CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02777749Updated Mar 20, 2019Results posted

Adductor Canal Block Versus Periarticular Bupivicaine Injection in Total Knee Arthroplasty

A Phase 4 interventional study of Bupivacaine in Osteoarthritis, sponsored by Columbia University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-03-20.

Sponsored by Columbia University · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
155
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The objective of the study is to compare the efficacy of adductor canal blocks versus periarticular bupivacaine injections for pain management in total knee arthroplasty. This randomized clinical trial will compare outcomes between adductor canal blocks, periarticular bupivacaine injections, and periarticular liposomal bupivacaine injections. Results from this study will help determine the most appropriate perioperative pain management strategy for patients undergoing a total knee arthroplasty.

Read the detailed description

Over 600,000 total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) are performed each year in the United States, with expectations for greater than 4 million/year by the year 2030. Since the onset of TKAs in the 1960's, there have been developments that have improved both functionality and patient satisfaction. In the last decade, a focus has been made on multimodal pain management protocols, more rapid functional recovery, reduced length of hospital stay, and minimizing side effects of treatment while maintaining function and durability. The widespread use of regional anesthesia has led to improvements in pain control, more rapid functional recovery, and reduced length of stay. In recent years many surgeons have transitioned from femoral nerve blocks (proximal femoral nerve) to adductor canal blocks (distal femoral nerve) to maintain a sensory block for pain control, while minimizing any motor blockade that is typically seen in proximal femoral nerve blocks, which would hamper rehabilitation, and increase risk of falls. In addition to regional blocks, which are typically performed in the preoperative setting, some surgeons favor an intraoperative periarticular anesthetic injection (PAI), typically with bupivacaine or the long acting form liposomal bupivacaine, either in conjunction with an adductor canal block, or independently. In theory, PAI has the advantage of a comparable sensory nerve block as an adductor canal block, without the disadvantages and risks, which include prolonged quadriceps weakness, fall risk, and neurologic dysfunction.

The purpose of this randomized control trial is to compare the efficacy of adductor canal blocks versus periarticular bupivacaine injections for pain management in total knee arthroplasty.

02

Conditions studied

  • Osteoarthritis

Browse trials for

03

In context

Osteoarthritis

4,398 studies on the registry are indexed under Osteoarthritis; 582 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 155 is above the median of 70 across 3,440 interventional studies indexed under Osteoarthritis.

Browse Osteoarthritis studies →

Lead sponsor

Columbia University is the lead sponsor of 1,103 studies on the registry; 193 are open to participants now.

Of its 172 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 142 (83%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients undergoing an unilateral primary total knee arthroplasty under the care of the two senior arthroplasty surgeons.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Allergy to bupivicaine or liposomal bupivicaine.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Care provider)
Enrollment
155 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Adductor Canal Block

    15 cc's of 0.5% bupivacaine preoperatively administered by the regional pain anesthesia team in the pre-operative block area, just prior to surgery. Adductor Canal Block (ACB)

    Drug: Bupivacaine

  • Active comparator
    Periarticular SB

    50 cc's of 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected intraoperatively, just prior to wound closure, by the performing surgeon.

    Drug: Bupivacaine

  • Active comparator
    ACB + SB

    15 cc's of 0.5% bupivacaine preoperatively administered by the regional pain anesthesia team in the pre-operative block area, just prior to surgery. 50 cc's of 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected intraoperatively, just prior to wound closure, by the performing surgeon.

    Drug: Bupivacaine

Interventions

  • DrugBupivacaine

    15 cc's of 0.5% bupivacaine or 50 cc's of 0.25% short-acting bupivacaine (SB), intramuscular injection

    Also known as: Bupivacaine Hydrochloride, Marcaine

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in VAS Pain Scores

    Post-operatively, visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores will be recorded two times/day from Post-Operative Day (POD) 0 through POD3. VAS Scores range from 0 to 10, with 0 being "No Pain" and 10 being the "Worst Pain"

    Time frame: Day 0 through Day 3

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Activity Level

    Daily steps taken will be recorded. The more steps taken daily the better. Minimum is 0 steps, maximum is unlimited.

    Time frame: Day 0 and Day 1

  2. Opioid Consumption

    Total amount of opioid consumption post-operatively will be recorded. The less opioids consumed (mg) postoperatively the better. A morphine equivalence metric will be used for equianalgesic comparison. Minimum is 0 mg, maximum is unlimited.

    Time frame: Day 0 through Day 3

  3. Range of Knee Flexion

    Range of knee flexion for active motion will be recorded at 3 week follow-up for all groups. The greater range of motion the better, with a good outcome considered at least 115 degrees of motion.

    Time frame: Postoperative day 21

  4. Length of Hospital Stay

    Total length of hospital stay from time of surgery through time of discharge will be recorded. The shorter the length of stay (days) the better. Range 0 days to 5 days.

    Time frame: Up to Day 5

07

Results

Posted Mar 20, 2019

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneAdductor Canal BlockPeriarticular SBACB + SB
Started535151
Completed535151
Not completed000

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in VAS Pain Scores

Post-operatively, visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores will be recorded two times/day from Post-Operative Day (POD) 0 through POD3. VAS Scores range from 0 to 10, with 0 being "No Pain" and 10 being the "Worst Pain"

Time frame:
Day 0 through Day 3
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Change in VAS Pain Scores
scores on a scaleAdductor Canal BlockPeriarticular SBACB + SB
Day 03.0 ± 2.93.0 ± 3.02.7 ± 2.6
Day 13.9 ± 2.33.8 ± 2.43.0 ± 2.1
Day 24.1 ± 2.53.8 ± 2.43.3 ± 2.5
Day 34.2 ± 3.13.0 ± 2.82.0 ± 2.0
SecondaryChange in Activity Level

Daily steps taken will be recorded. The more steps taken daily the better. Minimum is 0 steps, maximum is unlimited.

Time frame:
Day 0 and Day 1
Reported as:
Mean · steps
Change in Activity Level
stepsAdductor Canal BlockPeriarticular SBACB + SB
Day 026 ± 3368 ± 6365 ± 50
Day 1124 ± 117120 ± 117139 ± 118
SecondaryOpioid Consumption

Total amount of opioid consumption post-operatively will be recorded. The less opioids consumed (mg) postoperatively the better. A morphine equivalence metric will be used for equianalgesic comparison. Minimum is 0 mg, maximum is unlimited.

Time frame:
Day 0 through Day 3
Reported as:
Mean · morphine equivalents
Opioid Consumption
morphine equivalentsAdductor Canal BlockPeriarticular SBACB + SB
Combined (POD0 through POD3)131 ± 74100 ± 6298 ± 62
POD033 ± 1531 ± 1835 ± 21
POD148 ± 2542 ± 3140 ± 30
POD235 ± 2920 ± 2218 ± 21
POD313 ± 235.5 ± 164.3 ± 9
SecondaryRange of Knee Flexion

Range of knee flexion for active motion will be recorded at 3 week follow-up for all groups. The greater range of motion the better, with a good outcome considered at least 115 degrees of motion.

Time frame:
Postoperative day 21
Reported as:
Mean · degrees
Range of Knee Flexion
degreesAdductor Canal BlockPeriarticular SBACB + SB
Range of Knee Flexion99 ± 15104 ± 12101 ± 16
SecondaryLength of Hospital Stay

Total length of hospital stay from time of surgery through time of discharge will be recorded. The shorter the length of stay (days) the better. Range 0 days to 5 days.

Time frame:
Up to Day 5
Reported as:
Mean · days
Length of Hospital Stay
daysAdductor Canal BlockPeriarticular SBACB + SB
Length of Hospital Stay2.9 ± 1.52.5 ± 1.22.5 ± 2.1

Adverse events

Collected over postoperative day 0 through post-operative day 21.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Adductor Canal Block0/53 (0%)0/53 (0%)0/53 (0%)
Periarticular SB0/51 (0%)0/51 (0%)0/51 (0%)
ACB + SB0/51 (0%)0/51 (0%)0/51 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Adductor Canal BlockPeriarticular SBACB + SBTotal
<=18 years0000
Between 18 and 65 years1491336
>=65 years394238119
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Adductor Canal BlockPeriarticular SBACB + SBTotal
Mean69 ± 1073 ± 1071 ± 1071 ± 10
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Adductor Canal BlockPeriarticular SBACB + SBTotal
Female383337108
Male15181447
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Adductor Canal BlockPeriarticular SBACB + SBTotal
Count of participants———0
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Columbia University Medical Center
    New York, New York 10032, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Cram P, Lu X, Kates SL, Singh JA, Li Y, Wolf BR. Total knee arthroplasty volume, utilization, and outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries, 1991-2010. JAMA. 2012 Sep 26;308(12):1227-36. doi: 10.1001/2012.jama.11153. PubMed 23011713 ↗
  • Berend ME, Berend KR, Lombardi AV Jr. Advances in pain management: game changers in knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J. 2014 Nov;96-B(11 Supple A):7-9. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B11.34514. PubMed 25381400 ↗
  • Paul JE, Arya A, Hurlburt L, Cheng J, Thabane L, Tidy A, Murthy Y. Femoral nerve block improves analgesia outcomes after total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Anesthesiology. 2010 Nov;113(5):1144-62. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181f4b18. PubMed 20966667 ↗
  • Grevstad U, Mathiesen O, Valentiner LS, Jaeger P, Hilsted KL, Dahl JB. Effect of adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block on quadriceps strength, mobilization, and pain after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, blinded study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Jan-Feb;40(1):3-10. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000169. PubMed 25376972 ↗
  • Wang C, Cai XZ, Yan SG. Comparison of Periarticular Multimodal Drug Injection and Femoral Nerve Block for Postoperative Pain Management in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2015 Jul;30(7):1281-6. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.02.005. Epub 2015 Feb 20. PubMed 25735501 ↗
  • Schroer WC, Diesfeld PG, LeMarr AR, Morton DJ, Reedy ME. Does Extended-Release Liposomal Bupivacaine Better Control Pain Than Bupivacaine After Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA)? A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial. J Arthroplasty. 2015 Sep;30(9 Suppl):64-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.01.059. Epub 2015 Jun 3. PubMed 26117072 ↗
  • Berry J. Audience response-practice norm/trends. 22nd Annual Meeting of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons. American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons. November 2012.

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jul 1, 2016

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 20, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02777749
Lead sponsor
Columbia University
Responsible party
Jeffrey Geller (Associate Professor of Orthopedic Surgery at the Columbia University Medical Center, Columbia University) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 19, 2016
Start date
Jul 19, 2016
Primary completion
Sep 19, 2017
Completion
Nov 1, 2017
Results posted
Mar 20, 2019
Last update
Mar 20, 2019

Study contacts

Jeffrey Geller, MD
principal investigator · Columbia University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion