ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT02782325Updated May 14, 2019Results posted

Safety and Efficacy of Fecal Microbiome Transplantation (FMT) in the Treatment of Antibiotic Dependent Pouchitis (ADP)

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of Active FMT, then open label FMT and Placebo FMT, then open label FMT in Pouchitis, sponsored by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-05-14.

Sponsored by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Due low efficacy of FMT in interim analysis.
Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
6
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Antibiotic dependent pouchitis (ADP) is predestined to benefit from FMT, since bacterial dysbiosis, which can only be controlled with antibiotics, appears to be the major driver of the clinical symptoms. This is a proof of concept randomized placebo controlled trial, in which 50% of the patients will receive FMT and 50% will receive a placebo FMT. Additionally the trial offers an open label extension period.

Read the detailed description

FMT for ADP is a promising approach, given the documented role of bacteria in the pathogenesis. In contrast to patients with C. difficile colitis, in whom a single FMT is highly effective, in patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) an intensified therapy with daily or repeated FMT may be more beneficial. Whereas repeated endoscopic application are not feasible and repeated enema applications are not favored by patients a combination of endoscopic FMT and consecutive maintenance therapy with oral FMT using the FMT capsule G3 produced by OpenBiome to help establish the donor microbiome in the host seems to be the most promising approach. The objective of this trial is to evaluate the safety of FMT in patients with ADP and to estimate the effect size to be achieved from FMT therapy in patients with ADP for subsequent evaluation in a large definitive trial. A secondary objective is to study the microbial engraftment of donor FMT in the recipients.

This proof of concept randomized placebo controlled trial with an open label extension period will evaluate the safety and efficacy of an initial endoscopic FMT followed by 14 days of oral FMT. The study has two distinct outcomes, a clinical and translational aim, to investigate the effect of FMT in patients with ADP.

Aim1: Evaluation of safety, tolerability and clinical effectiveness (measured as clinical response or remission and discontinuation of antibiotic therapy) of FMT in patients with ADP.

Aim 2: Evaluation of the impact of FMT on the fecal bacterial microbiome in patients with ADP, which will provide functional data about possible mechanisms of this therapy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pouchitis

Browse trials for

03

In context

Pouchitis

50 studies on the registry are indexed under Pouchitis; 12 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 6 is below the median of 20 across 42 interventional studies indexed under Pouchitis.

Browse Pouchitis studies →

Lead sponsor

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill is the lead sponsor of 1,372 studies on the registry; 133 are open to participants now.

Of its 161 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 139 (86%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Signed .
  • Man or woman between 18 and 70 years of age.
  • Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis (IPAA) after colectomy for ulcerative colitis
  • Active pouchitis, defined as a modified pouch disease activity index (mPDAI) ≥ 5 and a history of ≥ 4 antibiotic therapies for pouchitis in the last 12 months

or

  • Need for ongoing antibiotic therapy (> 4 weeks) to maintain clinical remission and a history of at least 2 attempts in the last 24 months to stop antibiotic therapy resulting in pouchitis episodes.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Treatment with biologics (e.g. infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab, vedolizumab)
  • Treatment with immunomodulators (azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP), methotrexate), or any drugs
  • Use of cholestyramine
  • Crohn's disease of the pouch
  • Known cytomegalovirus infection of the pouch
  • Clostridium difficile infection
  • Isolated cuffitis
  • Clinical significant strictures of the pouch inlet or outlet
  • Concurrent intestinal obstruction
  • History of familial adenomatous polyposis
  • History of uncontrolled lactose intolerance
  • History of confirmed (serological test and/or histology) celiac disease
  • Pregnancy, breast feeding, or planning to become pregnant during the trial
  • Non - steroidal inflammatory medications (NSAIDs) as long-term treatment, defined as use for at least 4 days a week each month
  • Dysphagia (oropharyngeal, esophageal, functional, neuromuscular)
  • History of recurrent aspiration episodes
  • Proven Gastroparesis
  • Allergy to the following generally regarded as safe ingredients (GRAS): glycerol, acid resistant hypromellose (HPMC), gellan gum, cocoa butter, titanium dioxide
  • Adverse event attributable to previous FMT
  • Allergy/intolerance to pump inhibitor therapy
  • Any condition for which the investigator thinks the FMT treatment may pose a health risk (e.g. severely )
  • Participation in another clinical trial within the last 30 days, simultaneous participation in another clinical trial, or previous participation in this trial
  • During the trial period until one week after the trial end: Non-use of appropriate in females of (e.g. condoms, intrauterine device (IUD), hormonal contraception, or other means considered adequate by the responsible investigator) or in males with a child-fathering potential (condoms, or other means considered adequate by the responsible investigator during treatment - Well-founded doubt about the patient's cooperation
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(6)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
6 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Active FMT, then open label FMT

    Endoscopic application of OpenBiome FMT Lower Delivery followed by 2 weeks of treatment with OpenBiome FMT Capsules G3 with follow-up at week 4, 8, 16 and 24 after inclusion. In case the study patient does not achieve clinical remission at week 4 or experiences a flare of disease on day 15-28 after start of the study he/she will be offered the possibility to participate in open label extension after at least 10 day of antibiotic therapy with an additional endoscopic FMT followed by 2 weeks of oral FMT. Follow-up will occur in open label at week 4, 8, 16 and 24 after open label FMT.

    Biological: Active FMT, then open label FMT

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo FMT, then open label FMT

    Endoscopic application of Placebo FMT Lower Delivery followed by 2 weeks of treatment with Placebo FMT Capsules G3 with follow-up at week 4, 8, 16 and 24 after inclusion. In case the study patient does not achieve clinical remission at week 4 or experiences a flare of disease on day 15-28 after start of the study he/she will be offered the possibility to participate in open label extension after at least 10 day of antibiotic therapy with an additional endoscopic FMT followed by 2 weeks of oral FMT. Follow-up will occur in open label at week 4, 8, 16 and 24 after open label FMT.

    Biological: Placebo FMT, then open label FMT

Interventions

  • BiologicalActive FMT, then open label FMT

    Endoscopic application of OpenBiome FMT Lower Delivery followed by 2 weeks of treatment with OpenBiome FMT Capsules G3 with follow-up at week 4, 8, 16 and 24 after inclusion. In case the study patient does not achieve clinical remission at week 4 or experiences a flare of disease on day 15-28 after start of the study he/she will be offered the possibility to participate in open label extension after at least 10 day of antibiotic therapy with an additional endoscopic FMT followed by 2 weeks of oral FMT. Follow-up will occur in open label at week 4, 8, 16 and 24 after open label FMT.

    Also known as: Active FMT

  • BiologicalPlacebo FMT, then open label FMT

    Endoscopic application of Placebo FMT Lower Delivery followed by 2 weeks of treatment with Placebo FMT Capsules G3 with follow-up at week 4, 8, 16 and 24 after inclusion. In case the study patient does not achieve clinical remission at week 4 or experiences a flare of disease on day 15-28 after start of the study he/she will be offered the possibility to participate in open label extension after at least 10 day of antibiotic therapy with an additional endoscopic FMT followed by 2 weeks of oral FMT. Follow-up will occur in open label at week 4, 8, 16 and 24 after open label FMT.

    Also known as: Placebo FMT

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Patients With FMT Related Adverse Event

    Number of patients with FMT related adverse event (classified according to MedDRA; lowest level term) and categorized according to CTCAE Version 4.0. The safety was assessed in the randomized placebo controlled segment of the study over 24 weeks after initial endoscopic FMT weeks and if the patient should enter the open label extension part of the study also for 24 weeks after initial open label FMT. 6 patients participated in the randomized arm and 5 patients in the open label extension arm.

    Time frame: 24 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Patients in Clinical Remission Week 4 After Endoscopic and Oral FMT

    Clinical remission as defined by a composite assessment, of which all criteria need to be met: Clinical modified pouch diseases activity index (mPDAI) score ≤4 points and no need for antibiotic therapy at week 4.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  2. Number of Patients in Clinical Remission Week 16

    Clinical remission as defined by a composite assessment, of which all criteria need to be met: Clinical mPDAI score ≤4 points and no need for antibiotic therapy at week 16.

    Time frame: 16 weeks

  3. Number of Patients With Endoscopic Improvement Week 4 After Endoscopic and Oral FMT

    Endoscopic improvement of active pouchitis (decrease from baseline in modified pouch disease activity index endoscopic subscore \> 2 points) at week 4.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  4. Number of Patients With Clinical Response at Week 4 in Patients Entering the Trial With Active Pouchitis Symptoms

    This outcome measure is for patients with active pouchitis symptoms entering the trial. Since all patients entered with inactive pouchitis no patient could be evaluated for this outcome. Response as defined by a composite assessment of which both criteria has to be met: Decrease from baseline mPDAI clinical subscore \> 2 points and no need for antibiotic therapy at week 4.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  5. Number of Patients With Clinical Response Week 8 and Active Pouchitis at Baseline

    Response as defined by a composite assessment of which both criteria has to be met: Decrease from baseline mPDAI clinical subscore \> 2 points and no need for antibiotic therapy at week 8 of the randomized phase.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  6. Number of Patients With Clinical Response i at Week 16 and Active Pouchitis at Baseline

    This outcome measure is for patients with active pouchitis symptoms entering the trial. Response as defined by a composite assessment of which both criteria has to be met: Decrease from baseline mPDAI clinical subscore \> 2 points and no need for antibiotic therapy at week 16.

    Time frame: 16 weeks

07

Results

Posted May 14, 2019
Limitations and caveats
Due to the small sample size only exploratory analyses were performed.

Participant flow

Blinded FMT Treatment (up to 24 Weeks)
Participant flow — Blinded FMT Treatment (up to 24 Weeks)
MilestoneActive FMT, Then Open Label FMTPlacebo FMT, Then Open Label FMTOpen Label FMT Period
Started420
Completed000
Not completed420
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy420
Open Label FMT Period (up to 24 Weeks)
Participant flow — Open Label FMT Period (up to 24 Weeks)
MilestoneActive FMT, Then Open Label FMTPlacebo FMT, Then Open Label FMTOpen Label FMT Period
Started005
Completed001
Not completed004
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy004

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Patients With FMT Related Adverse Event

Number of patients with FMT related adverse event (classified according to MedDRA; lowest level term) and categorized according to CTCAE Version 4.0. The safety was assessed in the randomized placebo controlled segment of the study over 24 weeks after initial endoscopic FMT weeks and if the patient should enter the open label extension part of the study also for 24 weeks after initial open label FMT. 6 patients participated in the randomized arm and 5 patients in the open label extension arm.

Time frame:
24 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Patients With FMT Related Adverse Event
ParticipantsRandomized Phase: Active FMTRandomized Phase: PlaceboOpen Label FMT
Number of Patients With FMT Related Adverse Event000
SecondaryNumber of Patients in Clinical Remission Week 4 After Endoscopic and Oral FMT

Clinical remission as defined by a composite assessment, of which all criteria need to be met: Clinical modified pouch diseases activity index (mPDAI) score ≤4 points and no need for antibiotic therapy at week 4.

Time frame:
4 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Patients in Clinical Remission Week 4 After Endoscopic and Oral FMT
ParticipantsRandomized Phase: Active FMTRandomized Phase: PlaceboOpen Label FMT
Number of Patients in Clinical Remission Week 4 After Endoscopic and Oral FMT001
SecondaryNumber of Patients in Clinical Remission Week 16

Clinical remission as defined by a composite assessment, of which all criteria need to be met: Clinical mPDAI score ≤4 points and no need for antibiotic therapy at week 16.

Time frame:
16 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Patients in Clinical Remission Week 16
ParticipantsRandomized Phase: Active FMTRandomized Phase: PlaceboOpen Label FMT
Number of Patients in Clinical Remission Week 16001
SecondaryNumber of Patients With Endoscopic Improvement Week 4 After Endoscopic and Oral FMT

Endoscopic improvement of active pouchitis (decrease from baseline in modified pouch disease activity index endoscopic subscore \> 2 points) at week 4.

Time frame:
4 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Patients With Endoscopic Improvement Week 4 After Endoscopic and Oral FMT
ParticipantsRandomized Phase: Active FMTRandomized Phase: PlaceboOpen Label FMT
Number of Patients With Endoscopic Improvement Week 4 After Endoscopic and Oral FMT000
SecondaryNumber of Patients With Clinical Response at Week 4 in Patients Entering the Trial With Active Pouchitis Symptoms

This outcome measure is for patients with active pouchitis symptoms entering the trial. Since all patients entered with inactive pouchitis no patient could be evaluated for this outcome. Response as defined by a composite assessment of which both criteria has to be met: Decrease from baseline mPDAI clinical subscore \> 2 points and no need for antibiotic therapy at week 4.

Time frame:
4 weeks

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryNumber of Patients With Clinical Response Week 8 and Active Pouchitis at Baseline

Response as defined by a composite assessment of which both criteria has to be met: Decrease from baseline mPDAI clinical subscore \> 2 points and no need for antibiotic therapy at week 8 of the randomized phase.

Time frame:
8 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Patients With Clinical Response Week 8 and Active Pouchitis at Baseline
ParticipantsRandomized Phase: Active FMTRandomized Phase: PlaceboOpen Label FMT
Number of Patients With Clinical Response Week 8 and Active Pouchitis at Baseline000
SecondaryNumber of Patients With Clinical Response i at Week 16 and Active Pouchitis at Baseline

This outcome measure is for patients with active pouchitis symptoms entering the trial. Response as defined by a composite assessment of which both criteria has to be met: Decrease from baseline mPDAI clinical subscore \> 2 points and no need for antibiotic therapy at week 16.

Time frame:
16 weeks

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse event were collected for 24 weeks after endoscopic FMT in the randomized phase. If patient the patient participated in the open label extension study period adverse events were collected for 24 weeks after endoscopic FMT in the open label extension phase.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Randomized Phase: Active FMT0/4 (0%)0/4 (0%)4/4 (100%)
Randomized Phase: Placebo0/2 (0%)0/2 (0%)2/2 (100%)
Open Label FMT0/5 (0%)0/5 (0%)5/5 (100%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventRandomized Phase: Active FMTRandomized Phase: PlaceboOpen Label FMT
BloatingGastrointestinal disorders3/42/23/5
UrgencyGastrointestinal disorders3/40/21/5
DiarrheaGastrointestinal disorders3/40/22/5
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders0/41/20/5
FatigueGeneral disorders0/41/21/5

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Active FMT, Then Open Label FMTPlacebo FMT, Then Open Label FMTTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years426
>=65 years000
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Active FMT, Then Open Label FMTPlacebo FMT, Then Open Label FMTTotal
Female022
Male404
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Active FMT, Then Open Label FMTPlacebo FMT, Then Open Label FMTTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American000
White426
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Active FMT, Then Open Label FMTPlacebo FMT, Then Open Label FMTTotal
United States426
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of North Carolina
    Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — The final results of the trial will be posted on clinical trials.gov. No individual patient data will be posted.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 14, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02782325
Collaborators
OpenBiome, Crohn's and Colitis Foundation, The Broad Foundation
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 25, 2016
Start date
Jun 1, 2017
Primary completion
Dec 3, 2018
Completion
Dec 3, 2018
Results posted
May 14, 2019
Last update
May 14, 2019

Study contacts

Hans Herfarth, MD, PhD
principal investigator · University of North Carolina

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Dec 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion