ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02640417Updated Apr 19, 2019

Nucleotides and B Vitamins in the Treatment of Low Back Pain

A Phase 4 interventional study of Nucleotides + B12 and B Vitamins in Low Back Pain, sponsored by Fundação Educacional Serra dos Órgãos. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-04-19.

Sponsored by Fundação Educacional Serra dos Órgãos · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
300
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a double-blind, randomized study in parallel groups of subjects presenting with low back pain. Randomized subjects will receive treatment for 60 days with either a combination of nucleotides and vitamin B12 or vitamin B1+B6+B12.

Read the detailed description

This is a double-blind, randomized study in parallel groups of subjects presenting with low back pain. Randomized subjects will receive treatment for 60 days with either a combination of nucleotides and vitamin B12 or vitamin B1+B6+B12. The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the therapeutic effect of the combination of nucleotides + vitamin B12 with that of the combination of vitamins B1, B6 and B12 in low back pain. Safety and efficacy will be monitored throughout the treatment period. Subjects will be randomized in a double-blind fashion to either treatment group.

02

Conditions studied

  • Low Back Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Nucleotides (uridine, cytidine)
  • Vitamin B1
  • Vitamin B6
  • Vitamin B12
03

In context

Low Back Pain

2,922 studies on the registry are indexed under Low Back Pain; 580 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 300 is above the median of 60 across 2,364 interventional studies indexed under Low Back Pain.

Browse Low Back Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Fundação Educacional Serra dos Órgãos is the lead sponsor of 10 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients of both genders, at least 18 years of age
  • Clinical presentation of acute lumbago (\<3 days of initial visit, with and without functional alteration, with medium intensity: Visual Analog Pain score between 20mm and 80mm
  • Female subjects should be or using
  • Subjects must sign document

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Intolerance to any component of the study treatments
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Need for surgical treatment
  • Use of other analgesic drugs
  • dyshematopoiesis or coagulation disorder
  • Gastric or intestinal ulcer
  • Gastrointestinal, cerebrovascular, or other bleeding
  • Creatinine >3x% reference range
  • Urea, , AST, or GGT >2x% reference range
  • Any other disease or condition that in the investigator's opinion should exclude the subject from the study
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Postmenopausal

Periods have stopped for good: usually no period for 12 months in a row without another medical reason, sometimes confirmed by a blood test (FSH).

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
300 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Nucleotides + B12

    Nucleotides + Vitamin B12 Dose: two capsules, three times per day + placebo corresponding to Group B treatment

    Drug: Nucleotides + B12

  • Active comparator
    B vitamins

    Vitamin B1 + Vitamin B6 + Vitamin B12 Dose: one tablet, three times daily + placebo corresponding to Group A treatment

    Drug: B Vitamins

Interventions

  • DrugNucleotides + B12

    Oral treatment with either Nucleotides + Vitamin B12

    Also known as: Group A

  • Oral treatment with vitamins B1, B6, and B12

    Also known as: Group B

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Adverse Event Occurrence

    Percentage of subjects in each treatment group presenting with adverse events

    Time frame: Throughout 60 day treatment period

Secondary outcomes

  1. Low back pain Questionnaire

    Percentage of subjects in each treatment group presenting improvement of \>5 points in Questionnaire scores

    Time frame: Pretreatment, Visit 2 (at 30 days of treatment), Visit 3 (at 60 days of treatment)

  2. Visual Analog Pain Scores

    Percentage of subjects in each treatment group presenting improvement of VAS pain scores in relation to pretreatment

    Time frame: Pretreatment, Visit 2 (at 30 days of treatment), Visit 3 (at 60 days of treatment)

  3. Finger-to-Floor Distance

    Percentage of subjects in each treatment group presenting improvement of \>3cm in finger to floor distance in relation to pretreatment values

    Time frame: Pretreatment, Visit 2 (at 30 days of treatment), Visit 3 (at 60 days of treatment)

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Mar 2016, a primary completion of Mar 2018 and a completion of Oct 2018. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 15, 2015
First posted
Dec 29, 2015
Start
Mar 2016
Primary completionActual
Mar 2018
CompletionActual
Oct 2018
Last update
Apr 19, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 19, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02640417
Lead sponsor
Fundação Educacional Serra dos Órgãos
Responsible party
Marco Antonio Naslausky Mibielli (Professor and Chairman of Orthopedics, Fundação Educacional Serra dos Órgãos) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 29, 2015
Start date
Mar 2016
Primary completion
Mar 2018
Completion
Oct 2018
Last update
Apr 19, 2019

Study contacts

Marco AN Mibielli, MD
principal investigator · UNIFESO - Fundação Educacional Serra dos Órgãos

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion