CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02548910PRICEUpdated Mar 18, 2021Results posted

Phlebotomy to Prevent Blood Loss in Major Hepatic Resections

An interventional study of Phlebotomy and Citrated whole blood collection bag in Liver Neoplasms and Hepatectomy, sponsored by Ottawa Hospital Research Institute. Completed at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-03-18.

Sponsored by Ottawa Hospital Research Institute · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
62
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Major liver resection is associated with substantial intraoperative blood loss. Blood loss in elective liver surgery is a significant factor of perioperative morbidity and mortality, as well as possibly long-term oncologic outcome. The purpose of this study is to use whole blood phlebotomy to decrease the central venous pressure, resulting in a state of relative hypovolemia. It is hypothesized that this intervention will lead to a decrease in blood loss at the time of liver resection.

Read the detailed description

Major liver resection is associated with significant intraoperative blood loss. Blood loss in elective liver surgery is a key determinant of perioperative morbidity and mortality, as well as possibly long-term oncologic outcome. Whole blood phlebotomy is a simple intervention, whose aim is to decrease the central venous pressure yielding a state of relative hypovolemia and thus lead to decreased blood loss. Small studies, mostly from the liver transplant literature, would suggest that phlebotomy with controlled hypovolemia can result in decreased blood loss and blood transfusion. Since blood loss is an important issue in liver surgery, and the benefits of phlebotomy and controlled hypovolemia are unknown in liver resection patients, a rigorously conducted trial in a representative population of patients undergoing liver resection is warranted, and feasible. In this proposal, it is hypothesized that by the use of phlebotomy and controlled hypovolemia, it is possible to decrease blood loss and blood transfusions. To test this hypothesis the investigators plan to randomly allocate participants to phlebotomy plus standard of care or to standard of care. Participants will be those patients undergoing elective major liver resection at the Ottawa Hospital for any indication. The primary outcome will be intraoperative blood loss. Secondary outcomes will include transfusion requirements, perioperative morbidity and mortality, safety, physiologic parameters, and feasibility elements. A total of 62 patients will be randomized. The efficacy of phlebotomy in terms of blood loss prevention will be assessed.

02

Conditions studied

  • Liver Neoplasms
  • Hepatectomy

Browse trials for

03

In context

Liver Neoplasms

1,391 studies on the registry are indexed under Liver Neoplasms; 345 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 62 is above the median of 47 across 968 interventional studies indexed under Liver Neoplasms.

Browse Liver Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Ottawa Hospital Research Institute is the lead sponsor of 538 studies on the registry; 100 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Any patient being considered for a major elective liver resection will be considered for trial enrollment. Patients who are undergoing a concurrent additional abdominal or thoracic procedure (eg. colonic resection) will also be included.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age \<18 years
  • Pregnancy
  • Refusal of blood products
  • Active cardiac conditions: unstable coronary syndromes, decompensated heart failure (NYHA functional class IV; worsening or new-onset heart failure), significant arrhythmias, severe valvular disease
  • History of significant cerebrovascular disease
  • Renal dysfunction (patients with an estimated GFR \<60 mL/min)
  • Abnormal coagulation parameters (INR >1.5 not on warfarin and/or platelets count \<100 X109/L )
  • Evidence of hepatic metabolic disorder (bilirubin >35 umol/L)
  • Presence of active infection
  • Preoperative autologous blood donation
  • Hemoglobin \<100 g/L
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
62 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Phlebotomy

    For patients randomized to phlebotomy, the intervention will consist of the standard of care (low CVP surgery), plus whole blood phlebotomy. Blood will be collected in citrated whole blood collection bag.

    Procedure: Phlebotomy · Device: Citrated whole blood collection bag

  • No intervention
    Control

    Standard of care (low CVP surgery). In this arm, standard anesthesia will be maintained.

Interventions

  • ProcedurePhlebotomy

    A central venous catheter will be inserted for every patient to measure central venous pressure, as is the standard of care in elective liver surgery. Strict aseptic technique will be maintained. A total volume of whole blood of 7-10 mL per kg of body weight will be removed, as tolerated. The volume of removed blood will not be replaced by intravenous fluid administration. Collected blood will be transfused back at the end of the liver parenchymal transection, or within 8 hours of collection.

  • DeviceCitrated whole blood collection bag

    Transfusion Medicine will send the requested number of whole blood collection bags labelled with the patient's name and MRN. These whole blood collection bags are used in standard practice for collection of whole blood.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Total Intraoperative Blood Loss, by Measurement of Change in Hemoglobin Levels

    Intraoperative blood loss is notoriously difficult to measure. It is suggested that calculation of blood loss using preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin levels in most consistently accurate. In order to minimize the risk of bias associated with any one method of intraoperative measurement of blood loss, three methods will be used independently. In the operating room, all blood and fluid aspirated from the abdomen will be measured accurately using graduated suction containers. As well, the amount of irrigation fluid will be carefully monitored and recorded. Finally, the weight of all surgical sponges will be measured. This information will be used by the surgeon and anesthesiologist to independently visually estimate blood loss, as is commonly done in clinical practice. In parallel, intraoperative blood loss will also be calculated based on an equation.

    Time frame: 1 week prior to surgery (hemoglobin level), and day two of post-op (hemoglobin again).

  2. Trial Feasibility

    Trial accrual

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Blood Product Transfusion Rates

    Time frame: Will be measured in the operating room and in the first postoperative week

  2. Perioperative Morbidity (Dindo-Clavien Grade 3b of Higher) and Mortality

    Time frame: Postoperative setting up to 30 days following surgery

  3. Changes in Physiologic Parameters (CVP)

    Time frame: Will be measured in the operating room

  4. Change in Physiologic Parameters (Cardiac Index)

    Time frame: Will be measured in the operating room

07

Results

Posted Mar 18, 2021

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePhlebotomyControl
Started3131
Completed3131
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryTotal Intraoperative Blood Loss, by Measurement of Change in Hemoglobin Levels

Intraoperative blood loss is notoriously difficult to measure. It is suggested that calculation of blood loss using preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin levels in most consistently accurate. In order to minimize the risk of bias associated with any one method of intraoperative measurement of blood loss, three methods will be used independently. In the operating room, all blood and fluid aspirated from the abdomen will be measured accurately using graduated suction containers. As well, the amount of irrigation fluid will be carefully monitored and recorded. Finally, the weight of all surgical sponges will be measured. This information will be used by the surgeon and anesthesiologist to independently visually estimate blood loss, as is commonly done in clinical practice. In parallel, intraoperative blood loss will also be calculated based on an equation.

Time frame:
1 week prior to surgery (hemoglobin level), and day two of post-op (hemoglobin again).
Reported as:
Median · mL
Total Intraoperative Blood Loss, by Measurement of Change in Hemoglobin Levels
mLPhlebotomyControl
Anaesthetist Estimate862 (451 to 1187)872 (525 to 1314)
Surgeon Estimate761 (451 to 1100)872 (557 to 1248)
Calculated EBL1116 (958 to 1526)1249 (778 to 1601)
PrimaryTrial Feasibility

Trial accrual

Time frame:
through study completion, an average of 2 years
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Trial Feasibility
ParticipantsParticipant Accrual
Trial Feasibility62
SecondaryBlood Product Transfusion Rates
Time frame:
Will be measured in the operating room and in the first postoperative week
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Blood Product Transfusion Rates
ParticipantsPhlebotomyControl
Intraoperative11
Postoperative53
Total54
SecondaryPerioperative Morbidity (Dindo-Clavien Grade 3b of Higher) and Mortality
Time frame:
Postoperative setting up to 30 days following surgery
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Perioperative Morbidity (Dindo-Clavien Grade 3b of Higher) and Mortality
ParticipantsPhlebotomyControl
postoperative complications1015
Major complication23
SecondaryChanges in Physiologic Parameters (CVP)
Time frame:
Will be measured in the operating room
Reported as:
Median · cmH2O
Changes in Physiologic Parameters (CVP)
cmH2OPhlebotomyControl
before transection8 (4.5 to 9.5)7 (6 to 9)
transection8 (5 to 10)7.5 (5 to 10)
SecondaryChange in Physiologic Parameters (Cardiac Index)
Time frame:
Will be measured in the operating room
Reported as:
Median · I per min per m2
Change in Physiologic Parameters (Cardiac Index)
I per min per m2PhlebotomyControl
Before transection3.5 (3.0 to 4.1)4.2 (3.2 to 5.1)
transection3.5 (3.1 to 4.4)3.9 (3.1 to 5.1)

Adverse events

Collected over adverse event data were collected for each participant for up to 30 days post surgery (intervention). Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Phlebotomy2/31 (6.5%)0/31 (0%)8/31 (25.8%)
Control1/31 (3.2%)1/31 (3.2%)12/31 (38.7%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventPhlebotomyControl
DialysisRenal and urinary disorders0/311/31
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventPhlebotomyControl
Postoperative compliations (Dindo-clavien grade I-II)General disorders8/3112/31

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)PhlebotomyControlTotal
Mean58 ± 1462 ± 1160 ± 12.6
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)PhlebotomyControlTotal
Female161329
Male151833
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)PhlebotomyControlTotal
Count of participants——0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)PhlebotomyControlTotal
Canada313162
08

Study locations

1 site
  • The Ottawa Hospital - General Campus
    Ottawa, Ontario K1H 8L6, Canada
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Hashimoto T, Kokudo N, Orii R, Seyama Y, Sano K, Imamura H, Sugawara Y, Hasegawa K, Makuuchi M. Intraoperative blood salvage during liver resection: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2007 May;245(5):686-91. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000255562.60215.3b. PubMed 17457160 ↗
  • Alkozai EM, Lisman T, Porte RJ. Bleeding in liver surgery: prevention and treatment. Clin Liver Dis. 2009 Feb;13(1):145-154. doi: 10.1016/j.cld.2008.09.012. PubMed 19150318 ↗
  • Huntington JT, Royall NA, Schmidt CR. Minimizing blood loss during hepatectomy: a literature review. J Surg Oncol. 2014 Feb;109(2):81-8. doi: 10.1002/jso.23455. Epub 2013 Oct 4. PubMed 24449171 ↗
  • McNally SJ, Revie EJ, Massie LJ, McKeown DW, Parks RW, Garden OJ, Wigmore SJ. Factors in perioperative care that determine blood loss in liver surgery. HPB (Oxford). 2012 Apr;14(4):236-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2011.00433.x. Epub 2012 Feb 28. PubMed 22404261 ↗
  • Jarnagin WR, Gonen M, Fong Y, DeMatteo RP, Ben-Porat L, Little S, Corvera C, Weber S, Blumgart LH. Improvement in perioperative outcome after hepatic resection: analysis of 1,803 consecutive cases over the past decade. Ann Surg. 2002 Oct;236(4):397-406; discussion 406-7. doi: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000029003.66466.B3. PubMed 12368667 ↗
  • Poon RT, Fan ST, Lo CM, Liu CL, Lam CM, Yuen WK, Yeung C, Wong J. Improving perioperative outcome expands the role of hepatectomy in management of benign and malignant hepatobiliary diseases: analysis of 1222 consecutive patients from a prospective database. Ann Surg. 2004 Oct;240(4):698-708; discussion 708-10. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000141195.66155.0c. PubMed 15383797 ↗
  • Andreou A, Aloia TA, Brouquet A, Dickson PV, Zimmitti G, Maru DM, Kopetz S, Loyer EM, Curley SA, Abdalla EK, Vauthey JN. Margin status remains an important determinant of survival after surgical resection of colorectal liver metastases in the era of modern chemotherapy. Ann Surg. 2013 Jun;257(6):1079-88. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318283a4d1. PubMed 23426338 ↗
  • Sima CS, Jarnagin WR, Fong Y, Elkin E, Fischer M, Wuest D, D'Angelica M, DeMatteo RP, Blumgart LH, Gonen M. Predicting the risk of perioperative transfusion for patients undergoing elective hepatectomy. Ann Surg. 2009 Dec;250(6):914-21. doi: 10.1097/sla.0b013e3181b7fad3. PubMed 19953711 ↗
  • Spolverato G, Ejaz A, Kim Y, Hall BL, Bilimoria K, Cohen M, Ko C, Pitt H, Pawlik TM. Patterns of care among patients undergoing hepatic resection: a query of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-targeted hepatectomy database. J Surg Res. 2015 Jun 15;196(2):221-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.02.016. Epub 2015 Mar 19. PubMed 25881789 ↗
  • Massicotte L, Perrault MA, Denault AY, Klinck JR, Beaulieu D, Roy JD, Thibeault L, Roy A, McCormack M, Karakiewicz P. Effects of phlebotomy and phenylephrine infusion on portal venous pressure and systemic hemodynamics during liver transplantation. Transplantation. 2010 Apr 27;89(8):920-7. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181d7c40c. PubMed 20216483 ↗
  • Martel G, Baker L, Wherrett C, Fergusson DA, Saidenberg E, Workneh A, Saeed S, Gadbois K, Jee R, McVicar J, Rao P, Thompson C, Wong P, Abou Khalil J, Bertens KA, Balaa FK. Phlebotomy resulting in controlled hypovolaemia to prevent blood loss in major hepatic resections (PRICE-1): a pilot randomized clinical trial for feasibility. Br J Surg. 2020 Jun;107(7):812-823. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11463. Epub 2020 Jan 22. PubMed 31965573 ↗
  • Rekman J, Wherrett C, Bennett S, Gostimir M, Saeed S, Lemon K, Mimeault R, Balaa FK, Martel G. Safety and feasibility of phlebotomy with controlled hypovolemia to minimize blood loss in liver resections. Surgery. 2017 Mar;161(3):650-657. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.08.026. Epub 2016 Oct 4. PubMed 27712877 ↗

Study documents

  • Informed consent form · Feb 16, 2016
  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Oct 15, 2018

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 18, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02548910
Lead sponsor
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 14, 2015
Start date
Apr 2016
Primary completion
Mar 2018
Completion
Mar 2018
Results posted
Mar 18, 2021
Last update
Mar 18, 2021

Study contacts

Guillaume Martel, MD, MSc, FRCSC, FACS
principal investigator · Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion