ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT02549157Updated Nov 29, 2024

Treatments for Urogynaecological Problems and Patient Selfreports

An observational study in Urogynaecological Problem, Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, Cancer, sponsored by Swansea University. Recruiting at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-11-29.

Sponsored by Swansea University · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Sep 2025, 1 year 1 month ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
500
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The research aims to assess the relationship between treatments for a range of urogynaecological problems (pelvic floor dysfunction, cancers) and patient reported values, psychological states, and quality of life. The impact of treatments on patients' health outcomes will be measured, using specific urogynaecological outcome measures (for either pelvic floor dysfunction or cancer), and patient reported measures of general health and quality of life. Patients' psychological states and values will be measured by validated self-report instruments for these areas. Researchers will obtain consent for participation from patients. Following consent, baseline measures will be taken at the patients' routine appointment about 4 weeks prior to undergoing treatment (e.g., surgery or physiotherapy for pelvic floor dysfunction, or surgery for a urogynaecology cancer). These measures will be the routinely collected physical data obtained by medical staff, and patient reported measures of their general health, psychological state, and quality of life. These questionnaires should take about 30 minutes to complete, in total. The patients will undergo treatment (physiotherapy programme or surgery), which will not be affected by this research. About four weeks post treatment, patients will receive their usual appointment, and routinely collected physical data will be obtained by medical staff, and patients will complete the measures as described above. With the patient's consent, the above evaluation will be repeated at every follow-up appointment that the patient has (i.e. after 3months, and then at yearly intervals, for 5 years). The impact of treatments on objective routine health measures taken by medical staff, and on patient reported measures of health, quality of life, personal values, and psychological functioning, will be documented at each measurement point. Additionally, relationships between psychological states/values and both objective and subjective ratings of how treatments have impacted the patients will be established.

Read the detailed description

Aims The research aims to assess the relationship between treatments for various uro-gynaecological problems (pelvic floor dysfunction, and cancer) and both: (i) objective physical outcomes, and (ii) self reported outcomes in terms of general health, and quality of life, at a number of time points post treatment (4 week, 3months, 1year, and yearly, thereafter).

In addition, the research aims to assess the relationship between psychological factors (depression, anxiety, and values) prior to treatment, and treatment outcomes (specific outcome, self reported general health, and quality of life), at time points post treatment (4 week, 3months, 1year, and yearly, thereafter), for patients with various gynaecological problems (pelvic floor dysfunction, and cancers).

Participants and Recruitment Consecutive patients referred for treatments (physiotherapy, surgery) for uro-gynaecological problems (pelvic floor dysfunction, cancer) will be asked if they would like to participate in this evaluative study. The initial approach will be made through a letter sent out with their appointment details, which will give information about the study. This will make clear that their treatment will not depend on their participation in the study. The patients also will be given the chance to discuss their participation with the specialist nurse at the time of their pre-treatment assessment, and will give their consent (by completing and signing a Consent Form) on the day of their taking part in the research study, after they have had time to think about their participation and ask any questions that they may have.

Design and Methodology Following their consent, at the initial consultation prior to treatment (about 4 weeks prior to treatment), baseline measures will be taken from the patients. These measures will be the routinely collected physical data, obtained by the medical staff, plus a series of patient-reported measures, concerned with the patients' general health (GHQ28), depression and anxiety (HADS), values (PVQII), and quality of life (EQ5D, WHOQoL-BREF, and QLQC30). These questionnaires should take about 30 minutes to complete, in total. The patients will then undergo their treatment (the type of treatment decided upon forms no part of this study). About four weeks post-treatment, the patients will receive their usual physical screening by medical staff, and will, again, complete the same forms as described above. The patients will then be asked if they would complete the same questionnaires at a series of subsequent time points (approximately after 3 months post treatment, and then yearly for five years). The changes across the objectively- and subjectively-reported health status, and in the patient-reported quality of life, and psychological functioning will be measured. Additionally, the relationship between the baseline patient-reported psychological states (depression and anxiety) and values, and the objective (physical measures), and subjectively-reported (general health and quality of life) outcomes, will be assessed.

02

Conditions studied

  • Urogynaecological Problem, Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, Cancer

Browse trials for

03

In context

Neoplasms

10,818 studies on the registry are indexed under Neoplasms; 2,324 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 500 is above the median of 200 across 2,638 observational studies indexed under Neoplasms.

Browse Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Swansea University is the lead sponsor of 41 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Consecutive patients referred for treatments (physiotherapy, surgery) for urogynaecological problems (pelvic floor dysfunction, cancer) will be asked if they would like to participate in this study. Initial approach will be made through letter sent out with their appointment details, which will give information about the study. This will make clear that their treatment will not depend on their participation in the study. The patients also will be given the chance to discuss their participation with the specialist nurse at the time of their pre-treatment assessment, and will give their consent (by completing and signing a Consent Form) on the day of their taking part in the research study, after they have had time to think about their participation and ask any questions that they may have.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • consenting patients who are referred for pelvic floor problems to Singleton Hospital Swansea, UK.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • under 18 years
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
500 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • ProcedurePelvic Floor Muscle Training
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in objective physical outcomes

    Oxford Grading

    Time frame: Initial measures will be taken about 4 weks pre-treatment, and then again 4 weeks post-treatment. Follow-up measures will be taken after abou 3 months, and then after 1 year for each of the next 4 years.

  2. Change in self reported depression and anxiety

    Hospital Anxiety and Depresion Scales, ranging from 0-21 for both scales, with 9 or more being considered as showing signs of depression or anxiety.

    Time frame: Initial measures will be taken about 4 weks pre-treatment, and then again 4 weeks post-treatment. Follow-up measures will be taken after abou 3 months, and then after 1 year for each of the next 4 years.

  3. Change in self reported quality of life

    Euro-qual 5D measures health related quality of life on 5 dimensons (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) each rated as: "no problems," "slight problems," "moderate problems," "severe problems," and "unable to"/"extreme problems"

    Time frame: Initial measures will be taken about 4 weks pre-treatment, and then again 4 weeks post-treatment. Follow-up measures will be taken after abou 3 months, and then after 1 year for each of the next 4 years.

  4. Change in personal values

    Personal Values Questionnaire measures patient selected areas of their life which they value (e.g., health, family), giving a score between 0 and 25, with higher scores indicating a more strongly heald value.

    Time frame: Initial measures will be taken about 4 weks pre-treatment, and then again 4 weeks post-treatment. Follow-up measures will be taken after abou 3 months, and then after 1 year for each of the next 4 years.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Osborne LA, Mair Whittall C, Emery S, Reed P. Change in depression predicts change in bladder symptoms for women with urinary incontinence undergoing pelvic-floor muscle training. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2023 Jan;280:54-59. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.11.010. Epub 2022 Nov 14. PubMed 36402023 ↗
  • Reed P, Osborne LA, Whittall CM, Emery S. Impact of patient motivation on compliance and outcomes for incontinence. Physiotherapy. 2021 Dec;113:100-106. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2020.10.003. Epub 2020 Oct 24. PubMed 34563914 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Sep 2015, a primary completion of Sep 2025 and a completion of Sep 2025. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 10, 2015
First posted
Sep 15, 2015
Start
Sep 1, 2015
Primary completionEst.
Sep 30, 2025
CompletionEst.
Sep 30, 2025
Last update
Nov 29, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 29, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02549157
Lead sponsor
Swansea University
Collaborators
Abertawe Bro Morgannwg University Health Board
Responsible party
Prof Phil Reed (Professor Phil Reed, Swansea University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 15, 2015
Start date
Sep 1, 2015
Primary completion
Sep 30, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 30, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 29, 2024

Study contacts

Lisa A Osborne, D.Phil.
Contact
lisa.osborne@nhs.wales.uk
0044 (0)1792 285229
Phil Reed, D.Phil.
principal investigator · Swansea University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion