CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02581098Updated Apr 25, 2024

miR-200b & miR-21 in Diabetic Wounds

An observational study in Diabetes Mellitus, Foot Ulcer and Ulcer, sponsored by Indiana University. Completed at 4 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-04-25.

Sponsored by Indiana University · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
98
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to determine if elevated wound-edge endothelial miR-200b is a barrier to wound healing in diabetic patients and also to determine if ex vivo supplementation of miR-21 mimic and recombinant MFG-E8 resolve inflammation in wound macrophages isolated from NPWT sponges from diabetic wounds. This study will enroll 124 (60 in the miR-200b arm and 64 in the miR21 arm) Diabetic Wound patients who have wound tissue oxygenation adequate to support wound healing and will be in the study for 14 weeks that includes 4 study visits.

Read the detailed description

The study is designed as a 14 week prospective observational study where patients with diabetic wounds visiting the Indiana University Health Comprehensive Wound Center (CWC) will be enrolled. Patients enrolled will be followed for 14 weeks including 4 study visits, initial visit (week 0), study visit 2 (week 2), study visit 3 (week 4), and will return for a final follow-up study visit 4 (week 14; miR-200b arm only). Standardized Care Outline will be per physician discretion.

The initial visit will take place during the patients regularly scheduled CWC visit and the following will take place: informed consent will be obtained, baseline demographics and medical history with be collected, current labs and medications will be recorded, wound data will be obtained, an ankle brachial index will be completed for patients with leg wounds below the knee, if not already completed per Standard of Care (SoC) since onset of the wound, and wound photographs for digital planimetry to measure wound area. Wound fluid will be collected using a filter paper method, aspiration method, or via the NPWT (Negative Pressure Wound Therapy, also known as Wound Vac) sponge prior to debridement. Additionally, two 3 mm punch tissue biopsies will be obtained from the patient's physician; however, this is optional. If the wound shows signs of healing and does not show signs of infection (i.e. the wound has not stalled in healing for 2 or more weeks or become larger in size) or the wound has been declared healed by their physician, the biopsies will not be obtained. The study visits 2-4 will include the following: a medication and adverse event review, wound data will be recorded, wound photographs, wound fluid, and two 3 mm punch tissue biopsies will be obtained from the patient's physician.

Potential Risks:

The risks associated with this research study are low. There are no therapeutic interventions or medications as part of this study to be administered depending on the amount of sensation the subject has at the site of the wound.

If the subject is receiving a biopsy, the wound site will be numbed by applying local anesthesia as appropriate to the area being biopsied. There may be some discomfort with the tissue biopsy procedure, but all reasonable efforts will be made to minimize pain. The biopsy procedure is done within the boundaries of the existing wound to avoid giving the patient a separate new wound. Bleeding is a possible complication, but the risk is low for the small biopsies and is reduced by using local anesthetics with epinephrine, and silver nitrate sticks are available in each room to cauterize biopsy sites as needed. Infection is also a potential risk; however, wound tissue biopsies are routinely performed as the standard of care in the CWC to diagnose wound infection. The biopsy site will be appropriately monitored for infection by the physician managing the wound during routine wound clinic visits.

The ABI test may result in temporary discomfort around the ankle or foot when the cuff is inflated, but does not present any further physical or medical risks. The wound fluid collection is non-invasive and does not present any risk. Study participants will not benefit directly from participation in this study. This research information has the potential of providing considerable benefits to wound care by identifying a key player that influences the closure of chronic diabetic wounds. Such knowledge should help develop novel biomarker and or miR-directed therapeutic strategies.

02

Conditions studied

  • Diabetes Mellitus
  • Foot Ulcer
  • Ulcer
  • Diabetic Foot Ulcer
  • Wound
  • Wound Heal
03

In context

Diabetic Foot

1,054 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetic Foot; 222 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 98 is close to the median of 100 across 186 observational studies indexed under Diabetic Foot.

Browse Diabetic Foot studies →

Lead sponsor

Indiana University is the lead sponsor of 958 studies on the registry; 200 are open to participants now.

Of its 142 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 112 (79%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

124 subjects with diabetic foot ulcers who have wound tissue oxygenation adequate to support wound healing

Inclusion criteria

  • Ages 18 and older
  • Willing and able to provide informed consent
  • Willing and able to comply with protocol instructions, including all biopsies and study visits
  • Diabetes Mellitus
  • Chronic wounds (open >30d) of any etiology
  • Subjects with Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT or also called a wound vac) (Note: Applies only to the miR-21 arm)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Revascularization surgery on the target wound within 60 days prior to enrollment
  • Inadequate arterial supply, as evidenced by any of the following:
  • Transcutaneous Oxygen Measurement (TcOM) \< 30mmg
  • Ankle Brachial Index (ABI) \<0.7 or 1.3
  • Toe Brachial Index (TBI) \<0.6
  • Subjects with marked immunodeficiency (HIV/AIDS, organ transplant patients and actively being treated for cancer)
  • Trauma wounds
  • Wounds closed or to be closed by flap or graft coverage
  • Women who are pregnant
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
98 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Interventions

  • OtherNo interventions

    No interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Wound-edge endothelial miR-200b

    This study aims to determine if elevated wound-edge endothelial miR-200b and attenuated wound macrophage miR-21 levels are barriers to wound healing (closure) in diabetic wounds.

    Time frame: 14 weeks

  2. Wound macrophage isolation to determine miR-21

    To determine if ex vivo supplementation of miR-21 mimic and recombinant MFG-E8 resolve inflammation in wound macrophages isolated from Negative Pressure Wound Therapy sponges from diabetic wounds.

    Time frame: 14 weeks

07

Study locations

4 sites
  • IU Health Methodist Hospital
    Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, United States
  • OSU Hospital East
    Columbus, Ohio 43205, United States
  • Davis Heart and Lung Research Institute
    Columbus, Ohio 43210, United States
  • Martha Morehouse Medical Plaza
    Columbus, Ohio 43221, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Chan YC, Khanna S, Roy S, Sen CK. miR-200b targets Ets-1 and is down-regulated by hypoxia to induce angiogenic response of endothelial cells. J Biol Chem. 2011 Jan 21;286(3):2047-56. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.158790. Epub 2010 Nov 16. PubMed 21081489 ↗
  • Chan YC, Roy S, Khanna S, Sen CK. Downregulation of endothelial microRNA-200b supports cutaneous wound angiogenesis by desilencing GATA binding protein 2 and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2012 Jun;32(6):1372-82. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.112.248583. Epub 2012 Apr 12. PubMed 22499991 ↗
  • Chin D, Boyle GM, Theile DR, Parsons PG, Coman WB. The human genome and gene expression profiling. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006;59(9):902-11. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2006.01.008. Epub 2006 Mar 9. PubMed 16920579 ↗
  • Gardner SE, Frantz RA, Doebbeling BN. The validity of the clinical signs and symptoms used to identify localized chronic wound infection. Wound Repair Regen. 2001 May-Jun;9(3):178-86. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-475x.2001.00178.x. PubMed 11472613 ↗
  • Parsek MR, Singh PK. Bacterial biofilms: an emerging link to disease pathogenesis. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2003;57:677-701. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.57.030502.090720. PubMed 14527295 ↗
  • Roy S, Khanna S, Rink C, Biswas S, Sen CK. Characterization of the acute temporal changes in excisional murine cutaneous wound inflammation by screening of the wound-edge transcriptome. Physiol Genomics. 2008 Jul 15;34(2):162-84. doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00045.2008. Epub 2008 May 6. PubMed 18460641 ↗
  • Roy S, Patel D, Khanna S, Gordillo GM, Biswas S, Friedman A, Sen CK. Transcriptome-wide analysis of blood vessels laser captured from human skin and chronic wound-edge tissue. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Sep 4;104(36):14472-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0706793104. Epub 2007 Aug 29. PubMed 17728400 ↗
  • Schafer M, Werner S. Transcriptional control of wound repair. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2007;23:69-92. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.23.090506.123609. PubMed 17474876 ↗
  • Sen CK, Gordillo GM, Roy S, Kirsner R, Lambert L, Hunt TK, Gottrup F, Gurtner GC, Longaker MT. Human skin wounds: a major and snowballing threat to public health and the economy. Wound Repair Regen. 2009 Nov-Dec;17(6):763-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2009.00543.x. PubMed 19903300 ↗
  • Shilo S, Roy S, Khanna S, Sen CK. Evidence for the involvement of miRNA in redox regulated angiogenic response of human microvascular endothelial cells. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2008 Mar;28(3):471-7. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.107.160655. Epub 2008 Feb 7. PubMed 18258815 ↗
  • Shilo S, Roy S, Khanna S, Sen CK. MicroRNA in cutaneous wound healing: a new paradigm. DNA Cell Biol. 2007 Apr;26(4):227-37. doi: 10.1089/dna.2006.0568. PubMed 17465889 ↗
  • Hopf HW, Ueno C, Aslam R, Burnand K, Fife C, Grant L, Holloway A, Iafrati MD, Mani R, Misare B, Rosen N, Shapshak D, Benjamin Slade J Jr, West J, Barbul A. Guidelines for the treatment of arterial insufficiency ulcers. Wound Repair Regen. 2006 Nov-Dec;14(6):693-710. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2006.00177.x. No abstract available. PubMed 17199834 ↗
  • Padberg FT, Back TL, Thompson PN, Hobson RW 2nd. Transcutaneous oxygen (TcPO2) estimates probability of healing in the ischemic extremity. J Surg Res. 1996 Feb 1;60(2):365-9. doi: 10.1006/jsre.1996.0059. PubMed 8598670 ↗
  • Wutschert R, Bounameaux H. Determination of amputation level in ischemic limbs. Reappraisal of the measurement of TcPo2. Diabetes Care. 1997 Aug;20(8):1315-8. doi: 10.2337/diacare.20.8.1315. PubMed 9250461 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 25, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02581098
Lead sponsor
Indiana University
Collaborators
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
Responsible party
Chandan Sen (Professor, Indiana University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 20, 2015
Start date
Aug 2015
Primary completion
Jun 26, 2023
Completion
Jun 26, 2023
Last update
Apr 25, 2024

Study contacts

Chandan K Sen, PhD
principal investigator · Indiana University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion