CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02568995FEMORALIAUpdated Sep 27, 2016

Pain Management Following Total Hip Arthroplasty

A Phase 3 interventional study of ropivacaine + ketorolac + adrenaline in Postoperative Pain Intensity and Rescue Pain Requirements, sponsored by Örebro University, Sweden. Completed at 3 sites in Sweden. Open to participants aged 40 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-09-27.

Sponsored by Örebro University, Sweden · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
55
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a common and standardized procedure. Postoperative mortality after hip joint replacement is low but some complications remain, including chronic post-surgical pain (1), hip dislocation (2), infection (3), and deep vein thrombosis (4). Strategies that have been identified to reduce morbidity and mortality include: posterior surgical approach, mechanical and pharmacological prophylaxis of deep vein thrombosis, and the use of spinal anesthesia (5). One of the important factors for patient satisfaction with lower limb arthroplasty is good postoperative pain management (6). Poorly managed postoperative pain can lead to chronic post-surgical pain and therefore aggressive postoperative pain management is important (7). Several different methods have been used to treat postoperative pain following THA. Recently, local infiltration analgesia (LIA) using a combination of large volume local anesthetics (LA) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents (NSAID) injected systematically peri-articularly has been used for pain management with variable success (8). We found that better analgesia could be achieved when using LIA compared to intrathecal morphine during the first few days postoperatively (9,10).

Ultrasound techniques are commonly used for peripheral nerve blocks and have been shown to reduce pain intensity and may be considered by many to be a standard of care. Specifically, the 3-in-1 block has been commonly used because of its ease of application and good pain management following total hip arthroplasty. The present study aims to compare postoperative pain intensity following local infiltration analgesia with a standardised 3-in-1 block for total hip arthroplasty.

Read the detailed description

Sixty ASA I-II patients undergoing THA would be randomised to one of two groups in a double-blind study:

Group LIA: A total of 151.5 ml of a combination of 0.2% ropivacaine (150 ml), 30 mg ketorolac (1 ml) and 0.5 mg (0.5 ml) adrenaline was administered systematically peri-articularly during THA and 30 ml of normal saline for ultrasound-guided 3-in-1 block Group Femoral block: Received 30 ml of ropivacaine 0,75% for ultrasound-guided 3-in-1 block and a total of 151.5 ml of normal saline peri-articularly.

All patients would receive spinal anaesthesia with 0.5% heavy bupivacaine for surgery

Postoperatively, the following parameters would be measured:

  1. Pain intensity at fixed time intervals during 0-7 days and thereafter at weekly intervals for 1 month
  2. Rescue morphine consumption during 0-4, 4-24 and 24-48 h
  3. Side effects and complications
  4. Home readiness and length of hospital stay
  5. Chronic pain intensity measured after 3 and 6 months using the Brief Pain Inventory
  6. Plasma Cytokine concentration at fixed intervals
  7. Motor block using Bromage scale
  8. EQ5D and HOOS questionnaires
02

Conditions studied

  • Postoperative Pain Intensity
  • Rescue Pain Requirements

Keywords

  • postoperative pain
  • morphine
  • total hip arthroplasty
  • femoral nerve block
03

In context

Pain, Postoperative

5,093 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain, Postoperative; 1,137 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 55 is below the median of 75 across 4,341 interventional studies indexed under Pain, Postoperative.

Browse Pain, Postoperative studies →

Lead sponsor

Örebro University, Sweden is the lead sponsor of 84 studies on the registry; 15 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • 40-80 years
  • ASA I-II
  • THA operation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Chronic pain requiring opiates
  • Language constraints preventing completion of the study
  • Contraindications to regional block
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
55 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    LIA

    Local infiltration analgesia using a combination of ropivacaine 300 mg + ketorolac 30 mg + adrenaline 0.5 mg

    Drug: ropivacaine + ketorolac + adrenaline

  • Active comparator
    Femoral nerve block

    Ultrasound guided 3-in-1 block using 30 ml of 0.75% ropivacaine

    Drug: ropivacaine + ketorolac + adrenaline

Interventions

  • Drugropivacaine + ketorolac + adrenaline

    A combination of drugs injected locally for postoperative pain management

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain intensity

    Pain intensity during movement at 24 h after end of surgery

    Time frame: 24 h

Secondary outcomes

  1. Rescue analgesic consumption

    Amount of PCA morphine used for pain management

    Time frame: 0-24 h

  2. Chronic pain

    Pain at 3 and 6 months after surgery using Brief Pain Inventory

    Time frame: 3-6 months

  3. Inflammation

    Pre- and post-operative cytokine concentration would be measured

    Time frame: Preoperative to 3-5 days postoperatively

07

Study locations

3 sites
  • Karolinskasjukhuset
    Solna, Sweden
  • University Hospital
    Örebro, 701 85, Sweden
  • Örebro University Hospital
    Örebro, 70185, Sweden
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 27, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02568995
Lead sponsor
Örebro University, Sweden
Responsible party
Anil Gupta (Associate Professor, Örebro University, Sweden) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 6, 2015
Start date
May 2014
Primary completion
Sep 2016
Completion
Sep 2016
Last update
Sep 27, 2016

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion