ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02596451Updated Jun 28, 2017Results posted

To Study Generic Diclofenac Sodium Topical Gel 1% in the Treatment of Osteoarthritis of the Knee (Degenerative Joint Disease Presented as Joint Pain, Stiffness, Swelling and Restricted Motion).

A Phase 3 interventional study of Diclofenac Sodium gel, 1% and Voltaren® Gel in Osteoarthritis, sponsored by Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd. India. Completed at 44 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 35 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-06-28.

Sponsored by Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd. India · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,164
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
35 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Design, Multiple-Site Clinical Study to Evaluate the Therapeutic Equivalence of Diclofenac Sodium Gel, 1% (Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd) to Voltaren® Gel (Diclofenac Sodium topical gel) 1% (Novartis Consumer Health, Inc) in Patients with Osteoarthritis (OA) of the Knee

02

Conditions studied

  • Osteoarthritis

Browse trials for

03

In context

Osteoarthritis

4,445 studies on the registry are indexed under Osteoarthritis; 582 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 1,164 is above the median of 70 across 3,474 interventional studies indexed under Osteoarthritis.

Browse Osteoarthritis studies →

Lead sponsor

Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd. India is the lead sponsor of 16 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
35 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Healthy male or non-pregnant female aged ≥ 35 years with a clinical diagnosis of OA of the knee according to the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria.
  2. OA Symptoms for at least 6 months prior to screening.
  3. Baseline Western Ontario McMaster Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) pain subscale of > 9 on a 20 point scale for the target knee immediately prior to randomization.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History of OA pain in the contralateral knee requiring medication within 1 year prior to screening.
  2. History of secondary OA, rheumatoid arthritis, chronic inflammatory disease (e.g., colitis) or fibromyalgia.
  3. History of gastrointestinal bleeding or peptic ulcer disease.
  4. Known allergy to aspirin or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID).
  5. Use of anticoagulants, ACE-inhibitors, cyclosporine, diuretics, lithium, or methotrexate prior to 30 days of screening.
  6. Concomitant use of systemic corticosteroids, topical corticosteroids, or immunosuppressive drugs or their use prior to 30 days of screening.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
1,164 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Diclofenac Sodium gel, 1%

    apply gel to the target knee

    Drug: Diclofenac Sodium gel, 1%

  • Active comparator
    Voltaren® Gel

    apply gel to the target knee

    Drug: Voltaren® Gel

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    apply gel to the target knee

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Absolute Change in the Total WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index) Pain Subscale Score for the Target Knee

    The total WOMAC Pain Subscale score was determined by summing the individual scores from each of the five questions using a 5-point Likert scale (i.e., 'none'=0; 'mild'=1, 'moderate'=2; 'severe'=3; 'extreme'=4) comprising the WOMAC Pain Subscale Rating for the Target Knee.

    Time frame: Baseline and week 4

07

Results

Posted Jun 28, 2017

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneTestReferencePlacebo
Started385392387
Completed381374373
Not completed41814

Outcome measures

PrimaryAbsolute Change in the Total WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index) Pain Subscale Score for the Target Knee

The total WOMAC Pain Subscale score was determined by summing the individual scores from each of the five questions using a 5-point Likert scale (i.e., 'none'=0; 'mild'=1, 'moderate'=2; 'severe'=3; 'extreme'=4) comprising the WOMAC Pain Subscale Rating for the Target Knee.

Time frame:
Baseline and week 4
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Absolute Change in the Total WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index) Pain Subscale Score for the Target Knee
units on a scaleTestReference
Absolute Change in the Total WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index) Pain Subscale Score for the Target Knee5.8 ± 3.965.9 ± 3.94

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Test—0/383 (0%)28/383 (7.3%)
Reference—2/382 (0.5%)26/382 (6.8%)
Placebo—1/378 (0.3%)23/378 (6.1%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventTestReferencePlacebo
Right Ankle Surgery Due To Stair FallSurgical and medical procedures0/3830/3821/378
Rib FractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/3831/3820/378
Pleural EffusionRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/3831/3820/378
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders0/3831/3820/378
L Ankle Surgery Secondary To Trimalleolar FractureSurgical and medical procedures0/3831/3820/378
AsthmaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/3830/3820/378
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventTestReferencePlacebo
HeadacheNervous system disorders28/38326/38223/378

Baseline characteristics

A total of 1164 subjects were randomized in the study; however there were 21 subjects excluded from the safety population randomized who did not received dose. (Test=2, Reference=10, Placebo=9). Therefore the subject numbers are not consistent with any of the rows in the Participant Flow module.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)TestReferencePlaceboTotal
Mean56.2 ± 10.3656.5 ± 10.6856.7 ± 10.5256.4 ± 10.51
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)TestReferencePlaceboTotal
Female249237248734
Male134145130409
08

Study locations

44 sites
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 5
    Mesa, Arizona, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 1
    Anaheim, California, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 21
    Anaheim, California, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 31
    Anaheim, California, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 26
    Canoga Park, California, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 42
    Carlsbad, California, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 30
    Carmichael, California, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 33
    Cerritos, California, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 25
    El Cajon, California, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 24
    La Mesa, California, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 2
    Pasadena, California, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 13
    Rancho Cucamonga, California, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 27
    Sacramento, California, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 10
    Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 41
    Hialeah, Florida, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 15
    Miami, Florida, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 19
    Miami, Florida, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 28
    Miami, Florida, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 32
    Miami, Florida, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 40
    Miami, Florida, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 3
    Miami Lakes, Florida, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 37
    Ormond Beach, Florida, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 11
    West Palm Beach, Florida, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 18
    West Palm Beach, Florida, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 8
    Evanston, Illinois, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 43
    Newburgh, Indiana, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 38
    Wichita, Kansas, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 17
    New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 22
    Saginaw, Michigan, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 14
    St Louis, Missouri, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 9
    Englewood, Ohio, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site7
    Altoona, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 36
    Knoxville, Tennessee, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 39
    Nashville, Tennessee, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 23
    Beaumont, Texas, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 20
    Bryan, Texas, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 34
    Dallas, Texas, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 35
    Houston, Texas, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 44
    Houston, Texas, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 4
    Lampasas, Texas, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 29
    San Antonio, Texas, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 6
    San Antonio, Texas, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 16
    Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site12
    Midlothian, Virginia, United States
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Aug 2015, a primary completion of Mar 2016 and a completion of Mar 2016. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Jun 2017, 1 year 3 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 3, 2015
First posted
Nov 4, 2015
Start
Aug 2015
Primary completionActual
Mar 2016
CompletionActual
Mar 2016
Results first posted
Jun 28, 2017
Last update
Jun 28, 2017
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 28, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02596451
Lead sponsor
Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd. India
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 4, 2015
Start date
Aug 2015
Primary completion
Mar 2016
Completion
Mar 2016
Results posted
Jun 28, 2017
Last update
Jun 28, 2017

Study contacts

Mahesh V Deshpande
study director · Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Diclofenac Sodium Gel

Start the discussion