CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02785354Updated Nov 2, 2018Results posted

Anticoagulants Comparative Benefit-risk Ratio in Real Life

An observational study in Atrial Fibrillation, sponsored by Boehringer Ingelheim. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-11-02.

Sponsored by Boehringer Ingelheim · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
103,101
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The study is an analysis using the French national health insurance database, six months after the beginning of NOAC launch in the NVAF indication.

The aim is to compare the one-year, two-year and three-year benefit-risk (major bleeding, arterial thrombotic events, myocardial infarction (MI), death) between patients starting a NOAC and patients starting a VKA for NVAF in 2013

02

Conditions studied

  • Atrial Fibrillation

Browse trials for

03

In context

Atrial Fibrillation

3,870 studies on the registry are indexed under Atrial Fibrillation; 924 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 103,101 is above the median of 300 across 1,363 observational studies indexed under Atrial Fibrillation.

Browse Atrial Fibrillation studies →

Lead sponsor

Boehringer Ingelheim is the lead sponsor of 2,245 studies on the registry; 58 are open to participants now.

Of its 162 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 116 (72%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

New users of NOAC or VKA for NVAF

Inclusion criteria

Patients with NVAF with a first reimbursed dispensation of Pradaxa®, Xarelto®, or VKA in 2013, with no other identified indication for anticoagulation; Without any VKA or NOAC (Pradaxa®, Xarelto®, or Eliquis®) reimbursed dispensation for the last 3 years before the first reimbursed dispensation of Pradaxa®, Xarelto®, or VKA

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

None

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
103,101 participants (actual)

Groups and cohorts

  • NOAC

    New oral anticoagulant groups

  • VKA

    VKA group

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Clinically Relevant Bleeding

    First hospitalization with primary diagnosis (Tenth Revision codes of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10 codes)) of: 1. Hemorrhagic stroke, 2. Other critical organ or site bleeding, 3. Other bleeding (gastro-intestinal bleeding, urogenital bleeding and other bleeding subtype).

    Time frame: One year

  2. Major Bleeding

    First hospitalization with primary diagnosis (ICD-10 codes) of: 1. Hemorrhagic stroke, 2. Other critical organ or site bleeding, 3. Other bleeding with transfusion, or acute post-hemorrhagic anemia or death during hospital stay.

    Time frame: 1 year

  3. Arterial Thrombotic Event

    First hospitalization with primary diagnosis (ICD-10 codes) of: 1. Ischemic or undefined stroke, 2. Systemic arterial embolism.

    Time frame: 1 year

  4. Acute Coronary Syndrome

    First hospitalization with primary diagnosis (ICD-10 codes) of: 1. Myocardial infarction (ST-segment elevation Myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-segment elevation Myocardial infarction(NSTEMI)), 2. Unstable angina.

    Time frame: One year

  5. Death (All-cause)

    All-cause death (cause of death not available in the database).

    Time frame: 1 year

  6. Composite Criterion (Clinically Relevant Bleeding, Arterial Thrombotic Events, Acute Coronary Syndrome, Death)

    First event among clinically relevant bleeding, arterial thrombotic event, acute coronary syndrome, or death defined above.

    Time frame: One year

07

Results

Posted Nov 2, 2018
Limitations and caveats
DOAC \& VKA were prescribed by physicians in their daily practice,with differences for pts \& disease characteristics,including stroke \& bleeding risk factors.To control this pts were 1:1 matched on date of 1st dispensing, gender,age \& hdPS.

Participant flow

The study ENGEL 2 is a real-world historical cohort study in the French nationwide healthcare claims and hospitalization database (SNIIRAM) including new users of DOAC or VKA for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) in 2013 with a follow-up for one year (main objective).

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneDabigatranRivaroxabanVitamin K Antagonists
Started270603138844653
Completed270603138844653
Not completed000

Outcome measures

PrimaryClinically Relevant Bleeding

First hospitalization with primary diagnosis (Tenth Revision codes of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10 codes)) of: 1. Hemorrhagic stroke, 2. Other critical organ or site bleeding, 3. Other bleeding (gastro-intestinal bleeding, urogenital bleeding and other bleeding subtype).

Time frame:
One year
Reported as:
Number · participants with event
Clinically Relevant Bleeding
participants with eventDabigatran (Dabigatran vs VKA)VKA (Dabigatran vs VKA)Rivaroxaban (Rivaroxaban vs VKA)VKA (Rivaroxaban vs VKA)
Clinically Relevant Bleeding367 (2.2 to 2.7)668 (4.1 to 4.8)635 (3.5 to 4.1)767 (4.2 to 4.8)
Statistical analysis
  • Dabigatran (Dabigatran vs VKA) vs VKA (Dabigatran vs VKA) · Fine and Gray model · p = <0.0001 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.58 · 95% CI 0.51 to 0.66
  • Rivaroxaban (Rivaroxaban vs VKA) vs VKA (Rivaroxaban vs VKA) · Fine and Gray model · p = 0.0006 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.83 · 95% CI 0.75 to 0.92
PrimaryMajor Bleeding

First hospitalization with primary diagnosis (ICD-10 codes) of: 1. Hemorrhagic stroke, 2. Other critical organ or site bleeding, 3. Other bleeding with transfusion, or acute post-hemorrhagic anemia or death during hospital stay.

Time frame:
1 year
Reported as:
Number · participants with events
Major Bleeding
participants with eventsDabigatran (Dabigatran vs VKA)VKA (Dabigatran vs VKA)Rivaroxaban (Rivaroxaban vs VKA)VKA (Rivaroxaban vs VKA)
Major Bleeding178 (1.0 to 1.4)341 (2.0 to 2.5)280 (1.5 to 1.9)417 (2.2 to 2.7)
Statistical analysis
  • Dabigatran (Dabigatran vs VKA) vs VKA (Dabigatran vs VKA) · Fine and Gray model · p = <0.0001 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.55 · 95% CI 0.46 to 0.66
  • Rivaroxaban (Rivaroxaban vs VKA) vs VKA (Rivaroxaban vs VKA) · Fine and Gray model · p = <0.0001 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.68 · 95% CI 0.58 to 0.79
PrimaryArterial Thrombotic Event

First hospitalization with primary diagnosis (ICD-10 codes) of: 1. Ischemic or undefined stroke, 2. Systemic arterial embolism.

Time frame:
1 year
Reported as:
Number · participants with events
Arterial Thrombotic Event
participants with eventsDabigatran (Dabigatran vs VKA)VKA (Dabigatran vs VKA)Rivaroxaban (Rivaroxaban vs VKA)VKA (Rivaroxaban vs VKA)
Arterial Thrombotic Event226 (1.4 to 1.8)321 (1.9 to 2.4)343 (1.8 to 2.2)351 (1.9 to 2.3)
Statistical analysis
  • Dabigatran (Dabigatran vs VKA) vs VKA (Dabigatran vs VKA) · Fine and Gray model · p = 0.0007 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.75 · 95% CI 0.63 to 0.88
  • Rivaroxaban (Rivaroxaban vs VKA) vs VKA (Rivaroxaban vs VKA) · Fine and Gray model · p = 0.8341 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.98 · 95% CI 0.85 to 1.14
PrimaryAcute Coronary Syndrome

First hospitalization with primary diagnosis (ICD-10 codes) of: 1. Myocardial infarction (ST-segment elevation Myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-segment elevation Myocardial infarction(NSTEMI)), 2. Unstable angina.

Time frame:
One year
Reported as:
Number · participants with events
Acute Coronary Syndrome
participants with eventsDabigatran (Dabigatran vs VKA)VKA (Dabigatran vs VKA)Rivaroxaban (Rivaroxaban vs VKA)VKA (Rivaroxaban vs VKA)
Acute Coronary Syndrome176 (1.1 to 1.4)238 (1.4 to 1.8)230 (1.2 to 1.5)277 (1.4 to 1.8)
Statistical analysis
  • Dabigatran (Dabigatran vs VKA) vs VKA (Dabigatran vs VKA) · Fine and Gray model · p = 0.0147 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.79 · 95% CI 0.65 to 0.95
  • Rivaroxaban (Rivaroxaban vs VKA) vs VKA (Rivaroxaban vs VKA) · Fine and Gray model · p = 0.0501 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.84 · 95% CI 0.71 to 1.00
PrimaryDeath (All-cause)

All-cause death (cause of death not available in the database).

Time frame:
1 year
Reported as:
Number · participants with events
Death (All-cause)
participants with eventsDabigatran (Dabigatran vs VKA)VKA (Dabigatran vs VKA)Rivaroxaban (Rivaroxaban vs VKA)VKA (Rivaroxaban vs VKA)
Death (All-cause)686 (4.6 to 5.3)983 (6.4 to 7.3)908 (5.2 to 6.0)1186 (6.9 to 7.8)
Statistical analysis
  • Dabigatran (Dabigatran vs VKA) vs VKA (Dabigatran vs VKA) · Cox proportional hazard risk model · p = <0.0001 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.74 · 95% CI 0.67 to 0.82
  • Rivaroxaban (Rivaroxaban vs VKA) vs VKA (Rivaroxaban vs VKA) · Cox proportional hazard risk model · p = <0.0001 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.77 · 95% CI 0.71 to 0.84
PrimaryComposite Criterion (Clinically Relevant Bleeding, Arterial Thrombotic Events, Acute Coronary Syndrome, Death)

First event among clinically relevant bleeding, arterial thrombotic event, acute coronary syndrome, or death defined above.

Time frame:
One year
Reported as:
Number · participants with events
Composite Criterion (Clinically Relevant Bleeding, Arterial Thrombotic Events, Acute Coronary Syndrome, Death)
participants with eventsDabigatran (Dabigatran vs VKA)VKA (Dabigatran vs VKA)Rivaroxaban (Rivaroxaban vs VKA)VKA (Rivaroxaban vs VKA)
Composite Criterion (Clinically Relevant Bleeding, Arterial Thrombotic Events, Acute Coronary Syndrome, Death)1340 (8.8 to 9.8)1970 (12.5 to 13.7)1967 (11.1 to 12.1)2328 (13.2 to 14.3)
Statistical analysis
  • Dabigatran (Dabigatran vs VKA) vs VKA (Dabigatran vs VKA) · Cox proportional hazard risk model · p = <0.0001 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.71 · 95% CI 0.66 to 0.76
  • Rivaroxaban (Rivaroxaban vs VKA) vs VKA (Rivaroxaban vs VKA) · Cox proportional hazard risk model · p = <0.0001 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.84 · 95% CI 0.79 to 0.89

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Dabigatran———
Rivaroxaban———
Vitamin K Antagonists———

Baseline characteristics

The main analysis was on matched patients 1:1 on the date of the first drug (DOAC or VKA) dispensing (± 2 weeks), gender, age at index date (± 1 year) and hdPS (± 0.05).Baseline measures were presented for overall treatment groups and matched populations: dabigatran vs VKA and rivaroxaban vs VKA.

Age, Customized
Age, Customized(Years)DabigatranRivaroxabanVitamin K AntagonistsTotal
Overall73.2 ± 11.873.2 ± 11.877.9 ± 11.175.2 ± 11.7
Dabigatran vs VKA (matched pop)75.3 ± 10.7—75.4 ± 10.775.4 ± 10.7
Rivaroxaban vs VKA (matched pop)—75.3 ± 10.775.4 ± 10.775.4 ± 10.7
Sex/Gender, Customized
Sex/Gender, Customized(Participants)DabigatranRivaroxabanVitamin K AntagonistsTotal
Overall — Male15253176532286855774
Overall — Female11807137352178547327
Dabigatran vs VKA (matched pop) — Male11164—1116422328
Dabigatran vs VKA (matched pop) — Female9325—932518650
Rivaroxaban vs VKA (matched pop) — Male—125571255725114
Rivaroxaban vs VKA (matched pop) — Female—104961049620992
08

Study locations

1 site
  • 1160.263.1 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Multiple Locations, France
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Blin P, Dureau-Pournin C, Benichou J, Cottin Y, Mismetti P, Abouelfath A, Lassalle R, Droz C, Moore N. Comparative Real-Life Effectiveness and Safety of Dabigatran or Rivaroxaban vs. Vitamin K Antagonists: A High-Dimensional Propensity Score Matched New Users Cohort Study in the French National Healthcare Data System SNDS. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2020 Feb;20(1):81-103. doi: 10.1007/s40256-019-00359-z. Erratum In: Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2022 Jan;22(1):111. doi: 10.1007/s40256-021-00517-2. PubMed 31254174 ↗
  • Blin P, Dureau-Pournin C, Cottin Y, Benichou J, Mismetti P, Abouelfath A, Lassalle R, Droz C, Moore N. Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Standard or Reduced Dose Dabigatran vs. Rivaroxaban in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2019 Jun;105(6):1439-1455. doi: 10.1002/cpt.1318. Epub 2019 Feb 6. PubMed 30499605 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 2, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02785354
Lead sponsor
Boehringer Ingelheim
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 27, 2016
Start date
Mar 1, 2016
Primary completion
Mar 4, 2016
Completion
Apr 5, 2016
Results posted
Nov 2, 2018
Last update
Nov 2, 2018

Study contacts

Boehringer Ingelheim
study chair · Boehringer Ingelheim
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion