CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02674529SONRISAUpdated Nov 3, 2022Results posted

Study of Neural Responses Induced by Antidepressant Effects

A Phase 2/3 interventional study of Escitalopram and Placebo in Major Depressive Disorder, sponsored by Marta Peciña, MD PhD. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-11-03.

Sponsored by Marta Peciña, MD PhD · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2/3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The proposed work aims to examine the neural changes associated with fast-acting antidepressant treatments in order to develop imaging-based biomarkers of treatment response for depression.

Read the detailed description

Over the past decade, neuroimaging tools have rapidly advanced the field of neural biomarkers of treatment response in depression. Still, despite obvious scientific progress in this field, the ability to implement neuroimaging biomarkers of antidepressant treatment response in clinical trial settings is lacking. In order to objectively assess the neural bases of treatment response in depression, the investigators will use a "Real-time Neurofeedback fMRI task", specifically designed to record and modulate mood improvement by providing neurofeedback in the context of the administration of an antidepressant treatment. In a pilot study, positive neurofeedback during the administration of the drug was associated with significant acute mood improvement and increased blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) responses in the rostral anterior cingulate cortex (rACC), a common neural target of antidepressant treatments. The central hypothesis is that antidepressant effects in depression are mediated by increased neural activity in the rACC (AIM1), which can be used in clinical trials of antidepressant treatment to predict antidepressant effects (AIM 2) and assess the effect of antidepressant treatment on antidepressant-induced rACC neural responses (AIM 3). The results obtained from this project are expected to have an important impact on our ability to understand the cognitive and neural mechanisms implicated in antidepressant treatment responses in patients with depression, as well as on the ability to implement neuroimaging biomarkers of treatment response in the clinical trial settings.

02

Conditions studied

  • Major Depressive Disorder

Keywords

  • Depression
  • Neuroimaging biomarkers
  • MDD
  • Neurofeedback
03

In context

Depressive Disorder

4,845 studies on the registry are indexed under Depressive Disorder; 514 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 60 is below the median of 80 across 3,999 interventional studies indexed under Depressive Disorder.

Browse Depressive Disorder studies →

Lead sponsor

Marta Peciña, MD PhD is the lead sponsor of 4 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • A man or woman age of 18 or older.
  • Currently experiencing a depressive episode as part of Major Depressive Disorder.
  • Able to tolerate lying still on your back for 60 minutes at a time.
  • Have had no more than one failed antidepressant trial of adequate dose and duration.
  • Have been antidepressant medication-free for at least 21 days prior to collection of imaging data (5 weeks for fluoxetine)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Are currently taking any psychiatric medication, or any potentially augmenting or sedative drugs.
  • Have a history of inadequate response/tolerability to escitalopram; or history of resistant depression
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding or plan to become pregnant over the duration of the study.
  • Have a history (lifetime) of psychotic depressive, schizophrenic, bipolar, schizoaffective, or other Axis I psychotic disorders.
  • Meet criteria for substance dependence in the last 6 months, except nicotine, or substance abuse in the last 2 months.
  • Have a medical condition that contradicts treatment with escitalopram.
  • Are currently receiving psychotherapy or any other treatment for your depression.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Antidepressant Treatment

    20mg of escitalopram will be taken over an 8-week period, starting with 10mg for the first week.

    Drug: Escitalopram · Behavioral: Real-time Neurofeedback fMRI task pre- and post-RCT

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    A placebo pill will be taken over an 8-week period.

    Drug: Placebo · Behavioral: Real-time Neurofeedback fMRI task pre- and post-RCT

Interventions

  • DrugEscitalopram

    Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI)

    Also known as: Lexapro

  • DrugPlacebo

    Placebo

  • BehavioralReal-time Neurofeedback fMRI task pre- and post-RCT

    Placebo experiment during an fMRI scanning session

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Scores

    The Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) is a ten-item diagnostic questionnaire which psychiatrists use to measure the severity of depressive episodes in patients with mood disorders. It was designed in 1979 by British and Swedish researchers as an adjunct to the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD) which would be more sensitive to the changes brought on by antidepressants and other forms of treatment than the Hamilton Scale was.\[2\] There is, however, a high degree of statistical correlation between scores on the two measures.

    Time frame: baseline and week 8

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS) Scores

    The Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS) is a 16-item, self-reported measure of depression that ranges from 1 (no depression) to 27 (very severe depression).

    Time frame: baseline and 8 weeks

  2. Neural Responses During the Sham Neurofeedback fMRI Task.

    Voxel-wise BOLD changes during the expectancy condition of the Sham Neurofeedback fMRI task.

    Time frame: Baseline

07

Results

Posted Nov 3, 2022

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneAntidepressant TreatmentPlacebo
Started2529
Completed2224
Not completed35
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up12
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject21
Withdrew: Physician decision01
Withdrew: Protocol violation01

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Scores

The Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) is a ten-item diagnostic questionnaire which psychiatrists use to measure the severity of depressive episodes in patients with mood disorders. It was designed in 1979 by British and Swedish researchers as an adjunct to the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD) which would be more sensitive to the changes brought on by antidepressants and other forms of treatment than the Hamilton Scale was.\[2\] There is, however, a high degree of statistical correlation between scores on the two measures.

Time frame:
baseline and week 8
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Scores
score on a scaleChanges in MADRS Scores From Baseline to Week 8 Within the Antidepressant Treatment ArmChanges in MADRS Scores From Baseline to Week 8 Within the Placebo Arm
Change in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Scores11 ± 912 ± 9
Statistical analysis
  • Changes in MADRS Scores From Baseline to Week 8 Within the Antidepressant Treatment Arm vs Changes in MADRS Scores From Baseline to Week 8 Within the Placebo Arm · Regression, Linear · p = 0.58 · Regression coefficient: -1.29864Drug (antidepressant vs. placebo) prediction of changes in mood as measured by the MADRS scores.
  • Changes in MADRS Scores From Baseline to Week 8 Within the Antidepressant Treatment Arm vs Changes in MADRS Scores From Baseline to Week 8 Within the Placebo Arm · Correlation · p = 0.05 · R: 0.02Change in MADRS after 8 weeks correlation with brain responses during the baseline fMRI task.
SecondaryChange in Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS) Scores

The Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS) is a 16-item, self-reported measure of depression that ranges from 1 (no depression) to 27 (very severe depression).

Time frame:
baseline and 8 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS) Scores
score on a scaleChanges in QIDS Scores From Baseline to Week 8 Within the Antidepressant Treatment ArmChanges in QIDS Scores From Baseline to Week 8 Within the Placebo Arm
Change in Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS) Scores6.82 ± 6.015.54 ± 5.45
Statistical analysis
  • Changes in QIDS Scores From Baseline to Week 8 Within the Antidepressant Treatment Arm vs Changes in QIDS Scores From Baseline to Week 8 Within the Placebo Arm · Regression, Linear · p = 0.8 · Regression coefficient: -1.4328918
SecondaryNeural Responses During the Sham Neurofeedback fMRI Task.

Voxel-wise BOLD changes during the expectancy condition of the Sham Neurofeedback fMRI task.

Time frame:
Baseline
Reported as:
Mean · BOLD signal change
Neural Responses During the Sham Neurofeedback fMRI Task.
BOLD signal changeBaseline fMRI Measures
Neural Responses During the Sham Neurofeedback fMRI Task.1.1 (0.47 to 1.61)
Statistical analysis
  • Baseline fMRI Measures · t-test, 2 sided · p = <0.05 (The resulting voxel-wise parametric maps are thresholded with height and extent values generated by Monte Carlo simulations with 3dClustSim to protect against overall type I error at p \< 0.05.)

Adverse events

Collected over Eight weeks.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Antidepressant Treatment0/25 (0%)0/25 (0%)22/25 (88%)
Placebo0/29 (0%)0/29 (0%)18/29 (62.1%)
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 30
Most frequent other events
EventAntidepressant TreatmentPlacebo
FatigueGeneral disorders12/255/29
Appetite DisturbancesGastrointestinal disorders6/251/29
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders6/253/29
DizzinessNervous system disorders5/252/29
InsomniaGeneral disorders3/255/29
Gastrointestinal DiscomfortGastrointestinal disorders3/252/29
HeadacheNervous system disorders3/252/29
AnxietyNervous system disorders2/253/29
Vivid Dreams/NightmaresNervous system disorders2/250/29
Worsening of Depressive SymptomsNervous system disorders2/251/29

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Antidepressant TreatmentPlaceboTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years252954
>=65 years000
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Antidepressant TreatmentPlaceboTotal
Mean25.44 ± 6.3323.45 ± 5.6524.18 ± 5.76
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Antidepressant TreatmentPlaceboTotal
Female202646
Male538
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Antidepressant TreatmentPlaceboTotal
Hispanic or Latino202
Not Hispanic or Latino232952
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Antidepressant TreatmentPlaceboTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian4610
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American2810
White141529
More than one race505
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Antidepressant TreatmentPlaceboTotal
United States252954
08

Study locations

1 site
  • WPIC
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jun 29, 2022

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The study will follow NIMH schedule for data sharing for clinical trials. The schedule allows for descriptive data to be submitted - but not shared - ongoing and results associated with a finding - both positive and negative - to be submitted prior to the communication of a result. Once a result is communicated, either through publication and/or on the NDCT website the data specifically defined to the clinical trial will then be shared.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 3, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02674529
Lead sponsor
Marta Peciña, MD PhD
Responsible party
Marta Peciña, MD PhD (Assistant Professor, University of Pittsburgh) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Feb 4, 2016
Start date
Sep 2016
Primary completion
May 2021
Completion
May 2021
Results posted
Nov 3, 2022
Last update
Nov 3, 2022

Study contacts

Marta Pecina, MD, PhD
principal investigator · University of Pittsburgh

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion