ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02650089Updated Jan 8, 2016

Resistance Exercise Modify Cardiovascular Responses of Professors During Teaching and Sleep

An interventional study of Resistance Exercise Low intensity and Resistance Exercise High intensity in Post-Exercise Hypotension, sponsored by Universidade Federal do vale do São Francisco. Completed. Open to male participants aged 30 Years to 40 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-01-08.

Sponsored by Universidade Federal do vale do São Francisco · Not applicable and Interventional

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
10
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
30 Years to 40 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

Both work activity and reduced nocturnal dipping of blood pressure are related to increased cardiovascular risk. The aim of the present study was to assess the hemodynamic and autonomic responses of university professors during teaching and sleeping times after different resistance exercise intensities. Ten normotensive professors (33.6±3.4 years, 82.4±12.4 kg; 177.0±7.5 cm) randomly underwent control and resistance exercise before initiating their daily activities. Resistance exercise consisted of a circuit training lasting 40min at 40% and 80% of one repetition maximum test. Systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure as well as heart rate variability indicators in the time and frequency domains (Low Frequency, High Frequency, Low Frequency:High Frequency ratio) were evaluated on resting and 24 hours after the sessions. The average day-time, night-time and nocturnal blood pressure fall of systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure were calculated.

Read the detailed description

Experimental Procedure To test the hypothesis of the present study, after the evaluation of anthropometric characteristics, an interview covering medical history and habits of daily living and a strength assessment using the one maximum repetition test, consisting of another three distinct experimental sessions for a period of seven days each and always at the same time of the day and in random order, were applied to university professors. The interventions during each experimental session consisted of resistance exercise with intensities of 40% one maximum repetition (low intensity), 80% one maximum repetition (high intensity) and control without exercise. Before and 24 hours after the different interventions, with emphasis on the teaching and sleeping hours of the university professors, the hemodynamic and cardiac autonomic responses were examined.

Experimental Sessions The participants were told to avoid the intake of alcohol and caffeine in the 24 hours prior to the experimental sessions. In addition, for this same period, the participants were asked to not perform moderate or vigorous physical activity. The experimental sessions were performed in random order and were separated by a period of seven days each, from 9 to 10 am. All sessions were performed on days the professor taught class, which occurred during the university's night period, between 7 and 10 pm. In the three experimental sessions, the professor taught the same class and the same subject.

Pre-intervention: Before each intervention, the individuals remained seated in the laboratory for a period of 20 minutes in a quiet room without interference from noise and with a room temperature between 22-24ºC. During this period, every 5 minutes, blood pressure measurements were obtained, and the R-R intervals (the elapsed time between two consecutive R waves between cardiac cycles) were continuously recorded. The mean blood pressure and indicators of heart rate variability based on the R-R interval records were considered for the pre-intervention resting period.

Intervention: The resistance exercise intensities were defined based on previous studies. These studies found that both low intensity (40% one maximum repetition) and high intensity (80% one maximum repetition) resistance exercise sessions promoted positive blood pressure responses at periods subsequent to their execution in normotensive individuals. The low intensity and high intensity resistance exercise and control sessions lasted 40 minutes each. For sessions with resistance exercise, three circuits with 7 exercises each were performed in the same sequence of the one maximum repetition test. For low intensity and high intensity, 16 and 8 repetitions were performed for each exercise, with an interval of 60 and 90 seconds between exercises, respectively, and 120 seconds between circuits. The duration of repetition in the exercises, both at low intensity and high intensity, was 3 seconds - 1 second in the concentric phase and 2 seconds in the eccentric phase of the movement. In the control session, the participants remained seated in a comfortable chair in the same environment of the resistance exercise sessions.

Post-intervention: When the intervention periods were completed, the participants were allowed to bathe for subsequent installation of the equipment for hemodynamic and cardiac autonomic assessment. The blood pressure monitoring was performed in the subsequent 24 hours, every 15 minutes during the day and every 30 minutes during the night. The R-R interval records were continuously obtained in the subsequent 24 hours. At the end of the 24 hours period, the volunteers returned to the laboratory for removal of the measuring equipment. In the ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, the tests were considered valid when records occurred with more than 80% validity.

Hemodynamic and Autonomic Evaluation All participants were instructed to maintain their daily eating routine on the day of the hemodynamic and autonomic evaluation. A Meditech Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring-04, properly validated, was used for the hemodynamic assessment of systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure in the pre- and post-intervention periods. A Polar® RS800CX frequency meter (Electo Oy, Kempele, Finland), also with demonstrated validity and reproducibility, was used for the cardiac autonomic assessment during the same period. The autonomic indicators examined were 1) linear methods in the time domain from absolute mean records of the R-R interval; and 2) methods in the frequency domain by spectral analysis through Fast Fourier Transform, including low frequency power (0.04/0.15 Hz) in normalized units as a marker of sympathetic activity, high frequency power (0.15/0.40 Hz) in normalized units as a marker of vagal activity, and the low frequency:high frequency ratio as a marker of the sympathetic-vagal balance. All indicators are described by the European Society of Cardiology, and all analyses were performed using the software Kubios Heart Rate Variability Analysis version 2.0 (Biosignal Laboratory, University of Kuopio, Finland).

All variables were analyzed pre-intervention and for 24 hours post-intervention. In addition, the day time and night time periods were adopted to calculate, from the systolic blood pressures and diastolic blood pressures, the mean blood pressure during the day time (wakefulness) and night time (sleep) hours. The percentage of nocturnal blood pressure fall was calculated from the percentage of blood pressure reduction during night-time compared to day time (night time:day time ratio). The morning blood pressure surge that corresponds to the morning increase in blood pressure and is calculated according to the difference between morning pressure (the average blood pressure during the 2 hours after awakening) and the lowest night time blood pressure (the average of the lowest blood pressure and the 2 readings immediately preceding and after the lowest value) were also analyzed.

Statistical Analysis Descriptive statistics with means and standard deviations or standards error of means were adopted. All variables are presented in absolute variations (Δ = the difference between the baseline and various times after session). Mathematical procedures to calculate the percentage blood pressure fall and morning blood pressure surge were performed. Data normality was verified through an exploratory analysis using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance was applied, reporting "F-ratio" and "p-value" to check the main interaction effects of time by session (time*session) and of time (time). When statistically significant effects were found, a post-hoc Tukey test was adopted for multiple comparisons, and the "p" values were reported. Initially, the variable low-frequency:high-frequency ratio had a non-normal distribution; however, the natural logarithmic transformation was performed for scale adjustments to meet the normal distribution model. The significance level used in the study was p\<0.05, and the software programs used were BioEstat v. 5.3 and Statistica® v. 7.0.

02

Conditions studied

  • Post-Exercise Hypotension

Keywords

  • Resistance Exercise
  • Postexercise Hypotension
  • Sympathovagal balance
  • Professor
03

In context

Post-Exercise Hypotension

22 studies on the registry are indexed under Post-Exercise Hypotension; 2 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 10 is below the median of 21 across 22 interventional studies indexed under Post-Exercise Hypotension.

Browse Post-Exercise Hypotension studies →

Lead sponsor

Universidade Federal do vale do São Francisco is the lead sponsor of 14 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
30 Years to 40 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Being healthy university professor;
  • Teach classes at night;
  • Physically active.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hypertension;
  • Cardiovascular disease;
  • Obesity;
  • Smoking or drug use that could affect the cardiovascular responses during the study;
  • Joint, bone or muscle problems that could limit the execution of the experimental sessions;
  • Not complying with the recommendations during the study.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
10 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Resistance Exercise Low intensity

    The 40% one maximum repetition resistance exercise session lasted 40 minutes. Three circuits with 7 exercises, 16 repetitions were performed for each exercise, with an interval of 60 seconds between exercises and 120 seconds between circuits. The duration of repetition in the exercises was 3 seconds - 1 second in the concentric phase and 2 seconds in the eccentric phase of the movement.

    Other: Resistance Exercise Low intensity

  • Experimental
    Resistance Exercise High intensity

    The 80% one maximum repetition resistance exercise session lasted 40 minutes. Three circuits with 7 exercises, 8 repetitions were performed for each exercise, with an interval of 90 seconds between exercises and 120 seconds between circuits. The duration of repetition in the exercises was 3 seconds - 1 second in the concentric phase and 2 seconds in the eccentric phase of the movement.

    Other: Resistance Exercise High intensity

  • Other
    Control

    In the control session, the participants remained seated in a comfortable chair in the same environment of the resistance exercise sessions.

    Other: Control

Interventions

  • OtherResistance Exercise Low intensity

    The 40% one maximum repetition resistance exercise session lasted 40 minutes. Three circuits with 7 exercises, 16 repetitions were performed for each exercise, with an interval of 60 seconds between exercises and 120 seconds between circuits. The duration of repetition in the exercises was 3 seconds - 1 second in the concentric phase and 2 seconds in the eccentric phase of the movement.

  • OtherResistance Exercise High intensity

    The 80% one maximum repetition resistance exercise session lasted 40 minutes. Three circuits with 7 exercises, 16 repetitions were performed for each exercise, with an interval of 60 seconds between exercises and 120 seconds between circuits. The duration of repetition in the exercises was 3 seconds - 1 second in the concentric phase and 2 seconds in the eccentric phase of the movement.

  • OtherControl

    In the control session, the participants remained seated in a comfortable chair in the same environment of the resistance exercise sessions.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Blood pressure response to resistance exercise of different intensities during teaching period.

    Time frame: 24 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Blood pressure response to resistance exercise of different intensities during sleep period.

    Time frame: 6 hours

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Jul 2013, a primary completion of Jul 2014 and a completion of Jul 2014. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 31, 2015
First posted
Jan 8, 2016
Start
Jul 2013
Primary completionActual
Jul 2014
CompletionActual
Jul 2014
Last update
Jan 8, 2016
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 8, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02650089
Lead sponsor
Universidade Federal do vale do São Francisco
Responsible party
Alfredo Anderson Teixeira de Araujo (Principal Investigator, Universidade Federal do vale do São Francisco) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 8, 2016
Start date
Jul 2013
Primary completion
Jul 2014
Completion
Jul 2014
Last update
Jan 8, 2016

Study contacts

Alfredo Anderson Teixeira-Araujo
principal investigator · Federal University of Vale do São Francisco

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion