CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02544412PSTUpdated Jan 26, 2021

A Well-being Training for Preservice Teachers

An interventional study of novel mindfulness-based well-being training in Burnout, Professional, Stress, Psychological and Well-being, sponsored by University of Wisconsin, Madison. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-01-26.

Sponsored by University of Wisconsin, Madison · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
98
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this project is to study whether a mindfulness-based training program supports self-regulation, resiliency, effective classroom behaviors, and persistence in teaching.

Read the detailed description

Participants in this study will be undergraduate pre-service teachers already enrolled in the Early Elementary Certification Program (EECP) in the School of Education. This competitive admission program is four semesters long and consists of 4 certificate granting areas. Over the course of 2 years (i.e., 4 semesters), the investigators will recruit a total of 8 cohorts; 2 from each certificate granting area. Participants will be recruited during their second semester in the program for enrollment during the third semester (i.e., enrollment first semester of senior year). Cohorts will be match randomized by cohort type, ensuring that 4 cohorts are randomized to treatment and 4 cohorts are randomized to teacher education as usual, and that one of each type of cohort is randomized to treatment and control, respectively.

All participants will complete a battery of self-report and behavioral tasks, as well as undergo a standardized classroom observation prior to the start of the intervention, immediately after the intervention, and at follow-up (5-8 months post intervention). Follow-up testing will occur during the final month of the final semester in the EECP program, a time during which participants will be full-time student teaching, training that best approximates in-service teaching. The qualitative component of this study will involve participants partaking in approximately four-hours of interviews (either group or individual based on a hierarchal sampling criterion), before and after the intervention period. In addition, all student EECP records will be qualitatively analyzed (i.e., supervisor notes, state certification portfolios). Each September for three years post-graduation, participants will be contacted and instructed to complete an online survey consisting of self-report inventories and information about whether they are continuing to teach and if so, the name and district of the school they currently work.

Participants randomized to treatment will receive 1.5 hours of mindfulness training for 8 to 10 weeks during their third semester. Thirty minutes of this will occur during mandatory cohort seminar time, with the remaining one-hour after the end of cohort seminar time. In addition, during the intervention period they will participate in two 4-hour "Days of Mindfulness." In total, intervention participants will receive about 21 hours of instruction in mindfulness over the intervention period. During the following semester (4th semester), intervention participants will receive 15 minutes of mindfulness "booster" practice each week as part of their mandatory cohort seminar.

This novel mindfulness based intervention is incorporates elements of Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction (Kabat-Zinn, 1982), as well as contemplative practices that might be defined as social connectedness practices or constructivist practices (Dahl, Lutz, \& Davidson, 2015). The curriculum has been developed by experienced mindfulness teachers (>10 years teaching experience, on average), all of whom have extensive meditation histories and most of whom have long-term experience as classroom teachers. The training will consist of formal and informal mindfulness meditation practices.

02

Conditions studied

  • Burnout, Professional
  • Stress, Psychological
  • Well-being
  • Psychological Adjustment
  • Self-regulation

Keywords

  • Mindfulness
  • School Teachers
  • preservice teachers
  • teacher education
03

In context

Burnout, Professional

214 studies on the registry are indexed under Burnout, Professional; 33 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 98 is above the median of 80 across 158 interventional studies indexed under Burnout, Professional.

Browse Burnout, Professional studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Wisconsin, Madison is the lead sponsor of 1,161 studies on the registry; 182 are open to participants now.

Of its 151 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 114 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Undergraduate students in good academic standing entering their third semester of one of the following teacher education certificate programs (Early Education ESL, Middle Education SPED, Middle Education Content, Middle Education ESL). Note that good academic standing is a requirement for continuation in the certification program.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A history of schizophrenia-spectrum, bipolar disorder, or other psychotic disorders
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
98 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention Group

    A novel mindfulness-based well-being training for preservice teachers will be employed. The intervention will be held once a week for 8-10 weeks. Two 4-hour "days of mindfulness" will also be implemented during the intervention period. The intervention will involve training in a range of attentional and constructive (Dahl, Lutz, \& Davidson) contemplative practices. During the follow-up period participants will receive weekly 15 minute "booster" trainings.

    Behavioral: novel mindfulness-based well-being training

  • No intervention
    Control Group

    Teacher education as usual. These participants will continue with the prescribed teacher training regime established by the Early Education Certification Program at the university.

Interventions

  • Behavioralnovel mindfulness-based well-being training
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline on CLASS assessment tool (La Paro, Pianta, & Stuhlman, 2004)

    A standardized classroom observation tool assessing teacher classroom behaviors.

    Time frame: 1-2 weeks before intervention (i.e., baseline), 11 - 12 weeks after baseline (1-2 weeks post-intervention), 8 - 11 months after baseline ( 5-8 months post intervention)

  2. Change from baseline on Symptoms Checklist 90 Revised (Derogatis, 1994)

    a 90-item self-report of psychological symptoms comprised of 9 symptom axes (somatization, obsessive-compulsive, interpersonal sensitivity, depression, anxiety, hostility, phobic anxiety, paranoid ideation and psychoticism). An aggregated score across all 9 domains provides a Global Severity Index score of psychological health.

    Time frame: 1-2 weeks before intervention (i.e., baseline), 11 - 12 weeks after baseline (1-2 weeks post-intervention), 8 - 11 months after baseline ( 5-8 months post intervention)

  3. Change from baseline on Maslach Burnout Inventory - Education Survey (Maslach, Jackson, & Leiter, 1996)

    a 22-item self-report of teaching related burnout

    Time frame: 1-2 weeks before intervention (i.e., baseline), 11-12 weeks after baseline (1-2 weeks post-intervention), 8-11 months after baseline (5-8 months post-intervention): ~14 months after baseline, ~26 months after baseline, and ~38 months after baseline

  4. Change from baseline on Emotional go/nogo (Hare et al., 2008)

    An emotional inhibition paradigm.

    Time frame: 1-2 weeks before intervention (i.e., baseline), 11 - 12 weeks after baseline (1-2 weeks post-intervention), 8 - 11 months after baseline ( 5-8 months post intervention)

  5. Persistence in teaching: Current profession and role (if teaching, name of school)

    Self-report on employment status following graduation and teacher licensure.

    Time frame: ~ 14 months after baseline, ~ 26 months after baseline, and ~ 38 months after baseline.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline on Implicit Positive and Negative Affect Test (Quirin, Kazen, & Kuhl, 2009)

    A computer-based behavioral measure of implicit affective bias in which participants are provided with 5 nonsense words and asked to rate the words on a scale of emotional valence.

    Time frame: 1-2 weeks before intervention (i.e., baseline), 11-12 weeks after baseline (1-2 weeks post-intervention), 8-11 months after baseline (5-8 months post-intervention): ~14 months after baseline, ~26 months after baseline, and ~38 months after baseline

  2. Change from baseline on General Self-efficacy Scale (Jerusalem & Schwarzer, 1992)

    A 10-item self-report of general self-efficacy

    Time frame: 1-2 weeks before intervention (i.e., baseline), 11 - 12 weeks after baseline (1-2 weeks post-intervention), 8 - 11 months after baseline ( 5-8 months post intervention)

  3. Change from baseline on Psychological Well-Being Scale (Ryff & Keyes, 1995)

    A 54-item self-report inventory assessing psychological well-being.

    Time frame: 1-2 weeks before intervention (i.e., baseline), 11-12 weeks after baseline (1-2 weeks post-intervention), 8-11 months after baseline (5-8 months post-intervention): ~14 months after baseline, ~26 months after baseline, and ~38 months after baseline

  4. Change from baseline on Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (Watson, Clark, & Tellegen, 1988)

    A self-report survey of general positive and negative affect.

    Time frame: 1-2 weeks before intervention (i.e., baseline), 11 - 12 weeks after baseline (1-2 weeks post-intervention), 8 - 11 months after baseline ( 5-8 months post intervention)

  5. Change from baseline on Emotional Styles Questionnaire (under development)

    A self-report designed to assess styles of emotional responding.

    Time frame: 1-2 weeks before intervention (i.e., baseline), 11-12 weeks after baseline (1-2 weeks post-intervention), 8-11 months after baseline (5-8 months post-intervention): ~14 months after baseline, ~26 months after baseline, and ~38 months after baseline

  6. Change from baseline on Open response on difficulties in teaching

    A one-item open response on difficulty in teaching.

    Time frame: 1-2 weeks before intervention (i.e., baseline), 11 - 12 weeks after baseline (1-2 weeks post-intervention), 8 - 11 months after baseline ( 5-8 months post intervention)

  7. Change from baseline on Perceived Stress Scale (Cohen, Kamarck, & Mermelstein, 1983)

    A 10-item self-report on perceived stress in the last month.

    Time frame: 1-2 weeks before intervention (i.e., baseline), 11 - 12 weeks after baseline (1-2 weeks post-intervention), 8 - 11 months after baseline ( 5-8 months post intervention)

  8. Change from baseline on Implicit Association Task (Race, child and adult versions; Baron & Banaji, 2006)

    A behavioral task designed to assess implicit biases related to race.

    Time frame: 1-2 weeks before intervention (i.e., baseline), 11 - 12 weeks after baseline (1-2 weeks post-intervention), 8 - 11 months after baseline ( 5-8 months post intervention)

  9. Change from baseline on Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (Baer et al., 2008)

    A 39-item self-report of mindfulness

    Time frame: 1-2 weeks before intervention (i.e., baseline), 11 - 12 weeks after baseline (1-2 weeks post-intervention), 8 - 11 months after baseline ( 5-8 months post intervention)

  10. Change from baseline on Breath Count Task (Levinson et al., 2014)

    15 minute behavioral measure of mindfulness

    Time frame: 1-2 weeks before intervention (i.e., baseline), 11 - 12 weeks after baseline (1-2 weeks post-intervention), 8 - 11 months after baseline ( 5-8 months post intervention)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • UW Madison Department of Curriculum and Instruction
    Madison, Wisconsin 53706, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Kabat-Zinn J. An outpatient program in behavioral medicine for chronic pain patients based on the practice of mindfulness meditation: theoretical considerations and preliminary results. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1982 Apr;4(1):33-47. doi: 10.1016/0163-8343(82)90026-3. PubMed 7042457 ↗
  • La Paro, K. M., Pianta, R. C., & Stuhlman, M. (2004). The Classroom Assessment Scoring System: Findings from the prekindergarten year. The Elementary School Journal, 104(5), 409-426. http://doi.org/10.1086/499760
  • Levinson DB, Stoll EL, Kindy SD, Merry HL, Davidson RJ. A mind you can count on: validating breath counting as a behavioral measure of mindfulness. Front Psychol. 2014 Oct 24;5:1202. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01202. eCollection 2014. PubMed 25386148 ↗
  • Dahl CJ, Lutz A, Davidson RJ. Reconstructing and deconstructing the self: cognitive mechanisms in meditation practice. Trends Cogn Sci. 2015 Sep;19(9):515-23. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.07.001. Epub 2015 Jul 28. PubMed 26231761 ↗
  • Derogatis, L. R. (1994). SCL-90-R Symptom Checklist-90-R administration, scoring and procedures manual. Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems.
  • Maslach, C., Jackson, S. E., & Leiter, M. P. (1996). Maslach burnout inventory manual . Mountain View, CA: CPP. Inc., and Davies-Black.
  • Baron AS, Banaji MR. The development of implicit attitudes. Evidence of race evaluations from ages 6 and 10 and adulthood. Psychol Sci. 2006 Jan;17(1):53-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01664.x. PubMed 16371144 ↗
  • Baer RA, Smith GT, Lykins E, Button D, Krietemeyer J, Sauer S, Walsh E, Duggan D, Williams JM. Construct validity of the five facet mindfulness questionnaire in meditating and nonmeditating samples. Assessment. 2008 Sep;15(3):329-42. doi: 10.1177/1073191107313003. Epub 2008 Feb 29. PubMed 18310597 ↗
  • Quirin M, Kazen M, Kuhl J. When nonsense sounds happy or helpless: The Implicit Positive and Negative Affect Test (IPANAT). J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Sep;97(3):500-16. doi: 10.1037/a0016063. PubMed 19686004 ↗
  • Jerusalem, M., & Schwarzer, R. (1992). Self-efficacy as a resource factor in stress appraisal processes. Self-efficacy: Thought control of action, 195-213.
  • Ryff CD, Keyes CL. The structure of psychological well-being revisited. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1995 Oct;69(4):719-27. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.69.4.719. PubMed 7473027 ↗
  • Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988 Jun;54(6):1063-70. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063. PubMed 3397865 ↗
  • Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983 Dec;24(4):385-96. No abstract available. PubMed 6668417 ↗
  • Hare TA, Tottenham N, Galvan A, Voss HU, Glover GH, Casey BJ. Biological substrates of emotional reactivity and regulation in adolescence during an emotional go-nogo task. Biol Psychiatry. 2008 May 15;63(10):927-34. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.03.015. PubMed 18452757 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 26, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02544412
Lead sponsor
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Collaborators
Mind and Life Institute, Hadley, Massachusetts, The Trust for the Meditation Process
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 9, 2015
Start date
Sep 1, 2015
Primary completion
Dec 14, 2017
Completion
Dec 11, 2020
Last update
Jan 26, 2021

Study contacts

Lisa Flook, PhD
principal investigator · University of Wisconsin, Madison
Matthew J Hirshberg, PhD
study director · University of Wisconsin, Madison

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion