ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT02587585Updated Apr 21, 2017

The Effect of Activity Feedback Enabled by Smart Watches During In-patient Stroke Rehabilitation

An interventional study of Feedback against tailored target and No feedback in Stroke, sponsored by The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui University of Traditional Chinese Medicine. Status unknown at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-04-21.

Sponsored by The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Mar 2017), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
200
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The amount of activity completed by individuals within rehabilitation programs, even when units are well staffed, is often far below that required for optimal stroke rehabilitation, and is not individually adapted on a day-to-day basis. Daily feedback on their activity levels may motivate stroke survivors to engage in greater skills practice and thus outcome after stroke. To date only a few trials suggests that augmented feedback may be effective. There is a need for a large pragmatic trial to explore the impact of augmented activity feedback on top of their standard care. The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of augmented activity feedback by smart watches to support in-patient stroke rehabilitation.

Read the detailed description

This study had a feasibility and pilot development phase from September 2015 to April 2016, and then moved into the main study with some changes in design and execution occurring in the light of experience. Its execution has also been constrained by external factors beyond control.

It is in essence asking whether wearing a Smart Watch which gives feedback on activity every two hours, with a specific target tailored to the patient's performance 24 hours earlier will be associated with a higher rate of physical activity than seen in people wearing the same watch without and feedback been given.

The intervention only lasts unto 21 days, but earlier discharge will terminate that patient's participation sooner. A telephone interview at 12 weeks after entry collect data on mobility.

Outcome measures will assess mobility, activity, and health status.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stroke

Browse trials for

03

In context

Stroke

8,255 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,056 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 200 is above the median of 49 across 6,024 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui University of Traditional Chinese Medicine is the lead sponsor of 7 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Admission for acute/sub-acute in-patient neurorehabilitation of a first stroke at the 2nd affiliated hospital of Anhui University of Traditional Medicine and Acupuncture, Hefei, China.
  • Time from onset of stroke to admission for rehabilitation \<16 weeks.
  • Ability to follow a two stage command; pick up an object, put object on table.
  • Independent in mobility prior to admission. Subjects can use any type of assistive device and brace needed.
  • Able to understand and repeat information related to the .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Admission for second stroke.
  • Subjects who are unable to provide consent due to a cognitive impairment.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
200 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Feedback against tailored target

    For each two hour epoch, the watch calculate the level of activity for the same epoch the day before, and adds 5% as the new target to be achieved.

    Behavioral: Feedback against tailored target

  • Sham comparator
    No Feedback

    For participants assigned to the control group, the smart watch will not provide any activity feedback against a target; it simply shows which two hour epoch a person is in.

    Behavioral: No feedback

Interventions

  • BehavioralFeedback against tailored target

    Participants will wear a smart watch every weekday for nine hours during in-patient rehabilitation to monitor activity levels while receiving their usual care. In the active group, the watch will summate activity movement in two hour epochs and the target for the day for that epoch is the activity in the same epoch 24 hours earlier, plus 5%. During an epoch the patient is shown progress towards the target at at the end of an epoch, they will see their final process towards target for that epoch.

  • BehavioralNo feedback

    Participants will wear a smart watch every weekday for nine hours during in-patient rehabilitation to monitor activity levels while receiving their usual care. However the watch face will simply show which epoch a person is in. The watch will collect the activity in exactly the same way over the day.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in activity counts as measured by a triaxial accelerometer from a smart watch from admission to 3 weeks or discharge from rehabilitation

    Time frame: Baseline, Three weeks or at discharge from in-patient rehabilitation if sooner

Secondary outcomes

  1. Activity goal attainment as measured and provided by the smart watch

    Participants in feedback group receive a preset activity goal based on their previous activity levels at baseline. The smart watch will then provide graduated encouragement by increasing their activity goal by about 5%. Every 10-15 minutes the screen lights up and participants can see their activity progress expressed by activity bars (representing 0-100%). Participants reaching their activity goal is used to measure goal attainment.

    Time frame: At three weeks, or discharge if sooner

  2. Change in walking mobility

    Change in walking speed and spatio-temporal characteristics of walking as measured by an inertial sensor on the lower trunk during a 10m walk test.

    Time frame: Baseline, Three weeks or discharge from in-patient rehabilitation if sooner

  3. Fatigue

    Fatigue Severity Index

    Time frame: Baseline, Three weeks or discharge from in-patient rehabilitation if sooner

  4. Health status on EQ-5D-5L

    This scale is used a measure for health status and compromises 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression

    Time frame: Baseline, Three weeks or discharge from in-patient rehabilitation if sooner, and 12 weeks (by telephone)

  5. Change in functional mobility as measured by Rivermead Mobility Index (RMI)

    This scale assesses functional mobility in gait, balance and transfers after stroke

    Time frame: Baseline, Three weeks or discharge from in-patient rehabilitation if sooner, and 12 weeks (by telephone)

  6. Change in cognitive function as measured by The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)

    This is a screening instrument for to measure mild cognitive dysfunction. It assesses different cognitive domains: attention and concentration, executive functions, memory, language, visuoconstructional skills, conceptual thinking, calculations, and orientation.

    Time frame: Baseline, Three weeks or discharge from in-patient rehabilitation if sooner

  7. Change in arm function recovery

    Grip dynamometer

    Time frame: Baseline, Three weeks or discharge from in-patient rehabilitation if sooner

  8. Change in performance of activities of daily living as measured by Barthel ADL Index

    This scale is used to record what the participant undertakes in personal activities, to establish a degree of independence from any help, physical or verbal.

    Time frame: Baseline, Three weeks or discharge from in-patient rehabilitation if sooner

  9. Change in disability as measured by WHO Disability Assessment Scale (12 item version)

    This scale provides a global measure of disability covering 6 domains: cognition, mobility, self-care, getting along, life activities, and participation

    Time frame: Baseline, Three weeks or discharge from in-patient rehabilitation if sooner, and 12 weeks

  10. Adverse events

    Self-reported adverse events

    Time frame: At three weeks, or discharge if sooner and at 12 weeks

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • The 2nd Affiliated Hospital to Anhui University of Tranditional Chinese Medicine
    Hefei, Anhui, China
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Lawrie S, Dong Y, Steins D, Xia Z, Esser P, Sun S, Li F, Amor JD, James C, Izadi H, Cao Y, Wade D, Mayo N, Dawes H; Smart Watch Activity Feedback Trial Committee (SWAFT). Evaluation of a smartwatch-based intervention providing feedback of daily activity within a research-naive stroke ward: a pilot randomised controlled trial. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2018 Oct 6;4:157. doi: 10.1186/s40814-018-0345-x. eCollection 2018. PubMed 30323946 ↗
  • Dong Y, Steins D, Sun S, Li F, Amor JD, James CJ, Xia Z, Dawes H, Izadi H, Cao Y, Wade DT; Smart watch activity feedback trial committee (SWAFT). Does feedback on daily activity level from a Smart watch during inpatient stroke rehabilitation increase physical activity levels? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2018 Mar 9;19(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2476-z. PubMed 29523170 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — In the unlikely event that someone asks, it will probably be shared but so far (March 2017) there is no plan

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Sep 2015, a primary completion of Jan 2018 and a completion of Aug 2018. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 30, 2015
First posted
Oct 27, 2015
Start
Sep 2015
Primary completionEst.
Jan 2018
CompletionEst.
Aug 2018
Last update
Apr 21, 2017
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 21, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02587585
Lead sponsor
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
Collaborators
Oxford Brookes University, Oxford International Rehabilitation Foundation and Innovation, University of Warwick
Responsible party
Dr Derick Wade (Professor in Neurological Rehabilitation, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui University of Traditional Chinese Medicine) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 27, 2015
Start date
Sep 2015
Primary completion
Jan 2018 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 2018 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 21, 2017

Study contacts

Yun Dong, Dr
Contact
dongyun1003@126.com
+86 551 6266 5048
Zhidao Xia, Dr
Contact
zhidao.xia@gmail.com
Derick T Wade, MD
principal investigator · Oxford Brookes University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Mar 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion