CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT02570347RADIANSUpdated May 30, 2025

Routine Antibiotic vs. Directed Antibiotic Treatment in Snake Bite

A Phase 4 interventional study of Co-amoxiclav and Tetanus toxoid in Snake Bites, sponsored by Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research. Terminated at 1 site in India. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-30.

Sponsored by Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Slower than anticipated recruitment and emergent COVID-19 situation
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
66
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Clinicians tend to overuse antibiotics in snake bite despite evidence from three previous clinical trials that failed to show a benefit. But, none of these trials was done in India. Further, the species of snake in two of these trials was quite different from that seen in the Indian setting limiting generalization of these findings. Hence, home-grown evidence is needed to persuade clinicians to use antibiotics rationally.

Read the detailed description

Snake bite is a common clinical problem in India and elsewhere, affecting agricultural workers and rural population, resulting in thousands of deaths every year. Apart from causing systemic manifestations such as coagulopathy, acute renal failure, and neuroparalysis, local effects of the venom manifest as swelling of the bitten limb. Despite administration of adequate antivenom, the limb swelling progresses in the first 48-72 hours accompanied by considerable pain. Often the limb swelling is accompanied by formation of blebs and gangrenous skin changes. At times, the limb swelling is severe enough to result in compartment syndrome, necessitating surgical interventions such as fasciotomy and debridement. Animal bites are typically associated with a risk of infection by the oral flora. Likewise, apart from releasing the venom, inoculation of oral flora as a result of snake bite could result in local infectious complications adding to the deleterious effects of the snake venom.

Observational studies suggest that the risk of infection following simple bites on the lower limbs is much less than what is often believed, and evidence from clinical trials also does not support routine use of antibiotics in snake bite. For this reason, clinical practice guidelines do not recommend routine prophylactic use of antibiotics in snake bite. But, in reality, many clinicians continue to use antibiotics routinely in all venomous snake bites hoping to prevent a local infection. While such a strategy may not reduce the risk of infection, it would result in overuse of antibiotics promoting antimicrobial resistance and escalating treatment costs.

The investigators hypothesize that clinically-directed use of antibiotics would be non-inferior to routine use in preventing local infectious complications of snake bite, while being superior in reducing the antibiotic consumption. Non-inferiority would be inferred if the one-sided 95% CI of the difference does not exceed 10% in favour of the routine use arm.

02

Conditions studied

  • Snake Bites

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Snake Envenomation
  • Antibiotic Prophylaxis
  • Viperidae
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18-65 years
  • History of snake bite with features of local envenomation with/without systemic features
  • Less than 24 hours since bite, AND
  • No prior antibiotic treatment

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Upper limb bites
  • Multiple (> 1) bites
  • Wound manipulation
  • Extensive local necrosis or blebs
  • Seriously-ill patients with hypotension/capillary leak/life threatening bleeding.
  • Suspected cobra bite, OR
  • Pregnant/breast-feeding women
04

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
66 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Routine use arm

    All participants allocated to this arm will be given * Injection Tetanus toxoid 0.5 ml intramuscularly Stat * Antibiotic (Co-amoxiclav) will be given to all patients for a minimum duration of 5 days. * Daily clinical assessment would be done. Change of antibiotics is allowed if clinical failure occurs. Use of antibiotics for emergent indications unrelated to the bitten limb such as nosocomial infections would be allowed at the treating physician's discretion.

    Drug: Co-amoxiclav · Biological: Tetanus toxoid

  • Experimental
    Clinically-directed use arm

    Participants allocated to this arm will be given * Injection Tetanus toxoid 0.5 ml intramuscularly Stat * Daily clinical assessment would be done. Antibiotic (Co-amoxiclav) will be started only if clinical failure occurs. Use of antibiotics for emergent indications unrelated to the bitten limb such as nosocomial infections would be allowed at the treating physician's discretion.

    Drug: Co-amoxiclav · Biological: Tetanus toxoid

Interventions

  • DrugCo-amoxiclav

    Injection Co-amoxiclav 1.2 g intravenously q8h for a minimum of 48-72 hours; switched to oral Co-amoxiclav 625 mg b.i.d. when clinically appropriate.

    Also known as: Augmentin

  • BiologicalTetanus toxoid

    Injection Tetanus toxoid 0.5 ml intramuscularly Stat

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Clinical failure

    Defined as occurrence of any one of the following on daily assessments - Abscess formation at any point of time; Surgical debridement/fasciotomy at any time; Worsening limb swelling beyond 72-96 hours or appearance of necrosis or blebs along with any one of the following: fever, persistent or worsening leucocytosis, or global deterioration on clinical assessment.

    Time frame: up to 4 weeks

  2. Antibiotic consumption

    Defined as the total amount of all antibiotics consumed regardless of clinical indication expressed in terms of defined daily doses (DDD).

    Time frame: up to 4 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Length of hospital stay

    Number of days from hospital admission until discharge

    Time frame: up to 4 weeks

  2. Anti-snake venom consumption

    The total number of vials of the anti-venom administered including doses received prior to being brought to JIPMER.

    Time frame: up to 4 weeks

  3. New-onset organ failure

    This includes acute kidney injury (AKI) defined as peak serum creatinine \> 2 mg/dL, shock defined as systolic blood pressure \< 90 mm Hg requiring use of vasopressors; bleeding from any site necessitating transfusion of blood/blood products; and capillary leak syndrome.

    Time frame: up to 4 weeks

  4. Death/need for surgical intervention

    This would be a composite measure of death and/or need for surgical intervention. Death indicates in-hospital death due to any cause during the index hospitalisation. Surgical intervention would include need for any surgical intervention such as incision and drainage of abscess, wound debridement for necrosis or gangrene, fasciotomy for compartment syndrome, etc.

    Time frame: up to 4 weeks

  5. Drug-related adverse events

    Any suspected or confirmed adverse drug reaction

    Time frame: up to 4 weeks

06

Study locations

1 site
  • Department of Medicine, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research
    Pondicherry, Puducherry 605006, India
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Terry P, Mackway-Jones K. Towards evidence based emergency medicine: best BETs from the Manchester Royal Infirmary. The use of antibiotics in venomous snake bite. Emerg Med J. 2002 Jan;19(1):48-9. doi: 10.1136/emj.19.1.48. PubMed 11777875 ↗
  • Terry P, Mackway-Jones K. Towards evidence based emergency medicine: best BETs from the Manchester Royal Infirmary. Antibiotics in non-venomous snakebite. Emerg Med J. 2002 Mar;19(2):142. doi: 10.1136/emj.19.2.142. PubMed 11904264 ↗
  • Jorge MT, Malaque C, Ribeiro LA, Fan HW, Cardoso JL, Nishioka SA, Sano-Martins IS, Franca FO, Kamiguti AS, Theakston RD, Warrell DA. Failure of chloramphenicol prophylaxis to reduce the frequency of abscess formation as a complication of envenoming by Bothrops snakes in Brazil: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2004 Sep;98(9):529-34. doi: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2003.12.009. PubMed 15251401 ↗
  • Kularatne SA, Kumarasiri PV, Pushpakumara SK, Dissanayaka WP, Ariyasena H, Gawarammana IB, Senanayake N. Routine antibiotic therapy in the management of the local inflammatory swelling in venomous snakebites: results of a placebo-controlled study. Ceylon Med J. 2005 Dec;50(4):151-5. doi: 10.4038/cmj.v50i4.1405. PubMed 16538909 ↗
  • Kerrigan KR, Mertz BL, Nelson SJ, Dye JD. Antibiotic prophylaxis for pit viper envenomation: prospective, controlled trial. World J Surg. 1997 May;21(4):369-72; discussion 372-3. doi: 10.1007/pl00012255. PubMed 9143566 ↗
  • Mohapatra B, Warrell DA, Suraweera W, Bhatia P, Dhingra N, Jotkar RM, Rodriguez PS, Mishra K, Whitaker R, Jha P; Million Death Study Collaborators. Snakebite mortality in India: a nationally representative mortality survey. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011 Apr 12;5(4):e1018. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001018. PubMed 21532748 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified individual participant data that underlie the published results (text, tables, figures and appendices).

Supporting information: Study protocol, Icf, Csr

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02570347
Lead sponsor
Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research
Responsible party
Tamilarasu Kadhiravan, MD (Professor of Medicine, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 7, 2015
Start date
May 3, 2016
Primary completion
Oct 24, 2019
Completion
Mar 31, 2020
Last update
May 30, 2025

Study contacts

Tamilarasu Kadhiravan, M.D.
principal investigator · Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in May 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion