A Phase 3 interventional study of fiblast,gelatin sponge,fibrin glue in Tympanic Membrane Perforation, sponsored by Translational Research Center for Medical Innovation, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan. Completed. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-12-22.
Sponsored by Translational Research Center for Medical Innovation, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment
To assess the efficacy and safety of the regeneration treatment of tympanic membrane with NPC-18 and FBG-18.
45 studies on the registry are indexed under Tympanic Membrane Perforation; 10 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 20 is below the median of 57 across 31 interventional studies indexed under Tympanic Membrane Perforation.
Browse Tympanic Membrane Perforation studies →Translational Research Center for Medical Innovation, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan is the lead sponsor of 55 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Intervention drug: NPC-18;trafermin(recombination) and gelatin spnge, combination drug FBG-18;fibrin glue Usage:NPC-18 and FBG-18 is administered at the same time for regenerative treatment of tympanic membrane
Drug: fiblast,gelatin sponge,fibrin glue
Closure of tympanic membrane perforation in the observation period at16 wks
Time frame: Closure of tympanic membrane perforation in the observation period at16 wks
Closure of tympanic membrane perforation in the observation period at 4 wks
Time frame: Closure of tympanic membrane perforation in the observation period at 4 wks
Improvement of hearing level in the observation period at 4 wks and 16 wks
Time frame: Improvement of hearing level in the observation period at 4 wks and 16 wks
Air-bone gap in the observation period at 4 wks and 16 wks
Time frame: Air-bone gap in the observation period at 4 wks and 16 wks
The difference of the average hearing level of air conduction threshold from the treatment at 0 wk and observation period at 4wks and 6 wks
Time frame: The difference of the average hearing level of air conduction threshold from the treatment at 0 wk and observation period at 4wks and 6 wks
Average hearing level of air conduction threshold in the observation period at 4 wks and 16 wks
Time frame: Average hearing level of air conduction threshold in the observation period at 4 wks and 16 wks
No study locations are listed for this record.
Plan to share: Undecided
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Tympanic Membrane Perforation→
Translational Research Center for Medical Innovation, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan