An observational study in Pneumonia, Blood Stream Infection and Urinary Tract Infections, sponsored by Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey. Completed at 6 sites in 3 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-12-02.
Sponsored by Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · Observational
Polymyxin B is already being used extensively in the USA and other parts of the world; its use is likely to rapidly increase due to the greater burden of infections caused by MDR Gram-negative bacteria and the growing awareness of the limitations inherent in the clinical pharmacology of CMS/colistin. Cross resistance exists between the two polymyxins and thus both must be dosed optimally; but the recently generated scientifically-based dosage regimens for CMS/colistin cannot be extrapolated to polymyxin B. It is essential that an adequately powered study is conducted to define the clinical PK/PD/TD relationships of polymyxin B and identify, using next-generation proteomics, biomarkers for early detection of kidney injury. This will allow the development of scientifically-based dosage regimens for various categories of patients and an adaptive feedback control clinical tool for optimized dosing of polymyxin B in future individual patients.
Multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative 'superbugs' are rapidly spreading around the world, and polymyxin B and colistin (polymyxin E) are often the only effective antibiotics. Since polymyxin B was released in the 1950s, its pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, toxicodynamics (PK/PD/TD) have never been defined. Recent pharmacological research on polymyxins has predominantly focused on colistin methanesulfonate (CMS, an inactive prodrug of colistin) and demonstrates that CMS has significant limitations. Thus, polymyxin B is increasingly being viewed as the preferred polymyxin. Unfortunately, recently developed scientifically-based dosing recommendations for CMS cannot and should not be applied to polymyxin B, as the latter is administered as its active entity. Therefore, it is essential to determine the PK/PD/TD of polymyxin B in critically-ill patients, refine optimal dosage regimens, and develop the user-friendly adaptive feedback control (AFC) clinical tool.
The Specific Aims are:
Research Design: Patients being treated with intravenous polymyxin B will be identified at three clinical sites in the USA and one in Singapore. Patients (n = 250) will have blood collected at various times surrounding a dose of polymyxin B between days 1 and 5 of therapy. Development of nephrotoxicity, clinical response, and bacteriological response will be examined. Total and free plasma concentrations of polymyxin B will be determined. Bacterial isolates will be examined for the emergence of polymyxin resistance. The relationships between polymyxin B PK, PD and TD end-points (e.g. clinical and bacteriological responses, development of toxicity and resistance) will be assessed using pharmacometric analyses. Finally, the obtained information will be used to apply Monte Carlo simulation to examine the impact of various patient characteristics and other factors on polymyxin B PK, PD and TD, in order to establish optimal dosage regimens and AFC algorithms for individual critically-ill patients.
Significance: No new antibiotics will be available for Gram-negative 'superbugs' for many years. This landmark multicenter study will provide essential information for optimizing polymyxin B use in critically-ill patients, while minimizing resistance and toxicity. This proposal aligns perfectly with the NIAID priority "To teach old drugs new tricks" and the recent Executive Order of the White House to combat antibiotic resistance.
6,687 studies on the registry are indexed under Infections; 807 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 155 is below the median of 240 across 2,136 observational studies indexed under Infections.
Browse Infections studies →Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey is the lead sponsor of 496 studies on the registry; 130 are open to participants now.
Of its 38 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 30 (79%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
The human subjects involved in this study will be receiving intravenous polymyxin B as part of their routine clinical care because of infection due to bacteria resistant to all other first-line antibiotics.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients receiving IV polymyxin B for treatment of bacteremia and/or urinary tract infection and/or respiratory tract infection (including tracheobronchitis) or sepsis
Polymyxin B plasma concentrations
Time frame: 28 days after enrollment
Changes in serum creatinine
Time frame: 28 days after enrollment
Clinical response based on resolution of signs and symptoms of infection
Time frame: 28 days after enrollment
Microbiologic response based on eradication of pathogens from blood and respiratory cultures
Time frame: 28 days after enrollment
Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.
Plan to share: Yes
This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey