CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT02738346CBPCUpdated Apr 25, 2016

SCLC on the 2nd Line With Relapsed After Response to Chemotherapy GFPC 01-2013

A Phase 3 interventional study of Carboplatin and Etoposide in Small Cell Lung Cancer, sponsored by University Hospital, Angers. Status unknown at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-04-25.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Angers · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Apr 2016), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
164
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study was to determine prospectively in all patients with SCLC in second line therapy that progression-free survival with the expected reintroduction of platinum / etoposide is greater progression-free survival in the standard arm (topotecan ) in patients who have relapsed at least three months after initial chemotherapy with platinum-etoposide

Read the detailed description

Topotecan is currently the only drug approved in Europe and the United States for the treatment of second line of SCLC when the recovery first line of treatment is considered inappropriate. This raises the problem of knowing when the recovery first line of treatment should be considered appropriate. Secondly, the effectiveness of response to chemotherapy can be predicted based on the response to initial chemotherapy and the time interval after stopping first line treatment. A complete response after initial treatment and a long disease-free interval are predictors of better response to a second-line treatment. There are two groups: the said patients 'sensitive', which correspond to the first-line chemotherapy and who have relapsed at least 90 days after the first-line treatment and a group of so-called patients "Refractory" refers patients who progress in 90 days or patients who have not responded or progressed during first-line treatment. Median survival is very different depending on whether patients with so-called "sensitive" or "refractory".

When relapse occurs six months after the end of the first line chemotherapy, the usual practice is to reintroduce the first-line treatment. This is based on old studies where the number of patients included was low. If the interval of time after the first line of treatment is ≥ three months, two second-line treatment strategies are possible resumption of initial chemotherapy or topotecan. The combination of cisplatin with etoposide have shown high response rate, whatever the time of relapse. There are, however, no randomized study in the literature comparing topotecan to the reintroduction of a platinum salt associated etoposide.

This study is Randomized, multicenter, controlled, open-label, second line, 2 arms.

Arm A : Carboplatin Auc 5 J1 Etoposide 100 mg / m² / J J1 to J3 IV Arm B : topotecan 2.3 mg / m²J1 to J5 po

1 line by Etoposide Cisplatin or carboplatin etoposide Time interval between the first-line chemotherapy and relapse ≥ 90 days (the date is set at J1 of the last cycle) J-28: TDM thoracoabdominal, brain CT or MRI brain, J 7: Biology, quality of life questionnaire (Lung Cancer Symptom Scale). Assessment of tumor response every 6 weeks during chemotherapy post-chemotherapy followed 2nd line: TDM every 8 weeks until progression or death.

The duration of the participation of each patient included in the trial will be from inclusion through 12 months.

The planned total duration of the trial will be 5 years including 4 years of patient inclusion

02

Conditions studied

  • Small Cell Lung Cancer

Keywords

  • Small Cell Lung Cancer
  • Topotecan
  • Etoposide
03

In context

Small Cell Lung Carcinoma

1,203 studies on the registry are indexed under Small Cell Lung Carcinoma; 342 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 164 is above the median of 56 across 1,031 interventional studies indexed under Small Cell Lung Carcinoma.

Browse Small Cell Lung Carcinoma studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Angers is the lead sponsor of 464 studies on the registry; 116 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Lung Cancer Small cell histologically confirmed.
  • SCLC stage IV according to the TNM classification in 2009
  • Relapse localized SCLC treated with chemoradiotherapy if they are outside the radiation field.
  • Patients who have had an objective response to first-line chemotherapy with cisplatin and etoposide or carboplatin and etoposide and have a time interval > or = 90 days between relapse and first-line chemotherapy (the date is set J1 of the last cycle)
  • At least one-dimensionally measurable disease (RECIST)
  • Age > or = 18 years
  • Weight loss \<10% during the last 3 months
  • Performance status (PS) \< or = 2
  • Creatinine clearance> 45 ml / min.
  • Neutrophils >1,5X10 9 / L and platelets > 100X109 / L.
  • Bilirubin \< 1,5 X normal.
  • Transaminases, alkaline phosphatase \< 2,5 X normal except in cases of hepatic metastases (5 X normal).
  • Informed Consent signed
  • Patients with asymptomatic brain metastases may be included
  • Prophylactic brain irradiation based on the habits of each center defined in advance

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Lung cancer non-small cell or mixed form (small cell / non-small cell) or absence of histological evidence
  • SCLC stage I or stage II or stage III.
  • Patients who have not had an objective response to first-line chemotherapy with cisplatin and etoposide or carboplatin and etoposide or that have a time interval \< 90 days between relapse and first-line chemotherapy (the date is defined in J1 of the last cycle)
  • Serum Na \< 125 mmol / L
  • Hypercalcemia despite corrective treatment
  • Brain metastases or symptomatic meningeal
  • A history of malignancy within the last 5 years with the exception of basal cell carcinoma of the skin or carcinoma in situ of the cervix.
  • Other concomitant serious medical conditions: congestive heart failure, unstable angina, significant arrhythmia or previous myocardial in the previous six months trial
  • Severe or uncontrolled systemic diseases, the investigator found incompatible with the proposed protocol
  • Neurological and psychiatric disorders prohibiting comprehension test
  • Severe infectious disease during or fever > 38 ° C
  • Peripheral neuropathy > or = grade 2
  • Any geographical or psychological condition does not allow a proper understanding and compliance with the protocol.
  • Private Patient freedom following a judicial or administrative decision
  • Pregnant woman, parturient or nursing; Women of childbearing potential and men with a woman of childbearing age must have adequate contraception for the duration of the study and up to 6 months after treatment ends.
  • Patient in an exclusion period for another Biomedical study
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
164 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Arm A : Carboplatin-Etoposide

    Intravenous administration of Carboplatin Auc 5 at Day 1 and Intravenous administration of 100 mg / m² / of Etoposide J Day 1 to Day 3 The CT scans evaluations will be conducted during chemotherapy every 6 weeks

    Drug: Carboplatin · Drug: Etoposide · Device: CT scans

  • Active comparator
    Arm B : Topotecan

    Per os administration of 2.3 mg / m² of Topotecan Day 1 to Day 5 The CT scans evaluations will be conducted during chemotherapy every 6 weeks

    Drug: Topotecan · Device: CT scans

Interventions

  • DrugCarboplatin

    Intravenous administration of Carboplatin AUC 5 at Day 1, Every 3 weeks, maximum 6 cycles

  • DrugEtoposide

    Intravenous administration of 100mg/m²/day of Etoposide, Day 1 to Day 3 Every 3 weeks, maximum 6 cycles

  • DrugTopotecan

    Per os administration of 2.3 mg / m2 of Topotecan, Day 1 to Day 5 Every 3 weeks, maximum 6 cycles

  • DeviceCT scans

    The CT scan evaluations will be conducted during chemotherapy every 6 weeks

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Benefit in terms of progression-free survival of a therapeutic strategy

    Determine the benefit in terms of progression-free survival of a therapeutic strategy by second-line carboplatin etoposide versus topotecan in patients who relapsed at least three months after the initial chemotherapy with platinum-etoposide.

    Time frame: 18 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Objective response rate assessed by RECIST

    Time frame: 18 weeks

  2. Overall survival

    Time frame: 18 weeks

  3. Name and number of with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v4.0".

    Time frame: 18 weeks

  4. The quality of life

    the method of assessment : questionnaire

    Time frame: 18 weeks

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Angers University Hospital
    Angers, 49933, France
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Baize N, Monnet I, Greillier L, Geier M, Lena H, Janicot H, Vergnenegre A, Crequit J, Lamy R, Auliac JB, Letreut J, Le Caer H, Gervais R, Dansin E, Madroszyk A, Renault PA, Le Garff G, Falchero L, Berard H, Schott R, Saulnier P, Chouaid C; Groupe Francais de Pneumo-Cancerologie 01-13 investigators. Carboplatin plus etoposide versus topotecan as second-line treatment for patients with sensitive relapsed small-cell lung cancer: an open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2020 Sep;21(9):1224-1233. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30461-7. PubMed 32888454 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 25, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02738346
Lead sponsor
University Hospital, Angers
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 14, 2016
Start date
Jul 2013
Primary completion
Jul 2017 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 2017 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 25, 2016

Study contacts

Nathalie BAIZE
Contact
NaBaize@chu-angers.fr
Nathalie BAIZE
principal investigator · Angers University Hospital Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Apr 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion