ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02781727Updated Jul 7, 2026Results posted

A Phase 3 Trial of the Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of TransCon hGH Weekly Versus Daily hGH in Children With Growth Hormone Deficiency (GHD)

A Phase 3 interventional study of Once weekly subcutaneous injection of TransCon hGH and Once daily subcutaneous injection of Genotropin in Growth Hormone Deficiency, Pediatric, hGH (Human Growth Hormone) and Endocrine System Diseases, sponsored by Ascendis Pharma Endocrinology Division A/S. Completed at 53 sites in 14 countries. Open to participants aged 3 Years to 12 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-07.

Sponsored by Ascendis Pharma Endocrinology Division A/S · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
162
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
3 Years to 12 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A 52 week trial of TransCon hGH, a long-acting growth hormone product, versus human growth hormone therapy. TransCon hGH will be given once-a-week, human growth hormone (hGH) will be given daily. Approximately 150 prepubertal, hGH-treatment naïve children (males and females) with GHD will be included. Randomization will occur in a 2:1 ratio (TransCon hGH : Genotropin). This is a global trial that will be conducted in Armenia, Australia, Belarus, Bulgaria, Georgia, Greece, Italy, New Zealand, Poland, Romania, Russia, Turkey, Ukraine, and the United States.

02

Conditions studied

  • Growth Hormone Deficiency, Pediatric
  • hGH (Human Growth Hormone)
  • Endocrine System Diseases
  • Hormones
  • Pituitary Diseases

Keywords

  • Human Growth Hormone
  • hGH
  • GHD
  • rHGH
  • Pediatric Growth Hormone Deficiency
  • Long Acting Growth Hormone
  • Somatropin
  • Prodrug
  • Growth Failure
  • Growth Hormone Replacement Therapy
  • Sustained Release
  • Sustained Release Growth Hormone
  • Growth Hormone Deficiency
03

In context

Dwarfism, Pituitary

252 studies on the registry are indexed under Dwarfism, Pituitary; 30 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 162 is above the median of 60 across 169 interventional studies indexed under Dwarfism, Pituitary.

Browse Dwarfism, Pituitary studies →

Lead sponsor

Ascendis Pharma Endocrinology Division A/S is the lead sponsor of 7 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
3 Years to 12 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Prepubertal children with GHD (either isolated or as part of a multiple pituitary hormone deficiency) in Tanner stage 1 (Tanner 1982) aged:

    • Boys: 3-12 years, inclusive
    • Girls: 3-11 years, inclusive
  • Impaired height (HT) defined as at least 2.0 standard deviations (SD) below the mean height for chronological age and sex (HT SDS ≤ -2.0) according to the 2000 CDC Growth Charts for the United States Methods and Development, available at http://www.cdc.gov/growthcharts/
  • Diagnosis of GHD confirmed by 2 different GH stimulation tests, defined as a peak GH level of ≤10 ng/mL, determined with a validated assay
  • Bone age (BA) at least 6 months less than chronological age
  • Baseline IGF-1 level of at least 1 SD below the mean IGF-1 level standardized for age and sex (IGF-1 SDS ≤-1)
  • Written, signed of the parent(s) or legal guardian(s) of the subject and written assent of the subject (if the subject is able to read, understand, and sign)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Children with a body weight below 12 kg
  • Prior exposure to recombinant hGH or IGF-1 therapy
  • Children with past or present intracranial tumor growth as confirmed by a sellar MRI scan (with contrast) at Screening (MRI results from up to 6 months prior to Screening may be accepted)
  • Children with psychosocial dwarfism
  • Children with idiopathic short stature
  • History or presence of malignant disease; any evidence of present tumor growth
  • Closed epiphyses
  • Major medical conditions and/or presence of to hGH treatment
  • Participation in any other trial of an agent within 3 months prior to Screening
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
162 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    TransCon hGH

    Once weekly subcutaneous injection of TransCon hGH

    Drug: Once weekly subcutaneous injection of TransCon hGH

  • Active comparator
    human growth hormone (Genotropin)

    Once daily subcutaneous injection of Genotropin

    Drug: Once daily subcutaneous injection of Genotropin

Interventions

  • DrugOnce weekly subcutaneous injection of TransCon hGH

    Once weekly subcutaneous injection

  • DrugOnce daily subcutaneous injection of Genotropin

    Once daily subcutaneous injection

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Annualized Height Velocity at 52 Weeks for Weekly Lonapegsomatropin and Daily hGH Treatment Groups

    Annualized height velocity (AHV) at 52 weeks for weekly lonapegsomatropin (TransCon hGH) and daily hGH treatment groups

    Time frame: 52 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability]

    Number of participants with Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events for the weekly lonapegsomatropin and daily hGH treatment groups

    Time frame: 52 Weeks

  2. Annualized Height Velocity Over 52 Weeks for Weekly Lonapegsomatropin and Daily hGH Treatment Groups

    Annualized height velocity (AHV) over 52 weeks for weekly lonapegsomatropin and daily hGH treatment groups. AHV by visit was determined by ANCOVA model with multiple imputation. For each imputed data set, an ANCOVA model with by visit AHV as the dependent variable, treatment and gender as factors, baseline age, baseline peak GH levels (log transformed) at stimulation test, and baseline height SDS - average parental height SDS as covariates were fitted.

    Time frame: Week 5, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39 and Week 52

  3. Change in Height Standard Deviation Score Over 52 Weeks for the Weekly Lonapegsomatropin and Daily hGH Treatment Groups

    Height Standard Deviation Score (SDS) is the number of standard deviations above or below the mean height for age and sex. Height SDS was derived using the LMS method as ((Height/M)\^L)-1)/(L x S), where M = median, S = generalized coefficient of variation, and L = power in the Box-Cox transformation, the M, S, L values were obtained from 2000 CDC growth charts for the United States. A Standard Deviation Score of 0 represents the population mean. A higher change from baseline in Height Standard Deviation Score (SDS) indicates a better outcome. The change from baseline in height SDS by visit was determined by ANCOVA model and included baseline age, peak GH levels (log transformed) at stimulation test and baseline height SDS as covariates, as well as treatment and gender as factors.

    Time frame: Week 5, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39 and Week 52

  4. Average IGF-1 Standard Deviation Score Over 52 Weeks for the Weekly Lonapegsomatropin and Daily hGH Treatment Groups

    IGF-1 Standard Deviation Score (SDS) is the number of standard deviations above or below the mean Insulin-like Growth Factor 1 (IGF-1) level for age and sex. IGF-1 SDS was derived using the LMS method as ((IGF-1/M)\^L)-1)/(L x S), where M = median, S = generalized coefficient of variation, and L = power in the Box-Cox transformation, the M, S, L values were obtained from Bidlingmaier et al. (2014). A Standard Deviation Score of 0 represents the population mean. Average IGF-1 SDS by visit was determined by ANCOVA. The ANCOVA model included baseline age, peak GH levels (log transformed) at stimulation test, baseline IGF-1 SDS as covariates, as well as treatment and gender as factors. Modeled values begin at Week 13 corresponding with achievement of IGF-1 steady state. Average IGF-1 SDS values by visit for the Lonapegsomatropin group were derived from a population pharmacodynamic model; the average IGF-1 SDS values for the Genotropin group are represented by observed values.

    Time frame: Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, and Week 52

  5. Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Anti-hGH Binding Antibody Formation

    Number of participants with treatment emergent anti-hGH binding antibody formation during the 52 week study. All samples were negative for anti-hGH neutralizing antibodies.

    Time frame: Start of study treatment through Week 52

07

Results

Posted Jan 4, 2022

Participant flow

Pre-dosing Period
Participant flow — Pre-dosing Period
MilestoneLonapegsomatropinDaily hGH
Started10656
Completed10556
Not completed10
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject10
Treatment Period
Participant flow — Treatment Period
MilestoneLonapegsomatropinDaily hGH
Started10556
Completed10455
Not completed11
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject10
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up01

Outcome measures

PrimaryAnnualized Height Velocity at 52 Weeks for Weekly Lonapegsomatropin and Daily hGH Treatment Groups

Annualized height velocity (AHV) at 52 weeks for weekly lonapegsomatropin (TransCon hGH) and daily hGH treatment groups

Time frame:
52 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · cm/year
Annualized Height Velocity at 52 Weeks for Weekly Lonapegsomatropin and Daily hGH Treatment Groups
cm/yearLonapegsomatropinDaily hGH
Annualized Height Velocity at 52 Weeks for Weekly Lonapegsomatropin and Daily hGH Treatment Groups11.17 ± 0.2310.31 ± 0.30
Statistical analysis
  • Lonapegsomatropin vs Daily hGH · ANCOVA with multiple imputation · p = 0.0088 (P-value is based on a test of superiority)two-sided
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability]

Number of participants with Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events for the weekly lonapegsomatropin and daily hGH treatment groups

Time frame:
52 Weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability]
ParticipantsLonapegsomatropinDaily hGH
TEAEs8139
TEAEs related to study drug1210
SAEs11
SAEs related to study drug00
SecondaryAnnualized Height Velocity Over 52 Weeks for Weekly Lonapegsomatropin and Daily hGH Treatment Groups

Annualized height velocity (AHV) over 52 weeks for weekly lonapegsomatropin and daily hGH treatment groups. AHV by visit was determined by ANCOVA model with multiple imputation. For each imputed data set, an ANCOVA model with by visit AHV as the dependent variable, treatment and gender as factors, baseline age, baseline peak GH levels (log transformed) at stimulation test, and baseline height SDS - average parental height SDS as covariates were fitted.

Time frame:
Week 5, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39 and Week 52
Reported as:
Least squares mean · cm/year
Annualized Height Velocity Over 52 Weeks for Weekly Lonapegsomatropin and Daily hGH Treatment Groups
cm/yearLonapegsomatropinDaily hGH
Week 513.54 ± 1.0712.83 ± 1.37
Week 1313.28 ± 0.4912.22 ± 0.63
Week 2612.65 ± 0.3211.21 ± 0.42
Week 3911.89 ± 0.2610.90 ± 0.33
Week 5211.17 ± 0.2310.31 ± 0.30
SecondaryChange in Height Standard Deviation Score Over 52 Weeks for the Weekly Lonapegsomatropin and Daily hGH Treatment Groups

Height Standard Deviation Score (SDS) is the number of standard deviations above or below the mean height for age and sex. Height SDS was derived using the LMS method as ((Height/M)\^L)-1)/(L x S), where M = median, S = generalized coefficient of variation, and L = power in the Box-Cox transformation, the M, S, L values were obtained from 2000 CDC growth charts for the United States. A Standard Deviation Score of 0 represents the population mean. A higher change from baseline in Height Standard Deviation Score (SDS) indicates a better outcome. The change from baseline in height SDS by visit was determined by ANCOVA model and included baseline age, peak GH levels (log transformed) at stimulation test and baseline height SDS as covariates, as well as treatment and gender as factors.

Time frame:
Week 5, Week 13, Week 26, Week 39 and Week 52
Reported as:
Least squares mean · standard deviation score
Change in Height Standard Deviation Score Over 52 Weeks for the Weekly Lonapegsomatropin and Daily hGH Treatment Groups
standard deviation scoreLonapegsomatropinDaily hGH
Week 50.13 ± 0.020.12 ± 0.02
Week 130.38 ± 0.020.33 ± 0.03
Week 260.68 ± 0.030.58 ± 0.04
Week 390.92 ± 0.030.80 ± 0.04
Week 521.10 ± 0.040.96 ± 0.05
SecondaryAverage IGF-1 Standard Deviation Score Over 52 Weeks for the Weekly Lonapegsomatropin and Daily hGH Treatment Groups

IGF-1 Standard Deviation Score (SDS) is the number of standard deviations above or below the mean Insulin-like Growth Factor 1 (IGF-1) level for age and sex. IGF-1 SDS was derived using the LMS method as ((IGF-1/M)\^L)-1)/(L x S), where M = median, S = generalized coefficient of variation, and L = power in the Box-Cox transformation, the M, S, L values were obtained from Bidlingmaier et al. (2014). A Standard Deviation Score of 0 represents the population mean. Average IGF-1 SDS by visit was determined by ANCOVA. The ANCOVA model included baseline age, peak GH levels (log transformed) at stimulation test, baseline IGF-1 SDS as covariates, as well as treatment and gender as factors. Modeled values begin at Week 13 corresponding with achievement of IGF-1 steady state. Average IGF-1 SDS values by visit for the Lonapegsomatropin group were derived from a population pharmacodynamic model; the average IGF-1 SDS values for the Genotropin group are represented by observed values.

Time frame:
Week 13, Week 26, Week 39, and Week 52
Reported as:
Least squares mean · standard deviation score
Average IGF-1 Standard Deviation Score Over 52 Weeks for the Weekly Lonapegsomatropin and Daily hGH Treatment Groups
standard deviation scoreLonapegsomatropinDaily hGH
Week 130.31 ± 0.09-0.60 ± 0.11
Week 260.46 ± 0.08-0.51 ± 0.10
Week 390.59 ± 0.09-0.30 ± 0.11
Week 520.72 ± 0.09-0.02 ± 0.12
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Anti-hGH Binding Antibody Formation

Number of participants with treatment emergent anti-hGH binding antibody formation during the 52 week study. All samples were negative for anti-hGH neutralizing antibodies.

Time frame:
Start of study treatment through Week 52
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Anti-hGH Binding Antibody Formation
ParticipantsLonapegsomatropinDaily hGH
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Anti-hGH Binding Antibody Formation62

Adverse events

Collected over From the first trial-related activity after the subject signed the informed consent until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period (up to week 52). Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Lonapegsomatropin0/105 (0%)1/105 (1%)81/105 (77.1%)
Daily hGH0/56 (0%)1/56 (1.8%)39/56 (69.6%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventLonapegsomatropinDaily hGH
ConcussionInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/1051/56
AppendicitisInfections and infestations1/1050/56
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventLonapegsomatropinDaily hGH
PharyngitisInfections and infestations10/10510/56
PyrexiaGeneral disorders16/1055/56
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations12/1058/56
HeadacheNervous system disorders13/1057/56
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders10/1054/56
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations6/1055/56
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders9/1053/56
Respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations7/1053/56
Secondary hypothyroidismEndocrine disorders7/1053/56
DiarrheaGastrointestinal disorders6/1053/56

Baseline characteristics

The Intention-to-Treat (ITT) population included all randomized subjects who had received at least 1 dose of active treatment.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)LonapegsomatropinDaily hGHTotal
Mean8.5 ± 2.78.5 ± 2.88.5 ± 2.7
Age, Customized
Age, Customized(Participants)LonapegsomatropinDaily hGHTotal
Age, Categorical — <6 years251439
Age, Categorical — ≥6 years8042122
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)LonapegsomatropinDaily hGHTotal
Female191029
Male8646132
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)LonapegsomatropinDaily hGHTotal
Race — Asian101
Race — Black or African American213
Race — White10052152
Race — Other235
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)LonapegsomatropinDaily hGHTotal
Ethnicity — Hispanic or Latino527
Ethnicity — Not Hispanic or Latino10054154
Height
Height(cm)LonapegsomatropinDaily hGHTotal
Mean112.93 ± 14.09112.15 ± 15.29112.66 ± 14.48
Height SDS
Height SDS(standard deviation score)LonapegsomatropinDaily hGHTotal
Mean-2.89 ± 0.85-3.00 ± 0.90-2.93 ± 0.87
Weight
Weight(kg)LonapegsomatropinDaily hGHTotal
Mean21.01 ± 6.5421.20 ± 6.6721.08 ± 6.56

3 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

53 sites
  • Ascendis Pharma Investigational Site
    Birmingham, Alabama 35233, United States
  • Ascendis Pharma Investigational Site
    Little Rock, Arkansas 72202, United States
  • Ascendis Pharma Investigational Site
    Los Angeles, California 90048, United States
  • Ascendis Pharma Investigational Site
    Orange, California 92868, United States
  • Ascendis Pharma Investigational Site
    Centennial, Colorado 80112, United States
  • Ascendis Pharma Investigational Site
    Jacksonville, Florida 32207, United States
  • Ascendis Pharma Investigational Site
    Orlando, Florida 32806, United States
  • Ascendis Pharma Investigational Site
    Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102, United States
  • Ascendis Pharma Investigational Site
    Jackson, Mississippi 39216, United States
  • Ascendis Pharma Investigational Site
    Lebanon, New Hampshire 03756, United States
  • Ascendis Pharma Investigational Site
    Mineola, New York 11501, United States
  • Ascendis Pharma Investigational Site
    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73104, United States
  • Ascendis Pharma Investigational Site
    Portland, Oregon 97239, United States
  • Ascendis Pharma Investigational Site
    Dallas, Texas 75235, United States
  • Ascendis Pharma Investigational Site
    Fort Worth, Texas 76104, United States
  • Ascendis Pharma Investigational Site
    Tacoma, Washington 98405, United States
  • Ascendis Pharma Investigational Site
    Yerevan, 0075, Armenia
  • Ascendis Pharma Investigational Site
    Clayton, 3168, Australia
  • Ascendis Pharma Investigational Site
    Minsk, 220020, Belarus
  • Ascendis Pharma Investigational Site
    Varna, 9010, Bulgaria
  • Ascendis Pharma Investigational Site
    Tbilisi, 0144, Georgia
  • Ascendis Pharma Investigational Site
    Tbilisi, 0159, Georgia
  • Ascendis Pharma Investigational Site
    Tbilisi, 0162, Georgia
  • Ascendis Pharma Investigational Site
    Athens, 11527, Greece
  • Ascendis Pharma Investigational Site
    Milan, 20157, Italy
  • Ascendis Pharma Investigational Site
    Roma, 00165, Italy
  • Ascendis Pharma Investigational Site
    Grafton, 1023, New Zealand
  • Ascendis Pharma Investigatonal Site
    Gdansk, 80-952, Poland
  • Ascendis Pharma Investigational Site
    Warsaw, 02-691, Poland
  • Ascendis Pharma Investigational Site
    Iași, 700111, Romania
  • Ascendis Pharma Investigational Site
    Izhevsk, 426009, Russia
  • Ascendis Pharma Investigational Site
    Kazan', 420138, Russia
  • Ascendis Pharma Investigational Site
    Krasnoyarsk, 620022, Russia
  • Ascendis Pharma Investigational Site
    Moscow, 125373, Russia
  • Ascendis Pharma Investigational Site
    Moscow, 127994, Russia
  • Ascendis Pharma Investigational Site
    Nizhny Novgorod, 603136, Russia
  • Ascendis Pharma Investigational Site
    Novosibirsk, 630048, Russia
  • Ascendis Pharma Investigational Site
    Omsk, 644001, Russia
  • Ascendis Pharma Investigational Site
    Saint Petersburg, 191144, Russia
  • Ascendis Pharma Investigational Site
    Saint Petersburg, 194100, Russia
  • Ascendis Pharma Investigational Site
    Samara, 443079, Russia
  • Ascendis Pharma Investigational Site
    Saratov, 410054, Russia
  • Ascendis Pharma Investigational Site
    Tomsk, 634050, Russia
  • Ascendis Pharma Investigational Site
    Ufa, 450008, Russia
  • Ascendis Pharma Investigational Site
    Vologda, 160022, Russia
  • Ascendis Pharma Investigational Site
    Voronezh, 394024, Russia
  • Ascendis Pharma Investigational Site
    Izmir, 35100, Turkey (Türkiye)
  • Ascendis Pharma Investigational Site
    Melikgazi, 38039, Turkey (Türkiye)
  • Ascendis Pharma Investigational Site
    Trabzon, 61080, Turkey (Türkiye)
  • Ascendis Pharma Investigational Site
    Kharkiv, 61093, Ukraine
  • Ascendis Pharma Investigational Site
    Kyiv, 01021, Ukraine
  • Ascendis Pharma Investigational Site
    Kyiv, 04114, Ukraine
  • Ascendis Pharma Investigational Site
    Odesa, 65031, Ukraine
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Thornton PS, Maniatis AK, Aghajanova E, Chertok E, Vlachopapadopoulou E, Lin Z, Song W, Christoffersen ED, Breinholt VM, Kovalenko T, Giorgadze E, Korpal-Szczyrska M, Hofman PL, Karpf DB, Shu AD, Beckert M. Weekly Lonapegsomatropin in Treatment-Naive Children With Growth Hormone Deficiency: The Phase 3 heiGHt Trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2021 Oct 21;106(11):3184-3195. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgab529. PubMed 34272849 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Dec 2016 to primary completion in Jan 2019, 25 months.

Results were first posted in Jan 2022, 2 years 11 months after primary completion. A results delay was requested in Dec 2019.

Of 19 phase 3 interventional studies under Dwarfism, Pituitary, half reached primary completion within 24 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 18 and three quarters within 30. This study's 25 months is close to that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 19, 2016
First posted
May 24, 2016
StartActual
Dec 13, 2016
Primary completionActual
Jan 17, 2019
CompletionActual
Jan 17, 2019
Results delay requested
Dec 17, 2019
Results first posted
Jan 4, 2022
Last update
Jul 7, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 7, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02781727
Lead sponsor
Ascendis Pharma Endocrinology Division A/S
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 24, 2016
Start date
Dec 13, 2016
Primary completion
Jan 17, 2019
Completion
Jan 17, 2019
Results posted
Jan 4, 2022
Last update
Jul 7, 2026

Study contacts

Study Director, MD
study director · Ascendis Pharma A/S

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion