CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT02723825Updated Mar 31, 2016

Study of Prognostic Factors of the Distal Epiphysis of the Tibia Fracture Prognosis

An interventional study of Closed reduction and Open reduction in Tibial Fractures and Epiphyseal Fracture, sponsored by Foshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 10 Years to 16 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-03-31.

Sponsored by Foshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2021, 4 years 10 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
200
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
10 Years to 16 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Background: Epiphysis of distal end of tibia fracture is quite common in children epiphysis injury, because of the complex damage mechanism and often leads to growth retardation and joint deformity, the patient's physical and mental damage larger; also epiphysis injury restoration requires higher standard and more difficult to fixed, and methods are being actively explored to improve the curative effect and prevent the sequelae. Our hospital pediatric department of orthopedics expects to conduct prospective study through multi center to study the influence of factors such as the tibia epiphysis fracture of distal injury's mechanism and initial and residual displacement and treatment etc. on patients' prognosis of late growth disorders, joint deformity and ankle function.

Methods and analysis: To join the multi center research collaboration group of the south pediatric department of orthopedics (including Pediatric Department of orthopedics of Wuhan Union Hospital, Wuhan Tongji Hospital, Hunan Children's Hospital, Wuhan women and children's Hospital, Foshan Hospital of traditional Chinese medicine, Shenzhen children's Hospital, Guangzhou city women and children's Medical Center), the formation of multi center research network, writing program, including the inclusion and exclusion criteria, grouping and follow-up time, method. Participating in the working group meeting, listening to the expert's opinions to improve research programs, formulate the tracking table of distal tibial epiphyseal fracture, and starting to implement after approved by the medical ethics committee of each hospital. The hospital is responsible for supervision in the whole process of project implementation, and building the real-time reporting system, and it is the responsible person of pediatric department of orthopedics of Foshan Hospital of TCM to do the random inspection. After the completion of data collection, data entry and statistical analysis conducted by the pediatric department of orthopedics in Foshan Hospital of TCM.

Ethics and promotion: The research is approved by the hospital medical ethics committee of the south pediatric orthopedics multi center cooperative research group. Single blind method is performed for children in the course of the study. Research data is shared by all participating units and joints promotion of research results.

Registration: To register and update the study on the United States NIH ClinicalTrials.gov website.

Read the detailed description

Introduction Epiphyseal and Epiphyseal plate are all immature skeletal growth mechanism, the epiphyseal plate injury also known as epiphyseal injuries, fracture line through the epiphyseal plate can also spread to the epiphysis or metaphysis. Epiphyseal plate's connection is weaker than normal tendon, ligament, or joint capsule, so the children of epiphyseal injuries are common. Distal tibial epiphyseal injuries accounted for about 25%- 38% of the epiphyseal injuries. Because after the injury of the distal epiphysis of the tibia injury often leads to growth retardation and joint deformity, the patient's physical and mental damage larger. Because of the complexity of the pathogenesis of this disease, and there are many related factors. The research of related factors of the disease is benefit to evaluate the prognosis, and conducive to early intervention, benefit to avoid the occurrence or development of severe sequelae, has positive significance in clinical practice.

Because the disease is related to many factors, and the serious cases of this disease are less, the multi center cooperation is conducive to the collection of sufficient cases to analyze and achieve the objective and effective results, so establish the multi center topic.

Design and overview In epiphyseal growth stage, the epiphyseal plate connects weaker than normal tendons, ligaments, or joint capsule, so epiphyseal plate is more vulnerable to be injured. Every epiphyseal complex is composed of each epiphysis and epiphyseal plate, its growth and blood supply are interdependent, which any damage may reinforce each other. The Ranvier district around the epiphysis has the ability to ossify. It is easy to form a bone bridge and growth arrest and angular deformity after injury. Epiphyseal fracture is belongs to intra-articular fractures, such as not timely reset, prone to complications. About 15% of children with fractures involving the epiphyseal injuries, the number of boys are more than girls, as the chance of injury is more, this is because men's epiphyseal plate closure time later than women's. X-ray manifestation of epiphyseal injuries, while more complex, but the epiphyseal and backbone of the corresponding position of the dislocation and epiphyseal line broadening is the most important, a slight shift and (or) epiphyseal line broadening is the most easy to be ignored, should X-ray the healthy side at the same time.

In theory, fracture involving the epiphyseal growth plate and articular surface is easily occurred in two kinds of complications: first distal tibia epiphyseal premature closure causes valgus or varus malleolus and limb shortening; the second is the distal tibial articular surface damage causes the ankle joint degenerative changes and bone arthritis. According to Salter Harris bone epiphysis injury types were divided into five types, and in the distal tibial epiphysis injury I, II type are common in clinic. Therefore, the biggest problem is the formation of the bone bridge, early epiphyseal closure, resulting in growth arrest, angular deformity. From the current literature, the most important related factors are in injured mechanism and degree of displacement Leary JT's research shows: the initial fracture displacement and damage mechanism for determining development of PPC after the fracture of epiphysis of distal end of tibia may have a significant predictive value. Ankle fracture Lauge - Hansen parting is ankle fracture classification system put forward by Lauge - Hansen doctors in 1950 according to the damage position and violence that cause deformity, able to quickly assess the damage mechanism of 90% - 95% cases, and has been widely used. Its clinical significance lies in: 1 find fracture and classify injury and be able to make the diagnosis of ligament injury. 2 guide manipulative reduction. The general principle is: closed manipulative reduction and fracture have the opposite force mechanism.3 for the distal tibial epiphysis fracture, can also understand the severity of the injury and the existence of the risk of soft tissue embedded. Therefore, we think, it is necessary to research on the lauge Hansen classification and correlation of prognosis. The relationship between the fracture displacement and correlation of prognosis is in the extent of the shift, the vast majority of doctors think less than 2mm shift can be accepted, and to shift more than 2mm, there are different opinions. Gonc U et al think ankle joint fracture usually involving the tibia and fibular epiphyses in children and adolescents. Although they do not occur with growth arrest, but may still lead to traumatic arthritis. Therefore, for more than 2 mm of residual displacement there is a need for surgical treatment. And David podeszwa Da thinks is greater than 3mm residual displacement often means embedded with soft tissue, may increase early closure of epiphysis of probability. Russo F the most pessimistic, he thinks a shift of the S - H type Ⅱ tibial distal epiphyseal fracture is a challenging problem. Rate of epiphyseal early closure is very high (> 43%). Even if incision and anatomical repositioning, removal of embedded organization, also cannot reduce the incidence of PPC, and may increase the risk of subsequent surgery.

Considered in the design, what JOHN A.O GDEN points out "epiphyseal separation should be reset as soon as possible, each delay 1 d will increase the difficulty as it repair soon. For type II epiphyseal injuries after more than 10 d, if you don't use excessive force can not make manual reduction success, however it could damage the cartilage epiphyseal plate and damage the early osteotylus, therefore, for type II epiphyseal injuries that see a doctor later (after (7-10 d) ,had better let it be malunion, and cannot use powerful technique or surgical repositioning, lest cause obvious epiphyseal growth stopped, heals the residual deformities can then use the appropriate correction osteotomy". This view is widely agreed. In the inclusion criteria we chose cases that injury within 7 days. In addition, the Risser ilium epiphyseal ossification sign is a commonly used method for determination of the bone age, JiShiJun's pediatric bone science thinks " ossification of the crista iliaca is usually in conformity with the stop of limbs' longitudinal growth", this is the important index for determining growth potential in include and exclude criteria in this topic, so there is reason to believe that when a Risser sign V degrees distal tibial epiphyseal growth stopped, fixed limb length and Angle.

Grouping Divide the patients into groups according to the residual displacement of the fracture after the first manual reduction.

Group A: the residual displacement is less than or equal to 2mm, select closed reduction and external fixation (such as splint, plaster or traction, frame of external fixation, etc.) Group B: the residual shift is between 2-4mm, manual reset once again, as still between 2-4mm, the cooperation of each unit to choose closed reduction.

Group C: the residual shift is between 2-4mm, manual reset once again, as still between 2-4mm, the cooperation of each unit to choose closed reduction.

Group D: residual displacement is greater than 4mm, open reduction and internal fixation.

Evaluation criteria According to OVADIA et al' evaluation criteria: excellent, Joint function restore basic consistent with that of the healthy side, without any symptoms, or joint flexion range is more than 75% of the healthy side, mild sore and swollen after walking, restore normal work; Good, joint flexion range is 50% - 70% of the healthy side, joint is mild soreness, markedly swollen after walking, unable to attend the heavy physical work; Can, joint flexion range is 25% - 50% of the healthy side, joint is obvious swelling and pain, difficulty walking, and accept joint arthrodesis at the end; Poor, joint range is less than 25% of the healthy side, joint is markedly swollen, pain, stiffness, unable to walk, and accept joint arthrodesis at the end.

Data collection To hospital after conventional laboratory tests, X-ray the anteroposterior and lateral film of the affected side, the contralateral tibiofibula (including ankle) and posteroanterior radiograph of pelvis, scan the affected ankle with CT (fracture displacement measurement, tibial epiphyseal radius vector and the transverse diameter and cross section). Select cases according to the inclusion criteria, exclusion criteria Divide the patients into groups according to the X-ray films of the affected side, the degree of displacement after measuring residual displacement after the first manual reduction.

Treated according to the grouping, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 1-5 years after surgery follow-up.Between 3 to 12 months, each time X-ray films were taken on both ankles, observe whether there are the early closure of epiphysis; 1 to 5 years, each time we measure whether the tibia shortening or angle, OVADIA efficacy assessment and ankle function evaluation (using the table of "AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot Scale "), until 5 years long and the distal tibial epiphyseal closure of the other side.

Organization and implementation The projects will be written by Foshan Hospital of TCM pediatric orthopaedic and submitted to the south pediatric orthopaedic multicenter study group. The project design will be discussed, modified by the hospital experts. The projects will be submitted for approval by the hospital medical ethics committee. Then the various units sign a cooperation agreement after the experts determine and clear scientific, the feasibility of this topic, and the study will be registered on the United States NIH ClinicalTrials.gov website and updated according to the situation.

In the process of implementation, the southern pediatric orthopaedic multicenter study group will communicate and consult with each other to timely solve the problems and difficulties appeared in the research through the email, WeChat and phone, even on a business trip and other means of collaboration, besides the plenary meeting each quarter, to ensure the implementation of this project.

Data collection and management Statistic analysis Foshan Hospital of TCM pediatric orthopaedic formulated the tibial distal epiphyseal fracture tracking table and send it every cooperative unit to record whether there is patients epiphyseal closed early, and if there is, record the shortening length of the affected limb and angle of angulation deformity, and record the ankle limb function (valgus, varus and back stretch, plantar flexion), assess the pain index and rank according to the evaluation criteria of OVADIA etc. During the implementation of the project, the data should be filled in the table timely, accurately and objectively by cooperative unit, to keep a record of each item shall be seriously not omissions, and regular follow-up. At the same time, set up the monitor, regularly or randomly go to the test center to check and ensure that the original data is real and effective. Accounting personnel chose by Foshan Hospital of TCM to do the double entry, ensure the data entry is correct. If in doubt, the monitor will investigate then return the data. Use the SPSS16.0 to input the data, and describe normal measurement data with mean + / - standard deviation, average between the group by t test, counting data, with chi-square, finally with Logistic regression model to analysis multi-factor.

02

Conditions studied

  • Tibial Fractures
  • Epiphyseal Fracture

Keywords

  • Distal tibia
  • fractures
  • epiphyses
  • children
03

In context

Fractures, Bone

2,261 studies on the registry are indexed under Fractures, Bone; 325 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 200 is above the median of 69 across 1,482 interventional studies indexed under Fractures, Bone.

Browse Fractures, Bone studies →

Lead sponsor

Foshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine is the lead sponsor of 5 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
10 Years to 16 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • The fresh fractures, within 7 days
  • Closed fracture
  • Type S-H I or II
  • Unilateral limb fracture, no other parts of the fractures or damage
  • On the other side of the lower extremity was normal
  • Epiphysis is not closed and Risser sign 0-IV degrees
  • No metabolic, genetic sex diseases etc.
  • Signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Old fracture, more than 8 days.
  • Open injury
  • Type S-H III or IV or V
  • Multiple fractures and injuries
  • The contralateral limb was abnormal
  • Epiphyseal closure or Risser sign V degree
  • There are metabolic or genetic diseases
  • Do not agree to sign informed consent, not on time to follow-up.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
200 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    Less or equal to 2mm

    the residual displacement is less than or equal to 2mm

    Procedure: Closed reduction

  • Placebo comparator
    Between 2-4mm

    the residual shift is between 2-4mm, manual reset once again, as still between 2-4mm

    Procedure: Closed reduction · Procedure: Open reduction

  • Active comparator
    Greater than 4mm

    the residual displacement is greater than 4mm

    Procedure: Open reduction

Interventions

  • ProcedureClosed reduction

    Treated with Manipulatio, using plywood, gypsum or external fixation support to fixed

    Also known as: Manipulative reduction and External fixation

  • ProcedureOpen reduction

    Open reduction and internal fixation

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Evaluation criteria of OVADIA and the change over time

    Excellent, Joint function restore basic consistent with that of the healthy side, without any symptoms, or joint flexion range is more than 75% of the healthy side, mild sore and swollen after walking, restore normal work; Good, joint flexion range is 50% - 70% of the healthy side, joint is mild soreness, markedly swollen after walking, unable to attend the heavy physical work; Can, joint flexion range is 25% - 50% of the healthy side, joint is obvious swelling and pain, difficulty walking, and accept joint arthrodesis at the end; Poor, joint range is less than 25% of the healthy side, joint is markedly swollen, pain, stiffness, unable to walk, and accept joint arthrodesis at the end.

    Time frame: 1 year,2year,3year,4year,5year(We think that develops gradually of limb shortening or angle because of early epiphyseal closure will result in a lowered grad of OVADIA)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Early closure of epiphysis

    Yes/No

    Time frame: 3 months,6 months,9months,12months

  2. Limb shortening

    The length difference between the two tibia

    Time frame: 1 year,2year,3year,4year,5year

  3. Ankle joint function and the change over time

    Use AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot Scale to score

    Time frame: 1 year,2year,3year,4year,5year(We think that develops gradually of limb shortening or angle because of early epiphyseal closure will also result in a lower score of AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot Scale)

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Russo F, Moor MA, Mubarak SJ, Pennock AT. Salter-Harris II fractures of the distal tibia: does surgical management reduce the risk of premature physeal closure? J Pediatr Orthop. 2013 Jul-Aug;33(5):524-9. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3182880279. PubMed 23752150 ↗
  • Leary JT, Handling M, Talerico M, Yong L, Bowe JA. Physeal fractures of the distal tibia: predictive factors of premature physeal closure and growth arrest. J Pediatr Orthop. 2009 Jun;29(4):356-61. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181a6bfe8. PubMed 19461377 ↗
  • Podeszwa DA, Mubarak SJ. Physeal fractures of the distal tibia and fibula (Salter-Harris Type I, II, III, and IV fractures). J Pediatr Orthop. 2012 Jun;32 Suppl 1:S62-8. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e318254c7e5. PubMed 22588106 ↗
  • Gonc U, Kayaalp A. [Ankle fractures in children and adolescents]. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2004;38 Suppl 1:127-37. Turkish. PubMed 15187469 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 31, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02723825
Lead sponsor
Foshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine
Responsible party
Yueming Guo (Director, Head of Pediatric Department of Orthopedics,Clinical Professor of Guangzhou University of TCM, Foshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 31, 2016
Start date
Mar 2016
Primary completion
Dec 2021 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 31, 2016

Study contacts

Yueming Guo, benco
Contact
guo_yueming2008@126.com
0086-13827710333
Zhiyuan Wang, master
Contact
milo-8008@126.com
0086-18928613202
Yueming Guo, benco
study chair · Director of pediatric orthopaedic

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Mar 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion