CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT02782260Updated May 25, 2016

Assessment of the Efficacy of Ocular Dipyridamole in the Treatment of Dry Eye Symptomology in Subjects With Pterygium

A Phase 2 interventional study of Dipyridamole and Placebo in Dry Eye Syndromes and Pterygium, sponsored by Ariel University. Status unknown. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-05-25.

Sponsored by Ariel University · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified May 2016), so the status shown — last known as Not yet recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Subjects with pterygium and associated dry eye symptoms (DES) are randomized into an active cohort (receiving ocular administration of Dipyridamole) or placebo cohort (ocular administration of vehicle). Monthly follow up is conducted for 12 months. Testing conducted at follow up will assess dry eye / pterygium symptoms and endpoints and review the efficacy of the intervention.

02

Conditions studied

03

In context

Dry Eye Syndromes

1,292 studies on the registry are indexed under Dry Eye Syndromes; 191 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 40 is below the median of 60 across 1,077 interventional studies indexed under Dry Eye Syndromes.

Browse Dry Eye Syndromes studies →

Lead sponsor

Ariel University is the lead sponsor of 29 studies on the registry; 7 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Able to provide informed consent.
  • Ineligible or refused surgical excision, or had recurrence of pterygium following surgical excision
  • Able to follow the study instructions, including application of the study product
  • Agreement not to change the type of lubricating eye drops used (if any) during their participation in the study.
  • Assessed as having at least pterygium stage 0-1 (pinguecula) based on Johnston, Williams \& Sheppard's classification for pterygium
  • Concomitant dry eye symptoms, as determined by one or more of the following Subject interview (modified Ocular Surface Disease Index test), Tearing, Itch / foreign body sensation, Positive Fluorescein test, Positive TBUT test, Positive Tear meniscus test

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to provide informed consent
  • Dry eye due to other factors
  • Known lacrimal obstruction
  • Contact lens wearers
  • Non-corrected refraction
  • Allergy or sensitivity to dipyridamole or excipients
  • Use of dipyridamole in the last 6 months
  • Other eye conditions (i.e. active ocular infection, herpes keratitis in last 6 months, corneal disorder abnormality excluding pterygium, history of ocular acne rosacea, blepharitis) which would impact results
  • Diagnosis of ALS (Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis)
  • Existing conditions which are contraindicated or precaution in use of dipyridamole or excipients
  • Use of eye drops (other than ocular lubricants)
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding
  • Inability to apply the medical product or follow the study procedures
  • Anything that the PI thinks would impact the trial
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
40 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Active

    Dipyridamole eye drops 8.48 mg in 100ml 1 drop three times a day for 1 year

    Drug: Dipyridamole

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Fluorescein in Active Vehicle 1 drop three times a day for 1 year

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugDipyridamole
  • DrugPlacebo
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Assess the changes in dry eye parameters via a change in tear secretion rate

    Change in the tear secretion rate will be defined by successful change in parameters of ONE of the following testing methods compared to baseline: 1. Fluorescein - Improvement of one of the quadrants sufficient to change the severity rating 2. TBUT (Tear Breakup time) - Decreased by at least 1 second 3. Tear meniscus test - Increase of at least 0.2mm

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Assess the changes in dry eye parameters via reduction in dry eye symptomology.

    Reduction in dry eye symptomology will be defined as ONE of the following relative to baseline, determined by subject feedback * An improvement in questionnaire scores * Specified improvement in blurred vision grading * Specified improvement in tearing grading * Specified improvement in itch / foreign body (grittiness) sensation grading.

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. A minimum significant reversion of pterygia relative to baseline or cessation of growth of pterygium

    Minimum significant reversion will be defined as a decrease in vascularisation, or a measurable decrease from baseline of OCT (Ocular Coherence Tomography) measured parameters (height or width).

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 25, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02782260
Lead sponsor
Ariel University
Responsible party
Lily Karmona (Dr, Ariel University) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 25, 2016
Start date
Jul 2016
Primary completion
Oct 2017 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 2018 (estimated)
Last update
May 25, 2016

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in May 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion