A Phase 4 interventional study of Reactive Focal Drug Administration in Malaria, sponsored by PATH. Completed at 1 site in Zambia. Open to participants aged 3 Months and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-02-04.
Sponsored by PATH · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment
This study is designed to compare the effectiveness of reactive focal drug administration (RFDA) using dihydroartemisinin+piperaquine (DHAP) versus reactive focal test and treat (RFTAT) using artemether+lumefantrine (AL) as a routine process for identifying and eliminating malaria transmission as measured through achieving zero seropositivity in children under five in Southern Province, Zambia. These two strategies are potential candidates for expanded malaria operational surveillance and elimination for low malaria transmission areas.
The study is a cluster randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate the impact of RFDA intervention against current standard of care for the impact on seropositivity in children under five years, passive surveillance for confirmed malaria case incidence, and elimination of transmission from hotspots. It will be conducted among a background population of \~130,000 people in \~30,000 households in 16 health center catchment areas across several districts in Southern Province. The government of Zambia is pursuing malaria elimination as a national goal on an accelerated timeline and this trial will help evaluate two treatment-based strategies for supporting malaria elimination.
The secondary objectives of the study include: 1). Compare the effectiveness of RFDA using DHAP with RFTAT using AL in reducing rapid diagnostic test (RDT) confirmed malaria incidence through passive case detection at health facilities; 2). Compare the effectiveness of RFDA using DHAP with RFTAT using AL in reducing the prevalence of malaria and preventing re-infection in individuals receiving reactive responses; 3). Compare the cost-effectiveness of RFDA using DHAP with RFTAT using AL in reducing the burden of malaria in the community; 4). Measure the proportion of P. falciparum infections likely attributable to importation and local transmission using parasite genotyping as well as defining genotype spatial distribution; 5). Assess the utility of using serology to measure short term changes in malaria transmission and evaluate malaria elimination programs; and 6). Assess the feasibility of using remotely sensed malaria risk maps to identify areas with higher potential for local malaria transmission.
1,299 studies on the registry are indexed under Malaria; 86 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 8,682 is above the median of 220 across 1,027 interventional studies indexed under Malaria.
Browse Malaria studies →PATH is the lead sponsor of 111 studies on the registry; 7 are open to participants now.
Of its 10 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 10 (100%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
This is the experimental arm and is described by a reactive response to passively detected index case of malaria. The reactive response consists of treating all individuals within a defined radius of each RDT-confirmed incident malaria case with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DHAP).
Drug: Reactive Focal Drug Administration
This is the current standard of care in Southern Province and is described by a reactive response to passively detected index case of malaria. The reactive response consists of testing all individuals within a defined radius of each RDT-confirmed incident malaria case with an RDT and treating all positive individuals with artemether-lumefantrine (AL).
This is the experimental arm and is described by a reactive response to passively detected index case of malaria. The reactive response consists of treating all individuals within a defined radius of each RDT-confirmed incident malaria case with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DHAP).
Malaria seropositivity in children under five
Malaria seropositivity in children under five after two-year intervention within health center catchment areas
Time frame: 24 months
Incidence of malaria confirmed by RDT or microscopy as measured through passive case detection at health posts and health centers
Quality-improved incidence of malaria data confirmed by malaria rapid diagnostic test (RDT) or microscopy as measured through passive case detection at health posts and health centers in the study area.
Time frame: 24 months
PCR parasite prevalence among individuals participating at 0, 30 and 90 days following a reactive research response for a period of 24 months
Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)-based testing for malaria parasite prevalence of individuals participating in each community at 0, 30 and 90 days following a reactive research response for a period of 24 months
Time frame: 24 months
This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
PATH