CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02740413Updated Jul 16, 2025Results posted

Treatment Patterns And Outcomes In Patients Treated With Benefix Or Refacto/Refacto AF - A Swedish Cohort Study

An observational study in Hemophilia A and Hemophilia B, sponsored by Pfizer. Completed. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-07-16.

Sponsored by Pfizer · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
86
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The overall aim of the study is to describe demographic and clinical characteristics, treatment patterns and outcomes, in the populations of hemophilia patients treated with BeneFIX and ReFacto/ReFacto AF in Sweden

Read the detailed description

The overall aim of the study is to describe demographic and clinical characteristics, treatment patterns and outcomes, as well as the related direct treatment costs in the populations of hemophilia patients treated with BeneFIX and ReFacto/ReFacto AF, and in subgroups (e.g. level of severity) at the MHC in Sweden.

The study population will consist of all patients diagnosed with haemophilia (D66.9 (haemophilia A) D67.9 (haemophilia B) in International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD-10) that have been registered in the MHR since 1977 and that have had at least one registered prescription of BeneFIX or ReFacto/ReFacto AF in the MHR since market authorization of the respective product (Benefix August 27 1997, ReFacto April 13 1999, ReFacto AF July 1 2009). Diseased individuals are included. Information on drugs picked up at the pharmacy is available in the Prescribed Drug Register from 2005.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hemophilia A
  • Hemophilia B
03

In context

Hemophilia A

866 studies on the registry are indexed under Hemophilia A; 137 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 86 is close to the median of 80 across 314 observational studies indexed under Hemophilia A.

Browse Hemophilia A studies →

Lead sponsor

Pfizer is the lead sponsor of 3,244 studies on the registry; 139 are open to participants now.

Of its 582 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 381 (65%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

The study population will consist of all patients diagnosed with hemophilia (D66.9 (hemophilia A) D67.9 (hemophilia B) in International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD-10) that have been registered in the Malmö Hemophilia Register since 1977 and that have had at least one registered prescription of BeneFIX or ReFacto/ReFacto AF in the MHR since market authorization of the respective product (Benefix August 27 1997, ReFacto April 13 1999, ReFacto AF July 1 2009). Diseased individuals are included.

Inclusion criteria

  • The study population will consist of all patients diagnosed with hemophilia (D66.9 (hemophilia A) D67.9 (hemophilia B) in International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD-10) that have been registered in the Malmö Hemophilia Register since 1977 and that have had at least one registered prescription of BeneFIX or ReFacto/ReFacto AF in the MHR since market authorization of the respective product

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No exclusion criteria in this study
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
86 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Patients with Haemophilia A

    Patients in The MHR diagnosed with Haemophilia A

  • Patients with Haemophilia B

    Patients in The MHR diagnosed with Haemophilia B

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Age of Participants at Disease Diagnosis

    Time frame: At disease diagnosis within 11 years before the study start date (Day 1)

  2. Age of Participants at Start of Treatment With Benefix or Refacto

    Time frame: At start of treatment with Benefix/Refacto within 11 years before the study start date (Day 1)

  3. Age of Participants at Start of Replacement Treatment

    Participants diagnosed with coagulation disorders received intravenous replacement treatment of the missing coagulation factor. Replacement treatment could be given prophylactically or to stop the bleed and/or to stop it from becoming more severe.

    Time frame: At start of replacement treatment within 11 years before the study start date (Day 1)

  4. Average Prescribed Dose Per Infusion for Factor VIII and Factor IX Concentrates

    Participants diagnosed with coagulation disorders received intravenous replacement treatment of the missing coagulation factor (Factor VIII or IX). Data was measured in international units (IU) for factor VIII and factor IX concentrates.

    Time frame: For the duration of 11 years before the study start date (Day 1)

  5. Average Prescribed Dose Per Kilogram Bodyweight for Factor VIII and Factor IX Concentrates

    The average dose per kilogram body weight of factor VIII and IX was defined as a set of two derived variables from the MHR based on information on prescribed replacement treatment (Benefix or Refacto/Refacto AF): prescribed dose per infusion divided by registered body weight (all participants) and prescribed dose per week (prescribed dose per infusion multiplied by registered number of infusions per week) divided by registered body weight (only participants on prophylaxis).

    Time frame: For the duration of 11 years before the study start date (Day 1)

  6. Percentage of Participants on Prophylactic Treatment

    Prophylactic treatment was defined as administration of drug regularly to reduce the insufficiency of coagulation factor to prevent bleeding to occur.

    Time frame: For the duration of 11 years before the study start date (Day 1)

  7. Average Prescribed Frequency of Infusions Per Week Dispensed for Haemophilia A or B Participants With Prophylaxis

    Time frame: For the duration of 11 years before the study start date (Day 1)

  8. Average Prescribed Annual Dose of Factor VIII and IX Concentrates for Participants on Prophylaxis

    Participants diagnosed with coagulation disorders received intravenous replacement treatment of the missing coagulation factor (Factor VIII or IX). Prescribed annual dose of factor concentrate was derived from the MHR registration of prescribed annual dose of factor concentrate.

    Time frame: For the duration of 11 years before the study start date (Day 1)

  9. Average Prescribed Annual Dose of Factor VIII and IX Concentrates Per Kilogram Bodyweight for Participants on Prophylaxis

    Participants diagnosed with coagulation disorders received intravenous replacement treatment of the missing coagulation factor (Factor VIII or IX). Prescribed annual dose of factor concentrate per kilogram body weight was derived from the MHR registration of prescribed annual dose of factor concentrate and the registered body weight.

    Time frame: For the duration of 11 years before the study start date (Day 1)

  10. Average Annual Registered Consumption of Factor VIII and IX Concentrates

    Participants diagnosed with coagulation disorders received intravenous replacement treatment of the missing coagulation factor (Factor VIII or IX). Average annual registered consumption of factor VIII and IX concentrates was defined as MHR registered participant's reports on factor concentrate consumption during calendar year.

    Time frame: For the duration of 11 years before the study start date (Day 1)

  11. Number of Participants With Consumption of Factor VIII, Factor IX, Factor rVIIa and/or aPCC Concentrate

    Participants who develop inhibitors to factor VIII or IX concentrates were treated with bypassing agents in the form of activated prothrombin complex concentrate (aPCC) which was measured in units (U) and/or recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) measured in micrograms (mcg).

    Time frame: For the duration of 11 years before the study start date (Day 1)

  12. Percentage of Time on Refacto or Benefix

    Percentage of time (in days) on Refacto/Refacto AF or Benefix was calculated as total number of days when participant was prescribed Refacto/Refacto AF or Benefix over the total number of days on any replacement treatment. Total number of days on any replacement treatment was derived from date of start of replacement treatment according to MHR and August 31, 2015 or date of death, whichever was earliest.

    Time frame: For the duration of 11 years before the study start date (Day 1)

  13. Average Use of Factor Concentrate Per Surgery Event at Hospital for Invasive Procedures

    Time frame: For the duration of 11 years before the study start date (Day 1)

  14. Average Factor Concentrate Use at Hospital for Invasive Procedures

    Average factor concentrate use was calculated as percentage of total annual use of factor concentrates (in IU) at hospital for invasive procedures.

    Time frame: For the duration of 11 years before the study start date (Day 1)

  15. Average Annual Number of Filled Prescriptions of Factor Concentrate

    Data at end of every year was based on the number of filled prescriptions during the last 3 years.

    Time frame: For a duration of 3 years (for up to 11 years before the study start Day 1)

  16. Average Annual Number of Dispensed Units of Factor Concentrate

    To assess annual consumption of factor concentrates, calculations were based on prescription date as start of use and the day before the next prescription as the last date of use of the factor concentrates retrieved. The annual number of dispensed units of factor concentrate were then summed up of all dispensed units of factor concentrate with periods within the calendar year plus estimates of average daily use periods extending over two years. Data at end of every year was based on the number of dispensed units of factor concentrate during the last 3 years.

    Time frame: For a duration of 3 years (for up to 11 years before the study start Day 1)

  17. Average Number of Units of Benefix or Refacto

    Data from the National Board of Health and Welfare (NBHW) had information on all filled prescriptions from July 1, 2005-last date of observation (August 31, 2015). Derived variable calculated as total number of units of filled prescriptions of Refacto/Refacto AF and Benefix over the total units of all factor VIII concentrates and factor IX concentrates, respectively. Total number of units were derived from the date of start of NBHW to last available observation or date of death, whichever was earliest.

    Time frame: For the duration of 11 years before the study start date (Day 1)

  18. Total Number of Bleeds

    Time frame: For the duration of 11 years before the study start date (Day 1)

  19. Number of Joint Bleed, Muscle Bleeds and Other Bleed Events in Participants

    Joint bleeds included traumatic and spontaneous joint bleeds, muscle bleeds included traumatic and spontaneous soft tissue bleeds and other bleed events included intracranial bleed, gastrointestinal bleed and urinary tract bleed.

    Time frame: For the duration of 11 years before the study start date (Day 1)

  20. Gilbert Joint Score

    Gilbert joint score was an instrument to measure joint health in the domain of body structure and function (i.e. impairment), of the joints most commonly affected by bleeding in haemophilia - knees, ankles, elbows. Total score ranged from 0-100, evaluating ankle, knee and elbow, where "0" indicated normal joint function, "100" indicated worst joint function, where higher values indicated more impairment in joints.

    Time frame: Data analyzed on study start Day 1 for the duration of 4 years (2005 to 2009)

  21. Haemophilia Joint Health Score

    Haemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS) was used to assess joint damage in participants with haemophilia. Total score ranges from 0 to 124, where, 0 indicates normal function, and 124 indicates worst joint function, higher values indicated more damage in joints.

    Time frame: Data analyzed on study start Day 1 for the duration of 6 years (2009 to 2015)

  22. Percentage of Participants With Surgeries

    Percentage of participants who had any type of surgery (arthrodesis, surgery on foot, nose, elbow, hand or shoulder, surgery on hip, surgery on knee, tooth extraction, venous port or any other) during the data observation period were reported.

    Time frame: For the duration of 11 years before the study start date (Day 1)

  23. Average Relative Dose Intensity of Factor Concentrate Dispensed for Haemophilia A or B Participants on Prophylaxis Based on Dispensed Volume of Units

    Relative dose intensity based on dispensed volume of units was calculated using annual dispensed volume of factor concentrate per participant divided by annual prescribed dose per participant. Data was analysed for 2 categories separately: children/adolescents and adults.

    Time frame: For the duration of 11 years before the study start date (Day 1)

  24. Average Cost of Replacement Treatment (Benefix or Refacto/Refacto AF) Related to Bleed Event

    Time frame: For the duration of 11 years before the study start date (Day 1)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Average Annual Cost of Prescribed Factor Concentrate and Dispensed Replacement Treatment

    Time frame: For the duration of 11 years before the study start date (Day 1)

  2. Average Cost of Replacement Treatment Related to Invasive Procedures

    Time frame: For the duration of 11 years before the study start date (Day 1)

Other outcomes

  1. Average Annual Cost of Replacement Treatment Related to Invasive Procedures

    Time frame: Data analyzed on study start Day 1 for Year 1 (2005) and Year 7 (2011)

  2. Average Cost for Replacement Treatment Related to Invasive Procedures

    The average cost for replacement treatment related to invasive procedures was derived from the percentage of total costs for dispensed replacement therapy and calculated as: cost of factor concentrate used for invasive procedures/ total cost of factor concentrate.

    Time frame: Data analyzed on study start Day 1 for Year 1 (2005) and Year 7 (2011)

07

Results

Posted May 3, 2019

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneBenefix/Refacto/Refacto AF
Started86
Completed86
Not completed0

Outcome measures

PrimaryAge of Participants at Disease Diagnosis
Time frame:
At disease diagnosis within 11 years before the study start date (Day 1)
Reported as:
Mean · years
Age of Participants at Disease Diagnosis
yearsBenefix/Refacto/Refacto AF: Haemophilia ABenefix/Refacto/Refacto AF: Haemophilia B
Age of Participants at Disease Diagnosis5 ± 10.17 ± 10.7
PrimaryAge of Participants at Start of Treatment With Benefix or Refacto
Time frame:
At start of treatment with Benefix/Refacto within 11 years before the study start date (Day 1)
Reported as:
Mean · years
Age of Participants at Start of Treatment With Benefix or Refacto
yearsBenefix/Refacto/Refacto AF: Haemophilia ABenefix/Refacto/Refacto AF: Haemophilia B
Age of Participants at Start of Treatment With Benefix or Refacto18 ± 16.230 ± 20.9
PrimaryAge of Participants at Start of Replacement Treatment

Participants diagnosed with coagulation disorders received intravenous replacement treatment of the missing coagulation factor. Replacement treatment could be given prophylactically or to stop the bleed and/or to stop it from becoming more severe.

Time frame:
At start of replacement treatment within 11 years before the study start date (Day 1)
Reported as:
Mean · years
Age of Participants at Start of Replacement Treatment
yearsBenefix/Refacto/Refacto AF: Haemophilia ABenefix/Refacto/Refacto AF: Haemophilia B
Age of Participants at Start of Replacement Treatment16 ± 15.627 ± 20.3
PrimaryAverage Prescribed Dose Per Infusion for Factor VIII and Factor IX Concentrates

Participants diagnosed with coagulation disorders received intravenous replacement treatment of the missing coagulation factor (Factor VIII or IX). Data was measured in international units (IU) for factor VIII and factor IX concentrates.

Time frame:
For the duration of 11 years before the study start date (Day 1)
Reported as:
Mean · IU
Average Prescribed Dose Per Infusion for Factor VIII and Factor IX Concentrates
IUBenefix/Refacto/Refacto AF
Factor VIII1600 ± 700
Factor IX2500 ± 900
PrimaryAverage Prescribed Dose Per Kilogram Bodyweight for Factor VIII and Factor IX Concentrates

The average dose per kilogram body weight of factor VIII and IX was defined as a set of two derived variables from the MHR based on information on prescribed replacement treatment (Benefix or Refacto/Refacto AF): prescribed dose per infusion divided by registered body weight (all participants) and prescribed dose per week (prescribed dose per infusion multiplied by registered number of infusions per week) divided by registered body weight (only participants on prophylaxis).

Time frame:
For the duration of 11 years before the study start date (Day 1)
Reported as:
Mean · IU per kilogram
Average Prescribed Dose Per Kilogram Bodyweight for Factor VIII and Factor IX Concentrates
IU per kilogramBenefix/Refacto/Refacto AF
Factor VIII27 ± 10
Factor IX37 ± 11
PrimaryPercentage of Participants on Prophylactic Treatment

Prophylactic treatment was defined as administration of drug regularly to reduce the insufficiency of coagulation factor to prevent bleeding to occur.

Time frame:
For the duration of 11 years before the study start date (Day 1)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants on Prophylactic Treatment
percentage of participantsBenefix/Refacto/Refacto AF: Haemophilia ABenefix/Refacto/Refacto AF: Haemophilia B
Percentage of Participants on Prophylactic Treatment7856
PrimaryAverage Prescribed Frequency of Infusions Per Week Dispensed for Haemophilia A or B Participants With Prophylaxis
Time frame:
For the duration of 11 years before the study start date (Day 1)
Reported as:
Mean · infusions per week
Average Prescribed Frequency of Infusions Per Week Dispensed for Haemophilia A or B Participants With Prophylaxis
infusions per weekBenefix/Refacto/Refacto AF: Haemophilia ABenefix/Refacto/Refacto AF: Haemophilia B
Average Prescribed Frequency of Infusions Per Week Dispensed for Haemophilia A or B Participants With Prophylaxis3.9 ± 1.63.1 ± 2.4
PrimaryAverage Prescribed Annual Dose of Factor VIII and IX Concentrates for Participants on Prophylaxis

Participants diagnosed with coagulation disorders received intravenous replacement treatment of the missing coagulation factor (Factor VIII or IX). Prescribed annual dose of factor concentrate was derived from the MHR registration of prescribed annual dose of factor concentrate.

Time frame:
For the duration of 11 years before the study start date (Day 1)
Reported as:
Mean · IU/year
Average Prescribed Annual Dose of Factor VIII and IX Concentrates for Participants on Prophylaxis
IU/yearBenefix/Refacto/Refacto AF
Factor VIII286000 ± 116000
Factor IX367000 ± 187000
PrimaryAverage Prescribed Annual Dose of Factor VIII and IX Concentrates Per Kilogram Bodyweight for Participants on Prophylaxis

Participants diagnosed with coagulation disorders received intravenous replacement treatment of the missing coagulation factor (Factor VIII or IX). Prescribed annual dose of factor concentrate per kilogram body weight was derived from the MHR registration of prescribed annual dose of factor concentrate and the registered body weight.

Time frame:
For the duration of 11 years before the study start date (Day 1)
Reported as:
Mean · IU/kg/year
Average Prescribed Annual Dose of Factor VIII and IX Concentrates Per Kilogram Bodyweight for Participants on Prophylaxis
IU/kg/yearBenefix/Refacto/Refacto AF
Factor VIII4500 ± 800
Factor IX4700 ± 2200
PrimaryAverage Annual Registered Consumption of Factor VIII and IX Concentrates

Participants diagnosed with coagulation disorders received intravenous replacement treatment of the missing coagulation factor (Factor VIII or IX). Average annual registered consumption of factor VIII and IX concentrates was defined as MHR registered participant's reports on factor concentrate consumption during calendar year.

Time frame:
For the duration of 11 years before the study start date (Day 1)
Reported as:
Mean · IU/year
Average Annual Registered Consumption of Factor VIII and IX Concentrates
IU/yearBenefix/Refacto/Refacto AF
Factor VIII80000 ± 70000
Factor IX73000 ± 53000
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Consumption of Factor VIII, Factor IX, Factor rVIIa and/or aPCC Concentrate

Participants who develop inhibitors to factor VIII or IX concentrates were treated with bypassing agents in the form of activated prothrombin complex concentrate (aPCC) which was measured in units (U) and/or recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) measured in micrograms (mcg).

Time frame:
For the duration of 11 years before the study start date (Day 1)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Consumption of Factor VIII, Factor IX, Factor rVIIa and/or aPCC Concentrate
ParticipantsBenefix/Refacto/Refacto AF
Factor VIII33
Factor IX53
Factor rVIIa0
Factor aPCC0
PrimaryPercentage of Time on Refacto or Benefix

Percentage of time (in days) on Refacto/Refacto AF or Benefix was calculated as total number of days when participant was prescribed Refacto/Refacto AF or Benefix over the total number of days on any replacement treatment. Total number of days on any replacement treatment was derived from date of start of replacement treatment according to MHR and August 31, 2015 or date of death, whichever was earliest.

Time frame:
For the duration of 11 years before the study start date (Day 1)
Reported as:
Median · days
Percentage of Time on Refacto or Benefix
daysBenefix/Refacto/Refacto AF
Percentage of time on Refacto0 (0 to 100)
Percentage of time on Benefix19 (0 to 100)
PrimaryAverage Use of Factor Concentrate Per Surgery Event at Hospital for Invasive Procedures
Time frame:
For the duration of 11 years before the study start date (Day 1)
Reported as:
Mean · IU per surgery event
Average Use of Factor Concentrate Per Surgery Event at Hospital for Invasive Procedures
IU per surgery eventBenefix/Refacto/Refacto AF: Haemophilia ABenefix/Refacto/Refacto AF: Haemophilia B
Average Use of Factor Concentrate Per Surgery Event at Hospital for Invasive Procedures13447 ± 1069524171 ± 20976
PrimaryAverage Factor Concentrate Use at Hospital for Invasive Procedures

Average factor concentrate use was calculated as percentage of total annual use of factor concentrates (in IU) at hospital for invasive procedures.

Time frame:
For the duration of 11 years before the study start date (Day 1)
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of factor concentrate
Average Factor Concentrate Use at Hospital for Invasive Procedures
percentage of factor concentrateBenefix/Refacto/Refacto AF
Average Factor Concentrate Use at Hospital for Invasive Procedures2 ± 14
PrimaryAverage Annual Number of Filled Prescriptions of Factor Concentrate

Data at end of every year was based on the number of filled prescriptions during the last 3 years.

Time frame:
For a duration of 3 years (for up to 11 years before the study start Day 1)
Reported as:
Mean · prescriptions
Average Annual Number of Filled Prescriptions of Factor Concentrate
prescriptionsBenefix/Refacto/Refacto AF
20055 ± 4
200811 ± 8
201111 ± 7
201411 ± 7
PrimaryAverage Annual Number of Dispensed Units of Factor Concentrate

To assess annual consumption of factor concentrates, calculations were based on prescription date as start of use and the day before the next prescription as the last date of use of the factor concentrates retrieved. The annual number of dispensed units of factor concentrate were then summed up of all dispensed units of factor concentrate with periods within the calendar year plus estimates of average daily use periods extending over two years. Data at end of every year was based on the number of dispensed units of factor concentrate during the last 3 years.

Time frame:
For a duration of 3 years (for up to 11 years before the study start Day 1)
Reported as:
Mean · dispensed units
Average Annual Number of Dispensed Units of Factor Concentrate
dispensed unitsBenefix/Refacto/Refacto AF
Factor VIII (2005)109000 ± 79000
Factor VIII (2008)219000 ± 151000
Factor VIII (2011)220000 ± 138000
Factor VIII (2014)235000 ± 130000
Factor IX (2005)68000 ± 71000
Factor IX (2008)163000 ± 140000
Factor IX (2011)194000 ± 217000
Factor IX (2014)212000 ± 200000
PrimaryAverage Number of Units of Benefix or Refacto

Data from the National Board of Health and Welfare (NBHW) had information on all filled prescriptions from July 1, 2005-last date of observation (August 31, 2015). Derived variable calculated as total number of units of filled prescriptions of Refacto/Refacto AF and Benefix over the total units of all factor VIII concentrates and factor IX concentrates, respectively. Total number of units were derived from the date of start of NBHW to last available observation or date of death, whichever was earliest.

Time frame:
For the duration of 11 years before the study start date (Day 1)
Reported as:
Mean · units
Average Number of Units of Benefix or Refacto
unitsBenefix/Refacto/Refacto AF
Refacto - Factor VIII229000 ± 130000
Benefix - Factor IX191000 ± 163000
PrimaryTotal Number of Bleeds
Time frame:
For the duration of 11 years before the study start date (Day 1)
Reported as:
Mean · bleeds
Total Number of Bleeds
bleedsBenefix/Refacto/Refacto AF
Total Number of Bleeds1.1 ± 1.4
PrimaryNumber of Joint Bleed, Muscle Bleeds and Other Bleed Events in Participants

Joint bleeds included traumatic and spontaneous joint bleeds, muscle bleeds included traumatic and spontaneous soft tissue bleeds and other bleed events included intracranial bleed, gastrointestinal bleed and urinary tract bleed.

Time frame:
For the duration of 11 years before the study start date (Day 1)
Reported as:
Number · bleeds
Number of Joint Bleed, Muscle Bleeds and Other Bleed Events in Participants
bleedsBenefix/Refacto/Refacto AF
Joint bleed68
Muscle bleed179
Other bleed32
PrimaryGilbert Joint Score

Gilbert joint score was an instrument to measure joint health in the domain of body structure and function (i.e. impairment), of the joints most commonly affected by bleeding in haemophilia - knees, ankles, elbows. Total score ranged from 0-100, evaluating ankle, knee and elbow, where "0" indicated normal joint function, "100" indicated worst joint function, where higher values indicated more impairment in joints.

Time frame:
Data analyzed on study start Day 1 for the duration of 4 years (2005 to 2009)
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Gilbert Joint Score
scores on a scaleBenefix/Refacto/Refacto AF
Gilbert Joint Score6 ± 8
PrimaryHaemophilia Joint Health Score

Haemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS) was used to assess joint damage in participants with haemophilia. Total score ranges from 0 to 124, where, 0 indicates normal function, and 124 indicates worst joint function, higher values indicated more damage in joints.

Time frame:
Data analyzed on study start Day 1 for the duration of 6 years (2009 to 2015)
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Haemophilia Joint Health Score
scores on a scaleBenefix/Refacto/Refacto AF
Haemophilia Joint Health Score15 ± 17
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Surgeries

Percentage of participants who had any type of surgery (arthrodesis, surgery on foot, nose, elbow, hand or shoulder, surgery on hip, surgery on knee, tooth extraction, venous port or any other) during the data observation period were reported.

Time frame:
For the duration of 11 years before the study start date (Day 1)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Surgeries
percentage of participantsBenefix/Refacto/Refacto AF
Arthrodesis8
Surgery on foot, nose, elbow, hand or shoulder8
Surgery on hip7
Surgery on knee11
Tooth extraction17
Venous port15
Other surgeries34
PrimaryAverage Relative Dose Intensity of Factor Concentrate Dispensed for Haemophilia A or B Participants on Prophylaxis Based on Dispensed Volume of Units

Relative dose intensity based on dispensed volume of units was calculated using annual dispensed volume of factor concentrate per participant divided by annual prescribed dose per participant. Data was analysed for 2 categories separately: children/adolescents and adults.

Time frame:
For the duration of 11 years before the study start date (Day 1)
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of factor concentrate
Average Relative Dose Intensity of Factor Concentrate Dispensed for Haemophilia A or B Participants on Prophylaxis Based on Dispensed Volume of Units
percentage of factor concentrateHaemophilia AHaemophilia B
Children/Adolescents103 ± 3396 ± 22
Adults88 ± 2471 ± 33
SecondaryAverage Annual Cost of Prescribed Factor Concentrate and Dispensed Replacement Treatment
Time frame:
For the duration of 11 years before the study start date (Day 1)
Reported as:
Mean · SEK
Average Annual Cost of Prescribed Factor Concentrate and Dispensed Replacement Treatment
SEKBenefix/Refacto/Refacto AF
Prescribed Factor Concentrate2085000 ± 875000
Dispensed Replacement Treatment1351000 ± 944000
PrimaryAverage Cost of Replacement Treatment (Benefix or Refacto/Refacto AF) Related to Bleed Event
Time frame:
For the duration of 11 years before the study start date (Day 1)
Reported as:
Mean · Swedish Krona (SEK)
Average Cost of Replacement Treatment (Benefix or Refacto/Refacto AF) Related to Bleed Event
Swedish Krona (SEK)Benefix/Refacto/Refacto AF
Average Cost of Replacement Treatment (Benefix or Refacto/Refacto AF) Related to Bleed Event100000 ± 121000
SecondaryAverage Cost of Replacement Treatment Related to Invasive Procedures
Time frame:
For the duration of 11 years before the study start date (Day 1)
Reported as:
Mean · SEK
Average Cost of Replacement Treatment Related to Invasive Procedures
SEKBenefix/Refacto/Refacto AF
Average Cost of Replacement Treatment Related to Invasive Procedures71000 ± 72000
Other pre-specifiedAverage Annual Cost of Replacement Treatment Related to Invasive Procedures
Time frame:
Data analyzed on study start Day 1 for Year 1 (2005) and Year 7 (2011)
Reported as:
Mean · SEK
Average Annual Cost of Replacement Treatment Related to Invasive Procedures
SEKBenefix/Refacto/Refacto AF
2005165000 ± 143000
201163000 ± 51000
Other pre-specifiedAverage Cost for Replacement Treatment Related to Invasive Procedures

The average cost for replacement treatment related to invasive procedures was derived from the percentage of total costs for dispensed replacement therapy and calculated as: cost of factor concentrate used for invasive procedures/ total cost of factor concentrate.

Time frame:
Data analyzed on study start Day 1 for Year 1 (2005) and Year 7 (2011)
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of cost
Average Cost for Replacement Treatment Related to Invasive Procedures
percentage of costBenefix/Refacto/Refacto AF
2005124 ± 245
201114 ± 21

Adverse events

Collected over Within 11 years (from 2005 to 2015) before the study start date (Day 1). Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Benefix/Refacto/Refacto AF0/86 (0%)0/86 (0%)0/86 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

MHR Benefix or Refacto/Refacto AF analysis set: all participants diagnosed with haemophilia A or B in International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD-10), registered in MHR since 1977, had at least 1 registered prescription of Benefix or Refacto/Refacto AF in MHR since market authorization of respective product

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Benefix/Refacto/Refacto AF
Mean34 ± 20.9
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Benefix/Refacto/Refacto AF
Female3
Male83
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Benefix/Refacto/Refacto AF
Year of Birth for Participants
Year of Birth for Participants(years)Benefix/Refacto/Refacto AF
Median1985 (1932 to 2012)
Percentage of Participants Who Had Died During the Prior 11 Year Period
Percentage of Participants Who Had Died During the Prior 11 Year Period(percentage of participants)Benefix/Refacto/Refacto AF
Number0
Percentage of Participants With Severe, Moderate and Mild Haemophilia A or B
Percentage of Participants With Severe, Moderate and Mild Haemophilia A or B(percentage of participants)Benefix/Refacto/Refacto AF
Mild20
Moderate24
Severe56
Percentage of Participants with Inhibitor Status
Percentage of Participants with Inhibitor Status(percentage of participants)Benefix/Refacto/Refacto AF
Current2
Ever1
Never97
Percentage of Participants Infected With Hepatitis C
Percentage of Participants Infected With Hepatitis C(percentage of participants)Benefix/Refacto/Refacto AF
Number40

1 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Jun 16, 2015
  • Statistical analysis plan · Nov 3, 2015

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical\_trials/trial\_data\_and\_results/data\_requests.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 16, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02740413
Lead sponsor
Pfizer
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 15, 2016
Start date
Jan 11, 2016
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2017
Completion
Dec 31, 2017
Results posted
May 3, 2019
Last update
Jul 16, 2025

Study contacts

Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
study director · Pfizer

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion