CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02573844PRITONUpdated Aug 9, 2021

Pain Relief In Irritable Bowel Syndrome

A Phase 4 interventional study of Proklama and Placebo in Irritable Bowel Syndrome, sponsored by Geophyt S.r.l.s.. Completed at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-08-09.

Sponsored by Geophyt S.r.l.s. · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether Proklama is effective in significative reduction of pain, other symptoms IBS's related, and improves quality of life concerning IBS disease.

Read the detailed description

This is a phase IV, double- blind, randomized, placebo controlled, monocentric study.

Males and women over 18 y.o. with Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) diagnosed applying Rome III criteria will be enrolled consecutively.

The study consist of 4 periods:

  • A screening's period of 2 weeks starting from visit 1, useful to screen potentially eligible patients performing diagnostic investigations necessary to confirm diagnosis.
  • A run- in's period, starting from visit 2 and lasting 2 weeks will represent a baseline without specific treatments in order to characterize the severity of symptomatology and evaluate patients' compliance relative to daily diaries
  • A 2 weeks- treatment's period ( active/ placebo) starting from visit 3. The 1st day of the period of treatment, eligible patients will be randomized following a 1:1 ratio to receive Proklama ( 1 sachet/ day) or placebo. Treatments will be administered daily during the whole 2 weeks- treatment's period.
  • A wash out's period lasting 2 weeks starting from visit 4, to be performed the day after the end of the 2 weeks- treatment's period.
  • A 2 weeks- treatment's period ( placebo/ active) starting from visit 5, to be performed the last day of wash out's period. During this visit patients will receive the second treatment, following a crossover design.
02

Conditions studied

  • Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Keywords

  • irritable bowel syndrome
  • abdominal pain
  • rome III criteria
  • abdominal distension
  • consistency of stools
  • stool frequency
  • meteorism
  • flatulence
  • abdominal discomfort
  • proklama
  • probiotics
  • alga klamath
  • aphanizomenon flos-aquae
  • prebiotics
  • colitis ulcerosa
03

In context

Irritable Bowel Syndrome

1,062 studies on the registry are indexed under Irritable Bowel Syndrome; 190 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 30 is below the median of 71 across 853 interventional studies indexed under Irritable Bowel Syndrome.

Browse Irritable Bowel Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Geophyt S.r.l.s. as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. patients over 18 y.o.
  2. clinical diagnosis of IBS following Rome III symptom- based criteria:

    1. abdominal pain or discomfort recurring for at least 3 days a month in the previous 3 months, associated with 2 of the following characteristics at least: improved with evacuation; onset associated with variation of stool frequency; onset associated with changes in stool consistency
    2. onset of symptomatology at least 6 months preceding diagnosis
    3. additional criterion: mean severity of abdominal pain higher than 3 in the 11-points NRS
  3. For patients over 50 y.o. or with positive familiarity for colorectal cancer: normal colonoscopy performed within 5 years from the beginning of the screening's period and after symptomatology's onset
  4. For patients over 65 y.o. : absence of ischemic / microscopic colitis, or other organic gastrointestinal disorders, as highlighted through colonoscopy with biopsy performed within 6 months from the beginning of the screening's period
  5. For fertile and sexually active women: use of effective contraception with failure rate of less than 1% for one year during the trial period and 30 days after its end.

    Oral contraceptive are admitted as long as formulation didn't undergo changes during the 6 months preceeding the trial.

  6. Physical examination is negative during the period of screening
  7. Absence of significant alterations in 12- lead ECG during the period of screening.
  8. Normal haematochemical parameters during the period of screening
  9. Compliant patients towards procedures provided for the study, especially the use of daily diary
  10. Patients with mental integrity, able to express an informed before any procedure related to protocol, compliant toward clinical examinations provided for the protocol.
  11. Patients willing to avoid loperamide and laxatives use during the 3 days preceding run in and during the whole run in's period ( to be verified before randomization)
  12. Patients that during both the 2 run in's weeks reported an average daily intensity of abdominal pain for every week >3 on 0-10 (NRS)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Male gender
  2. Patient has a diagnosis of IBS with a subtype of constipation, mixed IBS, or unsubtyped IBS according to the Rome III criteria
  3. Patient has had surgery that meets any of the following criteria:

    a) colonic or major abdominal surgery, i.e. bariatric surgery and stomach, small/ large bowel or large vessel abdominal surgery ( except appendicectomy, hysterectomy, cholecystectomy, caesarean section, or laparoscopic surgery).

  4. Patient has any elective major surgery planned or expected at any time during the study.
  5. Patient has a history of inflammation bowel diseases, complicated diverticulosis ( i.e. diverticulitis), ischaemic colitis, microscopic colitis.
  6. Patient has a history of organic abnormalities of the GI tract, intestinal obstruction, stricture, toxic megacolon, GI perforation, fecal impaction, gastric banding, adhesions or impaired intestinal circulation ( e.g., aortoiliac disease).
  7. Patient has a history of pancreatitis of any etiology, cholecystitis or of symptomatic gallbladder stone disease in the previous 6 months.
  8. Patient has an active biliary duct disease of a history of Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction.
  9. Patient has a history of gluten enteropathy.
  10. Patient has a history of lactose intolerance as assessed by response to diet.
  11. Patient has a current or previous diagnosis of neoplasia ( except non-GI) neoplasia in complete remission \< or = 5 years, squamous and basal cell carcinomas and cervical carcinoma in situ).
  12. Patient has a history of ectopic endometriosis.
  13. Patient has a history of positive tests for ova or parasites, or clostridium difficile toxin or occult blood in the stool in the previous 6 months.
  14. Patient has a history of human immunodeficiency virus infection.
  15. Patient has a history of a cardiovascular event, including stroke, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure ( NYHA class > 2), or transient ischemic attack in the previous 6 months.
  16. Patient has uncontrolled hypertension, defined as systolic blood pressure \<180 mmHg or a diastolic blood pressure \< 100 mmHg.
  17. Patient has insulin- dependent diabetes mellitus.
  18. Patient has a major pshychiatric or neurological disorders.
  19. Patient has an unstable medical condition which may compromise the efficacy and safety assessments as required in the study and/or require change in concomitant medication.
  20. Patient has a history of abnormal thyroid function. Patient is candidate for the study if thyroid hormone replacement therapy is stable from at least 2 months.
  21. Patient has evidence of clinically hepatic disease as defined by alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) >3 times rthe upper limit of normal or total bilirubin >3 mg/dl (>51.3 mmoL/L), with the exception of Gilbert's syndrome or albumin \< 2.8 g/dL during the Screening period.
  22. Patient has a sever renal insufficiency ( Glomerular Filtration Rate [GFR] \<30 mL/min/ 1.73 m\^2 calculated by the Cockcroft. Gault formula adjusted for the body surface area [BSA]) during the Screening period
  23. Patient has evidence of anemia as confirmed by hemoglobin \< 9 g/dL during the Screening period.
  24. Relevant changes in dietary habits, lifestyle or exercise regimen should be maintained for the duration of the study.
  25. Use of prohibited concurrent medication within the previous month, namely:

    • Antibiotics ( 4 months in the case of rifaximin);
    • 5- HT3 antagonists alosetron.
  26. Use of prohibited concurrent medication in the previous 7 days namely:

    • Antimuscarinic drugs;
    • Drug enhancing GI motility such as prokinetic agents and other stimulants of GI contractility drugs, laxatives, or anti- diarrhoeal agents ( except for loperamide, please refer to inclusion criterion No.12);
    • Analgesic drugs ( opioids or non- steroidal anti- inflammatory drugs). NOTE: short term use of paracetamol is allowed for max 2 consecutive days;
    • Fibre products and herbal preparations;
    • Antidepressants. NOTE: the use of a single antidepressant is only allowed when the drug type and its dose regimen have not been changed in the previous 6 months;
    • Benzodiazepines. NOTE: the use of a single benzodiazepine is only allowed when it is administered as sleep- inducer and the drug type and its dose regimen have not been changed in the previous 6 months.
  27. Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
  28. Hypersensitivity to the drug excipients.
  29. Patient is not able to understand or collaborate throughout the study.
  30. Patient is unable to swallow solid, oral dosage forms whole with the aid of liquid ( patients may not chew, divide, dissolve, or crush the study drug).
  31. Partecipation in other clinical studies in the previous 4 weeks or the patient is currently enrolled in a clinical study with another investigational drug.
  32. Patient has any condition that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would compromise the well- being of the patient or the requirements of the study.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
30 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    A: Proklama ( 1 sachet/ day)

    15 patients belonging to group A will receive drug A (Proklama: 1 sachet/ day). The treatment will be administred starting from visit 3 for a 2 weeks- treatment's period. After a 2 weeks wash out's period, patients belonging to group A, starting from visit 5, will receive drug B ( Placebo: 1 sachet/day).

    Drug: Proklama

  • Placebo comparator
    B: Placebo ( 1 sachet/ day)

    15 patients belonging to group B will receive drug B (Placebo: 1 sachet/ day). The treatment will be administred starting from visit 3 for a 2 weeks- treatment's period. After a 2 weeks wash out's period, patients belonging to group B, starting from visit 5, will receive drug A ( Proklama: 1 sachet/day).

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugProklama
  • DrugPlacebo
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Recorded pain in a diary using a 11-points Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)

    Self reported evaluation of the most severe pain occurred in the previous 24 hours. Pain severity is scored 0-10 ( 0= absent; 10= pain as bad as can be).

    Time frame: 24 h

Secondary outcomes

  1. Recorded abdominal distension in a diary using a 11-points Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)

    Self reported evaluation of abdominal distension occurred in the previous 24 hours. Abdominal distension is scored 0-10 ( 0= absent; 10= abdominal distension as bad as can be).

    Time frame: 24 h

  2. Recorded abdominal discomfort in a diary using a 11-points Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)

    Self reported evaluation of abdominal discomfort occurred in the previous 24 hours. Abdominal discomfort is scored 0-10 ( 0= absent; 10= abdominal discomfort as bad as can be).

    Time frame: 24 h

  3. Recorded abdominal meteorism in a diary using a 11-points Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)

    Self reported evaluation of abdominal meteorism occurred in the previous 24 hours. Abdominal meteorism is scored 0-10 ( 0= absent; 10= abdominal meteorism as bad as can be).

    Time frame: 24 h

  4. Recorded flatulence in a diary using a 11-points Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)

    Self reported evaluation of flatulence occurred in the previous 24 hours. Flatulence is scored 0-10 ( 0= absent; 10= flatulence as bad as can be).

    Time frame: 24 h

  5. Recorded borborygmi in a diary using a 11-points Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)

    Self reported evaluation of borgorygms occurred in the previous 24 hours. Borborygmi is scored 0-10 ( 0= absent; 10= borborygmi as bad as can be).

    Time frame: 24 h

  6. Recorded nausea in a diary using a 11-points Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)

    Self reported evaluation of nausea occurred in the previous 24 hours. Nausea is scored 0-10 ( 0= absent; 10= nausea as bad as can be).

    Time frame: 24 h

  7. Recorded belching in a diary using a 11-points Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)

    Self reported evaluation of belching occurred in the previous 24 hours. Belching is scored 0-10 ( 0= absent; 10= belching as bad as can be).

    Time frame: 24 h

  8. Recorded asthenia in a diary using a 11-points Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)

    Self reported evaluation of asthenia occurred in the previous 24 hours. Asthenia is scored 0-10 ( 0= absent; 10= asthenia as bad as can be).

    Time frame: 24 h

  9. Recorded headache in a diary using a 11-points Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)

    Self reported evaluation of headache occurred in the previous 24 hours. Headache is scored 0-10 ( 0= absent; 10= headache as bad as can be).

    Time frame: 24 h

  10. Recorded "empty- head" feeling in a diary using a 11-points Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)

    Self reported evaluation of "empty- head" feeling occurred in the previous 24 hours. "Empty- head" feeling is scored 0-10 ( 0= absent; 10= "empty- head" feeling as bad as can be).

    Time frame: 24 h

  11. Recorded attention deficity in a diary using a 11-points Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)

    Self reported evaluation of attention deficity occurred in the previous 24 hours. Attention deficity is scored 0-10 ( 0= absent; 10= attention deficity as bad as can be).

    Time frame: 24 h

  12. Recorded vomiting feeling in a diary using a 11-points Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)

    Self reported evaluation of vomiting occurred in the previous 24 hours. Vomiting feeling is scored 0-10 ( 0= absent; 10= vomiting as bad as can be).

    Time frame: 24 h

  13. Recorded heartburn in a diary using a 11-points Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)

    Self reported evaluation of heartburn occurred in the previous 24 hours. Heartburn is scored 0-10 ( 0= absent; 10= heartburn as bad as can be).

    Time frame: 24 h

  14. Number of evacuations recorded in a diary

    Self reported record of number of evacuations in the previous 24 h.

    Time frame: 24 h

  15. Recorded stool consistency in a diary using a 7- point Bristol Stool Form Scale

    Self reported evaluation of stool consistency occurred in the previous 24 hours. Stool consistency is scored 1- 7 ( 1= constipation; 7=diarrhoea)

    Time frame: 24 h

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Policlinico San Matteo Pavia Fondazione IRCCS
    Pavia, 27100, Italy
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 9, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02573844
Lead sponsor
Geophyt S.r.l.s.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 12, 2015
Start date
Jan 2015
Primary completion
Oct 2017
Completion
Jun 2018
Last update
Aug 9, 2021

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion