ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07890961PREVENT-RUpdated Oct 23, 2026

A Clinician-Patient Dual Behavior Change Framework to Leverage Informed Digital Nudges to Reduce Hospital Readmissions and Improve Patient Outcomes: A Trial for Scalable Strategy to Reduce Readmissions (PREVENT-R)

An interventional study of Digital nudge prompting in Readmission, Readmission Rates and Readmission, Hospital, sponsored by Yale University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 65 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-23.

Sponsored by Yale University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Updated Oct 23, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
800
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
65 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The PREVENT-R trial will evaluate an intervention targeting both clinician and patient behavior. The clinician-focused piece consists of an electronic medical record-based digital nudge presented to emergency department clinicians caring for eligible older adults at high risk of readmission. The nudge is intended to prompt clinicians to consider referral to the Service Navigator Program from the Agency on Aging of South Central Connecticut for patients with needs that may be addressed through community-based services and supports. The study will evaluate whether these mechanisms (clinician referral and patient program acceptance behavior) are associated with subsequent Emergency Department (ED) revisits and 30-day hospital re-admissions.

02

Conditions studied

  • Readmission
  • Readmission Rates
  • Readmission, Hospital
  • Elderly (People Aged 65 or More)

Keywords

  • Digital Health
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Yale University is the lead sponsor of 1,763 studies on the registry; 292 are open to participants now.

Of its 217 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 128 (59%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Patient Participants:

  • Hospitalization within the previous 30 days.
  • Identified as being at high risk for readmission by the EMR-embedded algorithm.
  • Reside in a geographic area identified as having high health-related social needs based on the Community Health Needs Assessment (CHNA).
  • For consent-dependent patient research activities, able to provide informed consent.

Clinician Participants:

  • ED clinicians who have experience with the PREVENT-R intervention and/or SNP referral process and are able to provide informed consent for participation in the qualitative interview.

Service Navigator Participants:

  • Individuals involved in delivering SNP services to patients enrolled in or referred through PREVENT-R and who are able to provide informed consent for participation in the qualitative interview.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Patient Participants:

  • Require immediate hospital admission.
  • Receiving hospice, skilled nursing facility, or palliative care.
  • Unable to participate in study procedures in English or Spanish.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
800 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    EMR-based digital nudge

    The EMR will generate a digital nudge prompting the ED clinician to consider referral of the eligible patient to the SNP. Patients referred to the SNP will have the opportunity to engage with an SN and receive individualized navigation and support based on their identified needs.

    Behavioral: Digital nudge prompting

  • No intervention
    Control Arm

    No study-related EMR digital nudge will be generated. Clinicians will proceed with usual ED care and discharge practices, which may include referral to the SNP when clinically appropriate.

Interventions

  • BehavioralDigital nudge prompting

    The EMR will generate a digital nudge prompting the treating ED clinician to consider referral of the patient to the SNP.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of participants with hospital readmissions

    Hospital readmission within 30 days of the index ED visit.

    Time frame: 30 days following the index ED

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of participants referred to the SNP

    Percentage of participants referred to the SNP to assess clinician referral behavior

    Time frame: up to 3 months

  2. Percentage of participants that accept or decline SNP services

    Percentage of participants that accept or decline SNP services among those referred to and successfully contacted by the SNPt o assess patient acceptance

    Time frame: up to 3 months

  3. Post-SNP assessment

    Patient-reported experience and outcomes will be assessed using the SNP survey administered at completion of SNP services. (This assessment is currently being refined.)

    Time frame: up to 3 months

  4. Percentage of participants that interact with SNs

    Percentage of intervention arm participants that interact with SNs

    Time frame: up to 3 months

  5. Percentage of participants that utilize services

    Percentage of intervention arm participants that utilized recommended services and supports.

    Time frame: up to 3 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Yale New Haven Hospital System
    New Haven, Connecticut 06520, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Nov 2026; primary completion for May 2028, 18 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 15, 2026
First posted
Oct 23, 2026
StartEst.
Nov 2026
Primary completionEst.
May 2028
CompletionEst.
Nov 2028
Last update
Oct 23, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 23, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 23, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07890961
Lead sponsor
Yale University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 23, 2026
Start date
Nov 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
May 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 23, 2026

Study contacts

Fuad Abujarad, PhD, MSc
Contact
fuad.abujarad@yale.edu
203-737-5088
Fuad Abujarad, PhD, MSc
principal investigator · Yale University

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion