ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02688933Updated Mar 28, 2022Results posted

A Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of the Morning Injection of Toujeo Versus Lantus in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

A Phase 4 interventional study of HOE901-U300 (Insulin Glargine 300 U/ml) and Lantus (Insulin Glargine 100 U/ml) in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus, sponsored by Sanofi. Completed at 100 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-03-28.

Sponsored by Sanofi · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
638
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Primary Objective:

To demonstrate that morning injection of Toujeo (HOE901-U300) compared to Lantus provides better glycemic control evaluated by Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) in adult participants with type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Secondary Objective:

To demonstrate that treatment with HOE901-U300 compared to Lantus provides:

  • Lower incidence rate of nocturnal symptomatic hypoglycemia;
  • Better glucose control coverage during the last hours of CGM before next basal-insulin dosing;
  • Less variability in CGM profile.
Read the detailed description

The maximum study duration per participant was to be of approximately 20 weeks that consisted of an up to a 4-week screening and CGM training period including a 1-2 week baseline (blinded) CGM performance (allowed for re-training), a 14-week open-label, comparative treatment period allowing for dose titration in both basal and meal-time insulin and including a 1-2 week end-of treatment blinded CGM collection with fixed dose of HOE901-U300 and Lantus, and a 2 day post treatment follow-up period.

02

Conditions studied

  • Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
03

In context

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1

3,614 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; 586 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 638 is above the median of 40 across 2,718 interventional studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1.

Browse Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 studies →

Lead sponsor

Sanofi is the lead sponsor of 1,547 studies on the registry; 88 are open to participants now.

Of its 204 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 122 (60%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult participants (male and female) with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM).
  • Signed written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  • Age \<18 years or >70 years.
  • Fasting c-peptide ≥0.3 nmol/L as per source document or central lab test at Visit 1.
  • Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) ≤ 6.5 % or ≥ 10.0% via central lab test at Visit 1.
  • Participants who experienced none of episode of documented symptomatic and/or severe hypoglycemia (as per the American Diabetes Association (ADA) classification) during the past month prior to screening.
  • Participants who experienced >1 episode of severe hypoglycemia resulting in coma/seizures during the last 12 months before screening.
  • Participants received less than 1 year treatment with basal plus mealtime insulin.
  • Used any basal insulins other than long-acting insulin analogs (ie, Lantus, Toujeo, Levemir, and Tresiba) in the past 3 months before screening.
  • Required >80 U/day basal insulin analogs or not on stable dose (±20% total dose) within 30 days prior to screening.
  • Used fewer than 2 injections of rapid-acting insulin analog per day within 30 days prior to screening.
  • Used human regular insulin as mealtime insulin within 30 days prior to screening.
  • Used an insulin pump during the last 6 months before screening.
  • History of unstable proliferative diabetic retinopathy or any other rapidly progressive diabetic retinopathy or macular edema likely to required treatment (e.g., laser, surgical treatment, or injectable drugs) during the study period.
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding women or planned pregnancy during the duration of the study.
  • Use of any other investigational drug(s) within 1 month or 5 half-lives, whichever was longer prior to screening.
  • Inappropriate CGM use during screening period evidenced by failure to obtain a minimum of 4 days of usable records by the end of screening.
  • Noncompliance with self-monitored plasma glucose (SMPG) performance evidenced by failure to demonstrate at least 5 days of 5 point SMPG records by the end of screening.

The above information is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participants's potential participation in a clinical trial.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
638 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    HOE901-U300

    HOE901-U300 (Insulin glargine, 300 U/mL) once daily for 16 weeks on top of mealtime insulins analogs. Basal insulin doses were individually titrated (until the end of Week 14) to reach fasting self-measured plasma glucose (SMPG) levels of 80 to 100 mg/dL, while mitigating hypoglycemia.

    Drug: HOE901-U300 (Insulin Glargine 300 U/ml) · Drug: Mandated back ground therapy

  • Active comparator
    Lantus

    Lantus (Insulin glargine, 100 U/mL) once daily for 16 weeks on top of mealtime insulins analogs. Basal insulin doses were individually titrated (until the end of Week 14) to reach fasting SMPG levels of 80 to 100 mg/dL, while mitigating hypoglycemia.

    Drug: Lantus (Insulin Glargine 100 U/ml) · Drug: Mandated back ground therapy

Interventions

  • DrugHOE901-U300 (Insulin Glargine 300 U/ml)

    Drug page: Insulin Glargine

    Self-administered by subcutaneous (SC) injection in the morning (between waking up and breakfast) using a pre-filled pen.

    Also known as: Toujeo

  • DrugLantus (Insulin Glargine 100 U/ml)

    Drug page: Insulin Glargine

    Self-administered by subcutaneous (SC) injection in the morning (between waking up and breakfast using a pre-filled pen.

    Also known as: HOE901-U100

  • DrugMandated back ground therapy

    Rapid insulin analogs: e.g., insulin glulisine, insulin lispro or insulin aspart, used by participant at least 30 days before screening. Mealtime insulin was to be continued during the study and titrated towards protocol specified postprandial glucose targets (130-180 mg/dL).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Time of Mean Glucose Concentration Within the Target Range of 70-180 mg/dL as Obtained From CGM

    The CGM system combined frequent interstitial glucose measurements (every 5 minutes) with ability to analyze glucose levels in real time. Adjusted least square (LS) means and standard error (SE) were obtained from a generalized linear model with identity link including post baseline CGM assessment during Week 15 (and/or Week 16).

    Time frame: During Week 15 and/or 16

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Documented Symptomatic Nocturnal Hypoglycemia

    Documented symptomatic nocturnal hypoglycemia was defined as an event with typical symptoms of hypoglycemia accompanied by SMPG \<=70 mg/dL that occurred between 00:00 and 05:59 hours as reported on the hypoglycemia electronic case report form (eCRF).

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 16

  2. Documented Symptomatic Nocturnal Hypoglycemia Event Rate Per Participant-Year

    Documented symptomatic nocturnal hypoglycemia was defined as an event with typical symptoms of hypoglycemia accompanied by SMPG \<=70 mg/dL that occurred between 00:00 and 05:59 hours as reported on the hypoglycemia eCRF.

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 16

  3. Mean Change From Baseline in Glucose Level During Last 4 Hours of CGM Data Collection Prior to the Next Day Basal Insulin Injection During Week 15 and/or Week 16

    Adjusted LS means and SE were obtained from mixed model including post baseline CGM assessment during the last 4 hours prior to the next day's basal insulin injection during Week 15 (and/or Week 16).

    Time frame: Baseline, during Week 15 and/or Week 16

  4. Percentage of Time Glucose Concentrations Within the Target Range of 70 to 140 mg/dL During Last 4 Hours of CGM Data Collection Prior to Next Day Basal Insulin Injection

    Adjusted LS means and SE were obtained from mixed model including post baseline CGM assessment during the last 4 hours prior to the next day's basal insulin injection during Week 15 (and/or Week 16).

    Time frame: During Week 15 and/or Week 16

  5. Coefficient of Variation (CV%) in Mean CGM Glucose

    CV% was a measure of spread of variability relative to mean of population. For CGM glucose values over 24 hours, CV% was measure of glycemic variability across 24-hour day and calculated for each period (total, within day and between days) as ratio of standard deviation of glucose values to mean of glucose values.

    Time frame: During Week 15 and/or Week 16

Other outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Daily Insulin Dose at Week 16

    Change from Baseline at Week 16 for daily basal insulin dose and daily bolus insulin dose was reported.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

07

Results

Posted Aug 20, 2018

Participant flow

The study was conducted at 100 sites in United States. A total of 980 participants were screened between 5 May 2016 and 16 February 2017, of whom 342 were screen failures. Screen failures were mainly due to exclusion criteria met.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneHOE901-U300Lantus
Started320318
Completed291281
Not completed2937
Withdrew: Adverse event31
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy22
Withdrew: Poor compliance to protocol74
Withdrew: Hypoglycemia20
Withdrew: Other than specified1425
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up15

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Time of Mean Glucose Concentration Within the Target Range of 70-180 mg/dL as Obtained From CGM

The CGM system combined frequent interstitial glucose measurements (every 5 minutes) with ability to analyze glucose levels in real time. Adjusted least square (LS) means and standard error (SE) were obtained from a generalized linear model with identity link including post baseline CGM assessment during Week 15 (and/or Week 16).

Time frame:
During Week 15 and/or 16
Reported as:
Least squares mean · percentage of time
Percentage of Time of Mean Glucose Concentration Within the Target Range of 70-180 mg/dL as Obtained From CGM
percentage of timeHOE901-U300Lantus
Percentage of Time of Mean Glucose Concentration Within the Target Range of 70-180 mg/dL as Obtained From CGM55.40 ± 1.0855.18 ± 1.10
Statistical analysis
  • HOE901-U300 vs Lantus · Generalized linear model · p = 0.8494 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Least square mean difference: 0.22Generalized linear model with identity link
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Documented Symptomatic Nocturnal Hypoglycemia

Documented symptomatic nocturnal hypoglycemia was defined as an event with typical symptoms of hypoglycemia accompanied by SMPG \<=70 mg/dL that occurred between 00:00 and 05:59 hours as reported on the hypoglycemia electronic case report form (eCRF).

Time frame:
Baseline up to Week 16
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Documented Symptomatic Nocturnal Hypoglycemia
percentage of participantsHOE901-U300Lantus
Documented <=70mg/dL70.868.3
Documented <54 mg/dL50.954.1
SecondaryDocumented Symptomatic Nocturnal Hypoglycemia Event Rate Per Participant-Year

Documented symptomatic nocturnal hypoglycemia was defined as an event with typical symptoms of hypoglycemia accompanied by SMPG \<=70 mg/dL that occurred between 00:00 and 05:59 hours as reported on the hypoglycemia eCRF.

Time frame:
Baseline up to Week 16
Reported as:
Number · events per participant-year
Documented Symptomatic Nocturnal Hypoglycemia Event Rate Per Participant-Year
events per participant-yearHOE901-U300Lantus
Documented <=70 mg/dL11.3811.39
Documented <54 mg/dL4.995.61
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Glucose Level During Last 4 Hours of CGM Data Collection Prior to the Next Day Basal Insulin Injection During Week 15 and/or Week 16

Adjusted LS means and SE were obtained from mixed model including post baseline CGM assessment during the last 4 hours prior to the next day's basal insulin injection during Week 15 (and/or Week 16).

Time frame:
Baseline, during Week 15 and/or Week 16
Reported as:
Least squares mean · mg/dL
Mean Change From Baseline in Glucose Level During Last 4 Hours of CGM Data Collection Prior to the Next Day Basal Insulin Injection During Week 15 and/or Week 16
mg/dLHOE901-U300Lantus
Mean Change From Baseline in Glucose Level During Last 4 Hours of CGM Data Collection Prior to the Next Day Basal Insulin Injection During Week 15 and/or Week 16-1.99 ± 3.685.67 ± 3.72
SecondaryPercentage of Time Glucose Concentrations Within the Target Range of 70 to 140 mg/dL During Last 4 Hours of CGM Data Collection Prior to Next Day Basal Insulin Injection

Adjusted LS means and SE were obtained from mixed model including post baseline CGM assessment during the last 4 hours prior to the next day's basal insulin injection during Week 15 (and/or Week 16).

Time frame:
During Week 15 and/or Week 16
Reported as:
Least squares mean · percentage of time
Percentage of Time Glucose Concentrations Within the Target Range of 70 to 140 mg/dL During Last 4 Hours of CGM Data Collection Prior to Next Day Basal Insulin Injection
percentage of timeHOE901-U300Lantus
Percentage of Time Glucose Concentrations Within the Target Range of 70 to 140 mg/dL During Last 4 Hours of CGM Data Collection Prior to Next Day Basal Insulin Injection36.49 ± 1.6235.07 ± 1.65
SecondaryCoefficient of Variation (CV%) in Mean CGM Glucose

CV% was a measure of spread of variability relative to mean of population. For CGM glucose values over 24 hours, CV% was measure of glycemic variability across 24-hour day and calculated for each period (total, within day and between days) as ratio of standard deviation of glucose values to mean of glucose values.

Time frame:
During Week 15 and/or Week 16
Reported as:
Least squares mean · percent of mean glucose level
Coefficient of Variation (CV%) in Mean CGM Glucose
percent of mean glucose levelHOE901-U300Lantus
Total CV%41.27 ± 0.6340.72 ± 0.64
Within-day CV%36.99 ± 0.5636.23 ± 0.56
Between-days CV%17.44 ± 0.5917.53 ± 0.60
Other pre-specifiedChange From Baseline in Daily Insulin Dose at Week 16

Change from Baseline at Week 16 for daily basal insulin dose and daily bolus insulin dose was reported.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 16
Reported as:
Mean · International Units
Change From Baseline in Daily Insulin Dose at Week 16
International UnitsHOE901-U300Lantus
Daily basal Insulin Dose8.8 ± 11.87.0 ± 10.1
Daily bolus Insulin Dose-1.8 ± 11.8-3.0 ± 11.3
Post-hocChange From Baseline in Time (Min) of Mean Glucose Concentration Within the Target Range of 70 to 180 mg/dL, by End of Study hbA1c Levels During Week 15 and/or Week 16

Adjusted LS means and SE were obtained from mixed model including post baseline CGM assessments. Data was reported for participants with an end of study HbA1c \<7.5 or HbA1c \>=7.5% over a 24 hour period.

Time frame:
Baseline, during Week 15 and/or Week 16
Reported as:
Least squares mean · minutes
Change From Baseline in Time (Min) of Mean Glucose Concentration Within the Target Range of 70 to 180 mg/dL, by End of Study hbA1c Levels During Week 15 and/or Week 16
minutesHOE901-U300Lantus
End of study HbA1c <7.5%105.84 ± 25.6456.07 ± 25.40
End of study HbA1c >=7.5%11.64 ± 27.2631.95 ± 27.57

Adverse events

Collected over All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of informed consent form up to study completion (Week 16) regardless of seriousness or relationship to study drug.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
HOE901-U3000/320 (0%)17/320 (5.3%)54/320 (16.9%)
Lantus0/318 (0%)14/318 (4.4%)54/318 (17%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 28
Most frequent serious events
EventHOE901-U300Lantus
Hypoglycaemic unconsciousnessNervous system disorders6/3203/318
HypoglycaemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders2/3203/318
Hypoglycaemic seizureNervous system disorders2/3203/318
Accidental overdoseInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/3203/318
HyperglycaemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders2/3200/318
Acute kidney injuryRenal and urinary disorders2/3200/318
Road traffic accidentInjury, poisoning and procedural complications2/3201/318
Diabetic foot infectionInfections and infestations0/3201/318
GangreneInfections and infestations0/3201/318
Hypoglycaemic comaNervous system disorders0/3201/318
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventHOE901-U300Lantus
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations28/32028/318
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations27/32027/318

Baseline characteristics

Analysis was performed on randomized population that included any participant who had been allocated to a randomized treatment regardless of whether the treatment kit was used or not.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)HOE901-U300LantusTotal
Mean45.5 ± 14.045.5 ± 13.945.5 ± 13.9
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)HOE901-U300LantusTotal
Female140138278
Male180180360
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)HOE901-U300LantusTotal
Hispanic or Latino434285
Not Hispanic or Latino277276553
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)HOE901-U300LantusTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native303
Asian538
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander112
Black or African American242852
White281282563
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported6410
Body mass index
Body mass index(kg/m^2)HOE901-U300LantusTotal
Mean27.50 ± 4.8827.65 ± 4.9227.57 ± 4.90
08

Study locations

100 sites
  • Investigational Site Number 840-151
    Little Rock, Arkansas 72205, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-071
    Concord, California 94520-2270, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-149
    Escondido, California 92025, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-004
    Fresno, California 93720, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-110
    Greenbrae, California 94904, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-124
    La Jolla, California 92037, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-030
    La Mesa, California 91942, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-044
    Los Angeles, California 90036, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-022
    Los Angeles, California 90057, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-129
    Los Gatos, California 95032, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-024
    Northridge, California 91325, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-069
    Pomona, California 91766, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-090
    Pomona, California 91767, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-132
    Rolling Hills Estates, California 90274, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-130
    San Jose, California 95148, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-055
    San Ramon, California 94583, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-028
    Santa Barbara, California, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-063
    Tarzana, California 91356, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-138
    Tustin, California 92780-6953, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-016
    Ventura, California 93003, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-039
    Denver, Colorado 80209, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-021
    Denver, Colorado 80246, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-070
    Denver, Colorado 80262, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-046
    Englewood, Colorado 80113, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-072
    Coral Gables, Florida 33124, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-133
    Hialeah, Florida 33016, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-137
    Maitland, Florida 32751, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-049
    Miami, Florida 33155, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-076
    Miami, Florida 33176, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-023
    New Port Richey, Florida 34652, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-053
    Ocoee, Florida 34761, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-112
    Ormond Beach, Florida 32174, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-018
    Palm Harbor, Florida 34684, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-047
    Port Charlotte, Florida 33952, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-114
    Tampa, Florida 33612, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-036
    West Palm Beach, Florida 33401, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-001
    Atlanta, Georgia 30318, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-064
    Columbus, Georgia 31904, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-012
    Lawrenceville, Georgia 30046, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-008
    Roswell, Georgia 30076, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-014
    Stockbridge, Georgia 30281, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-060
    Idaho Falls, Idaho 83404, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-125
    Arlington Heights, Illinois 60005, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-011
    Chicago, Illinois 60612, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-134
    Crystal Lake, Illinois 60012, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-002
    West Des Moines, Iowa 50265, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-073
    Wichita, Kansas 67226, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-062
    Covington, Kentucky 41011, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-042
    Lexington, Kentucky 40503, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-009
    Metairie, Louisiana 70006, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-032
    New Orleans, Louisiana 70115, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-054
    Hyattsville, Maryland 20782, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-006
    Rockville, Maryland 20852, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-157
    Framingham, Massachusetts 01702, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-122
    Waltham, Massachusetts 02453, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-037
    Flint, Michigan 48532, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-067
    Billings, Montana 59101, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-094
    Lincoln, Nebraska 68526, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-033
    Omaha, Nebraska 68114, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-142
    Omaha, Nebraska 68124, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-040
    Henderson, Nevada 89052, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-017
    Las Vegas, Nevada 89148, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-102
    New York, New York 10001, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-108
    New York, New York 10029, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-109
    Staten Island, New York 10301-3914, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-045
    Greenville, North Carolina 27834, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-010
    Morehead City, North Carolina 28557, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-080
    Morehead City, North Carolina 28557, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-051
    Fargo, North Dakota 58103, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-123
    Columbus, Ohio 43203, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-104
    Mentor, Ohio 44060, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-079
    Norman, Oklahoma 73069, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-162
    Bend, Oregon 97702, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-096
    Portland, Oregon 97210, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-058
    Chattanooga, Tennessee 37411, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-003
    Dallas, Texas 75230, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-019
    Dallas, Texas 75231, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-075
    Dallas, Texas 75235, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-005
    Dallas, Texas 75246, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-013
    Dallas, Texas 75246, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-153
    El Paso, Texas 79925, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-026
    Fort Worth, Texas 76132, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-081
    Houston, Texas 77024, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-160
    Houston, Texas 77043, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-156
    Houston, Texas 77079, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-152
    Houston, Texas 77089, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-031
    Houston, Texas 77095, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-140
    Lufkin, Texas 75904, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-029
    Mesquite, Texas 75149, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-048
    North Richland Hills, Texas 76180, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-150
    Pearland, Texas 77584, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-083
    Murray, Utah 84123, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-101
    Ogden, Utah 84405, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-097
    Salt Lake City, Utah 84102, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-143
    Bennington, Vermont 05201, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-056
    Burlington, Vermont 05405, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-015
    Renton, Washington 98055, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-074
    Spokane, Washington 99207, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-139
    Bridgeport, West Virginia 26330, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840-111
    Manati, 00674, Puerto Rico
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Aug 2, 2016
  • Statistical analysis plan · Jul 7, 2017

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Qualified researchers may request access to patient level data and related study documents including the clinical study report, study protocol with any amendments, blank case report form, statistical analysis plan, and dataset specifications. Patient level data will be anonymized and study documents will be redacted to protect the privacy of trial participants. Further details on Sanofi's data sharing criteria, eligible studies, and process for requesting access can be found at: https://vivli.org

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 28, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02688933
Lead sponsor
Sanofi
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 23, 2016
Start date
May 5, 2016
Primary completion
Jun 19, 2017
Completion
Jun 19, 2017
Results posted
Aug 20, 2018
Last update
Mar 28, 2022

Study contacts

Clinical Sciences & Operations
study director · Sanofi

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Insulin Glargine

Start the discussion