ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02755610CLIP-SPUpdated Oct 5, 2026

Check List to Improve Patient Self-care and Product Defect Report in Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis

An interventional study of PD Product Check List in End-Stage Kidney Disease and Peritonitis, sponsored by Chulalongkorn University. Completed at 1 site in Thailand. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-05.

Sponsored by Chulalongkorn University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Updated Oct 5, 2026Now CompletedPrimary completion movedGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
880
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Peritoneal Dialysis (PD) has been the main method of treatment for Thai End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) patients under the "PD First" policy of the Universal Coverage (UC) scheme. The increased demand has resulted in not only supply chain logistical problems, but also product quality concerns. Peritonitis, the main complication and checklist cause of failure in Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis (CAPD) patients, could be caused by a product defect. This cluster randomized trial will be conducted in 22 randomly selected PD centers in Thailand to assess if a checklist intervention could reduce peritonitis rate and increase the number of checklist product defect report.

Read the detailed description

Peritoneal Dialysis (PD) has been the main method of treatment for Thai End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) patients under the "PD First" policy of the Universal Coverage (UC) scheme. The increased demand has resulted in not only supply chain logistical problems, but also product quality concerns. Peritonitis, the main complication and main cause of failure in CAPD patients, could be caused by a product defect.

PD Product Check List was developed based on the 28 routine steps of standard orientation manual for new Thai PD patients. Of these, step 2 (weighting the PD solution bag), step 3 (checking expiration date, volume, glucose concentration, clarity, and color, step 27 (weighting the PD solution bag), and step 28 (recording time, volume, and any abnormality encountered) are relevant to product defect report.

This cluster randomized trial will be conducted in 22 PD centers (anticipated 20-25 prevalent and 10-15 incidence PD cases per center) to answer the primary research question: is the checklist intervention effective in reducing peritonitis rate? The secondary research questions will also be considered: does the checklist help increase the number of product defect report?

Peritonitis incidence rate is the primary outcome, defined based on the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis (ISPD) 2010 recommendation. Product defect incidence is the secondary outcome, measured by a number of incidence of product defect reported by the patients. Given no standard definition, a PD solution product will be considered defective if it is expired on the day of use, incorrect glucose concentration, abnormal clarity or color, physical abnormality of the box and/or the bag, or loose connector.

Because of the nature of the intervention, blinding is not possible. Cluster randomization will be performed to allocate 11 PD centers to the study group and the other 11 PD centers to control group. While all subjects will receive standard PD care, subjects in the study group will also receive the checklist plus a 30-minute orientation of how to use the checklist.

02

Conditions studied

  • End-Stage Kidney Disease
  • Peritonitis

Keywords

  • Peritoneal Dialysis
  • Checklist
03

In context

Kidney Failure, Chronic

2,108 studies on the registry are indexed under Kidney Failure, Chronic; 273 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 880 is above the median of 57 across 1,569 interventional studies indexed under Kidney Failure, Chronic.

Browse Kidney Failure, Chronic studies →

Lead sponsor

Chulalongkorn University is the lead sponsor of 322 studies on the registry; 66 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • ESRD patients who start peritoneal dialysis not longer than one month and participate in PDOPPS study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ESRD patients who receive only hemodialysis
  • ESRD patients who receive emergency peritoneal dialysis
  • Illiterate ESRD patients or their caregivers
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
880 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    PD Product Check List

    PD Product Check List was developed based on the 28 routine steps of standard orientation manual for new Thai PD patients. Of these, step 2 (weighting the PD solution bag), step 3 (checking expiration date, volume, glucose concentration, clarity, and color, step 27 (weighting the PD solution bag), and step 28 (recording time, volume, and any abnormality encountered) are relevant to product defect report.

    Other: PD Product Check List

  • No intervention
    Control

    Standard care

Interventions

  • OtherPD Product Check List

    PD Product Check List was developed based on the 28 routine steps of standard orientation manual for new Thai PD patients. Of these, step 2 (weighting the PD solution bag), step 3 (checking expiration date, volume, glucose concentration, clarity, and color, step 27 (weighting the PD solution bag), and step 28 (recording time, volume, and any abnormality encountered) are relevant to product defect report.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Peritonitis Incidence Rate

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Product Defect Incidence

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University
    Bangkok, 10330, Thailand
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Dhanakijcharoen P, Sirivongs D, Aruyapitipan S, Chuengsaman P, Lumpaopong A. The "PD First" policy in Thailand: three-years experiences (2008-2011). J Med Assoc Thai. 2011 Sep;94 Suppl 4:S153-61. PubMed 22043584 ↗
  • Praditpornsilpa K, Lekhyananda S, Premasathian N, Kingwatanakul P, Lumpaopong A, Gojaseni P, Sakulsaengprapha A, Prasithsirikul W, Phakdeekitcharoen B, Lelamali K, Teepprasan T, Aumanaphong C, Leerawat B, Pongpiyadej J, Srangsomvong S, Kanjanabuch T, Eiam-Ong S, Vareesaengthip K, Lumlertkul D. Prevalence trend of renal replacement therapy in Thailand: impact of health economics policy. J Med Assoc Thai. 2011 Sep;94 Suppl 4:S1-6. PubMed 22043559 ↗
  • Liu FX, Gao X, Inglese G, Chuengsaman P, Pecoits-Filho R, Yu A. A Global Overview of the Impact of Peritoneal Dialysis First or Favored Policies: An Opinion. Perit Dial Int. 2015 Jul-Aug;35(4):406-20. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2013.00204. Epub 2014 Jul 31. PubMed 25082840 ↗
  • Wong HS, Ong LM, Lim TO, Hooi LS, Morad Z, Ghazalli R, Shaariah W, Lim YN, Ahmad G, Goh BL, Liaw L, Pee S, Lee ML. A randomized, multicenter, open-label trial to determine peritonitis rate, product defect, and technique survival between ANDY-Disc and UltraBag in patients on CAPD. Am J Kidney Dis. 2006 Sep;48(3):464-72. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2006.05.008. PubMed 16931220 ↗
  • Kanjanabuch T, Chancharoenthana W, Katavetin P, Sritippayawan S, Praditpornsilpa K, Ariyapitipan S, Eiam-Ong S, Dhanakijcharoen P, Lumlertgul D. The incidence of peritoneal dialysis-related infection in Thailand: a nationwide survey. J Med Assoc Thai. 2011 Sep;94 Suppl 4:S7-12. PubMed 22043560 ↗
  • Amornnimit W, Pongpirul K, Sampatanukul P, Tungsanga K, Tosukhowong P, Kanjanabuch T. Black-stained peritoneal dialysis tubing: a national survey. Perit Dial Int. 2013 Nov-Dec;33(6):704-7. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2012.00167. No abstract available. PubMed 24335129 ↗
  • Pongpirul K, Pongpirul WA, Kanjanabuch T. Potential causes of black-stained peritoneal dialysis tubing: an analysis from nurse practitioner's prospect. BMC Res Notes. 2014 Jul 6;7:434. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-434. PubMed 24997794 ↗
  • Treamtrakanpon W, Katavetin P, Yimsangyad K, Keawsinark P, Sanganunttakan S, Pandon S, Buddeewong D, Prakot A, Khumsupo C, Thamsutee N, Yaibuaiam R, Khumwong S, Towannang P, Theerasin Y, Mahatnan N, Eiam-Ong S, Kanjanabuch T. From the "PD First" policy to the innovation in PD care. J Med Assoc Thai. 2011 Sep;94 Suppl 4:S13-8. PubMed 22043561 ↗
  • Bernardini J, Price V, Figueiredo A; International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis (ISPD) Nursing Liaison Committee. Peritoneal dialysis patient training, 2006. Perit Dial Int. 2006 Nov-Dec;26(6):625-32. No abstract available. PubMed 17047225 ↗
  • Perl J, Davies SJ, Lambie M, Pisoni RL, McCullough K, Johnson DW, Sloand JA, Prichard S, Kawanishi H, Tentori F, Robinson BM. The Peritoneal Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (PDOPPS): Unifying Efforts to Inform Practice and Improve Global Outcomes in Peritoneal Dialysis. Perit Dial Int. 2016 May-Jun;36(3):297-307. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2014.00288. Epub 2015 Nov 2. PubMed 26526049 ↗
  • Li PK, Szeto CC, Piraino B, Bernardini J, Figueiredo AE, Gupta A, Johnson DW, Kuijper EJ, Lye WC, Salzer W, Schaefer F, Struijk DG; International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis. Peritoneal dialysis-related infections recommendations: 2010 update. Perit Dial Int. 2010 Jul-Aug;30(4):393-423. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2010.00049. No abstract available. PubMed 20628102 ↗
  • Vonesh EF. Modelling peritonitis rates and associated risk factors for individuals on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Stat Med. 1990 Mar;9(3):263-71. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780090309. PubMed 2188325 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedDate before it movedWhere the date was before it movedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from May 2016 to primary completion in May 2017, 12 months.

Of 347 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Kidney Failure, Chronic, half reached primary completion within 23 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 47. This study's 12 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 425 studies reached it within 23 months; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 46.

Primary completion moved once since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026: May 2024 → May 2017, on Oct 5, 2026.

Earlier changes are on the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 9, 2016
First posted
Apr 29, 2016
StartActual
May 2, 2016
Primary completionActual
May 2017was May 2024
CompletionActual
May 2024
Last update
Oct 5, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Status
Active, not recruiting→Completed
changed Oct 5, 2026
Primary completion
May 2024→May 2017 (actual)
Oct 5, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 5, 2026
    Active, not recruiting→Completed
    Primary completion May 2024→May 2017 (now actual)
    + 3 other changes: verification date, references and index terms

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02755610
Collaborators
National Research Council of Thailand
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 29, 2016
Start date
May 2, 2016
Primary completion
May 2017
Completion
May 2024
Last update
Oct 5, 2026

Study contacts

Krit Pongpirul, MD,MPH,PhD.
principal investigator · Chulalongkorn University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion