CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02685475Updated Mar 16, 2016

Axillary Block Properties in Diabetic Patients

An observational study in Diabetes Mellitus, Nerve Block Duration and Pain, Postoperative, sponsored by Istanbul University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey. Open to participants aged 40 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-03-16.

Sponsored by Istanbul University · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
71
Ages
40 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Background and objectives: The investigators performed this study to explore whether the presence of diabetes mellitus (DM) would affect the outcomes of axillary brachial plexus blocks (ABPBs) in patients undergoing elective forearm and/or hand surgery. The primary hypothesis was that the sensory block duration would be delayed in diabetic patients.

Methods: After obtaining ethics committee approval and written informed consent, 71 patients were enrolled to the study. Diabetic patients were included in Group DM and non-diabetics were included in Group NODM. All received ultrasound-guided ABPBs with the mixture of 10 mL lidocaine 2% and 20 mL bupivacaine 0.5%. Our primary outcome was sensory block duration, and secondary outcomes were sensory and motor block onset times, motor block duration, time-to-first-pain (numeric rating scale (NRS) ≥4), postoperative NRS scores and rescue analgesic consumption (NRS) ≥4) through the postoperative first 2 days. All outcomes were assessed by a blinded investigators.

Read the detailed description

Background and objectives: The impact of diabetes mellitus (DM) on the practice of peripheral nerve block anesthesia was mostly investigated in animal researches, and effects on human models are required to be clarified. The investigators performed this study to explore whether the presence of DM would affect the outcomes of axillary brachial plexus blocks (ABPBs) in patients undergoing elective forearm and/or hand surgery. The primary hypothesis was that the sensory block duration would be delayed in diabetic patients.

Methods: After obtaining ethics committee approval and written informed consent, 71 patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III and aged between 40 and 75 years were enrolled to the study. Diabetic patients were included in Group DM and non-diabetics were included in Group NODM. All received ultrasound-guided ABPBs with the mixture of 10 mL lidocaine 2% and 20 mL bupivacaine 0.5%. Postoperatively, patients were administered paracetamol as rescue analgesics, if numeric rating scale (NRS) was ≥4. Our primary outcome was sensory block duration, and secondary outcomes were sensory and motor block onset times, motor block duration, time-to-first-pain (numeric rating scale (NRS) ≥4), postoperative NRS scores, and rescue analgesic consumption (NRS) ≥4) through the postoperative first 2 days. All outcomes were assessed by a blinded investigators.

02

Conditions studied

  • Diabetes Mellitus
  • Nerve Block Duration
  • Pain, Postoperative

Keywords

  • Diabetes mellitus
  • Axillary brachial plexus block
  • Block duration
  • Time-to-first pain
  • Postoperative analgesia
03

In context

Diabetes Mellitus

10,925 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus; 1,319 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 71 is below the median of 233 across 2,220 observational studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus.

Browse Diabetes Mellitus studies →

Lead sponsor

Istanbul University is the lead sponsor of 496 studies on the registry; 79 are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 1 (20%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients scheduled for elective forearm and/or hand surgery

Inclusion criteria

Patients scheduled for elective forearm and/or hand surgery American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III No regional anesthesia contraindication

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Type 1 DM Type 2 DM patients with only 'diet-controlled' therapy Difficulty with understanding the block and follow-up instructions Significant neurologic disorders Psychiatric or cognitive disorders History of substance abuse Acute and/or chronic opioid use Local anaesthetic hypersensitivity or allergy

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
71 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Diabetic patients

    Patients received ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus blocks (ABPBs) with the mixture of 10 mL lidocaine 2% and 20 mL bupivacaine 0.5%.

    Drug: Axillary Brachial Plexus Blocks

  • Non-diabetic patients

    Patients received ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus blocks (ABPBs) with the mixture of 10 mL lidocaine 2% and 20 mL bupivacaine 0.5%.

    Drug: Axillary Brachial Plexus Blocks

Interventions

  • DrugAxillary Brachial Plexus Blocks

    All patients received ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block (ABPBs) with the mixture of 10 mL lidocaine 2% and 20 mL bupivacaine 0.5%.

    Also known as: ABPBs

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Sensory block duration

    Time interval between a successful block and the complete restoration of all the senses controlled by the radial, ulnar, median and musculocutaneous nerves.

    Time frame: 0-24 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Sensory block onset time

    Physical examination with pin-prick test (≥7/8)

    Time frame: 0-30 minutes

  2. Motor block onset time

    Physical examination with modified Bromage scale (≥9/12)

    Time frame: 0-30 minutes

  3. Motor block duration

    Time interval between a successful block and the complete restoration of all motor responses controlled by the radial, ulnar, median and musculocutaneous nerves.

    Time frame: 0-24 hours

  4. Time-to-first pain

    Postoperative first pain (NRS ≥4)

    Time frame: 0-48 hours

  5. Pain (NRS) scores

    Numeric rating scale (NRS) pain scores (0: no pain, 10: worst pain imaginable)

    Time frame: 0-48 hours

  6. Rescue analgesic consumption

    Used postoperatively if NRS ≥4

    Time frame: 0-48 hours

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Istanbul University, Department of Anesthesiology
    Istanbul, Fatih 34093, Turkey
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Gebhard RE, Nielsen KC, Pietrobon R, Missair A, Williams BA. Diabetes mellitus, independent of body mass index, is associated with a "higher success" rate for supraclavicular brachial plexus blocks. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009 Sep-Oct;34(5):404-7. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181ada58d. PubMed 19920415 ↗
  • Sertoz N, Deniz MN, Ayanoglu HO. Relationship between glycosylated hemoglobin level and sciatic nerve block performance in diabetic patients. Foot Ankle Int. 2013 Jan;34(1):85-90. doi: 10.1177/1071100712460366. PubMed 23386766 ↗
  • Cuvillon P, Reubrecht V, Zoric L, Lemoine L, Belin M, Ducombs O, Birenbaum A, Riou B, Langeron O. Comparison of subgluteal sciatic nerve block duration in type 2 diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Br J Anaesth. 2013 May;110(5):823-30. doi: 10.1093/bja/aes496. Epub 2013 Jan 24. PubMed 23348203 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 16, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02685475
Lead sponsor
Istanbul University
Responsible party
Emine Aysu Salviz, MD (M.D., Attending Anesthesiologist, Istanbul University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 18, 2016
Start date
Feb 2015
Primary completion
Jan 2016
Completion
Jan 2016
Last update
Mar 16, 2016

Study contacts

Emine A Salviz, MD
principal investigator · Design and conduct the study, review and analyze the data, and write the manuscript

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion