CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT02571738*OTI-15-01Updated Oct 6, 2017

Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of CHAM* for the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers

A Phase 3 interventional study of CHAM and Control in Chronic Diabetic Foot Ulcers, sponsored by Osiris Therapeutics. Terminated at 18 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-10-06.

Sponsored by Osiris Therapeutics · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Company's desire to allocate more research and development resources to other clinical programs. Decision not driven by any safety concerns.
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
108
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A Multicenter, Randomized, Single-Blind Study with an Open-Label Extension Option to Further Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Cryopreserved Human Amniotic Membrane for the Treatment of Chronic Diabetic Foot Ulcers

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Diabetic Foot Ulcers
03

In context

Diabetic Foot

1,054 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetic Foot; 222 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 108 is above the median of 60 across 826 interventional studies indexed under Diabetic Foot.

Browse Diabetic Foot studies →

Lead sponsor

Osiris Therapeutics is the lead sponsor of 7 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Between 18 years and 80 years of age inclusive, as of the date of screening
  2. Confirmed diagnosis of Type I or Type II Diabetes
  3. An Index Ulcer defined as chronic (presence of wound for > 4 weeks), but not present for more than 52 weeks at the Screening Visit
  4. Index Ulcer is located below the malleoli on the plantar or dorsal surface of the foot
  5. The Index Ulcer is between 1 cm2 and 15 cm2, inclusive, at the Screening Visit
  6. The Index Ulcer extends into the dermis or subcutaneous tissue without evidence of exposed muscle, tendon, bone, or joint capsule
  7. Wound is free of necrotic debris
  8. Patient has adequate circulation to the foot as documented by either:

    • Ankle Brachial Index (ABI) > 0.70 and \< 1.30, or
    • In patients with non-compressible ankle vessels defined as an ABI ≥ 1.30, a Toe Brachial Index (TBI) ≥ 0.50, or
    • In patients with non-compressible ankle vessels defined as an ABI ≥ 1.30 and TBI cannot be performed (e.g., toe is absent, wounds are present, or site cannot perform a TBI), a Doppler waveform in the posterior tibial or dorsalis pedis arteries at the ankle consistent with adequate flow in the foot (biphasic or triphasic) and other diagnostic confirmation of adequate flow (e.g., duplex imaging, normal pulse volume recording [PVR] testing).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Index Ulcer is of non-diabetic pathophysiology
  2. Gangrene is present on any part of the affected foot
  3. Index Ulcer is over an active Charcot deformity
  4. The longest dimension of the Index Ulcer exceeds 5 cm at the Baseline Visit
  5. Patient is currently receiving dialysis or planning to go on dialysis
  6. Patient has had 2 or more previous disease-related amputations of the lower extremities
  7. Patient has a glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level of >10%
  8. Chronic oral steroid use >7.5 mg daily for longer than 3 months at the time of screening
  9. Patient is receiving IV corticosteroids, immunosuppressive or cytotoxic agents at the time of screening
  10. Requiring intravenous (IV) antibiotics to treat the index wound infection at the time of screening
  11. Patient has an ulcer within 5 cm of the Index Ulcer identified for study consideration
  12. Patient is Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) positive or has Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS)
  13. Current evidence of cellulitis, or other evidence of infection including fever or pus drainage from the wound site
  14. Current evidence of osteomyelitis or history of osteomyelitis within 30 days of screening
  15. Patient has active malignancy other than non-melanoma skin cancer
  16. Patient's Index Ulcer has decreased by ≥20% during 1-week screening period
  17. Patient's random blood sugar is >350 mg/dl at screening
  18. Patient has untreated alcohol or substance abuse at the time of screening
  19. Pregnant women and women who are breastfeeding
  20. Patient is currently enrolled or participated in another investigational device, drug, or biological trial within 30 days of screening
  21. Patient has had within the last 30 days, or is currently undergoing, or is planning for wound treatments with growth factors, living skin, dermal substitutes or other advanced biological therapies
  22. Patient is an employee, or an immediate family member of an employee, of the sponsor company or site research staff conducting the study
  23. Patients who have already been randomized in Protocol 303 at any center may not be considered for screening or for re-entry into the trial at any center, even after the end of their follow-up period
  24. Patients with a history of poor compliance, or an unwillingness or inability to adhere to the requirements of the protocol.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
108 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    CHAM

    Cryopreserved Human Amniotic Membrane

    Biological: CHAM

  • Placebo comparator
    Control

    Standard of Care

    Other: Control

Interventions

  • BiologicalCHAM

    The treatment indication is for chronic diabetic foot ulcers that can accommodate up to one 5cm x 5cm piece of CHAM

  • OtherControl

    Standard of Care

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Complete closure of the index wound, defined as 100% re-epithelialization as determined by the Investigator, by the End of Single-Blind Treatment Visit with follow-up confirmation of continued closure at 2 consecutive study visits 2 weeks apart

    Time frame: Up to 112 days after Baseline Visit

Secondary outcomes

  1. Complete index wound closure by the End of Single-Blind Treatment Visit as defined by 100% re-epithelialization, as determined by the Investigator.

    Time frame: Up to 84 days after Baseline Visit

  2. Time to initial wound closure among patients that receive CHAM versus those that receive control as measured by Kaplan-Meier analysis.

    Time frame: Up to 84 days after Baseline Visit

  3. Proportion of patients receiving CHAM that achieve a 50% reduction or greater in wound size by Day 28 (± 3 days) versus those that receive control.

    Time frame: Up to 28 days after Baseline

  4. Number of applications of CHAM versus control

    Time frame: Up to 77 days after Baseline

  5. Percentage of patients who achieve complete wound closure, defined as 100% re-epithelialization as determined by the Investigator, who participate in the Open-Label Treatment Phase

    Time frame: Up to 91 days after Single-Blind Treatment Phase

Other outcomes

  1. Wound re-occurrence for up to 3 months after initial wound closure in patients receiving CHAM versus control.

    Time frame: Up to 84 days after Single-Blind Treatment Phase

  2. Number and types of Adverse Events (AE) and Serious Adverse Events (SAE)

    Time frame: Up to 84 days after Single-Blind Treatment Phase

  3. Number of patients with worsening of wound defined by a 50% increase in wound size

    Time frame: Up to 84 days after Baseline

  4. Change in Quality of Life from Baseline, as determined by the Cardiff Wound Impact Schedule (CWIS)

    Time frame: Up to 84 days after Baseline

07

Study locations

18 sites
  • SAVAHCS
    Tucson, Arizona 85723, United States
  • ILD Research Center
    Carlsbad, California 92009, United States
  • Center for Clinical Research
    Castro Valley, California 94546, United States
  • Center for Clinical Research
    San Francisco, California 94115, United States
  • Stanford University
    Stanford, California 94305, United States
  • MedStar Georgetown University Hospital
    Washington, D.C., District of Columbia 20007, United States
  • Barry University Clinical Research
    North Miami Beach, Florida 33169, United States
  • SSH
    South Weymouth, Massachusetts 02190, United States
  • Ocean County Foot & Ankle Surgical Associates
    Toms River, New Jersey 08753, United States
  • NSLIJHS
    Lake Success, New York 11042, United States
  • UNC
    Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States
  • Duke University
    Durham, North Carolina 27710, United States
  • Cleveland Clinic
    Cleveland, Ohio 44195, United States
  • University Orthopedics
    Altoona, Pennsylvania 16602, United States
  • Temple University
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107, United States
  • Spartanburg Regional Healthcare System
    Spartanburg, South Carolina 29303, United States
  • North Texas Podiatric Medicine and Surgery Associates
    Dallas, Texas 75231, United States
  • Texas Gulf Coast Medical Group
    Webster, Texas 77598, United States
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 6, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02571738
Lead sponsor
Osiris Therapeutics
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 8, 2015
Start date
Oct 2015
Primary completion
Apr 2017
Completion
Jun 2017
Last update
Oct 6, 2017

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Oct 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion