ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02576509Updated Feb 17, 2025Results posted

An Investigational Immuno-therapy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Sorafenib as a First Treatment in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

A Phase 3 interventional study of Nivolumab and Sorafenib in Hepatocellular Carcinoma, sponsored by Bristol-Myers Squibb. Completed at 138 sites in 22 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-17.

Sponsored by Bristol-Myers Squibb · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
743
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if nivolumab or sorafenib is more effective in the treatment of Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hepatocellular Carcinoma
03

In context

Carcinoma, Hepatocellular

3,249 studies on the registry are indexed under Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; 974 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 743 is above the median of 55 across 2,347 interventional studies indexed under Carcinoma, Hepatocellular.

Browse Carcinoma, Hepatocellular studies →

Lead sponsor

Bristol-Myers Squibb is the lead sponsor of 1,562 studies on the registry; 118 are open to participants now.

Of its 435 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 227 (52%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Histologically confirmed advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, not eligible for surgical and/or locoregional therapies; or progressive disease after surgical and /or locoregional therapies
  • Locoregional therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) must be completed at least 4 weeks prior to the baseline scan
  • Child-Pugh Class A
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) 0 or 1

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known fibrolamellar HCC, sarcomatoid HCC, or mixed cholangiocarcinoma and HCC
  • Prior liver transplant
  • Active, known, or suspected autoimmune disease

Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria apply

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
743 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Nivolumab

    Nivolumab specified dose on specified days

    Drug: Nivolumab

  • Active comparator
    Sorafenib

    Sorafenib specified dose on specified days

    Drug: Sorafenib

Interventions

  • Specified Dose on Specified Days

  • Specified Dose on Specified Days

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Overall Survival (OS)

    OS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause in all randomized participants. Participants who are alive will be censored at the last known alive dates. Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimates.

    Time frame: time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause, assessed up to June 2019 (approximately 41 months)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Objective Response Rate (ORR) Per BICR RECIST 1.1

    ORR is defined as the proportion of participants whose best overall response (BOR) is either a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). BOR is defined as the best response designation, as determined based on BICR-assessed tumor response according to RECIST 1.1, recorded between the date of randomization and the date of first objectively documented progression or the date of subsequent anti-cancer therapy, whichever occurs first. For participants without documented progression or subsequent anti-cancer therapy, all available response designations will contribute to the BOR determination. For a BOR of CR or PR, the initial response assessment must be confirmed by a consecutive assessment no less than 4 weeks (28 days) later. Estimate of (Nivolumab - Sorafenib) is based on CMH method of weighting, stratified by stratification factors

    Time frame: the date of randomization and the date of first objectively documented progression or the date of subsequent anti-cancer therapy, whichever occurs first, assessed up to May 2019 (approximately 40 months)

  2. Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

    PFS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first objectively documented tumor progression as assessed by BICR according to RECIST 1.1 or death due to any cause in all randomized participants. Participants who die without a reported prior progression and without initiation of subsequent anti-cancer therapy will be considered to have progressed on the date of their death. Participants who did not progress or die will be censored on the date of their last tumor assessment. Participants who did not have baseline tumor assessment will be censored on the date they were randomized. Participants who did not have any on study tumor assessments and did not die will be censored on the date they were randomized. Participants who started any subsequent anti-cancer therapy without a prior reported progression will be censored at the last tumor assessment prior to subsequent anti-cancer therapy.

    Time frame: time from the date of randomization to the date of the first objectively documented tumor progression or death, assessed up to May 2019 (approximately 40 months)

  3. Efficacy Based on PD-L1 Expression - OS and PFS

    PD-L1 expression is defined as the percent of tumor cell membrane staining in a minimum of 100 evaluable tumor cells per Dako PD-L1 IHC assay unless otherwise specified. This is referred as quantifiable PD-L1 expression. If the PD-L1 staining could not be quantified, it is further classifies as: Indeterminate: Tumor cell membrane staining hampered for reasons attributed to the biology of the tumor biopsy specimen and not because of improper sample preparation or handling. Not evaluable: Tumor biopsy specimen was not optimally collected or prepared (e.g. PD-L1 expression is neither quantifiable nor indeterminate). PD-L1 status is a dichotomized variable using an X% cut-off for quantifiable PD-L1 expression: * PD-L1 \> X %: ≥ X % PD-L1 expression * PD-L1 \< X %: \< X % PD-L1 expression where X% denotes the PD-L1 expression cut-off of 1%. Additional cut off values may also be explored. Confidence interval based on the Clopper and Pearson method.

    Time frame: the date of randomization and the date of first objectively documented progression or the date of subsequent anti-cancer therapy, whichever occurs first, assessed up to May 2019 (approximately 40 months)

  4. Efficacy Based on PD-L1 Expression - ORR

    PD-L1 expression is defined as the percent of tumor cell membrane staining in a minimum of 100 evaluable tumor cells per Dako PD-L1 IHC assay unless otherwise specified. This is referred as quantifiable PD-L1 expression. If the PD-L1 staining could not be quantified, it is further classifies as: Indeterminate: Tumor cell membrane staining hampered for reasons attributed to the biology of the tumor biopsy specimen and not because of improper sample preparation or handling. Not evaluable: Tumor biopsy specimen was not optimally collected or prepared (e.g. PD-L1 expression is neither quantifiable nor indeterminate). PD-L1 status is a dichotomized variable using an X% cut-off for quantifiable PD-L1 expression: * PD-L1 \> X %: ≥ X % PD-L1 expression * PD-L1 \< X %: \< X % PD-L1 expression where X% denotes the PD-L1 expression cut-off of 1%. Additional cut off values may also be explored. Confidence interval based on the Clopper and Pearson method.

    Time frame: the date of randomization and the date of first objectively documented progression or the date of subsequent anti-cancer therapy, whichever occurs first, assessed up to May 2019 (approximately 40 months)

07

Results

Posted Jun 26, 2020

Participant flow

Pre-Treatment Period
Participant flow — Pre-Treatment Period
MilestoneNivolumab 240 mgSorafenib 400 mg
Started371372
Completed367363
Not completed49
Withdrew: Participant request to stop therapy02
Withdrew: Participant withdrew consent15
Withdrew: Participant no longer meets criteria32
Treatment Period
Participant flow — Treatment Period
MilestoneNivolumab 240 mgSorafenib 400 mg
Started367363
Completed00
Not completed367363
Withdrew: Disease progression263244
Withdrew: Study drug toxicity3741
Withdrew: Death11
Withdrew: Adverse event unrelated to study drug3941
Withdrew: Participant request to stop treatment818
Withdrew: Participant withdrew consent37
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up01
Withdrew: Maximum clinical benefit10
Withdrew: Poor/non-compliance11
Withdrew: Participant no longer meets criteria10
Withdrew: Other reason128
Withdrew: Not reported10
Withdrew: Administrative reason by sponsor01

Outcome measures

PrimaryOverall Survival (OS)

OS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause in all randomized participants. Participants who are alive will be censored at the last known alive dates. Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimates.

Time frame:
time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause, assessed up to June 2019 (approximately 41 months)
Reported as:
Median · Months
Overall Survival (OS)
MonthsNivolumab 240 mgSorafenib 400 mg
Overall Survival (OS)16.39 (13.93 to 18.37)14.69 (11.89 to 17.22)
Statistical analysis
  • Nivolumab 240 mg vs Sorafenib 400 mg · Log Rank · p = 0.0752 (A priori threshold for statistical significance is 0.0419) · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.85 · 95% CI 0.71 to 1.02Nivolumab over Sorafenib; Stratified Cox proportional hazard model
SecondaryObjective Response Rate (ORR) Per BICR RECIST 1.1

ORR is defined as the proportion of participants whose best overall response (BOR) is either a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). BOR is defined as the best response designation, as determined based on BICR-assessed tumor response according to RECIST 1.1, recorded between the date of randomization and the date of first objectively documented progression or the date of subsequent anti-cancer therapy, whichever occurs first. For participants without documented progression or subsequent anti-cancer therapy, all available response designations will contribute to the BOR determination. For a BOR of CR or PR, the initial response assessment must be confirmed by a consecutive assessment no less than 4 weeks (28 days) later. Estimate of (Nivolumab - Sorafenib) is based on CMH method of weighting, stratified by stratification factors

Time frame:
the date of randomization and the date of first objectively documented progression or the date of subsequent anti-cancer therapy, whichever occurs first, assessed up to May 2019 (approximately 40 months)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Objective Response Rate (ORR) Per BICR RECIST 1.1
Percentage of participantsNivolumab 240 mgSorafenib 400 mg
Objective Response Rate (ORR) Per BICR RECIST 1.115.4 (11.8 to 19.4)7.0 (4.6 to 10.1)
Statistical analysis
  • Nivolumab 240 mg vs Sorafenib 400 mg · Difference of orrs: 8.3 · 95% CI 3.9 to 12.7Estimate of (Nivolumab - Sorafenib) is based on CMH method of weighting, stratified by stratification factors
  • Nivolumab 240 mg vs Sorafenib 400 mg · Odds ratio (or): 2.41 · 95% CI 1.48 to 3.92Nivolumab over Sorafenib; Mantel-Haenszel estimator
SecondaryProgression-Free Survival (PFS)

PFS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first objectively documented tumor progression as assessed by BICR according to RECIST 1.1 or death due to any cause in all randomized participants. Participants who die without a reported prior progression and without initiation of subsequent anti-cancer therapy will be considered to have progressed on the date of their death. Participants who did not progress or die will be censored on the date of their last tumor assessment. Participants who did not have baseline tumor assessment will be censored on the date they were randomized. Participants who did not have any on study tumor assessments and did not die will be censored on the date they were randomized. Participants who started any subsequent anti-cancer therapy without a prior reported progression will be censored at the last tumor assessment prior to subsequent anti-cancer therapy.

Time frame:
time from the date of randomization to the date of the first objectively documented tumor progression or death, assessed up to May 2019 (approximately 40 months)
Reported as:
Median · Months
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
MonthsNivolumab 240 mgSorafenib 400 mg
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)3.68 (3.06 to 3.88)3.75 (3.71 to 4.47)
Statistical analysis
  • Nivolumab 240 mg vs Sorafenib 400 mg · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.93 · 95% CI 0.79 to 1.10Nivolumab over Sorafenib; Stratified Cox proportional hazard model
SecondaryEfficacy Based on PD-L1 Expression - OS and PFS

PD-L1 expression is defined as the percent of tumor cell membrane staining in a minimum of 100 evaluable tumor cells per Dako PD-L1 IHC assay unless otherwise specified. This is referred as quantifiable PD-L1 expression. If the PD-L1 staining could not be quantified, it is further classifies as: Indeterminate: Tumor cell membrane staining hampered for reasons attributed to the biology of the tumor biopsy specimen and not because of improper sample preparation or handling. Not evaluable: Tumor biopsy specimen was not optimally collected or prepared (e.g. PD-L1 expression is neither quantifiable nor indeterminate). PD-L1 status is a dichotomized variable using an X% cut-off for quantifiable PD-L1 expression: * PD-L1 \> X %: ≥ X % PD-L1 expression * PD-L1 \< X %: \< X % PD-L1 expression where X% denotes the PD-L1 expression cut-off of 1%. Additional cut off values may also be explored. Confidence interval based on the Clopper and Pearson method.

Time frame:
the date of randomization and the date of first objectively documented progression or the date of subsequent anti-cancer therapy, whichever occurs first, assessed up to May 2019 (approximately 40 months)
Reported as:
Median · Months
Efficacy Based on PD-L1 Expression - OS and PFS
MonthsNivolumab 240 mgSorafenib 400 mg
>=1%, OS16.07 (8.41 to 22.34)8.62 (5.72 to 16.30)
>=1%, PFS3.84 (2.10 to 7.62)3.58 (1.97 to 5.36)
<1%, OS16.72 (13.93 to 18.56)15.24 (12.58 to 18.10)
<1%, PFS3.61 (2.43 to 3.81)3.75 (3.71 to 5.32)
without PD-L1 quantifiable, OS16.23 (5.82 to NA)22.05 (1.77 to NA)
without PD-L1 quantifiable, PFS2.00 (1.87 to NA)6.13 (1.08 to 11.17)
Statistical analysis
  • Nivolumab 240 mg vs Sorafenib 400 mg · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.80 · 95% CI 0.54 to 1.19Nivolumab over Sorafenib
  • Nivolumab 240 mg vs Sorafenib 400 mg · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.71 · 95% CI 0.48 to 1.03Nivolumab over Sorafenib
  • Nivolumab 240 mg vs Sorafenib 400 mg · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.84 · 95% CI 0.69 to 1.02Nivolumab over Sorafenib
  • Nivolumab 240 mg vs Sorafenib 400 mg · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.98 · 95% CI 0.81 to 1.17Nivolumab over Sorafenib
  • Nivolumab 240 mg vs Sorafenib 400 mg · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.26 · 95% CI 0.34 to 4.74Nivolumab over Sorafenib
  • Nivolumab 240 mg vs Sorafenib 400 mg · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.98 · 95% CI 0.27 to 3.52Nivolumab over Sorafenib
SecondaryEfficacy Based on PD-L1 Expression - ORR

PD-L1 expression is defined as the percent of tumor cell membrane staining in a minimum of 100 evaluable tumor cells per Dako PD-L1 IHC assay unless otherwise specified. This is referred as quantifiable PD-L1 expression. If the PD-L1 staining could not be quantified, it is further classifies as: Indeterminate: Tumor cell membrane staining hampered for reasons attributed to the biology of the tumor biopsy specimen and not because of improper sample preparation or handling. Not evaluable: Tumor biopsy specimen was not optimally collected or prepared (e.g. PD-L1 expression is neither quantifiable nor indeterminate). PD-L1 status is a dichotomized variable using an X% cut-off for quantifiable PD-L1 expression: * PD-L1 \> X %: ≥ X % PD-L1 expression * PD-L1 \< X %: \< X % PD-L1 expression where X% denotes the PD-L1 expression cut-off of 1%. Additional cut off values may also be explored. Confidence interval based on the Clopper and Pearson method.

Time frame:
the date of randomization and the date of first objectively documented progression or the date of subsequent anti-cancer therapy, whichever occurs first, assessed up to May 2019 (approximately 40 months)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Efficacy Based on PD-L1 Expression - ORR
Percentage of participantsNivolumab 240 mgSorafenib 400 mg
>=1%, ORR28.2 (18.1 to 40.1)9.4 (3.5 to 19.3)
<1%, ORR12.2 (8.7 to 16.5)6.7 (4.1 to 10.1)
without PD-L1 quantifiable, ORR20.0 (0.5 to 71.6)0.0 (0.0 to 36.9)
Statistical analysis
  • Nivolumab 240 mg vs Sorafenib 400 mg · Odds ratio (or): 3.79 · 95% CI 1.41 to 10.17Odds ratio (Nivolumab over Sorafenib) and associated unstratified 95% exact CI.
  • Nivolumab 240 mg vs Sorafenib 400 mg · Odds ratio (or): 1.95 · 95% CI 1.10 to 3.45Odds ratio (Nivolumab over Sorafenib) and associated unstratified 95% exact CI

Adverse events

Collected over All cause mortality was collected from randomization up to last survival follow up (approximately up to 98 months). Serious and non-serious adverse events were collected from first dose till 100 days after last dose of study therapy (up to approximately 95 months).. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Nivolumab 240 mg321/371 (86.5%)216/367 (58.9%)339/367 (92.4%)
Sorafenib 400 mg335/372 (90.1%)216/363 (59.5%)351/363 (96.7%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 284
Most frequent serious events
EventNivolumab 240 mgSorafenib 400 mg
Malignant neoplasm progressionNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)69/36770/363
General physical health deteriorationGeneral disorders8/36714/363
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders7/36711/363
Hepatic failureHepatobiliary disorders10/3677/363
AscitesGastrointestinal disorders9/3677/363
Oesophageal varices haemorrhageGastrointestinal disorders4/3678/363
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders8/3676/363
PyrexiaGeneral disorders8/3677/363
Gastrointestinal haemorrhageGastrointestinal disorders7/3676/363
SepsisInfections and infestations7/3672/363
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 46
Most frequent other events
EventNivolumab 240 mgSorafenib 400 mg
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders100/367191/363
Palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia syndromeSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders29/367181/363
Decreased appetiteMetabolism and nutrition disorders77/367135/363
FatigueGeneral disorders103/367117/363
PruritusSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders88/36751/363
HypertensionVascular disorders33/36785/363
Aspartate aminotransferase increasedInvestigations84/36760/363
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders69/36782/363
RashSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders75/36759/363
AlopeciaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders6/36771/363

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Nivolumab 240 mgSorafenib 400 mgTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years185176361
>=65 years186196382
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Nivolumab 240 mgSorafenib 400 mgTotal
Mean63.9 ± 10.6164.5 ± 10.9164.2 ± 10.76
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Nivolumab 240 mgSorafenib 400 mgTotal
Female5755112
Male314317631
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Nivolumab 240 mgSorafenib 400 mgTotal
Hispanic or Latino51015
Not Hispanic or Latino180170350
Unknown or Not Reported186192378
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Nivolumab 240 mgSorafenib 400 mgTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native011
Asian165167332
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American325
White199196395
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported4610
08

Study locations

138 sites
  • Local Institution - 0066
    Birmingham, Alabama 35294, United States
  • Local Institution - 0020
    Los Angeles, California 90095, United States
  • Local Institution - 0015
    San Francisco, California 94115, United States
  • Local Institution - 0084
    San Francisco, California 94143, United States
  • Local Institution - 0061
    Chicago, Illinois 60637, United States
  • Ochsner Clinic Foundation
    New Orleans, Louisiana 70121, United States
  • Local Institution - 0083
    New York, New York 10029, United States
  • Local Institution - 0093
    New York, New York 10065, United States
  • Local Institution - 0016
    Charlotte, North Carolina 28204, United States
  • Local Institution - 0095
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
  • Local Institution - 0019
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107, United States
  • UT Southwestern Medical Center
    Dallas, Texas 75390, United States
  • Local Institution - 0017
    San Antonio, Texas 78229, United States
  • Scott & White Memorial Hospital And Clinic
    Temple, Texas 76508, United States
  • Local Institution - 0026
    Seattle, Washington 98101, United States
  • University of Washington - Seattle Cancer Care Alliance
    Seattle, Washington 98109, United States
  • Local Institution - 0050
    Madison, Wisconsin 53792, United States
  • Local Institution - 0005
    Camperdown, New South Wales 2050, Australia
  • Local Institution - 0007
    Adelaide, South Australia 5000, Australia
  • Local Institution - 0001
    Clayton, Victoria 3168, Australia
  • Local Institution - 0002
    Heidelberg, Victoria 3084, Australia
  • Local Institution - 0003
    Prahran, Victoria 3181, Australia
  • Local Institution - 0008
    Nedlands, Western Australia 6009, Australia
  • Local Institution - 0039
    Graz, 8036, Austria
  • Local Institution - 0038
    Vienna, 1090, Austria
  • Local Institution - 0075
    Brussels, 1000, Belgium
  • Local Institution - 0091
    Leuven, 3000, Belgium
  • Local Institution - 0077
    Liège, 4000, Belgium
  • Local Institution - 0043
    Calgary, Alberta T2N 4N2, Canada
  • Local Institution - 0044
    Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 4E6, Canada
  • Local Institution - 0042
    Québec, Quebec G1R 2J6, Canada
  • Local Institution - 0164
    Hefei, Anhui 230061, China
  • Local Institution - 0139
    Beijing, Beijing Municipality 100050, China
  • Local Institution - 0137
    Beijing, Beijing Municipality 100071, China
  • Local Institution - 0140
    Beijing, Beijing Municipality 100142, China
  • Local Institution - 0141
    Beijing, Beijing Municipality 100142, China
  • Local Institution - 0152
    Fuzhou, Fujian 350025, China
  • Local Institution - 0161
    Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, China
  • Local Institution - 0157
    Guangzhou, Guangdong 510080, China
  • Local Institution - 0144
    Guangzhou, Guangdong 510515, China
  • Local Institution - 0158
    Nanning, Guangxi 530021, China
  • Local Institution - 0142
    Harbin, Heilongjiang 155040, China
  • Local Institution - 0148
    Changsha, Hunan 410013, China
  • Local Institution - 0162
    Changsha, Hunan 410013, China
  • Local Institution - 0169
    Changzhou, Jiangsu 213003, China
  • Local Institution - 0135
    Nanjing, Jiangsu 210002, China
  • Local Institution - 0136
    Changchun, Jilin 130012, China
  • Local Institution - 0163
    Changchun, Jilin 130021, China
  • Local Institution - 0166
    Dalian, Liaoning 116000, China
  • Local Institution - 0138
    Xi'an, Shan3xi 710038, China
  • Local Institution - 0145
    Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality 200032, China
  • Local Institution - 0151
    Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality 200032, China
  • Local Institution - 0159
    Tianjin, Tianjin Municipality 300060, China
  • Local Institution - 0173
    Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310003, China
  • Local Institution - 0146
    Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310022, China
  • Local Institution - 0029
    Brno, 656 53, Czechia
  • Local Institution - 0027
    Hradec Králové, 500 05, Czechia
  • Local Institution - 0028
    Olomouc, 779 00, Czechia
  • Local Institution - 0071
    La Tronche, 38700, France
  • Local Institution - 0072
    Lille, 59037, France
  • Local Institution - 0069
    Lyon, 69004, France
  • Local Institution - 0073
    Montpellier, 34295, France
  • Local Institution - 0067
    Paris, 75651, France
  • Local Institution - 0068
    Pessac, 33604, France
  • Local Institution - 0070
    Rennes, 35042, France
  • Local Institution - 0074
    Toulouse, 31059, France
  • Local Institution - 0036
    Berlin, 13353, Germany
  • Local Institution - 0037
    Essen, 45136, Germany
  • Local Institution - 0167
    Frankfurt, 60590, Germany
  • Local Institution - 0034
    Hamburg, 20246, Germany
  • Local Institution - 0031
    Leipzig, 04103, Germany
  • Local Institution - 0035
    Mainz, 55131, Germany
  • Local Institution - 0033
    Munich, 81366, Germany
  • Local Institution - 0032
    Regensburg, 93053, Germany
  • Local Institution - 0030
    Tübingen, 72076, Germany
  • Local Institution - 0011
    Hong Kong, 0, Hong Kong
  • Local Institution - 0012
    Hong Kong, Hong Kong
  • Local Institution - 0082
    Haifa, 31096, Israel
  • Local Institution - 0060
    Jerusalem, 91120, Israel
  • Local Institution - 0058
    Petah Tikva, 49100, Israel
  • Local Institution - 0059
    Tel Aviv, 64239, Israel
  • Local Institution - 0054
    Benevento, 82100, Italy
  • Local Institution - 0062
    Bergamo, 0, Italy
  • Local Institution - 0055
    Milan, 20133, Italy
  • Local Institution - 0063
    Orbassano, 10043, Italy
  • Local Institution - 0064
    Siena, 53100, Italy
  • Local Institution - 0100
    Chiba, Chiba 2608670, Japan
  • Local Institution - 0103
    Matsuyama, Ehime 7900024, Japan
  • Local Institution - 0107
    Kurume-shi, Fukuoka 8300011, Japan
  • Local Institution - 0127
    Ogaki-shi, Gifu 5038502, Japan
  • Local Institution - 0102
    Sapporo, Hokkaido 0600033, Japan
  • Local Institution - 0130
    Sapporo, Hokkaido 0608648, Japan
  • Local Institution - 0105
    Kanazawa, Ishikawa-ken 9208641, Japan
  • Local Institution - 0110
    Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa 2138587, Japan
  • Local Institution - 0112
    Yokohama, Kanagawa 2320024, Japan
  • Local Institution - 0104
    Yokohama, Kanagawa 2418515, Japan
  • Local Institution - 0111
    Kyoto, Kyoto 6028566, Japan
  • Local Institution - 0106
    Osaka-Sayama-Shi, Osaka 5898511, Japan
  • Local Institution - 0113
    Suita, Osaka 5650871, Japan
  • Local Institution - 0115
    Saga, Saga-ken 8408571, Japan

Showing the first 100 of 138 sites across 22 countries.

09

References and documents

Publications

  • Neely J, Yao J, Kudo M, Finn RS, Sangro B, Melero I, El-Khoueiry AB, Yau T, Harding JJ, Rosmorduc O, Tschaika M, Novosiadly R, Cruz A, Kelley RK. Biomarkers associated with efficacy of first-line nivolumab vs. sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: results from the CheckMate 459 phase III trial. JHEP Rep. 2026 Sep 19:102038. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2026.102038. Online ahead of print. PubMed 42762856 ↗
  • Bitar R, Salem R, Finn R, Greten TF, Goldberg SN, Chapiro J. Interventional Oncology Meets Immuno-oncology: Combination Therapies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Radiology. 2024 Nov;313(2):e232875. doi: 10.1148/radiol.232875. PubMed 39560477 ↗
  • Zhou X, Cao J, Topatana W, Xie T, Chen T, Hu J, Li S, Juengpanic S, Lu Z, Zhang B, Wang K, Feng X, Shen J, Chen M. Evaluation of PD-L1 as a biomarker for immunotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis. Immunotherapy. 2023 Apr;15(5):353-365. doi: 10.2217/imt-2022-0168. Epub 2023 Feb 27. PubMed 36852452 ↗
  • Li Y, Liang X, Li H, Chen X. Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus nivolumab as first-line treatment for advanced or unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A cost-effectiveness analysis. Cancer. 2022 Nov 15;128(22):3995-4003. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34457. Epub 2022 Sep 16. PubMed 36111952 ↗
  • Shi J, Liu J, Tu X, Li B, Tong Z, Wang T, Zheng Y, Shi H, Zeng X, Chen W, Yin W, Fang W. Single-cell immune signature for detecting early-stage HCC and early assessing anti-PD-1 immunotherapy efficacy. J Immunother Cancer. 2022 Jan;10(1):e003133. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2021-003133. PubMed 35101942 ↗
  • Yau T, Park JW, Finn RS, Cheng AL, Mathurin P, Edeline J, Kudo M, Harding JJ, Merle P, Rosmorduc O, Wyrwicz L, Schott E, Choo SP, Kelley RK, Sieghart W, Assenat E, Zaucha R, Furuse J, Abou-Alfa GK, El-Khoueiry AB, Melero I, Begic D, Chen G, Neely J, Wisniewski T, Tschaika M, Sangro B. Nivolumab versus sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (CheckMate 459): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2022 Jan;23(1):77-90. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00604-5. Epub 2021 Dec 13. PubMed 34914889 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Jan 15, 2019
  • Statistical analysis plan · May 18, 2020

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Dec 2015 to primary completion in May 2019, 41 months.

Results were first posted in Jun 2020, 1 year after primary completion.

Of 47 industry-sponsored phase 3 interventional studies under Carcinoma, Hepatocellular, half reached primary completion within 51 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 41 and three quarters within 63. This study's 41 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 130 studies reached it within 57 months; a quarter within 44 and three quarters within 83.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 13, 2015
First posted
Oct 15, 2015
StartActual
Dec 7, 2015
Primary completionActual
May 30, 2019
CompletionActual
Feb 7, 2024
Results first posted
Jun 26, 2020
Last update
Feb 17, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 17, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02576509
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 15, 2015
Start date
Dec 7, 2015
Primary completion
May 30, 2019
Completion
Feb 7, 2024
Results posted
Jun 26, 2020
Last update
Feb 17, 2025

Study contacts

Bristol Myers Squibb
study director · Bristol-Myers Squibb

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Nivolumab

Start the discussion