CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02796443REWOUpdated Jul 26, 2019

The Real World of Acute Cholecystitis

An observational study in Acute Cholecystitis, sponsored by Asklepios Klinik Langen. Completed. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-07-26.

Sponsored by Asklepios Klinik Langen · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
1,729
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and population based studies in acute cholecystitis are in favor for early laparoscopic surgery versus a delayed operation several weeks later. The main problems in these studies are the exclusion criteria used, thus not reflecting the real world setting of acute cholecystitis. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that a delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a real world scenario has no worse outcome in comparison with an early operation (within 72 hours after onset of symptoms).

Read the detailed description

Background:

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and population based studies are in favor of an early operation in acute cholecystitis (1, 2). Thus, one of the largest RCT so far, demonstrated significant more complications in a group of delayed cholecystectomy. The main problems in these studies are the exclusion criteria used, ie severe cases are not considered.

Objective:

In a cohort study all cholecystectomy patients are analysed to demonstrate that delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy (DLC) in a real world setting has a less complication rate than early cholecystectomy (ELC).

Setting:

Academic Teaching Hospital with 400 beds, seven departments (anesthesiology and intensive care medicine, orthopaedics and trauma surgery, visceral and thoracic surgery, gastroenterology, cardiology, gynecology and obstetrics, psychiatry. The visceral and thoracic department has a main focus on minimally invasive techniques.

Participants:

All cholecystectomy patients during 1/2006 and 9/2015

Variables:

Clavien Dindo Complication score, American Society of Anaesthesiologist (ASA) Score, conversion rate, onset of symptoms, histology, hospital stay

Data sources:

Chart analyses

02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Cholecystitis

Keywords

  • acute cholecystitis
  • early versus delayed surgery
03

In context

Cholecystitis

266 studies on the registry are indexed under Cholecystitis; 46 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 1,729 is above the median of 200 across 90 observational studies indexed under Cholecystitis.

Browse Cholecystitis studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Asklepios Klinik Langen as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

All cholecystectomized patients

Inclusion criteria

  • All patients with cholecystectomies

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No exclusion criteria
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
1,729 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ELC)

    Operation within 72 hours after onset of symptoms

    Procedure: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC)

  • Intermediate cholecystectomy (ILC)

    Operation within 14 days after onset of symptoms

    Procedure: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC)

  • Delayed LC (DLC)

    Operation after 6-12 weeks

    Procedure: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC)

  • Elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy

    Biliary colic with no acute cholecystitis

    Procedure: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC)

Interventions

  • ProcedureLaparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC)

    Removal of the gallbladder via a minimally invasive approach

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Clavien-Dindo-Complication Score

    During the hospital stay after Operation, which is usually between 3 and 6 days, all complications according to the Clavien-Dindo-Complication Score, are recorded.

    Time frame: 3-6 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Conversion rate

    How often is the laparoscopic approach changed to the open procedure.

    Time frame: Intraoperatively

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Gutt CN, Encke J, Koninger J, Harnoss JC, Weigand K, Kipfmuller K, Schunter O, Gotze T, Golling MT, Menges M, Klar E, Feilhauer K, Zoller WG, Ridwelski K, Ackmann S, Baron A, Schon MR, Seitz HK, Daniel D, Stremmel W, Buchler MW. Acute cholecystitis: early versus delayed cholecystectomy, a multicenter randomized trial (ACDC study, NCT00447304). Ann Surg. 2013 Sep;258(3):385-93. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a1599b. PubMed 24022431 ↗
  • de Mestral C, Rotstein OD, Laupacis A, Hoch JS, Zagorski B, Alali AS, Nathens AB. Comparative operative outcomes of early and delayed cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a population-based propensity score analysis. Ann Surg. 2014 Jan;259(1):10-5. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a5cf36. PubMed 23979286 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Individual participant data (IPD) will be published on www.dkmic.de

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 26, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02796443
Lead sponsor
Asklepios Klinik Langen
Collaborators
Goethe University
Responsible party
Prof. Dr. Dr. Ernst Hanisch (Prof. Dr. Dr., Asklepios Klinik Langen) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 10, 2016
Start date
Jan 2006
Primary completion
Sep 2015
Completion
May 2016
Last update
Jul 26, 2019

Study contacts

Ernst W Hanisch, Prof Dr Dr
principal investigator · Asklepios Klinik Langen

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion