An observational study in Rosacea, sponsored by LEO Pharma. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-04-01.
Sponsored by LEO Pharma · Observational
To survey patients with rosacea about their rosacea treatment preferences as well as to assess potential drivers of rosacea treatment satisfaction.
231 studies on the registry are indexed under Rosacea; 20 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 206 is below the median of 240 across 22 observational studies indexed under Rosacea.
Browse Rosacea studies →LEO Pharma is the lead sponsor of 225 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.
Of its 31 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 24 (77%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Patients who are using topical rosacea treatment
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients using topical rosacea treatment
Drug: Azelaic Acid Gel including: Finacea (Azelaic Acid Gel 15%, BAY39-6251) · Drug: Azelaic Acid Cream · Drug: Metronidazole gel · Drug: Metronidazole cream · Drug: Metronidazole Emulsion · Drug: Metronidazole Lotion · Drug: Brimonidine Tartrate Gel
Azelaic Acid Gel 15%, Azelaic Acid Gel 15% w/Cleanser \& Moisturizing
Azelaic Acid Cream 20%
Metronidazole Gel 1%, Metronidazole Gel 1% w/ Cleanser, Metronidazole Gel 0.75%, Metronidazole Gel 0.75% w/ Cleanser
Metronidazole Cream 1%, Metronidazole Cream 0.75%, Metronidazole Cream 0.75% w/ Cleanser
Metronidazole Emulsion 0.75%
Metronidazole Lotion 0,75%
Brimonidine Tartrate Gel 0.33%
Self-reported concerns and importance of such concerns regarding their current topical rosacea treatments
Assessed from the Rosacea Treatment Preference Questionnaire: Rated on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 meaning not at all important and 10 meaning extremely important
Time frame: Rosacea treatment in the past 4 weeks
Self-reported likelihood of switching to a topical rosacea treatments
Assessed from the Rosacea Treatment Preference Questionnaire: Rated on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 meaning not at all likely and 10 meaning extremely likely
Time frame: Rosacea treatment in the past 4 weeks
Quality of life
Measured using Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI): The DLQI consists of 10 questions concerning symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work, and school, personal relationships and treatment
Time frame: Rosacea treatment in the past 4 weeks
Treatment satisfaction
Assessed by a score on the Treatment Satisfaction with Medicines Questionnaire (SATMED-Q). Scores will be standardized and expressed as a 0-100 standardized score
Time frame: Rosacea treatment in the past 4 weeks
Self-reported concerns and importance (a rating scale) of such concerns that patients would consider when switching to a new topical rosacea treatment
Extracted from the Rosacea Treatment Preference Questionnaire
Time frame: Rosacea treatment in the past 4 weeks
Baseline demographics and clinical characteristics: Age
Assessed from retrospective analysis of electronic medical records
Time frame: Retrospective database analysis: encompassing patient data from up to 5 years
Baseline demographics and clinical characteristics: Gender
Assessed from retrospective analysis of electronic medical records
Time frame: Retrospective database analysis: encompassing patient data from up to 5 years
Baseline demographics and clinical characteristics: Insurance type
Assessed from retrospective analysis of electronic medical records
Time frame: Retrospective database analysis: encompassing patient data from up to 5 years
Baseline demographics and clinical characteristics: Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI)
Assessed from retrospective analysis of electronic medical records
Time frame: Retrospective database analysis: encompassing patient data from up to 5 years
Baseline demographics and clinical characteristics: Rosacea-relevant comorbidities and complications
Assessed from retrospective analysis of electronic medical records: Blepharitis (ICD-9: 373.0) Conjunctivitis (ICD-9: 372.0-372.2) Corneal neovascularization / keratitis (ICD-9: 370) Depression (ICD-9: 296.2-296.3) Migraine (ICD-9: 346)
Time frame: Retrospective database analysis: encompassing patient data from up to 5 years
Baseline demographics and clinical characteristics: Rosacea treatment-related adverse events
Assessed from retrospective analysis of electronic medical records: Burning/stinging/tingling (ICD-9: 782.0) Pruritus (ICD-9: 698) Scaling/dry skin/xerosis (ICD-9: 692.9, 706.8) Erythema/irritation (ICD-9: 695) Contact dermatitis (ICD-9: 692.3, 692.8, 692.9) Facial edema (ICD-9: 782.3) Acne (ICD-9: 706.1)
Time frame: Retrospective database analysis: encompassing patient data from up to 5 years
Current and past medication use
Assessed from retrospective analysis of electronic medical records Including: azelaic acid gel, azelaic acid cream, metronidazole gel, metronidazole cream, metronidazole lotion, metronidazole emulsion, brimonidine tartrate gel
Time frame: Retrospective database analysis: encompassing patient data from up to 5 years
Self-reported adverse events associated with patients' satisfaction/dissatisfaction
Assessed from the Rosacea Treatment Preference Questionnaire: Rated on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 meaning no pain/discomfort and 10 meaning unbearable pain/discomfort
Time frame: Rosacea treatment in the past 4 weeks
This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.