ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02318303Updated Oct 20, 2020Results posted

To Study GSP 301 in Patients With Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis

A Phase 2 interventional study of GSP 301-1 NS (QD) and GSP 301-2 NS (BID) in Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis, sponsored by Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd. India. Completed at 10 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 12 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-10-20.

Sponsored by Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd. India · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,111
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
12 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Study to evaluate the two different strengths and dose regimen of GSP 301 to be effective in treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis
03

In context

Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal

404 studies on the registry are indexed under Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal; 24 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 1,111 is above the median of 131 across 366 interventional studies indexed under Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal.

Browse Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal studies →

Lead sponsor

Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd. India is the lead sponsor of 16 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Aged ≥12 years and older inclusive of either sex.
  2. Documented clinical history of SAR (for at least 2 years preceding the Screening Visit [Visit 1]) with exacerbations (clinical evidence of active symptoms) during the study season for the mountain cedar pollen
  3. A 12-hour reflective TNSS ≥ 8 out of a possible 12 and a congestion score of ≥ 2 for the AM assessment at the Screening Visit (Visit 1).

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pregnant or lactating women.
  2. Plans to travel outside the known pollen area for the investigative site for > 24 hours during the last 7 days of run in period.
  3. History of nasal polyps of other respiratory tract malformations, recent nasal , nasal trauma (such as nasal piercing) or surgery, atopic dermatitis or rhinitis medicamentosa.
  4. History of anaphylaxis and/or other severe local reaction(s) to skin testing.
  5. History of positive test for , or infection.
  6. Documented evidence of acute or significant chronic sinusitis or chronic purulent postnasal drip.
  7. Subjects with an active pulmonary disorder or infection.
  8. Subjects with posterior subcapsular cataracts or glaucoma.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
1,111 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    GSP 301 Placebo NS

    Drug: GSP 301 Placebo NS

  • Experimental
    GSP 301-1 NS (QD)

    Drug: GSP 301-1 NS (QD)

  • Experimental
    GSP 301-2 NS (BID)

    Drug: GSP 301-2 NS (BID)

  • Active comparator
    Olopatadine HCl-1 NS (QD)

    Drug: Olopatadine HCl-1 NS (QD)

  • Active comparator
    Olopatadine HCl-2 NS (BID)

    Drug: Olopatadine HCl-2 NS (BID)

  • Active comparator
    Mometasone Furoate-1 NS (QD)

    Drug: Mometasone Furoate-1 NS (QD)

  • Active comparator
    Mometasone Furoate-2 NS (BID)

    Drug: Mometasone Furoate-2 NS (BID)

Interventions

  • DrugGSP 301-1 NS (QD)

    GSP 301-1 NS (665 μg olopatadine hydrochloride/50 μg mometasone furoate) administered as 2 sprays/nostril

  • DrugGSP 301-2 NS (BID)

    GSP 301-2 NS (665 μg olopatadine hydrochloride/25 μg mometasone furoate) administered as 2 sprays/nostril

  • DrugGSP 301 Placebo NS

    GSP 301 placebo NS administered as 2 sprays/nostril

  • DrugOlopatadine HCl-1 NS (QD)

    Olopatadine HCl-1 NS (665 μg) administered as 2 sprays/nostril

  • DrugOlopatadine HCl-2 NS (BID)

    Olopatadine HCl-2 NS (665 μg) administered as 2 sprays/nostril

  • DrugMometasone Furoate-1 NS (QD)

    Mometasone furoate -1 NS (50 μg) administered as 2 sprays/nostril

  • DrugMometasone Furoate-2 NS (BID)

    Mometasone furoate-2 NS (25 μg) administered as 2 sprays/nostril

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in rTNSS From Baseline to End of Treatment

    Subjects were asked to assess rTNSS (reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score), ie, an evaluation of symptom severity over the past 12 hours prior to the recording of the score. The TNSS was defined as the sum of the subject-reported symptom severity scores for the following four nasal symptoms, recorded by each subject in the diary: rhinorrhea, sneezing, nasal congestion, nasal itching. The total rTNSS scores for all four symptoms (i.e, the lowest possible score (0) and the highest possible score (12).) Higher score means a worse outcome. The severity scale for each symptom evaluation was defined as follows: * 0 = absent (no sign/symptom evident) * 1 = mild (sign/symptom clearly present, but minimal awareness; easily tolerated) * 2 = moderate (definite awareness of sign/symptom that is bothersome but tolerable) * 3 = severe (sign/symptom that is hard to tolerate \[i.e., causes interference with activities of daily living and/or sleeping\])

    Time frame: 14 days

07

Results

Posted Jun 28, 2017

Participant flow

Subjects were enrolled at 10 sites in the US.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneGSP 301 Placebo NSGSP 301-1 NS (QD)Mometasone Furoate-1 NS (QD)Olopatadine HCl-1 NS (QD)GSP 301-2 NS (BID)Mometasone Furoate-2 NS (BID)Olopatadine HCl-2 NS (BID)
Started159158160158157159160
Completed155155157155152153158
Not completed4333562

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in rTNSS From Baseline to End of Treatment

Subjects were asked to assess rTNSS (reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score), ie, an evaluation of symptom severity over the past 12 hours prior to the recording of the score. The TNSS was defined as the sum of the subject-reported symptom severity scores for the following four nasal symptoms, recorded by each subject in the diary: rhinorrhea, sneezing, nasal congestion, nasal itching. The total rTNSS scores for all four symptoms (i.e, the lowest possible score (0) and the highest possible score (12).) Higher score means a worse outcome. The severity scale for each symptom evaluation was defined as follows: * 0 = absent (no sign/symptom evident) * 1 = mild (sign/symptom clearly present, but minimal awareness; easily tolerated) * 2 = moderate (definite awareness of sign/symptom that is bothersome but tolerable) * 3 = severe (sign/symptom that is hard to tolerate \[i.e., causes interference with activities of daily living and/or sleeping\])

Time frame:
14 days
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change in rTNSS From Baseline to End of Treatment
units on a scaleGSP 301 PlaceboGSP 301-1 NS (QD)Mometasone Furoate-1 NS (QD)Olopatadine HCl-1 NS (QD)GSP 301-2 NS (BID)Mometasone Furoate-2 NS (BID)Olopatadine HCl-2 NS (BID)
Baseline10.3 ± 1.1810.4 ± 1.2410.4 ± 1.3010.3 ± 1.2610.4 ± 1.1910.5 ± 1.1310.3 ± 1.24
Change from Baseline to Visit 4-1.4 ± 2.00-2.5 ± 2.52-2.2 ± 2.68-1.7 ± 2.09-2.6 ± 2.56-1.9 ± 1.88-2.1 ± 2.26
Statistical analysis
  • GSP 301 Placebo vs GSP 301-1 NS (QD) · ANCOVA · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): -1.1087 · 97.5% CI -1.6690 to -0.5485
  • GSP 301 Placebo vs GSP 301-2 NS (BID) · ANCOVA · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): -1.1703 · 97.5% CI -1.7315 to -0.6090
  • GSP 301-1 NS (QD) vs Olopatadine HCl-1 NS (QD) · ANCOVA · p = 0.0020 · Mean difference (final values): -0.7718 · 95% CI -1.2616 to -0.2820
  • GSP 301-1 NS (QD) vs Mometasone Furoate-1 NS (QD) · ANCOVA · p = 0.1524 · Mean difference (final values): -0.3563 · 95% CI -0.8445 to 0.1319
  • GSP 301-2 NS (BID) vs Olopatadine HCl-2 NS (BID) · ANCOVA · p = 0.0488 · Mean difference (final values): -0.4918 · 95% CI -0.9810 to -0.0025
  • GSP 301-2 NS (BID) vs Mometasone Furoate-2 NS (BID) · ANCOVA · p = 0.0043 · Mean difference (final values): -0.7133 · 95% CI -1.2031 to -0.2235

Adverse events

Collected over AEs and SAEs were collected from the time of signing the informed consent form until the follow-up contact. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
GSP 301 Placebo NS—0/159 (0%)0/159 (0%)
GSP 301-1 NS (QD)—1/158 (0.6%)0/158 (0%)
Mometasone Furoate-1 NS (QD)—0/160 (0%)0/160 (0%)
Olopatadine HCl-1 NS (QD)—0/158 (0%)0/158 (0%)
GSP 301-2 NS (BID)—0/157 (0%)0/157 (0%)
Mometasone Furoate-2 NS (BID)—0/159 (0%)0/159 (0%)
Olopatadine HCl-2 NS (BID)—0/160 (0%)0/160 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventGSP 301 Placebo NSGSP 301-1 NS (QD)Mometasone Furoate-1 NS (QD)Olopatadine HCl-1 NS (QD)GSP 301-2 NS (BID)Mometasone Furoate-2 NS (BID)Olopatadine HCl-2 NS (BID)
Gastrointestinal ulcer and GastritisGastrointestinal disorders0/1591/1580/1600/1580/1570/1590/160

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)GSP 301 Placebo NSGSP 301-1 NS (QD)Mometasone Furoate-1 NS (QD)Olopatadine HCl-1 NS (QD)GSP 301-2 NS (BID)Mometasone Furoate-2 NS (BID)Olopatadine HCl-2 NS (BID)Total
Mean45.35 ± 14.95143.83 ± 13.60944.40 ± 14.31241.90 ± 12.47843.44 ± 14.12844.58 ± 13.69843.49 ± 13.86843.86 ± 13.882
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)GSP 301 Placebo NSGSP 301-1 NS (QD)Mometasone Furoate-1 NS (QD)Olopatadine HCl-1 NS (QD)GSP 301-2 NS (BID)Mometasone Furoate-2 NS (BID)Olopatadine HCl-2 NS (BID)Total
Female11210011510511196101740
Male47584553466359371
08

Study locations

10 sites
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 10
    Austin, Texas, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 5
    Austin, Texas, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 6
    Austin, Texas, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 2
    Kerrville, Texas, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 7
    New Braunfels, Texas, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 3
    San Antonio, Texas, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 4
    San Antonio, Texas, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 8
    San Antonio, Texas, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 9
    San Antonio, Texas, United States
  • Glenmark Investigational Site 1
    Waco, Texas, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Andrews CP, Mohar D, Salhi Y, Tantry SK. Efficacy and safety of twice-daily and once-daily olopatadine-mometasone combination nasal spray for seasonal allergic rhinitis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2020 Feb;124(2):171-178.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2019.11.007. Epub 2019 Nov 15. PubMed 31734334 ↗
10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Dec 2014, a primary completion of Feb 2015 and a completion of Feb 2015. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Jun 2017, 2 years 4 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 3, 2014
First posted
Dec 17, 2014
Start
Dec 2014
Primary completionActual
Feb 2015
CompletionActual
Feb 2015
Results first posted
Jun 28, 2017
Last update
Oct 20, 2020
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 20, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02318303
Lead sponsor
Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd. India
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 17, 2014
Start date
Dec 2014
Primary completion
Feb 2015
Completion
Feb 2015
Results posted
Jun 28, 2017
Last update
Oct 20, 2020

Study contacts

Sudeesh Tantry, Ph.D
study director · Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion