ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02598843Updated Jan 27, 2020

Standard Non Operative Treatment Versus Accelerated Rehabilitation of Achilles Tendon Ruptures

An interventional study of Standard treatment protocol and Accelerated Rehabilitation in Rupture of Achilles Tendon, sponsored by NHS Lothian. Completed at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 16 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-01-27.

Sponsored by NHS Lothian · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 11 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Nov 2013, registered Oct 2015).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
140
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
16 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to directly compare traditional plaster treatment with early weightbearing in a walking boot for the non operative treatment of acute achilles tendon rupture.

Read the detailed description

This injury has traditionally been treated in a plaster cast applied to the leg for a period of 10 weeks which allows the tendon to heal, or by an operation to repair the tendon. Research undertaken in the investigators department has shown that patients treated with surgery or with a plaster had similar chance of re-rupture of the tendon after treatment and gain a similar recovery. The investigators therefore now manage these injuries in a plaster.

More recently, further research has shown that a new type of non-surgical rehabilitation programme, which is quicker than the traditional non-surgical programme, gave a tendon re-rupture rate that was similar to that after surgical treatment. This new rehabilitation programme uses a walking boot fitted with a heel-raise (instead of the traditional plaster). The potential benefit of this quicker rehabilitation programme is that it allows the patient to put weight through the leg immediately, whereas patients treated with the traditional plaster cast non-surgical treatment cannot weight bear (this means that they are kept non-weightbearing and therefore have to use crutches) for the first 8 weeks. The time spent in the walking boot in this new, quicker rehabilitation programme is 8 weeks while that spent in plaster is 10 weeks. This new non-surgical, quicker rehabilitation programme is referred to as the accelerated non-surgical programme hereafter. There are no known increased risks with the accelerated rehabilitation programme.

02

Conditions studied

  • Rupture of Achilles Tendon
03

In context

Lead sponsor

NHS Lothian is the lead sponsor of 53 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
16 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients aged 16-60 years old with an acute rupture of the Achilles tendon

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who do not have an acute rupture (ie. delayed presentation >2 weeks)
  • Patients who present with a re-rupture of a previously treated Achilles tendon
  • Patients from outside the Lothian (local treatment) area who are unwilling to attend follow-up at the study institution.
  • Latex allergy.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
140 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Standard treatment protocol

    Cast immobilisation with 4 weeks in equinus cast (non-weight bearing) followed by 4 weeks in semi-equinus cast (non-weightbearing) and 2 weeks in neutral cast (full weightbearing). At this point, the cast is removed and patients mobilise fully weightbearing for a further 2 weeks out of cast, with internal shoe insert heel raise. Commence physiotherapy at 10 weeks, when cast removed.

    Other: Standard treatment protocol

  • Experimental
    Accelerated rehabilitation

    4 weeks in Ossur rebound walking boot with 2 heel wedges (3cm), 2 weeks in Ossur rebound walking boot with 1 heel wedge (1.5cm) and 2 weeks in Ossur rebound walking boot with no heel wedges (neutral position). Fully weightbearing throughout. Commence physiotherapy at 8 weeks.

    Other: Accelerated Rehabilitation

Interventions

  • OtherStandard treatment protocol

    Cast Protocol 4 weeks in Full Equinus cast - Non Weight Bearing (NWB) with axillary crutches; 4 weeks in Semi-Equinus cast NWB with axillary crutches; 2 weeks in neutral cast - Full Weight Bearing (FWB); 2 weeks FWB out of cast, with shoe insert heel raise. Followed by course of physiotherapy

  • OtherAccelerated Rehabilitation

    4 weeks in Ossur Rebound walking boot with 3cm heel raise, worn continuously including in bed. Weight bearing as tolerated (WBAT)/FWB - crutches for balance; 2 weeks in Rebound walking boot with 1.5cm heel raise (WBAT/FWB - crutches for balance; 2 weeks in Rebound walking boot with foot in neutral. At 8 weeks, remove boot and allow FWB out of boot. At 8 weeks after initiation of treatment, physiotherapy is commenced.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. SMFA (Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment Questionnaire)

    46 question score. Patients are asked to tick boxes labelled between 1 (indicating good function/no problems) and 5 (poor function/significant problems) for each question and the responses are used to calculate a "dysfunction index", a "bother index" and an "overall SMFA score". These will be reported for each group with measure of central tendency (mean/median) and standard deviations/interquartile range.

    Time frame: final followup/one year

Secondary outcomes

  1. SMFA (Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment Questionnaire)

    46 question score. Patients are asked to tick boxes labelled between 1 (indicating good function/no problems) and 5 (poor function/significant problems) for each question and the responses are used to calculate a "dysfunction index", a "bother index" and an "overall SMFA score". These will be reported for each group with measure of central tendency (mean/median) and standard deviations/interquartile range.

    Time frame: At the initial review, upon enrolment in the study, patients are asked to complete the questionnaire detailing their immediate pre-injury status (ie status one day before injury). Then reassessed at 26 weeks.

  2. Incidence of thromboembolic events

    Incidence of radiologically confirmed thromboembolic events within one year of injury is to be reported for each group.

    Time frame: 1 year

  3. Ankle and subtalar motion

    Ankle motion is to be measured using a goniometer for each patient while subtalar motion is to be clinically assessed. Range of motion will be reported for each group as measure of central tendency (median or mean) and standard deviation or interquartile range.

    Time frame: 10, 26 and 52 weeks

  4. Calf circumference

    Measured in centimetres at a point 11 centimetres below the tibial tuberosity. Both sides are measured and the affected (injured) side is compared to the unaffected (uninjured) side for each patient, yielding a relative calf circumference for the affected side. Relative circumference can then be compared across the two groups and reported for each group as a measure of central tendency along with standard deviation/interquartile range..

    Time frame: 10, 26 and 52 weeks

  5. Visual Analogue Score (VAS) for pain

    VAS scored between 0 and 10. Patients asked to circle an integer between 0 and 10 to indicate their pain level, with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating severe pain. Scores to be reported for each group (arm of trial) as measure of central tendency (mean/median) and standard deviations/interquartile range.

    Time frame: Initial review, 4,8,10,26,52 weeks.

  6. Foot and Ankle Outcomes Questionnaire

    American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) questionnaire (August 2005 version based on version 2.0 Foot and Ankles Outcomes Instrument. This consists of 25 questions with patients asked to indicate the answer that best applies to their situation. Responses are used to calculate a score and scores for each group will be reported as a measure of central tendency (median/mean) with standard deviations/interquartile ranges.

    Time frame: At the initial review, upon enrolment in the study, patients are asked to complete the questionnaire detailing their immediate pre-injury status (ie status one day before injury). Then reassessed at 26 and 52 weeks.

  7. Achilles Tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS)

    This is a validated score consisting of 10 questions scored 0 to 10 (whole numbers only) with 0 indicating no limitation and 10 indicating maximal limitation. Data to be analysed and presented as measure of central tendency (median/mean) and standard deviations/interquartile ranges for patients in each group.

    Time frame: At the initial review, upon enrolment in the study, patients are asked to complete the questionnaire detailing their immediate pre-injury status (ie status one day before injury). Then reassessed at 26 and 52 weeks

  8. Return to work.

    Time to initial return to work activity measured in days from date of injury. To be reported as the measure of central tendency (mean or median) and standard deviation or interquartile range, for each group (arm of trial). Patients will be asked whether they have returned to work when reviewed at each of the review timepoints listed above, until they answer in the affirmative.

    Time frame: 10,26,52 weeks.

  9. Return to driving or public transport.

    Time to initial return to driving (or use of public transport if non-driver), measured in days from date of injury. To be reported as the measure of central tendency (mean or median) and standard deviation or interquartile range, for each group (arm of trial). Patients will be asked whether they have returned to these activities when reviewed at each of the review timepoints listed above, until they answer in the affirmative.

    Time frame: 10,26,52 weeks.

  10. Return to sport.

    Time to initial return to sporting activity (if applicable) measured in days from date of injury. To be reported as the measure of central tendency (mean or median) and standard deviation or interquartile range, for each group (arm of trial). Patients will be asked whether they have returned to sporting activities when reviewed at each of the review timepoints listed above, until they answer in the affirmative.

    Time frame: 10,26,52 weeks.

  11. Achilles tendon rerupture rate

    Number of achilles tendon re-ruptures occuring in each group up to one year after injury.

    Time frame: 1 year

  12. EQ-5D Index and EQ-5D VAS

    The EQ-5D-5L consists of an EQ-5D index, calculated from scores for 5 domains (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) and the index ranges from -1 to +1. The EQ-5D visual analog scale (VAS) asks patients to self-rate their health state on a scale between 0 and 100. Data to be analysed and presented as measure of central tendency (median/mean) and standard deviations/interquartile ranges for patients in each group. This data is collected for the final 41 patients in this study.

    Time frame: Pre-injury and post-injury (completed at initial review), 26 weeks and 52 weeks

  13. Satisfaction Question

    Patients asked "How satisfied are you with your treated ankle?". They must choose one of "Very satisfied"/"satisfied"/"neither satisfied nor dissatisfied"/"dissatisfied"/"very dissatisfied". Responses to be analysed as dichotomous data and ordinal data. This data is collected for the final 41 patients in this study.

    Time frame: 10, 16, 26 and 52 weeks

  14. Patient Preference question

    Patients asked "Did you have a preference for treatment type for your Achilles tendon injury?" (Choose one of: YES / NO). If Yes, then which modality would you have preferred? (choose one of CAST / BOOT ). Data will be cross tabulated for statistical analysis. This data is collected for the final 41 patients in this study.

    Time frame: 16 weeks

  15. Achilles Tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS)

    As above. An additional time point (post-injury), to be completed at the initial review, was added for the final 41 patients in this study.

    Time frame: Post-injury (completed at initial review)

  16. SMFA (Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment Questionnaire)

    As above. An additional time point (post-injury), to be completed at the initial review, was added for the final 41 patients in this study.

    Time frame: Post-injury (completed at initial review)

  17. Foot and Ankle Outcomes Questionnaire

    As above. An additional time point (post-injury), to be completed at the initial review, was added for the final 41 patients in this study.

    Time frame: Post-injury (completed at initial review)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Royal Infirmary Edinburgh
    Edinburgh, Lothian EH16 4SA, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Maempel JF, Clement ND, Duckworth AD, Keenan OJF, White TO, Biant LC. A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Traditional Plaster Cast Rehabilitation With Functional Walking Boot Rehabilitation for Acute Achilles Tendon Ruptures. Am J Sports Med. 2020 Sep;48(11):2755-2764. doi: 10.1177/0363546520944905. Epub 2020 Aug 20. PubMed 32816521 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 27, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02598843
Lead sponsor
NHS Lothian
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 6, 2015
Start date
Nov 2013
Primary completion
Jul 3, 2019
Completion
Jul 3, 2019
Last update
Jan 27, 2020

Study contacts

Leela Biant, BSc (Hons) MBBS FRSCEd MSres
principal investigator · University of Manchester

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion