scaphoid fracture is often challenging, particularly at the time of presentation, this study aims to evaluate whether the use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in the investigation of patients presenting with a suspected scaphoid fracture, with negative findings from the initial conventional radiography (4-view plain x-ray), leads to improved levels of efficiency, quality of care and patient experience.
This study is a single centre randomised, non-blinded, prospective study. Participants will be randomised, following the initial negative conventional radiography, to either: no further imaging at A\&E (consistent with current clinical practice); or 2) wrist MRI. The study considers a follow-up period of 6 months.
2,261 studies on the registry are indexed under Fractures, Bone; 325 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 136 is above the median of 69 across 1,482 interventional studies indexed under Fractures, Bone.
Browse Fractures, Bone studies →Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust is the lead sponsor of 284 studies on the registry; 79 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Every patient aged 16 years or over presenting at A\&E/UCC with clinical history and examination consistent with a suspected scaphoid fracture but negative findings on the initial 4-view plain x-ray. It is considered that a patient has suspected scaphoid fracture if at least one of the following criteria are present:
Furthermore, only patients that present at A\&E/UCC during the following schedule of MRI normal working hours will be included in the study:
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients randomised to this group will receive standard care, i.e. will not undergo additional imaging scans at A\&E/Urgent Care Centre.
Patients randomised to this group will undergo an additional 3-sequence wrist MRI during the initial A\&E/Urgent Care Centre episode.
Procedure: Wrist Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
Patients that enter this group are randomised to receive non-standard care with a 3-sequence MRI scan of the scaphoid following the initial conventional radiography.
3-month costs (measured in £ per patient) associated with the two clinical groups following the A&E/UCC initial episode
The primary objective is to estimate the 3-month costs associated with two clinical pathways at A\&E/UCC: (i) the current pathway, with x-ray as the only imaging modality (no further imaging group); or (ii) the proposed pathway (MRI group), with a hybrid approach i.e. using x-ray as the initial imaging modality and subsequently MRI for patients with negative findings on the initial x-ray.
Time frame: 3 months
6-month costs (measured in £ per patient) associated with the two clinical groups following the A&E/UCC initial episode
This objective aims to estimate the 6-month costs associated with two clinical pathways at A\&E/UCC: (i) the current pathway, with x-ray as the only imaging modality (no further imaging group); or (ii) the proposed pathway (MRI group), with a hybrid approach i.e. using x-ray as the initial imaging modality and subsequently MRI for patients with negative findings on the initial x-ray.
Time frame: 6 months
3-month cost-effectiveness analysis (ICER measured as £ per QALY) following the A&E/UCC initial episode
A cost-effectiveness analysis takes into account both the costs and outcomes related to the interventions. An unique incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), measured as £ per QALY, will be estimated comparing both interventions at 3 months.
Time frame: 3 months
6-month cost-effectiveness analysis (ICER measured as £ per QALY) following the A&E/UCC initial episode
A cost-effectiveness analysis takes into account both the costs and outcomes related to the interventions. An unique incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), measured as £ per QALY, will be estimated comparing both interventions at 6 months.
Time frame: 6 months
Cost per correctly diagnosed scaphoid fracture (measured in £ per correct diagnosis)
The cost per correctly diagnosed scaphoid fracture with the proposed intervention compared to standard care will be considered to evaluate whether overall potential cost-savings are aligned with the benefits of an improved diagnostic pathway. Findings from the treatment group (with MRI) and the control group (no further imaging) will be compared against the 3-month 4-view plain x-ray (gold standard). If both imaging findings are consistent, it is considered that a correct diagnosis was achieved.
Time frame: 3 months
Patient satisfaction in both groups (to be assessed using non-standard questionnaires, based on a 1-5 likert scale)
Patient experience will be evaluated using patient questionnaires. The underlying hypothesis is that the use of MRI will promote an improvement in the patient's overall experience, due to: i) a decrease in the need for secondary care contacts; ii) the reduction of plaster casts utilisation; and (iii) an improved and definitive diagnosis and subsequent treatment.
Time frame: 3 months
Likelihood ratio of the proposed pathway (i.e. wrist MRI group) in the detection of scaphoid fracture compared to the current pathway (no further imaging group)
The overall likelihood ratio and diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) of the MRI for the early identification of scaphoid fractures in the proposed pathway will be assessed against a 3-month conventional 4-view plain x-ray as the comparator.
Time frame: 3 months
Time (measured in days) taken to reach a definitive diagnosis and the first major treatment decision based on the MRI in comparison to the current pathway
The study will evaluate the time required to achieve a definitive diagnosis and deliver the subsequent appropriate treatment. It is considered that a definitive diagnosis is reached once there is agreement between the initial (at A\&E/UCC) and/or the follow-up (at fracture clinic) imaging exams and the final 3-month plain x-ray.
Time frame: 3 months
Percentage of agreement between radiographers and radiologists in the diagnosis of suspected scaphoid fractures
The percentage of agreement between radiographers and radiologists in the diagnosis of suspected scaphoid fractures (i.e. rule in/rule out) using MRI datasets will also be assessed. This information will provide pivotal insight as to how the proposed clinical pathway can operationally be rolled out, as well as future areas of research.
Time frame: 1 week
Time off work or informal care needs (measured in days) due to the suspected scaphoid fracture.
The study aims to assess potential benefits from a broader societal perspective. For this purpose, time off work and informal care required due to the suspected scaphoid fracture will be recorded. The underlying hypothesis is that the use of MRI might reduce the amount of unnecessary plaster casts (i.e. in patients with no scaphoid fracture) and translate into a reduction in days off work and subsequent need for informal care.
Time frame: 3 months
Plan to share: No
This study is status unknown, as verified in Aug 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust