CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02693015Updated Feb 26, 2016

Impact of Time to Coronary Angiography on Survival for NSTEMI

An observational study in Non ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction, sponsored by University of Leeds. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 100 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-02-26.

Sponsored by University of Leeds · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
235,986
Ages
18 Years to 100 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to investigate the extent to which the time to angiography impacts on survival in patients hospitalised with NSTEMI.

Read the detailed description

The use of an invasive strategy for the management of NSTEMI according to estimated risk of 6 month mortality is recommended by international guidelines. NSTEMI appropriate for coronary angiography (and percutaneous intervention) have better outcomes compare with NSTEMI who are medically managed. Whilst the national and international guidelines recommend that the timing of (in-hospital) coronary angiography (\<24, 24-72, 72-96 and \<96 hours) is based upon estimated clinical risk (using the GRACE risk score) there is scientific and clinical uncertainty as to the incremental benefit that more urgent invasive treatments strategies have over and above that of delayed strategies. Moreover, the investigators recent research has shown that in the UK, may NSTEMI (eligible) for coronary angiography fail to achieve care according to the recommended time thresholds, and this is associated with potentially avoidable premature death.

This study aims to investigate the extent to which the time to angiography impacts on survival in patients hospitalised with NSTEMI. It will characterise patients according to their estimated risk of death, their time to angiography, and associated outcomes. The investigators anticipate that this observational study will provide Level B evidence for the benefits of the timing of an invasive strategy according to the GRACE risk score. The investigators are aware that the NICE guidelines for the management of acute chest pain are to be updated in 2016.

02

Conditions studied

03

In context

Myocardial Infarction

2,744 studies on the registry are indexed under Myocardial Infarction; 418 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 235,986 is above the median of 500 across 983 observational studies indexed under Myocardial Infarction.

Browse Myocardial Infarction studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Leeds is the lead sponsor of 200 studies on the registry; 25 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 100 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The study population comprises 725,860 patients hospitalised for acute myocardial infarction and entered into the Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP) database between April 2004 and March 2013.

Inclusion criteria

  • The target population will be all patients aged 18 to 100 years recorded within MINAP from 2004 to 2013 who have been hospitalised with NSTEMI and received coronary angiography.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age below 18 or above 100 or age missing
  • Diagnosis not NSTEMI
  • Patients who did not receive coronary angiography - as this is the investigators explanatory variable
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
235,986 participants (actual)
Target follow-up
1 Year
Patient registry
Yes
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. All-cause mortality

    Time frame: 30-day mortality since hospitalisation

  2. Mortality

    Time frame: 1-year mortality since hospitalisation

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 26, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02693015
Lead sponsor
University of Leeds
Responsible party
Dr Christopher Gale (Associate Professor, University of Leeds) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 26, 2016
Start date
Apr 2004
Primary completion
Mar 2013
Completion
Mar 2013
Last update
Feb 26, 2016

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion