ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02546570Updated Apr 8, 2020Results posted

Oxytocin and Affect Processing in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder

A Phase 2 interventional study of Oxytocin and Placebo in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), sponsored by Yale University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 55 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-04-08.

Sponsored by Yale University · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
11
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 55 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The investigators will use multiple methods (including Oxytocin intranasal inhalation, neuroimaging, behavioral measures, peripheral hormone measurements) to examine how individuals' behavior, cognition, and brain function is impacted by the neuro-hormone Oxytocin. Specifically, the investigators plan to evaluate the influence of Oxytocin administration on affective processing in non-trauma exposed and trauma-exposed adults (both with and without posttraumatic stress disorder, PTSD).

Read the detailed description

The investigators will use multiple methods (including Oxytocin intranasal inhalation, neuroimaging, behavioral measures, peripheral hormone measurements) to examine how individuals' behavior, cognition, and brain function is impacted by the neuro-hormone Oxytocin. Specifically, the investigators plan to evaluate the influence of Oxytocin administration on affective processing in non-trauma exposed and trauma-exposed adults (both with and without posttraumatic stress disorder, PTSD). The investigators expect oxytocin (compared to placebo) to positively influence affect processing in healthy subjects, as well as among those diagnosed with PTSD. Given current literature, the investigators expect oxytocin to elevate the processing\perception of positive-related stimuli, and reduce the salience of aversive or un-pleasant cues. The investigators expect oxytocin to impact participants' brain function as measured with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while visually processing social and affect-related stimuli, rendering brain function and affective processing to be "more typical" or "adaptive" compared to placebo. Oxytocin's effect on human repertoire is not necessarily direct, but can interact with the individual's socioemotional characteristics, early life environment, and psychiatric symptoms. Therefore, the investigators will incorporate measures that capture the various dimensions that likely shape the effect of oxytocin.

02

Conditions studied

  • Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)
03

In context

Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic

2,284 studies on the registry are indexed under Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic; 557 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 11 is below the median of 70 across 1,897 interventional studies indexed under Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic.

Browse Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic studies →

Lead sponsor

Yale University is the lead sponsor of 1,763 studies on the registry; 292 are open to participants now.

Of its 217 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 128 (59%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 55 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults: age 18-55
  • Be in good medical health
  • Be cooperative with testing
  • English is a language spoken in the family
  • PTSD as diagnosed by a certified clinician or the research team for PTSD group.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Moderate or severe acute or chronic medical illnesses (e.g.cardiac disease, diabetes, epilepsy, influenza).
  • History of hypertension with baseline blood pressure above 160 mm Hg (systolic) over 100 mm Hg (diastolic).
  • history of syncope and/or baseline blood pressure below 100 mm Hg (systolic).
  • weight >300lb
  • The use of some psychotropic medications will not be allowed. Females taking contraceptive hormones will not be able to participate in the study.
  • Currently breast feeding or pregnant
  • For MRI ONLY: Any metal or electromagnetic implants
  • For MRI ONLY: Significant hearing loss or other severe sensory impairment
  • A fragile health status.
  • For MRI ONLY: A history of seizures or current use of anticonvulsants
  • Healthy adult controls (HC):
  • Be free of both neurological and psychiatric disorders (current and past) on the basis of self-report
  • Be free of psychiatric disorders
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
11 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Healthy adult controls (18-55)

    Drug: oxytocin and placebo nasal spray (within-subjects design, blinded and counterbalanced for two lab sessions); dosage=24 international units (IU). Participant inserts nasal spray container 1cm into nostril at angle of 45 degrees and sprays. Will wait 15 seconds then repeat administration to other nostril (alternating between nostrils). Participants will receive 6 puffs in total (3 in each nostril).

    Drug: Oxytocin · Drug: Placebo

  • Experimental
    Adults with PTSD (18-55)

    Drug: oxytocin and placebo nasal spray (within-subjects design, blinded and counterbalanced for two lab sessions); dosage=24 international units (IU). Participant inserts nasal spray container 1cm into nostril at angle of 45 degrees and sprays. Will wait 15 seconds then repeat administration to other nostril (alternating between nostrils). Participants will receive 6 puffs in total (3 in each nostril).

    Drug: Oxytocin · Drug: Placebo

  • Experimental
    Trauma-exposed/no-PTSD adults (18-55)

    Drug: oxytocin and placebo nasal spray (within-subjects design, blinded and counterbalanced for two lab sessions); dosage=24 international units (IU). Participant inserts nasal spray container 1cm into nostril at angle of 45 degrees and sprays. Will wait 15 seconds then repeat administration to other nostril (alternating between nostrils). Participants will receive 6 puffs in total (3 in each nostril).

    Drug: Oxytocin · Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • See arm/group descriptions for dosage amount and procedure.

    Also known as: Pitocin

  • DrugPlacebo

    See arm/group descriptions for dosage amount and procedure.

    Also known as: saline

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. fMRI Analysis: Change in Anterior Insula Region

    Change in blood-oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) contrast signal in regions of interest relevant to fear/threat (e.g., decrease in amygdala activation) and reward processing (increase in ventral striatum activation) in oxytocin versus placebo sessions. Forearm brush stroking targets C-tactile (CT) nerves, which respond to gentle touch and engage the insula and cortical brain regions that mediate social-emotional processing. Palm brush stroking is the control condition, in that CT afferents do not innervate the palm. We contrasted BOLD responses to gentle continuous brushing of the arm vs. palm (4 blocks of 8 trials each), expecting greater oxytocin-related increases in brain reactivity within the insula and other regions in the forearm condition versus the palm condition. The values are % signal change from baseline.

    Time frame: 1 week; fMRI data collected at second and third visits, one week apart

  2. fMRI Analysis: Change in Accumbens Region

    Change in blood-oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) contrast signal in regions of interest relevant to fear/threat (e.g., decrease in amygdala activation) and reward processing (increase in ventral striatum activation) in oxytocin versus placebo sessions. Forearm brush stroking targets C-tactile (CT) nerves, which respond to gentle touch and engage the insula and cortical brain regions that mediate social-emotional processing. Palm brush stroking is the control condition, in that CT afferents do not innervate the palm. We contrasted BOLD responses to gentle continuous brushing of the arm vs. palm (4 blocks of 8 trials each), expecting greater oxytocin-related increases in brain reactivity within the insula and other regions in the forearm condition versus the palm condition. The values are % signal change from baseline.

    Time frame: 1 week; fMRI data collected at second and third visits, one week apart

  3. fMRI Analysis: Change in Amygdala Region

    Change in blood-oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) contrast signal in regions of interest relevant to fear/threat (e.g., decrease in amygdala activation) and reward processing (increase in ventral striatum activation) in oxytocin versus placebo sessions. Forearm brush stroking targets C-tactile (CT) nerves, which respond to gentle touch and engage the insula and cortical brain regions that mediate social-emotional processing. Palm brush stroking is the control condition, in that CT afferents do not innervate the palm. We contrasted BOLD responses to gentle continuous brushing of the arm vs. palm (4 blocks of 8 trials each), expecting greater oxytocin-related increases in brain reactivity within the insula and other regions in the forearm condition versus the palm condition. The values are % signal change from baseline.

    Time frame: 1 week; fMRI data collected at second and third visits, one week apart

  4. fMRI Analysis: Change in dACC Region

    Change in blood-oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) contrast signal in regions of interest relevant to fear/threat (e.g., decrease in amygdala activation) and reward processing (increase in ventral striatum activation) in oxytocin versus placebo sessions. Forearm brush stroking targets C-tactile (CT) nerves, which respond to gentle touch and engage the insula and cortical brain regions that mediate social-emotional processing. Palm brush stroking is the control condition, in that CT afferents do not innervate the palm. We contrasted BOLD responses to gentle continuous brushing of the arm vs. palm (4 blocks of 8 trials each), expecting greater oxytocin-related increases in brain reactivity within the insula and other regions in the forearm condition versus the palm condition. The values are % signal change from baseline.

    Time frame: 1 week; fMRI data collected at second and third visits, one week apart

  5. fMRI Analysis: Change in mOFC Region

    Change in blood-oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) contrast signal in regions of interest relevant to fear/threat (e.g., decrease in amygdala activation) and reward processing (increase in ventral striatum activation) in oxytocin versus placebo sessions. Forearm brush stroking targets C-tactile (CT) nerves, which respond to gentle touch and engage the insula and cortical brain regions that mediate social-emotional processing. Palm brush stroking is the control condition, in that CT afferents do not innervate the palm. We contrasted BOLD responses to gentle continuous brushing of the arm vs. palm (4 blocks of 8 trials each), expecting greater oxytocin-related increases in brain reactivity within the insula and other regions in the forearm condition versus the palm condition. The values are % signal change from baseline.

    Time frame: 1 week; fMRI data collected at second and third visits, one week apart

  6. fMRI Analysis: Change in rACC Region

    Change in blood-oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) contrast signal in regions of interest relevant to fear/threat (e.g., decrease in amygdala activation) and reward processing (increase in ventral striatum activation) in oxytocin versus placebo sessions. Forearm brush stroking targets C-tactile (CT) nerves, which respond to gentle touch and engage the insula and cortical brain regions that mediate social-emotional processing. Palm brush stroking is the control condition, in that CT afferents do not innervate the palm. We contrasted BOLD responses to gentle continuous brushing of the arm vs. palm (4 blocks of 8 trials each), expecting greater oxytocin-related increases in brain reactivity within the insula and other regions in the forearm condition versus the palm condition. The values are % signal change from baseline.

    Time frame: 1 week; fMRI data collected at second and third visits, one week apart

  7. fMRI Analysis: Change in vmPFC Region

    Change in blood-oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) contrast signal in regions of interest relevant to fear/threat (e.g., decrease in amygdala activation) and reward processing (increase in ventral striatum activation) in oxytocin versus placebo sessions. Forearm brush stroking targets C-tactile (CT) nerves, which respond to gentle touch and engage the insula and cortical brain regions that mediate social-emotional processing. Palm brush stroking is the control condition, in that CT afferents do not innervate the palm. We contrasted BOLD responses to gentle continuous brushing of the arm vs. palm (4 blocks of 8 trials each), expecting greater oxytocin-related increases in brain reactivity within the insula and other regions in the forearm condition versus the palm condition. The values are % signal change from baseline.

    Time frame: 1 week; fMRI data collected at second and third visits, one week apart

Secondary outcomes

  1. Salivary Oxytocin

    Expect within-session (30 min) increase in peripheral salivary oxytocin level during OT sessions (within-session), and higher OT levels in oxytocin administration vs. placebo sessions. Peripheral OT levels measured with Salivettes (sterile cotton participants will be asked to chew on for 1 minutes).

    Time frame: Within session (30 min) and between sessions (1 week); saliva samples collected twice (before and after OT administration) at both second and third visits, one week apart

07

Results

Posted Apr 8, 2020

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneAdults With PTSD (18-55)Trauma-exposed/No-PTSD Adults (18-55)
Started92
Crossover order: oxytocin, placebo62
Crossover order: placebo, oxytocin30
Completed92
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryfMRI Analysis: Change in Anterior Insula Region

Change in blood-oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) contrast signal in regions of interest relevant to fear/threat (e.g., decrease in amygdala activation) and reward processing (increase in ventral striatum activation) in oxytocin versus placebo sessions. Forearm brush stroking targets C-tactile (CT) nerves, which respond to gentle touch and engage the insula and cortical brain regions that mediate social-emotional processing. Palm brush stroking is the control condition, in that CT afferents do not innervate the palm. We contrasted BOLD responses to gentle continuous brushing of the arm vs. palm (4 blocks of 8 trials each), expecting greater oxytocin-related increases in brain reactivity within the insula and other regions in the forearm condition versus the palm condition. The values are % signal change from baseline.

Time frame:
1 week; fMRI data collected at second and third visits, one week apart
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of area activation
fMRI Analysis: Change in Anterior Insula Region
percentage of area activationAdults With PTSD (18-55): DrugAdults With PTSD (18-55): PlaceboAdults Without PTSD (18-55): DrugAdults Without PTSD (18-55): Placebo
forearm-12.6 (-39.7 to 14.3)-1.6 (-13.5 to 10.3)10.6 (-100 to 100)-7.8 (-64.4 to 48.8)
palm-13.9 (-39.7 to 11.8)3.9 (-12.9 to 20.9)5.9 (-100 to 100)3.6 (-100 to 100)
PrimaryfMRI Analysis: Change in Accumbens Region

Change in blood-oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) contrast signal in regions of interest relevant to fear/threat (e.g., decrease in amygdala activation) and reward processing (increase in ventral striatum activation) in oxytocin versus placebo sessions. Forearm brush stroking targets C-tactile (CT) nerves, which respond to gentle touch and engage the insula and cortical brain regions that mediate social-emotional processing. Palm brush stroking is the control condition, in that CT afferents do not innervate the palm. We contrasted BOLD responses to gentle continuous brushing of the arm vs. palm (4 blocks of 8 trials each), expecting greater oxytocin-related increases in brain reactivity within the insula and other regions in the forearm condition versus the palm condition. The values are % signal change from baseline.

Time frame:
1 week; fMRI data collected at second and third visits, one week apart
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of area activation
fMRI Analysis: Change in Accumbens Region
percentage of area activationAdults With PTSD (18-55): DrugAdults With PTSD (18-55): PlaceboAdults Without PTSD (18-55): DrugAdults Without PTSD (18-55): Placebo
forearm7.6 (-5.4 to 20.7)-7.9 (-17.3 to 1.5)-17.2 (-100 to 100)-12.7 (-70.6 to 45.1)
palm-14.8 (-25.8 to -3.9)-8.0 (-25.4 to 9.3)-8.5 (-87.8 to 70.7)1.2 (-100 to 100)
PrimaryfMRI Analysis: Change in Amygdala Region

Change in blood-oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) contrast signal in regions of interest relevant to fear/threat (e.g., decrease in amygdala activation) and reward processing (increase in ventral striatum activation) in oxytocin versus placebo sessions. Forearm brush stroking targets C-tactile (CT) nerves, which respond to gentle touch and engage the insula and cortical brain regions that mediate social-emotional processing. Palm brush stroking is the control condition, in that CT afferents do not innervate the palm. We contrasted BOLD responses to gentle continuous brushing of the arm vs. palm (4 blocks of 8 trials each), expecting greater oxytocin-related increases in brain reactivity within the insula and other regions in the forearm condition versus the palm condition. The values are % signal change from baseline.

Time frame:
1 week; fMRI data collected at second and third visits, one week apart
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of area activation
fMRI Analysis: Change in Amygdala Region
percentage of area activationAdults With PTSD (18-55): DrugAdults With PTSD (18-55): PlaceboAdults Without PTSD (18-55): DrugAdults Without PTSD (18-55): Placebo
forearm-3.8 (-13.7 to 6.1)-9.1 (-20.6 to 2.3)14.5 (-24.9 to 54.1)-6.7 (-74.8 to 61.3)
palm-4.2 (-13.6 to 5.2).58 (-11.0 to 12.2)16.7 (-100 to 100)-.45 (-90.2 to 89.4)
PrimaryfMRI Analysis: Change in dACC Region

Change in blood-oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) contrast signal in regions of interest relevant to fear/threat (e.g., decrease in amygdala activation) and reward processing (increase in ventral striatum activation) in oxytocin versus placebo sessions. Forearm brush stroking targets C-tactile (CT) nerves, which respond to gentle touch and engage the insula and cortical brain regions that mediate social-emotional processing. Palm brush stroking is the control condition, in that CT afferents do not innervate the palm. We contrasted BOLD responses to gentle continuous brushing of the arm vs. palm (4 blocks of 8 trials each), expecting greater oxytocin-related increases in brain reactivity within the insula and other regions in the forearm condition versus the palm condition. The values are % signal change from baseline.

Time frame:
1 week; fMRI data collected at second and third visits, one week apart
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of area activation
fMRI Analysis: Change in dACC Region
percentage of area activationAdults With and Without PTSD (18-55): DrugAdults With and Without PTSD (18-55): PlaceboAdults Without PTSD (18-55): DrugAdults Without PTSD (18-55): Placebo
forearm-20.9 (-52.6 to 10.7)-16.4 (-28.2 to -4.6)-4.8 (-6.6 to -3.0)-30.2 (-62.3 to 1.8)
palm-23.8 (-48.3 to 0.5)-7.5 (-25.0 to 9.9)-10.9 (-100 to 100)-12.7 (-65.7 to 40.3)
PrimaryfMRI Analysis: Change in mOFC Region

Change in blood-oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) contrast signal in regions of interest relevant to fear/threat (e.g., decrease in amygdala activation) and reward processing (increase in ventral striatum activation) in oxytocin versus placebo sessions. Forearm brush stroking targets C-tactile (CT) nerves, which respond to gentle touch and engage the insula and cortical brain regions that mediate social-emotional processing. Palm brush stroking is the control condition, in that CT afferents do not innervate the palm. We contrasted BOLD responses to gentle continuous brushing of the arm vs. palm (4 blocks of 8 trials each), expecting greater oxytocin-related increases in brain reactivity within the insula and other regions in the forearm condition versus the palm condition. The values are % signal change from baseline.

Time frame:
1 week; fMRI data collected at second and third visits, one week apart
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of area activation
fMRI Analysis: Change in mOFC Region
percentage of area activationAdults With PTSD (18-55): DrugAdults With PTSD (18-55): PlaceboAdults Without PTSD (18-55): DrugAdults Without PTSD (18-55): Placebo
forearm1.5 (-6.8 to 9.8)2.5 (-6.8 to 22.7)1.7 (-92.6 to 96.2)-8.1 (-100 to 100)
palm-4.9 (-18.2 to 8.2)12.3 (2.0 to 22.7)4.2 (-46.3 to 54.9)10.3 (-21.6 to 23.7)
PrimaryfMRI Analysis: Change in rACC Region

Change in blood-oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) contrast signal in regions of interest relevant to fear/threat (e.g., decrease in amygdala activation) and reward processing (increase in ventral striatum activation) in oxytocin versus placebo sessions. Forearm brush stroking targets C-tactile (CT) nerves, which respond to gentle touch and engage the insula and cortical brain regions that mediate social-emotional processing. Palm brush stroking is the control condition, in that CT afferents do not innervate the palm. We contrasted BOLD responses to gentle continuous brushing of the arm vs. palm (4 blocks of 8 trials each), expecting greater oxytocin-related increases in brain reactivity within the insula and other regions in the forearm condition versus the palm condition. The values are % signal change from baseline.

Time frame:
1 week; fMRI data collected at second and third visits, one week apart
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of area activation
fMRI Analysis: Change in rACC Region
percentage of area activationAdults With PTSD (18-55): DrugAdults With PTSD (18-55): PlaceboAdults Without PTSD (18-55): DrugAdults Without PTSD (18-55): Placebo
forearm-5.9 (-16.0 to 4.0)-4.4 (-12.0 to 3.0)-0.2 (-15.2 to 14.8)-16.3 (-36.7 to 4.1)
palm-9.2 (-21.9 to 3.4)0.7 (-7.7 to 9.3)-1.6 (-100 to 100)-7.6 (-100 to 100)
PrimaryfMRI Analysis: Change in vmPFC Region

Change in blood-oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) contrast signal in regions of interest relevant to fear/threat (e.g., decrease in amygdala activation) and reward processing (increase in ventral striatum activation) in oxytocin versus placebo sessions. Forearm brush stroking targets C-tactile (CT) nerves, which respond to gentle touch and engage the insula and cortical brain regions that mediate social-emotional processing. Palm brush stroking is the control condition, in that CT afferents do not innervate the palm. We contrasted BOLD responses to gentle continuous brushing of the arm vs. palm (4 blocks of 8 trials each), expecting greater oxytocin-related increases in brain reactivity within the insula and other regions in the forearm condition versus the palm condition. The values are % signal change from baseline.

Time frame:
1 week; fMRI data collected at second and third visits, one week apart
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of area activation
fMRI Analysis: Change in vmPFC Region
percentage of area activationAdults With and Without PTSD (18-55): DrugAdults With and Without PTSD (18-55): PlaceboAdults Without PTSD (18-55): DrugAdults Without PTSD (18-55): Placebo
forearm-3.8 (-10.5 to 2.7)-6.8 (-13.0 to -0.6)-3.3 (-24.8 to 18.0)-16.0 (-96.7 to 64.6)
palm-12.0 (-26.6 to 2.5)2.4 (-7.4 to 12.4)-2.8 (-67.5 to 61.7)-10.4 (-100 to 100)
SecondarySalivary Oxytocin

Expect within-session (30 min) increase in peripheral salivary oxytocin level during OT sessions (within-session), and higher OT levels in oxytocin administration vs. placebo sessions. Peripheral OT levels measured with Salivettes (sterile cotton participants will be asked to chew on for 1 minutes).

Time frame:
Within session (30 min) and between sessions (1 week); saliva samples collected twice (before and after OT administration) at both second and third visits, one week apart

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Adults With PTSD (18-55)0/9 (0%)0/9 (0%)0/9 (0%)
Trauma-exposed/No-PTSD Adults (18-55)0/2 (0%)0/2 (0%)0/2 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Combat Veterans

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Adults With PTSD (18-55)Trauma-exposed/No-PTSD Adults (18-55)Total
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years9211
>=65 years000
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Adults With PTSD (18-55)Trauma-exposed/No-PTSD Adults (18-55)Total
Female000
Male9211
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Yale University
    New Haven, Connecticut 06520, United States
09

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 8, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02546570
Lead sponsor
Yale University
Collaborators
National Center for PTSD
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 11, 2015
Start date
Aug 2015
Primary completion
Aug 2016
Completion
Aug 2016
Results posted
Apr 8, 2020
Last update
Apr 8, 2020

Study contacts

Linda Mayes, MD
principal investigator · Yale University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Oxytocin

Start the discussion