ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02769585Updated May 13, 2016

Efficacy of Self-hypnosis for Weight Loss in Type 2 Diabetics

An interventional study of Self-hypnosis and CDE training in Obesity, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 and Weight Reduction, sponsored by Levenson, David I., M.D.. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-05-13.

Sponsored by Levenson, David I., M.D. · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
74
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Randomized study evaluating self-hypnosis versus certified diabetes educator training for weight loss in type 2 diabetics.

Read the detailed description

Study Subjects: Approximately 74 type II diabetics will be randomized. Key inclusion criteria: overweight (BMI≥25), motivated to lose weight, and are at least 18 years of age.

Key exclusion criteria: pregnant women or women of childbearing age, currently taking medications for weight loss, enrolled in another clinical trial, or planning on having bariatric surgery. Any patient who is taking medication prescribed by a physician for depression, anxiety, or any other psychiatric disorder will be excluded. Patients on glucocorticoids in excess of Prednisone 7.5 mg or equivalent will also be excluded.

Study Design: All patients who pass screening will be administered the IPQ Test®[6]. This test stratifies patients on how they use their imagination, an important factor necessary to reach their goals. This is predictive of their potential to "persist" toward agreed upon goals. Patients will be divided into groups as follows: (Raw score 49-96 = high responders; Raw score 0-48 = Low responders).

Ultimately, subjects will be divided into four groups: The assignment of "high" versus "low" responders will be based on the results of the IPQ® test. Subjects will then be randomly assigned to intervention versus control in a 1:1 fashion. Optimally, there should be equal numbers in each group; however, the group sizes may be unequal depending on the relative proportions of high versus low responders. The four groups will be as follows:

Group I (high responders) will receive self-hypnosis using the GIFT™ (Goal Image Focusing Technique)[7] as the main means of autosuggestion and self/group motivation to lose weight.

Group II (low responders) will receive self-hypnosis (without the GIFT™ system) and self/group motivation to lose weight.

Group III (high responders) will receive standard nutrition, diet, and exercise counseling by a CDE (Certified Diabetes Educator) to serve as a control group for Group I.

Group IV (low responders) will receive standard nutrition, diet, and exercise counseling by a CDE (Certified Diabetes Educator) to serve as a control for group II.

02

Conditions studied

  • Obesity
  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
  • Weight Reduction

Keywords

  • Obesity
  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
  • weight reduction
03

In context

Obesity

6,578 studies on the registry are indexed under Obesity; 1,718 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 74 is close to the median of 77 across 5,084 interventional studies indexed under Obesity.

Browse Obesity studies →

Lead sponsor

Levenson, David I., M.D. is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes
  • BMI greater than 25

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnant women of of childbearing age
  • currently taking weight loss medications
  • enrolled in another clinical trial
  • currently taking medications for depression or anxiety
  • currently taking Prednisone >7.5 mg day
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
74 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Self-hypnosis

    Subjects underwent two group sessions one week apart with a certified hypnotherapist to teach them the process of self-hypnosis for the purpose of attaining weight loss. Subjects were asked to perform self-hypnosis once or twice a day for the duration of the one year trial.

    Behavioral: Self-hypnosis

  • Active comparator
    CDE training

    Subjects underwent two group sessions one week apart with a certified diabetes educator to teach them re: diet and nutrition specifically as regards to a diabetic striving to lose weight. Subjects were asked to remain compliant with dietary restrictions for the duration of the one year trial.

    Behavioral: CDE training

Interventions

  • BehavioralSelf-hypnosis

    Self-hypnosis

  • BehavioralCDE training

    standard CDE training for an obese diabetic

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in weight (BMI)

    Comparison of subject's weight (BMI) from screening visit to last study visit.

    Time frame: one year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Waist circumference

    change in waist circumference from screening visit to last study date

    Time frame: One year

  2. hemoglobin A1c

    change in Hgb A1c from screening to last study visit

    Time frame: one year

  3. fasting glucose

    change in fasting glucose from screening visit to last study visit

    Time frame: one year

  4. High versus low imagery

    Comparison of subjects who scored high (\>=48) or low (\<= 47) on the IPQ questionnaire which was administered at the screening visit to all subjects. IPQ test can be found here Harte, Richard and Coller, Alan R. The Harte Coller IPQ® Inventory, Experimental Form E, New York/ The Harte Center for Hypnosis, 1986.

    Time frame: one year

  5. Compliance

    Assess whether self-reported adherence with the treatment (self-hypnosis or CDE) influenced degree of weight loss

    Time frame: one year

  6. Reproducibility of IPQ

    Compare results of IPQ test administered at screening with identical test administered at final study visit one year later. To assess how many subjects changed categorization between high (\>=48) or low (\<=47) responders. Information on IPQ can be found here: Harte, Richard and Coller, Alan R. The Harte Coller IPQ® Inventory, Experimental Form E, New York/ The Harte Center for Hypnosis, 1986.

    Time frame: one year

  7. Degree of weight loss in obese versus overweight

    Determine if starting BMI influenced degree of weight loss.

    Time frame: one year

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — If the need arises we are happy to share data (blinded)

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Jul 2013, a primary completion of Apr 2015 and a completion of Apr 2015. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 8, 2016
First posted
May 11, 2016
Start
Jul 2013
Primary completionActual
Apr 2015
CompletionActual
Apr 2015
Last update
May 13, 2016
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 13, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02769585
Lead sponsor
Levenson, David I., M.D.
Responsible party
David I. Levenson, MD (PI, Levenson, David I., M.D.) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 11, 2016
Start date
Jul 2013
Primary completion
Apr 2015
Completion
Apr 2015
Last update
May 13, 2016

Study contacts

David I Levenson, MD
principal investigator · East Coast Medical Associates

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion