CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02709694MaRCH-onUpdated Oct 25, 2021Results posted

Imaging Biomarkers in Crohn's Associated Spondyloarthritis

An observational study in Crohn's Disease and Spondyloarthritis, sponsored by Hospital for Special Surgery, New York. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-10-25.

Sponsored by Hospital for Special Surgery, New York · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
33
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In patients with Crohn's Disease, symptoms of inflammatory back pain (IBP) precede changes on plain X-rays by years, and MRI changes of axial inflammation precede development of X-ray changes. Sacroiliitis on MRI without x-ray changes (i.e.Non radiographic SpA) is a valid diagnostic criterion for Spondyloarthritis (SpA) and leads to earlier diagnosis of SpA in patients with IBP. It is unclear when MRI changes occur, and if they precede clinical symptoms of IBP. There are reports of asymptomatic sacroiliitis noted on MRI in Crohn's patients. This is important, as MRI evidence of inflammation may be the first sign of incipient SpA. Inflammation in other regions of the axial skeleton in SpA patients has also been documented, but its significance is unknown. The prospect of undiagnosed and untreated inflammation is concerning, as it can lead to significant morbidity. Moreover, relationship between MRI evidence of axial inflammation-likely a proxy for systemic inflammation- and patient reported outcomes (e.g. ASDAS-CRP= Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score- C reactive protein, BASDAI= Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index, SF-12 = Short Form- 12, HBI= Hervey Bradshaw Index and PROMIS-29= Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System-29), has not been reported. Recent unpublished data from Dr. Longman's lab (collaborator) suggest a distinct intestinal dysbiosis in Crohn's associated SpA. But relationship between this microbiome and MRI changes is yet to be determined.

Identifying inflammation earlier on MRI- in the absence of clinical symptoms will provide an opportunity to intervene early with available therapies, such as- biologics etc. Asymptomatic MRI changes could be a marker of underlying systemic inflammation- which is a risk factor for poor outcomes in Crohn's associated SpA. Studying association between whole spine MRI changes with patient reported outcomes) may facilitate informed clinical decision making to initiate targeted therapy to prevent progression of structural damage. Understanding microbial dysregulation in this population, and correlation with MRI changes, could lead to development of therapy targeted to restore intestinal symbiosis.

Read the detailed description

IMAGING AND CROHN'S ASSOCIATED SpA: Crohn's disease (CD) is the most common type of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). It affects an estimated 0.7 million patients in United States and is responsible for 0.2 million hospitalizations each year.1 Although the gastrointestinal tract is the primary site of inflammation, inflammatory arthritis (both peripheral and axial) can affect between 12.8-23% of patients with Crohn's Disease2,3, and axial SpA alone has been reported to effect 6.7% to 18% of Crohn's patients.4 However, in 2 recent studies5,6, radiological sacroiliitis was reported to be present in 27% and 52% in IBD patients. MRI changes of inflammation precede radiological sacroiliitis by years but it is not clear when this occurs. Presence of damage on x-ray in asymptomatic patients may suggest that Crohn's associated axial SpA could be underdiagnosed. Since Crohn's associated SpA often affects younger patients, undertreatment or missed diagnoses could have a significant impact on health related quality of life (HR-QoL) and disability during prime wage earning and child rearing years.7

"Non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis" is a term used to describe patients with symptomatic SpA who do not have findings on plain x-rays. These patients can have identical symptoms to those with radiographic evidence of cartilage loss and erosions, and anti-TNF (anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor) therapy has been shown to be effective in those with non-radiographic SpA.8 These patients are a clinically relevant subgroup, as 20% of patients with only MRI evidence of sacroiliitis will progress to non-reversible radiographic SpA over two years.9 Therefore, MRI evidence of sacroiliitis, in conjunction with inflammatory back pain is now sufficient to diagnosis SpA. In fact, MRI imaging is a standard component of current SpA diagnostic criteria, (ASAS: Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society),10 and MRI changes of sacroiliitis are routinely used to identify SpA patients for clinical trials.11

However, despite these new definitions there is a deficiency of published research evaluating the clinical significance of MRI findings in patients with Crohn's disease. Of all the SpA-associated diseases, Crohn's-associated SpA has a particularly high burden of extra-articular inflammation. Studies suggest only half to two thirds of patients with CT or MRI evidence of inflammation have symptoms of inflammatory back pain.1,12 This suggests that in Crohn's disease, MRI imaging biomarkers may be identifying early disease, analogous to the way that ultrasound can identify subclinical rheumatoid arthritis.13 We therefore hypothesize that in a mixed cohort of Crohn's patients with and without inflammatory back pain, MRI imaging biomarkers will correlate with measures of health status which reflect systemic inflammatory burden, (i.e. BASDAI, SF-12) independent of symptoms of inflammatory back pain.

MRI IMAGING BIOMARKERS: A POTENTIAL CARDIOVASCULAR RISK FACTOR? The observed discordance between axial inflammation seen on MRI and inflammatory back pain raises a particularly intriguing clinical question: could Crohn's patients with imaging evidence of axial inflammation but without axial symptoms potentially benefit from therapy?

It is very well established that in rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis, systemic inflammation is associated with myocardial infarction, stroke and death, and that treating inflammation improves cardiovascular outcomes.14,15.

Recent population based study from Europe and Canada showed increased risk of cardiovascular mortality in patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis.16,17 Despite clear evidence that cardiovascular risk is increased in SpA, how to quantify the increased risk is not straightforward. There is no consistently reliable marker of systemic inflammation in these patients; sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) may not always reflect ongoing inflammation, especially in patients with non-radiographic axial SpA9. Therefore, accurately measuring the inflammatory burden in Crohn's patients, regardless of musculoskeletal symptoms, is an important area for future research. Initiation of earlier targeted therapy to decrease inflammation may not only prevent incident Crohn's associated SpA, progression of prevalent SpA, with concurrent improvements in HRQoL, but may also improve cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.

In addition, although sacroiliitis is the primary axial feature in SpA, there is increasing evidence that there can also be spinal involvement even in the absence of SI joint inflammation. Recent studies suggest that spinal inflammation can occur in up to one-third of nonradiographic SpA patients with \<5 years of disease duration.18 This could be an important early imaging inflammatory biomarker. To our knowledge there are no published studies evaluating spinal and SI joint MRI imaging biomarkers in Crohn's associated SpA.

THE MICROBIOME: A CORRELATE OF INFLAMMATION IN CROHN'S DISEASE? The etiopathogenesis of Crohn's Disease-associated SpA remains a puzzle. As with other autoimmune diseases, interplay between genetic factors such as HLA B27 (Human Leukocyte Antigen- B27) and environmental factors likely play a role. The joint symptoms of SpA are not consistently correlated with bowel disease flares.19 Intestinal microbiota plays a critical role in evolution of our entire immune system, since axenic laboratory animals (germfree animals raised in sterile environment) were noted to have partial restoration of T cell population when these animals are colonized with filamentous bacteria. A symbiotic relationship between the main bacterial phyla is necessary for proper functioning of immune system, since notable alterations in the intestinal microbiome (i.e. dysbiosis) have been suggested in various autoimmune diseases. Reduction in taxa-diversity (such as, enterobacteriaceae, Bacteroidales and Clostridiales) and expansion of certain phyla in the intestine have been recently reported in a large cohort of new onset treatment-naïve Crohn's disease (CD) patients.20 In addition, Dr. Longman's lab has shown that the expansion of immunologically relevant Enterobacteriaceae correlates with Crohn's related SpA among a mixed group of patients with Crohn's and ulcerative colitis, (in press). However, while these are exciting data, SpA cases were identified using a non-validated clinical diagnosis, without systematic rheumatology evaluation and no imaging studies. This will be first study evaluating the microbiome in a carefully phenotyped cohort of Crohn's associated SpA, who will also have detailed MRI imaging.

02

Conditions studied

  • Crohn's Disease
  • Spondyloarthritis
03

In context

Spondylitis

623 studies on the registry are indexed under Spondylitis; 83 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 33 is below the median of 202 across 256 observational studies indexed under Spondylitis.

Browse Spondylitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Hospital for Special Surgery, New York is the lead sponsor of 217 studies on the registry; 39 are open to participants now.

Of its 27 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 20 (74%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients will biopsy proven Crohn's disease will be enrolled for the study. 50% (15 patients) will have symptoms of inflammatory back pain and 50% will not.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patients with biopsy proven Crohn's Disease
  2. 50% patients with inflammatory back pain and 50% without inflammatory back pain.
  3. Age 18 years and above
  4. English Speaking patients only

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History of psoriasis, other inflammatory arthritis
  2. No exposure to biologic agent within the past six months (except Vedolizumab, which exerts its effect locally)
  1. Contraindication to MRI
  1. History of malignancy \<5 years in remission, (except for non-melanomatous skin cancer).
  1. Non English speaking
  1. Unable to comply with study protocol.
  1. Critically or terminally ill patients
  1. Pregnancy
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
33 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Interventions

  • OtherNo intervention

    No drug or device intervention. However, participants will receive MRI of their spine, answer questionnaires, provide clinical history as well as blood and stool sample. Joint exams will also be performed on all participants.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With MRI Positivity- Global Assessment Positive

    MRIs were independently read and scored by 2 expert rheumatologists and 1 newly trained rheumatologist reader, blinded to any clinical information. MRIs were evaluated and scored for presence of bone marrow edema (BME) and structural lesions (erosion, fat metaplasia, backfill and ankylosis) using a validated scoring method originally derived from the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada SIJ module. MRI was considered "positive" for presence of sacroiliitis if it met global evaluation, based on the reader's overall evaluation of presence or absence of sacroiliitis by taking into account the contextual signature of both active and structural SIJ lesions. For analysis, MRI positivity for sacroiliitis was defined based on majority-of-readers agreement (≥2 out of 3).

    Time frame: one study visit

  2. Number of Participants With MRI Positivity- ASAS Positive

    Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society. Subjects are positive if they fulfill 4 out of following 5 back pain parameters: onset of symptoms \<40 years of age, insidious onset of pain, nocturnal pain, improvement with exercise and no improvement with rest.

    Time frame: one study visit

  3. Number of Participants With MRI Positivity- SPACE Positive

    SpondyloArthritis Caught Early. Positivity based on presence of erosions and fat metaplasia.

    Time frame: one study visit

  4. Number of Participants With MRI Positivity- Morpho Positive

    Positivity based on presence of bone marrow edema (BME) and/or erosion.

    Time frame: one study visit

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Axial Spondyloarthritis Based on European Spondyloarthropathy Study Group (ESSG) Guidelines

    Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society criteria was utilized to define inflammatory back pain.

    Time frame: one study visit

  2. Number of Participants With Current Peripheral Arthritis

    Time frame: one study visit

  3. Number of Participants With a History of Peripheral Arthritis

    Time frame: one study visit

  4. Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI)

    Minimum 0. Maximum 10. A score of 0 = none (no symptoms), and a score of 10 = very severe symptoms.

    Time frame: one study visit

  5. Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI)

    The scale of the BASMI ranges from 0 to 10, where 0 is no mobility limitation and 10 is a very severe limitation.

    Time frame: one study visit

  6. Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index C-reactive Protein (ASDAS-CRP)

    Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index C-reactive protein. Higher score indicates worse symptoms. ASDAS-CRP = 0.12 x Back Pain + 0.06 x Duration of Morning Stiffness + 0.11 x Patient Global + 0.07 x Peripheral Pain/Swelling + 0.58 x Ln(CRP+1)

    Time frame: one study visit

  7. CRP (C-reactive Protein)

    Peripheral blood was collected for measurement of CRP.

    Time frame: one study visit

  8. Duration of Crohn's Disease for Participants

    Time frame: one study visit

  9. Number of Participants Using Vedolizumab for Crohn's Disease

    Time frame: one study visit

  10. Number of Participants With a Past History of Biologic Use for Crohn's Disease

    Time frame: one study visit

  11. Number of Participants Who Have Had Surgery Related to Crohn's Disease

    Time frame: one study visit

  12. Crohn's Disease Activity (Harvey Bradshaw Index (HBI) Score)

    HBI consists of five parameters, which are all clinical. These parameters are: patient well-being (previous day). abdominal pain (previous day), number of liquid or soft stools (previous day), abdominal mass, and complications. Patient well-being is scored with: 0 = very well, 1 = slightly below par, 2 = poor, 3 = very poor, 4 = terrible. Abdominal pain is scored as: 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe. Abdominal mass is scored as: 0 = none, 1 = dubious, 2 = definite, 3 = definite and tender. Complications can be answered with "No" (0 points) or by choosing from a list, with each selection being 1 point. The list is: arthralgia, uveitis, erythema nodosum, aphthous ulcer, pyoderma gangrenosum, anal fissures, appearance of a new fistula, abscess. Calculation formula: sum of the scores of all 5 parameters. \< 5 remission 5 - 7 mild activity 8 - 16 moderate activity \> 16 severe activity

    Time frame: one study visit

  13. Number of Participants With Inflammatory Back Pain

    Time frame: one study visit

  14. Number of Participants With Current Enthesitis

    Time frame: one study visit

  15. Number of Participants With a History of Uveitis

    Time frame: one study visit

  16. Number of Participants With a History of Dactylitis

    Time frame: one study visit

  17. Number of Participants With HLA-B27 (Human Leukocyte Antigen B-27)

    Time frame: one study visit

  18. Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index C-reactive Protein (ASDAS-CRP)

    A higher score indicates worse symptoms. ASDAS-CRP = 0.12 x Back Pain + 0.06 x Duration of Morning Stiffness + 0.11 x Patient Global + 0.07 x Peripheral Pain/Swelling + 0.58 x Ln(CRP+1)

    Time frame: one study visit

  19. Duration of Crohn's Disease

    Time frame: one study visit

  20. Number of Participants With a Prior History of Biologic Use for Crohn's Disease

    Time frame: one study visit

  21. Interleukin 2

    Concentration of IL-2 in peripheral blood of participants.

    Time frame: one study visit

  22. Interleukin 4

    Concentration of IL-4 in peripheral blood of participants.

    Time frame: one study visit

  23. Interleukin 5

    Concentration of IL-5 in peripheral blood of participants.

    Time frame: one study visit

  24. Interleukin 6

    Concentration of IL-6 in peripheral blood of participants.

    Time frame: one study visit

  25. Interleukin 9

    Concentration of IL-9 in peripheral blood of participants.

    Time frame: one study visit

  26. Interleukin 10

    Concentration of IL-10 in peripheral blood of participants.

    Time frame: one study visit

  27. Interleukin 13

    Concentration of IL-13 in peripheral blood of participants.

    Time frame: one study visit

  28. Interleukin 12-23

    Concentration of IL 12-23 in peripheral blood of participants.

    Time frame: one study visit

  29. Interleukin 17A

    Concentration of IL-17A in peripheral blood of participants.

    Time frame: one study visit

  30. Interleukin 17F

    Concentration of IL-17F in peripheral blood of participants.

    Time frame: one study visit

  31. Interleukin 21

    Concentration of IL-21 in peripheral blood of participants.

    Time frame: one study visit

  32. Interleukin 22

    Concentration of IL-22 in peripheral blood of participants.

    Time frame: one study visit

  33. Interferon-γ

    Concentration of INFγ in peripheral blood of participants.

    Time frame: one study visit

  34. TNF-α (Tumor Necrosis Factor)

    Concentration of TNF-α in peripheral blood of participants.

    Time frame: one study visit

  35. Mean Number of Sacroiliac Joint (SIJ) Quadrants Affected by BME or Structural Lesions for Each Participant

    MRIs were independently read and scored by 2 expert rheumatologists and 1 newly trained rheumatologist reader, blinded to any clinical information. MRIs were evaluated and scored for presence of bone marrow edema (BME) and structural lesions (erosion, fat metaplasia, backfill and ankylosis) using a validated scoring method originally derived from the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada SIJ module. Readers determined whether BME and the structural lesions were present in each of the quadrants for each participant. There are 2 sacroiliac joints and 4 quadrants for each joint, for a total of 8 quadrants for each participant.

    Time frame: one study visit

  36. Median Number of Sacroiliac Joint (SIJ) Quadrants Affected by BME or Structural Lesions for Each Participant

    MRIs were independently read and scored by 2 expert rheumatologists and 1 newly trained rheumatologist reader, blinded to any clinical information. MRIs were evaluated and scored for presence of bone marrow edema (BME) and structural lesions (erosion, fat metaplasia, backfill and ankylosis) using a validated scoring method originally derived from the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada SIJ module. Readers determined whether BME and the structural lesions were present in each of the quadrants for each participant. There are 2 sacroiliac joints and 4 quadrants for each joint, for a total of 8 quadrants for each participant.

    Time frame: one study visit

  37. Number of Participants With ≥1 Quadrant Affected by BME or Structural Lesions

    MRIs were independently read and scored by 2 expert rheumatologists and 1 newly trained rheumatologist reader, blinded to any clinical information. MRIs were evaluated and scored for presence of bone marrow edema (BME) and structural lesions (erosion, fat metaplasia, backfill and ankylosis) using a validated scoring method originally derived from the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada SIJ module. Readers determined whether BME and the structural lesions were present in each of the quadrants for each participant. There are 2 sacroiliac joints and 4 quadrants for each joint, for a total of 8 quadrants for each participant. A quadrant is deemed affected if concordantly reported by ≥ 2/3 readers.

    Time frame: one study visit

  38. Number of Participants With ≥2 Quadrants Affected by BME or Structural Lesions

    MRIs were independently read and scored by 2 expert rheumatologists and 1 newly trained rheumatologist reader, blinded to any clinical information. MRIs were evaluated and scored for presence of bone marrow edema (BME) and structural lesions (erosion, fat metaplasia, backfill and ankylosis) using a validated scoring method originally derived from the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada SIJ module. Readers determined whether BME and the structural lesions were present in each of the quadrants for each participant. There are 2 sacroiliac joints and 4 quadrants for each joint, for a total of 8 quadrants for each participant. A quadrant is deemed affected if concordantly reported by ≥ 2/3 readers.

    Time frame: one study visit

  39. Number of Participants With ≥3 Quadrants Affected by BME or Structural Lesions

    MRIs were independently read and scored by 2 expert rheumatologists and 1 newly trained rheumatologist reader, blinded to any clinical information. MRIs were evaluated and scored for presence of bone marrow edema (BME) and structural lesions (erosion, fat metaplasia, backfill and ankylosis) using a validated scoring method originally derived from the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada SIJ module. Readers determined whether BME and the structural lesions were present in each of the quadrants for each participant. There are 2 sacroiliac joints and 4 quadrants for each joint, for a total of 8 quadrants for each participant. A quadrant is deemed affected if concordantly reported by ≥ 2/3 readers.

    Time frame: one study visit

  40. Number of Participants With ≥4 Quadrants Affected by BME or Structural Lesions

    MRIs were independently read and scored by 2 expert rheumatologists and 1 newly trained rheumatologist reader, blinded to any clinical information. MRIs were evaluated and scored for presence of bone marrow edema (BME) and structural lesions (erosion, fat metaplasia, backfill and ankylosis) using a validated scoring method originally derived from the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada SIJ module. Readers determined whether BME and the structural lesions were present in each of the quadrants for each participant. There are 2 sacroiliac joints and 4 quadrants for each joint, for a total of 8 quadrants for each participant. A quadrant is deemed affected if concordantly reported by ≥ 2/3 readers.

    Time frame: one study visit

  41. Number of Participants With ≥6 Quadrants Affected by BME or Structural Lesions

    MRIs were independently read and scored by 2 expert rheumatologists and 1 newly trained rheumatologist reader, blinded to any clinical information. MRIs were evaluated and scored for presence of bone marrow edema (BME) and structural lesions (erosion, fat metaplasia, backfill and ankylosis) using a validated scoring method originally derived from the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada SIJ module. Readers determined whether BME and the structural lesions were present in each of the quadrants for each participant. There are 2 sacroiliac joints and 4 quadrants for each joint, for a total of 8 quadrants for each participant. A quadrant is deemed affected if concordantly reported by ≥ 2/3 readers.

    Time frame: one study visit

  42. Number of Participants With ≥5 Quadrants Affected by BME or Structural Lesions

    MRIs were independently read and scored by 2 expert rheumatologists and 1 newly trained rheumatologist reader, blinded to any clinical information. MRIs were evaluated and scored for presence of bone marrow edema (BME) and structural lesions (erosion, fat metaplasia, backfill and ankylosis) using a validated scoring method originally derived from the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada SIJ module. Readers determined whether BME and the structural lesions were present in each of the quadrants for each participant. There are 2 sacroiliac joints and 4 quadrants for each joint, for a total of 8 quadrants for each participant. A quadrant is deemed affected if concordantly reported by ≥ 2/3 readers.

    Time frame: one study visit

  43. Number of Participants With ≥7 Quadrants Affected by BME or Structural Lesions

    MRIs were independently read and scored by 2 expert rheumatologists and 1 newly trained rheumatologist reader, blinded to any clinical information. MRIs were evaluated and scored for presence of bone marrow edema (BME) and structural lesions (erosion, fat metaplasia, backfill and ankylosis) using a validated scoring method originally derived from the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada SIJ module. Readers determined whether BME and the structural lesions were present in each of the quadrants for each participant. There are 2 sacroiliac joints and 4 quadrants for each joint, for a total of 8 quadrants for each participant. A quadrant is deemed affected if concordantly reported by ≥ 2/3 readers.

    Time frame: one study visit

07

Results

Posted Oct 25, 2021

Participant flow

Patients were identified by physicians in the study at outpatient IBD clinics at Cornell during scheduled visits and through review of medical records. Gastroenterologists at the IBD clinic and HSS rheumatologists were contacted and asked about potential patients. Flyers were placed in patient rooms so patients could express interest in study. We approached potential subjects via postal and/or email addresses and sent survey questionnaire to determine eligibility. Recruitment done 4/2016-5/2017.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneAdult Subjects With Crohn's Disease
Started33
Any back pain19
No back pain14
Mri showing presence of sacroiliitis4
Mri not showing sacroiliitis29
Classified as having inflammatory back pain by the asas criteria6
Not classified as having inflammatory back pain by the asas criteria25
Having bone marrow edema seen in mri33
Having erosion (a structural lesion) seen in mri33
Having fat metaplasia seen in mri33
Having backfill (type of structural lesion) seen in mri33
Having ankylosis seen in mri33
Completed33
Not completed0

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants With MRI Positivity- Global Assessment Positive

MRIs were independently read and scored by 2 expert rheumatologists and 1 newly trained rheumatologist reader, blinded to any clinical information. MRIs were evaluated and scored for presence of bone marrow edema (BME) and structural lesions (erosion, fat metaplasia, backfill and ankylosis) using a validated scoring method originally derived from the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada SIJ module. MRI was considered "positive" for presence of sacroiliitis if it met global evaluation, based on the reader's overall evaluation of presence or absence of sacroiliitis by taking into account the contextual signature of both active and structural SIJ lesions. For analysis, MRI positivity for sacroiliitis was defined based on majority-of-readers agreement (≥2 out of 3).

Time frame:
one study visit
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With MRI Positivity- Global Assessment Positive
ParticipantsAny Back PainNo Back Pain
Number of Participants With MRI Positivity- Global Assessment Positive40
PrimaryNumber of Participants With MRI Positivity- ASAS Positive

Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society. Subjects are positive if they fulfill 4 out of following 5 back pain parameters: onset of symptoms \<40 years of age, insidious onset of pain, nocturnal pain, improvement with exercise and no improvement with rest.

Time frame:
one study visit
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With MRI Positivity- ASAS Positive
ParticipantsAny Back PainNo Back Pain
Number of Participants With MRI Positivity- ASAS Positive42
PrimaryNumber of Participants With MRI Positivity- SPACE Positive

SpondyloArthritis Caught Early. Positivity based on presence of erosions and fat metaplasia.

Time frame:
one study visit
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With MRI Positivity- SPACE Positive
ParticipantsAny Back PainNo Back Pain
Number of Participants With MRI Positivity- SPACE Positive00
PrimaryNumber of Participants With MRI Positivity- Morpho Positive

Positivity based on presence of bone marrow edema (BME) and/or erosion.

Time frame:
one study visit
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With MRI Positivity- Morpho Positive
ParticipantsAny Back PainNo Back Pain
Number of Participants With MRI Positivity- Morpho Positive51
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Axial Spondyloarthritis Based on European Spondyloarthropathy Study Group (ESSG) Guidelines

Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society criteria was utilized to define inflammatory back pain.

Time frame:
one study visit
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Axial Spondyloarthritis Based on European Spondyloarthropathy Study Group (ESSG) Guidelines
ParticipantsAny Back Pain
Number of Participants With Axial Spondyloarthritis Based on European Spondyloarthropathy Study Group (ESSG) Guidelines13
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Current Peripheral Arthritis
Time frame:
one study visit
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Current Peripheral Arthritis
ParticipantsAny Back PainNo Back Pain
Number of Participants With Current Peripheral Arthritis144
SecondaryNumber of Participants With a History of Peripheral Arthritis
Time frame:
one study visit
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With a History of Peripheral Arthritis
ParticipantsAny Back PainNo Back Pain
Number of Participants With a History of Peripheral Arthritis166
SecondaryBath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI)

Minimum 0. Maximum 10. A score of 0 = none (no symptoms), and a score of 10 = very severe symptoms.

Time frame:
one study visit
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI)
score on a scaleAny Back PainNo Back Pain
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI)5.3 ± 1.82.4 ± 1.6
SecondaryBath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI)

The scale of the BASMI ranges from 0 to 10, where 0 is no mobility limitation and 10 is a very severe limitation.

Time frame:
one study visit
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI)
score on a scaleAny Back PainNo Back Pain
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI)2.9 ± 0.92.1 ± 0.9
SecondaryAnkylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index C-reactive Protein (ASDAS-CRP)

Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index C-reactive protein. Higher score indicates worse symptoms. ASDAS-CRP = 0.12 x Back Pain + 0.06 x Duration of Morning Stiffness + 0.11 x Patient Global + 0.07 x Peripheral Pain/Swelling + 0.58 x Ln(CRP+1)

Time frame:
one study visit
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index C-reactive Protein (ASDAS-CRP)
score on a scaleAny Back PainNo Back Pain
Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index C-reactive Protein (ASDAS-CRP)3.1 ± 0.92.1 ± 0.9
SecondaryCRP (C-reactive Protein)

Peripheral blood was collected for measurement of CRP.

Time frame:
one study visit
Reported as:
Mean · mg/L
CRP (C-reactive Protein)
mg/LAny Back PainNo Back Pain
CRP (C-reactive Protein)1.6 ± 2.01.7 ± 3.3
SecondaryDuration of Crohn's Disease for Participants
Time frame:
one study visit
Reported as:
Mean · years
Duration of Crohn's Disease for Participants
yearsAny Back PainNo Back Pain
Duration of Crohn's Disease for Participants11.9 ± 6.714.2 ± 10.5
SecondaryNumber of Participants Using Vedolizumab for Crohn's Disease
Time frame:
one study visit
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Using Vedolizumab for Crohn's Disease
ParticipantsAny Back PainNo Back Pain
Number of Participants Using Vedolizumab for Crohn's Disease34
SecondaryNumber of Participants With a Past History of Biologic Use for Crohn's Disease
Time frame:
one study visit
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With a Past History of Biologic Use for Crohn's Disease
ParticipantsAny Back PainNo Back Pain
Number of Participants With a Past History of Biologic Use for Crohn's Disease34
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Have Had Surgery Related to Crohn's Disease
Time frame:
one study visit
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Who Have Had Surgery Related to Crohn's Disease
ParticipantsAny Back PainNo Back Pain
Number of Participants Who Have Had Surgery Related to Crohn's Disease109
SecondaryCrohn's Disease Activity (Harvey Bradshaw Index (HBI) Score)

HBI consists of five parameters, which are all clinical. These parameters are: patient well-being (previous day). abdominal pain (previous day), number of liquid or soft stools (previous day), abdominal mass, and complications. Patient well-being is scored with: 0 = very well, 1 = slightly below par, 2 = poor, 3 = very poor, 4 = terrible. Abdominal pain is scored as: 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe. Abdominal mass is scored as: 0 = none, 1 = dubious, 2 = definite, 3 = definite and tender. Complications can be answered with "No" (0 points) or by choosing from a list, with each selection being 1 point. The list is: arthralgia, uveitis, erythema nodosum, aphthous ulcer, pyoderma gangrenosum, anal fissures, appearance of a new fistula, abscess. Calculation formula: sum of the scores of all 5 parameters. \< 5 remission 5 - 7 mild activity 8 - 16 moderate activity \> 16 severe activity

Time frame:
one study visit
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Crohn's Disease Activity (Harvey Bradshaw Index (HBI) Score)
score on a scaleAny Back PainNo Back Pain
Crohn's Disease Activity (Harvey Bradshaw Index (HBI) Score)9.1 ± 4.96.9 ± 3.7
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Inflammatory Back Pain
Time frame:
one study visit
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Inflammatory Back Pain
ParticipantsGlobal MRI PositiveGlobal MRI Negative
Number of Participants With Inflammatory Back Pain415
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Current Peripheral Arthritis
Time frame:
one study visit
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Current Peripheral Arthritis
ParticipantsGlobal MRI PositiveGlobal MRI Negative
Number of Participants With Current Peripheral Arthritis315
SecondaryNumber of Participants With a History of Peripheral Arthritis
Time frame:
one study visit
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With a History of Peripheral Arthritis
ParticipantsGlobal MRI PositiveGlobal MRI Negative
Number of Participants With a History of Peripheral Arthritis418
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Current Enthesitis
Time frame:
one study visit
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Current Enthesitis
ParticipantsGlobal MRI PositiveGlobal MRI Negative
Number of Participants With Current Enthesitis18
SecondaryNumber of Participants With a History of Uveitis
Time frame:
one study visit
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With a History of Uveitis
ParticipantsGlobal MRI PositiveGlobal MRI Negative
Number of Participants With a History of Uveitis13
SecondaryNumber of Participants With a History of Dactylitis
Time frame:
one study visit
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With a History of Dactylitis
ParticipantsGlobal MRI PositiveGlobal MRI Negative
Number of Participants With a History of Dactylitis21
SecondaryNumber of Participants With HLA-B27 (Human Leukocyte Antigen B-27)
Time frame:
one study visit
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With HLA-B27 (Human Leukocyte Antigen B-27)
ParticipantsGlobal MRI PositiveGlobal MRI Negative
Number of Participants With HLA-B27 (Human Leukocyte Antigen B-27)01
SecondaryCRP (C-reactive Protein)

Peripheral blood was collected for measurement of CRP.

Time frame:
one study visit
Reported as:
Mean · mg/L
CRP (C-reactive Protein)
mg/LGlobal MRI PositiveGlobal MRI Negative
CRP (C-reactive Protein)2.6 ± 3.01.5 ± 2.6
SecondaryBath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI)

Minimum 0. Maximum 10. A score of 0 = none (no symptoms), and a score of 10 = very severe symptoms.

Time frame:
one study visit
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI)
score on a scaleGlobal MRI PositiveGlobal MRI Negative
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI)4.3 ± 1.74.2 ± 2.4
SecondaryBath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI)

The scale of the BASMI ranges from 0 to 10, where 0 is no mobility limitation and 10 is a very severe limitation.

Time frame:
one study visit
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI)
score on a scaleGlobal MRI PositiveGlobal MRI Negative
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI)4.1 ± 0.72.4 ± 0.8
SecondaryAnkylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index C-reactive Protein (ASDAS-CRP)

A higher score indicates worse symptoms. ASDAS-CRP = 0.12 x Back Pain + 0.06 x Duration of Morning Stiffness + 0.11 x Patient Global + 0.07 x Peripheral Pain/Swelling + 0.58 x Ln(CRP+1)

Time frame:
one study visit
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index C-reactive Protein (ASDAS-CRP)
score on a scaleGlobal MRI PositiveGlobal MRI Negative
Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index C-reactive Protein (ASDAS-CRP)3.3 ± 0.42.5 ± 1.2
SecondaryDuration of Crohn's Disease
Time frame:
one study visit
Reported as:
Mean · years
Duration of Crohn's Disease
yearsGlobal MRI PositiveGlobal MRI Negative
Duration of Crohn's Disease17.9 ± 3.812.2 ± 8.7
SecondaryCrohn's Disease Activity (Harvey Bradshaw Index (HBI) Score)

HBI consists of five parameters, which are all clinical. These parameters are: patient well-being (previous day). abdominal pain (previous day), number of liquid or soft stools (previous day), abdominal mass, and complications. Patient well-being is scored with: 0 = very well, 1 = slightly below par, 2 = poor, 3 = very poor, 4 = terrible. Abdominal pain is scored as: 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe. Abdominal mass is scored as: 0 = none, 1 = dubious, 2 = definite, 3 = definite and tender. Complications can be answered with "No" (0 points) or by choosing from a list, with each selection being 1 point. The list is: arthralgia, uveitis, erythema nodosum, aphthous ulcer, pyoderma gangrenosum, anal fissures, appearance of a new fistula, abscess. Calculation formula: sum of the scores of all 5 parameters. \< 5 remission 5 - 7 mild activity 8 - 16 moderate activity \> 16 severe activity

Time frame:
one study visit
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Crohn's Disease Activity (Harvey Bradshaw Index (HBI) Score)
score on a scaleGlobal MRI PositiveGlobal MRI Negative
Crohn's Disease Activity (Harvey Bradshaw Index (HBI) Score)7.8 ± 4.98.3 ± 4.5
SecondaryNumber of Participants Using Vedolizumab for Crohn's Disease
Time frame:
one study visit
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Using Vedolizumab for Crohn's Disease
ParticipantsGlobal MRI PositiveGlobal MRI Negative
Number of Participants Using Vedolizumab for Crohn's Disease07
SecondaryNumber of Participants With a Prior History of Biologic Use for Crohn's Disease
Time frame:
one study visit
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With a Prior History of Biologic Use for Crohn's Disease
ParticipantsGlobal MRI PositiveGlobal MRI Negative
Number of Participants With a Prior History of Biologic Use for Crohn's Disease316
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Have Had Surgery Related to Crohn's Disease
Time frame:
one study visit
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Who Have Had Surgery Related to Crohn's Disease
ParticipantsGlobal MRI PositiveGlobal MRI Negative
Number of Participants Who Have Had Surgery Related to Crohn's Disease316
SecondaryInterleukin 2

Concentration of IL-2 in peripheral blood of participants.

Time frame:
one study visit
Reported as:
Mean · pg/mL
Interleukin 2
pg/mLASAS (Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society) MRI PositiveASAS (Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society) MRI Negative
Interleukin 24.7 ± 2.05.6 ± 7.8
SecondaryInterleukin 4

Concentration of IL-4 in peripheral blood of participants.

Time frame:
one study visit
Reported as:
Mean · pg/mL
Interleukin 4
pg/mLASAS (Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society) MRI PositiveASAS (Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society) MRI Negative
Interleukin 43.5 ± 1.65.7 ± 4.6
SecondaryInterleukin 5

Concentration of IL-5 in peripheral blood of participants.

Time frame:
one study visit
Reported as:
Mean · pg/mL
Interleukin 5
pg/mLASAS (Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society) MRI PositiveASAS (Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society) MRI Negative
Interleukin 53.7 ± 0.03.8 ± 0.1
SecondaryInterleukin 6

Concentration of IL-6 in peripheral blood of participants.

Time frame:
one study visit
Reported as:
Mean · pg/mL
Interleukin 6
pg/mLASAS (Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society) MRI PositiveASAS (Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society) MRI Negative
Interleukin 66.2 ± 7.25.1 ± 6.9
SecondaryInterleukin 9

Concentration of IL-9 in peripheral blood of participants.

Time frame:
one study visit
Reported as:
Mean · pg/mL
Interleukin 9
pg/mLASAS (Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society) MRI PositiveASAS (Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society) MRI Negative
Interleukin 92.4 ± 1.51.9 ± 0.9
SecondaryInterleukin 10

Concentration of IL-10 in peripheral blood of participants.

Time frame:
one study visit
Reported as:
Mean · pg/mL
Interleukin 10
pg/mLASAS (Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society) MRI PositiveASAS (Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society) MRI Negative
Interleukin 1031.0 ± 59.36.5 ± 1.8
SecondaryInterleukin 13

Concentration of IL-13 in peripheral blood of participants.

Time frame:
one study visit
Reported as:
Mean · pg/mL
Interleukin 13
pg/mLASAS (Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society) MRI PositiveASAS (Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society) MRI Negative
Interleukin 138.9 ± 6.38.9 ± 4.4
SecondaryInterleukin 12-23

Concentration of IL 12-23 in peripheral blood of participants.

Time frame:
one study visit
Reported as:
Mean · pg/mL
Interleukin 12-23
pg/mLASAS (Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society) MRI PositiveASAS (Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society) MRI Negative
Interleukin 12-23214.0 ± 159.5259.1 ± 227.7
SecondaryInterleukin 17A

Concentration of IL-17A in peripheral blood of participants.

Time frame:
one study visit
Reported as:
Mean · pg/mL
Interleukin 17A
pg/mLASAS (Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society) MRI PositiveASAS (Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society) MRI Negative
Interleukin 17A25.3 ± 13.121.1 ± 10.5
SecondaryInterleukin 17F

Concentration of IL-17F in peripheral blood of participants.

Time frame:
one study visit
Reported as:
Mean · pg/mL
Interleukin 17F
pg/mLASAS (Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society) MRI PositiveASAS (Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society) MRI Negative
Interleukin 17F4.8 ± 2.23.8 ± 3.5
SecondaryInterleukin 21

Concentration of IL-21 in peripheral blood of participants.

Time frame:
one study visit
Reported as:
Mean · pg/mL
Interleukin 21
pg/mLASAS (Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society) MRI PositiveASAS (Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society) MRI Negative
Interleukin 2119.8 ± 36.240.0 ± 43.2
SecondaryInterleukin 22

Concentration of IL-22 in peripheral blood of participants.

Time frame:
one study visit
Reported as:
Mean · pg/mL
Interleukin 22
pg/mLASAS (Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society) MRI PositiveASAS (Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society) MRI Negative
Interleukin 2215.2 ± 7.116.7 ± 11.2
SecondaryInterferon-γ

Concentration of INFγ in peripheral blood of participants.

Time frame:
one study visit
Reported as:
Mean · pg/mL
Interferon-γ
pg/mLASAS (Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society) MRI PositiveASAS (Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society) MRI Negative
Interferon-γ75.7 ± 31.079.0 ± 28.8
SecondaryTNF-α (Tumor Necrosis Factor)

Concentration of TNF-α in peripheral blood of participants.

Time frame:
one study visit
Reported as:
Mean · pg/mL
TNF-α (Tumor Necrosis Factor)
pg/mLASAS (Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society) MRI PositiveASAS (Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society) MRI Negative
TNF-α (Tumor Necrosis Factor)19.5 ± 15.235.4 ± 94.1
SecondaryMean Number of Sacroiliac Joint (SIJ) Quadrants Affected by BME or Structural Lesions for Each Participant

MRIs were independently read and scored by 2 expert rheumatologists and 1 newly trained rheumatologist reader, blinded to any clinical information. MRIs were evaluated and scored for presence of bone marrow edema (BME) and structural lesions (erosion, fat metaplasia, backfill and ankylosis) using a validated scoring method originally derived from the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada SIJ module. Readers determined whether BME and the structural lesions were present in each of the quadrants for each participant. There are 2 sacroiliac joints and 4 quadrants for each joint, for a total of 8 quadrants for each participant.

Time frame:
one study visit
Reported as:
Mean · Number of Quadrants Affected per Person
Mean Number of Sacroiliac Joint (SIJ) Quadrants Affected by BME or Structural Lesions for Each Participant
Number of Quadrants Affected per PersonBone Marrow EdemaErosionFat MetaplasiaBackfillAnkylosis
Mean Number of Sacroiliac Joint (SIJ) Quadrants Affected by BME or Structural Lesions for Each Participant0.86 ± 1.450.05 ± 0.150.98 ± 3.550.04 ± 0.231.02 ± 3.45
SecondaryMedian Number of Sacroiliac Joint (SIJ) Quadrants Affected by BME or Structural Lesions for Each Participant

MRIs were independently read and scored by 2 expert rheumatologists and 1 newly trained rheumatologist reader, blinded to any clinical information. MRIs were evaluated and scored for presence of bone marrow edema (BME) and structural lesions (erosion, fat metaplasia, backfill and ankylosis) using a validated scoring method originally derived from the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada SIJ module. Readers determined whether BME and the structural lesions were present in each of the quadrants for each participant. There are 2 sacroiliac joints and 4 quadrants for each joint, for a total of 8 quadrants for each participant.

Time frame:
one study visit
Reported as:
Median · Number of Quadrants Affected per Person
Median Number of Sacroiliac Joint (SIJ) Quadrants Affected by BME or Structural Lesions for Each Participant
Number of Quadrants Affected per PersonBone Marrow EdemaErosionFat MetaplasiaBackfillAnkylosis
Median Number of Sacroiliac Joint (SIJ) Quadrants Affected by BME or Structural Lesions for Each Participant0 (0 to 1.3)0 (0 to 0)0 (0 to 0)0 (0 to 0)0 (0 to 0)
SecondaryNumber of Participants With ≥1 Quadrant Affected by BME or Structural Lesions

MRIs were independently read and scored by 2 expert rheumatologists and 1 newly trained rheumatologist reader, blinded to any clinical information. MRIs were evaluated and scored for presence of bone marrow edema (BME) and structural lesions (erosion, fat metaplasia, backfill and ankylosis) using a validated scoring method originally derived from the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada SIJ module. Readers determined whether BME and the structural lesions were present in each of the quadrants for each participant. There are 2 sacroiliac joints and 4 quadrants for each joint, for a total of 8 quadrants for each participant. A quadrant is deemed affected if concordantly reported by ≥ 2/3 readers.

Time frame:
one study visit
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With ≥1 Quadrant Affected by BME or Structural Lesions
ParticipantsBone Marrow EdemaErosionFat MetaplasiaBackfillAnkylosis
Number of Participants With ≥1 Quadrant Affected by BME or Structural Lesions101212
SecondaryNumber of Participants With ≥2 Quadrants Affected by BME or Structural Lesions

MRIs were independently read and scored by 2 expert rheumatologists and 1 newly trained rheumatologist reader, blinded to any clinical information. MRIs were evaluated and scored for presence of bone marrow edema (BME) and structural lesions (erosion, fat metaplasia, backfill and ankylosis) using a validated scoring method originally derived from the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada SIJ module. Readers determined whether BME and the structural lesions were present in each of the quadrants for each participant. There are 2 sacroiliac joints and 4 quadrants for each joint, for a total of 8 quadrants for each participant. A quadrant is deemed affected if concordantly reported by ≥ 2/3 readers.

Time frame:
one study visit
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With ≥2 Quadrants Affected by BME or Structural Lesions
ParticipantsBone Marrow EdemaErosionFat MetaplasiaBackfillAnkylosis
Number of Participants With ≥2 Quadrants Affected by BME or Structural Lesions70102
SecondaryNumber of Participants With ≥3 Quadrants Affected by BME or Structural Lesions

MRIs were independently read and scored by 2 expert rheumatologists and 1 newly trained rheumatologist reader, blinded to any clinical information. MRIs were evaluated and scored for presence of bone marrow edema (BME) and structural lesions (erosion, fat metaplasia, backfill and ankylosis) using a validated scoring method originally derived from the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada SIJ module. Readers determined whether BME and the structural lesions were present in each of the quadrants for each participant. There are 2 sacroiliac joints and 4 quadrants for each joint, for a total of 8 quadrants for each participant. A quadrant is deemed affected if concordantly reported by ≥ 2/3 readers.

Time frame:
one study visit
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With ≥3 Quadrants Affected by BME or Structural Lesions
ParticipantsBone Marrow EdemaErosionFat MetaplasiaBackfillAnkylosis
Number of Participants With ≥3 Quadrants Affected by BME or Structural Lesions50102
SecondaryNumber of Participants With ≥4 Quadrants Affected by BME or Structural Lesions

MRIs were independently read and scored by 2 expert rheumatologists and 1 newly trained rheumatologist reader, blinded to any clinical information. MRIs were evaluated and scored for presence of bone marrow edema (BME) and structural lesions (erosion, fat metaplasia, backfill and ankylosis) using a validated scoring method originally derived from the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada SIJ module. Readers determined whether BME and the structural lesions were present in each of the quadrants for each participant. There are 2 sacroiliac joints and 4 quadrants for each joint, for a total of 8 quadrants for each participant. A quadrant is deemed affected if concordantly reported by ≥ 2/3 readers.

Time frame:
one study visit
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With ≥4 Quadrants Affected by BME or Structural Lesions
ParticipantsBone Marrow EdemaErosionFat MetaplasiaBackfillAnkylosis
Number of Participants With ≥4 Quadrants Affected by BME or Structural Lesions20102
SecondaryNumber of Participants With ≥6 Quadrants Affected by BME or Structural Lesions

MRIs were independently read and scored by 2 expert rheumatologists and 1 newly trained rheumatologist reader, blinded to any clinical information. MRIs were evaluated and scored for presence of bone marrow edema (BME) and structural lesions (erosion, fat metaplasia, backfill and ankylosis) using a validated scoring method originally derived from the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada SIJ module. Readers determined whether BME and the structural lesions were present in each of the quadrants for each participant. There are 2 sacroiliac joints and 4 quadrants for each joint, for a total of 8 quadrants for each participant. A quadrant is deemed affected if concordantly reported by ≥ 2/3 readers.

Time frame:
one study visit
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With ≥6 Quadrants Affected by BME or Structural Lesions
ParticipantsBone Marrow EdemaErosionFat MetaplasiaBackfillAnkylosis
Number of Participants With ≥6 Quadrants Affected by BME or Structural Lesions10102
SecondaryNumber of Participants With ≥5 Quadrants Affected by BME or Structural Lesions

MRIs were independently read and scored by 2 expert rheumatologists and 1 newly trained rheumatologist reader, blinded to any clinical information. MRIs were evaluated and scored for presence of bone marrow edema (BME) and structural lesions (erosion, fat metaplasia, backfill and ankylosis) using a validated scoring method originally derived from the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada SIJ module. Readers determined whether BME and the structural lesions were present in each of the quadrants for each participant. There are 2 sacroiliac joints and 4 quadrants for each joint, for a total of 8 quadrants for each participant. A quadrant is deemed affected if concordantly reported by ≥ 2/3 readers.

Time frame:
one study visit
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With ≥5 Quadrants Affected by BME or Structural Lesions
ParticipantsBone Marrow EdemaErosionFat MetaplasiaBackfillAnkylosis
Number of Participants With ≥5 Quadrants Affected by BME or Structural Lesions20102
SecondaryNumber of Participants With ≥7 Quadrants Affected by BME or Structural Lesions

MRIs were independently read and scored by 2 expert rheumatologists and 1 newly trained rheumatologist reader, blinded to any clinical information. MRIs were evaluated and scored for presence of bone marrow edema (BME) and structural lesions (erosion, fat metaplasia, backfill and ankylosis) using a validated scoring method originally derived from the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada SIJ module. Readers determined whether BME and the structural lesions were present in each of the quadrants for each participant. There are 2 sacroiliac joints and 4 quadrants for each joint, for a total of 8 quadrants for each participant. A quadrant is deemed affected if concordantly reported by ≥ 2/3 readers.

Time frame:
one study visit
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With ≥7 Quadrants Affected by BME or Structural Lesions
ParticipantsBone Marrow EdemaErosionFat MetaplasiaBackfillAnkylosis
Number of Participants With ≥7 Quadrants Affected by BME or Structural Lesions00102

Adverse events

Collected over 1 year. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Adult Subjects With Crohn's Disease0/33 (0%)0/33 (0%)0/33 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Adult Subjects With Crohn's Disease
<=18 years0
Between 18 and 65 years33
>=65 years0
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Adult Subjects With Crohn's Disease
Median36.4 (27.2 to 49.0)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Adult Subjects With Crohn's Disease
Female25
Male8
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Adult Subjects With Crohn's Disease
Hispanic or Latino0
Not Hispanic or Latino33
Unknown or Not Reported0
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Adult Subjects With Crohn's Disease
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian1
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American4
White25
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported3
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Adult Subjects With Crohn's Disease
United States33
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Hospital for Special Surgery
    New York, New York 10021, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Lichtenstein GR, Yan S, Bala M, Blank M, Sands BE. Infliximab maintenance treatment reduces hospitalizations, surgeries, and procedures in fistulizing Crohn's disease. Gastroenterology. 2005 Apr;128(4):862-9. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.01.048. PubMed 15825070 ↗
  • Bernstein CN, Blanchard JF, Rawsthorne P, Yu N. The prevalence of extraintestinal diseases in inflammatory bowel disease: a population-based study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001 Apr;96(4):1116-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.03756.x. PubMed 11316157 ↗
  • Dekker-Saeys BJ, Meuwissen SG, Van Den Berg-Loonen EM, De Haas WH, Agenant D, Tytgat GN. Ankylosing spondylitis and inflammatory bowel disease. II. Prevalence of peripheral arthritis, sacroiliitis, and ankylosing spondylitis in patients suffering from inflammatory bowel disease. Ann Rheum Dis. 1978 Feb;37(1):33-5. doi: 10.1136/ard.37.1.33. PubMed 629601 ↗
  • Shivashankar R, Loftus EV Jr, Tremaine WJ, Bongartz T, Harmsen WS, Zinsmeister AR, Matteson EL. Incidence of spondyloarthropathy in patients with Crohn's disease: a population-based study. J Rheumatol. 2012 Nov;39(11):2148-52. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.120321. Epub 2012 Sep 15. Erratum In: J Rheumatol. 2012 Nov;39(11):2232. PubMed 22984277 ↗
  • Bandinelli F, Terenzi R, Giovannini L, Milla M, Genise S, Bagnoli S, Biagini S, Annese V, Matucci-Cerinic M. Occult radiological sacroiliac abnormalities in patients with inflammatory bowel disease who do not present signs or symptoms of axial spondylitis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2014 Nov-Dec;32(6):949-52. Epub 2014 Aug 15. PubMed 25152017 ↗
  • Subramaniam K, Tymms K, Shadbolt B, Pavli P. Spondyloarthropathy in inflammatory bowel disease patients on TNF inhibitors. Intern Med J. 2015 Nov;45(11):1154-60. doi: 10.1111/imj.12891. PubMed 26337851 ↗
  • Boonen A, Sieper J, van der Heijde D, Dougados M, Bukowski JF, Valluri S, Vlahos B, Kotak S. The burden of non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2015 Apr;44(5):556-562. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2014.10.009. Epub 2014 Oct 22. PubMed 25532945 ↗
  • Sieper J, van der Heijde D, Dougados M, Mease PJ, Maksymowych WP, Brown MA, Arora V, Pangan AL. Efficacy and safety of adalimumab in patients with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: results of a randomised placebo-controlled trial (ABILITY-1). Ann Rheum Dis. 2013 Jun;72(6):815-22. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201766. Epub 2012 Jul 7. PubMed 22772328 ↗
  • Sieper J, van der Heijde D. Review: Nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis: new definition of an old disease? Arthritis Rheum. 2013 Mar;65(3):543-51. doi: 10.1002/art.37803. No abstract available. PubMed 23233285 ↗
  • Sieper J, Rudwaleit M, Baraliakos X, Brandt J, Braun J, Burgos-Vargas R, Dougados M, Hermann KG, Landewe R, Maksymowych W, van der Heijde D. The Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) handbook: a guide to assess spondyloarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009 Jun;68 Suppl 2:ii1-44. doi: 10.1136/ard.2008.104018. PubMed 19433414 ↗
  • Sieper J, van der Heijde D, Landewe R, Brandt J, Burgos-Vagas R, Collantes-Estevez E, Dijkmans B, Dougados M, Khan MA, Leirisalo-Repo M, van der Linden S, Maksymowych WP, Mielants H, Olivieri I, Rudwaleit M. New criteria for inflammatory back pain in patients with chronic back pain: a real patient exercise by experts from the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS). Ann Rheum Dis. 2009 Jun;68(6):784-8. doi: 10.1136/ard.2008.101501. Epub 2009 Jan 15. PubMed 19147614 ↗
  • Steer S, Jones H, Hibbert J, Kondeatis E, Vaughan R, Sanderson J, Gibson T. Low back pain, sacroiliitis, and the relationship with HLA-B27 in Crohn's disease. J Rheumatol. 2003 Mar;30(3):518-22. PubMed 12610811 ↗
  • van Steenbergen HW, Huizinga TW, van der Helm-van Mil AH. The preclinical phase of rheumatoid arthritis: what is acknowledged and what needs to be assessed? Arthritis Rheum. 2013 Sep;65(9):2219-32. doi: 10.1002/art.38013. No abstract available. PubMed 23686440 ↗
  • Solomon DH, Reed GW, Kremer JM, Curtis JR, Farkouh ME, Harrold LR, Hochberg MC, Tsao P, Greenberg JD. Disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis and the risk of cardiovascular events. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015 Jun;67(6):1449-55. doi: 10.1002/art.39098. PubMed 25776112 ↗
  • Roubille C, Richer V, Starnino T, McCourt C, McFarlane A, Fleming P, Siu S, Kraft J, Lynde C, Pope J, Gulliver W, Keeling S, Dutz J, Bessette L, Bissonnette R, Haraoui B. The effects of tumour necrosis factor inhibitors, methotrexate, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and corticosteroids on cardiovascular events in rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015 Mar;74(3):480-9. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-206624. Epub 2015 Jan 5. PubMed 25561362 ↗
  • Exarchou S, Lie E, Lindstrom U, Askling J, Forsblad-d'Elia H, Turesson C, Kristensen LE, Jacobsson LT. Mortality in ankylosing spondylitis: results from a nationwide population-based study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Aug;75(8):1466-72. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-207688. Epub 2015 Sep 2. PubMed 26338036 ↗
  • Haroon NN, Paterson JM, Li P, Inman RD, Haroon N. Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis Have Increased Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Mortality: A Population-Based Study. Ann Intern Med. 2015 Sep 15;163(6):409-16. doi: 10.7326/M14-2470. PubMed 26258401 ↗
  • van der Heijde D, Sieper J, Maksymowych WP, Brown MA, Lambert RG, Rathmann SS, Pangan AL. Spinal inflammation in the absence of sacroiliac joint inflammation on magnetic resonance imaging in patients with active nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014 Mar;66(3):667-73. doi: 10.1002/art.38283. PubMed 24574227 ↗
  • Manasson J, Scher JU. Spondyloarthritis and the microbiome: new insights from an ancient hypothesis. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2015 Feb;17(2):10. doi: 10.1007/s11926-014-0487-7. PubMed 25663180 ↗
  • Gevers D, Kugathasan S, Denson LA, Vazquez-Baeza Y, Van Treuren W, Ren B, Schwager E, Knights D, Song SJ, Yassour M, Morgan XC, Kostic AD, Luo C, Gonzalez A, McDonald D, Haberman Y, Walters T, Baker S, Rosh J, Stephens M, Heyman M, Markowitz J, Baldassano R, Griffiths A, Sylvester F, Mack D, Kim S, Crandall W, Hyams J, Huttenhower C, Knight R, Xavier RJ. The treatment-naive microbiome in new-onset Crohn's disease. Cell Host Microbe. 2014 Mar 12;15(3):382-392. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2014.02.005. PubMed 24629344 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jan 17, 2019
  • Informed consent form · Jan 18, 2017

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 25, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02709694
Lead sponsor
Hospital for Special Surgery, New York
Collaborators
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 16, 2016
Start date
Apr 2016
Primary completion
Jan 2019
Completion
Jan 2021
Results posted
Oct 25, 2021
Last update
Oct 25, 2021

Study contacts

Lisa Mandl, MD MPH
principal investigator · Hospital for Special Surgery, New York

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion