CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06195527PEMBRO-KUpdated Sep 8, 2026

PEMBRO-K : Evaluation of Pembrolizumab Therapeutic Pharmacological Monitoring Benefit in NSCLC

An observational study in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer, sponsored by University Hospital, Angers. Recruiting at 2 sites in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-08.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Angers · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
75
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Solid cancers and their therapeutic management remain a major public health problem due to their increasing prevalence and associated mortality. Among solid cancers, lung cancer ranks 4th among incident cancers. The prognosis remains poor, 33,117 deaths were recorded in France in 2018. Two histological forms of bronchopulmonary cancer are distinguished: non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC), which represent 85% of bronchopulmonary cancer, and small cell lung cancers. The most common forms of NSCLC are adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma and large cell carcinoma.

The emergence of new so-called targeted therapies has considerably modified the management and prognosis of oncology patients and in particular of patients with NSCLC. These new molecules were developed following the molecular characterization of tumors on the one hand and on the other hand the characterization of the role of immunity in anti-tumor defense, particularly the Programmed Death receptor pathway 1 (PD-1). Blocking this pathway restores the anti-tumor potential of these lymphocytes. Pembrolizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that binds to the PD-1 receptor and blocks its interaction with the Programmed Death Ligand-1 (PDL1) and Programmed Death Ligand-2 (PDL2), expressed by tumor cells but also by cells in the microenvironment. tumor and by antigen-presenting cells. Pembrolizumab thus potentiates T cell responses, including anti-tumor responses, by blocking the binding of PD-1 with PDL1 and PDL2.

Pembrolizumab currently has marketing authorization (MA) for the treatment of NSCLC. Despite therapeutic progress due, among other things, to the emergence of anti-PD-1 antibodies including pembrolizumab, the prognosis of NSCLC remains poor and the use of pembrolizumab is sometimes limited by the occurrence of adverse effects.

The pharmacokinetics of pembrolizumab was studied pre-marketing in patients with melanoma, NSCLC or metastatic or unresectable carcinomas. However, there are no data relating to the pharmacokinetic (PK) / clinical response (pharmacodynamic / PD) relationship of pembrolizumab, in real life. No prospective pharmacological study has in fact been published to date, especially in patients treated as part of the management of NSCLC. The absence of such studies - in real life - constitutes a pitfall given the existence of a possible association between PK data and the clinical response and/or toxicity of pembrolizumab.

02

Conditions studied

  • Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

This is a population pharmacokinetic study aimed at establishing the PK-PD relationship in patients with NSCLC treated with pembrolizumab (non-comparative descriptive study).

Taking into account the half-life (26 days) and the time necessary to obtain the equilibrium state (16 weeks), the choice was made to take residual and peak samples during administrations. This sampling strategy will allow the construction and validation of the PK model.

Inclusion criteria

  • 18 years or more
  • patient with NSCLC
  • pembrolizumab treatment (monotherapy or not) with a placed line (peripheral catheter, PICC or implantable port)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • objection to participate in the study
  • patient under judicial protection
04

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
75 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pembrolizumab efficiency Month 2

    Pembrolizumab effectiveness according to RECIST's radiological criteria

    Time frame: month 2

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pembrolizumab efficiency Month 4

    Pembrolizumab effectiveness according to RECIST's radiological criteria

    Time frame: month 4

  2. Pembrolizumab efficiency Month 12

    Pembrolizumab effectiveness according to RECIST's radiological criteria

    Time frame: month 12

  3. Pembrolizumab toxicity Month 18

    All adverse/toxic reactions collected by Regional Safety center until 18 months

    Time frame: month 18

06

Study locations

1 of 2 sites recruiting
07

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06195527
Lead sponsor
University Hospital, Angers
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 8, 2024
Start date
Dec 17, 2025
Primary completion
Jun 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 8, 2026

Study contacts

Guillaume DREVIN, Doctor
Contact
Guillaume.Drevin@chu-angers.fr
0241354551
Chadi ABBARA, Doctor
Contact
Chadi.Abbara@chu-angers.fr
0241353644
Guillaume DREVIN, Doctor
study director · University Hospital, Angers

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion