An interventional study of Patient education and Physical activity in Chronic Pain, sponsored by Norwegian University of Science and Technology. Completed at 1 site in Norway. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-01-23.
Sponsored by Norwegian University of Science and Technology · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care
The study's primary objective is to test the hypothesis that a group-based health promotion intervention with patient education and practical exercises delivered at a Healthy Life Centre increases patient activation in people living with chronic pain. Due to many people living with chronic pain, interventions focusing on self-management and coping are on the agenda in primary care. This study will investigate whether a Healthy Life Centre in a municipality is a suitable setting for interventions targeting people living with chronic pain. Short and long term effect of an intervention developed in a health promotion and salutogenic framework will be investigated in a randomized clinical trial.
Previous research indicates that if self-management interventions are developed within a health promotion framework focusing on the participants' strengths, there is a beneficial effect on patient activation and thus on self-management behaviour. However, there is a lack of knowledge about which interventions will improve patient activation for persons with chronic pain. To be sustainable, such interventions should be delivered using the least possible amount of resources needed to get an effect. One way to do so is to deliver the intervention in primary care instead of in hospitals. The Healthy Life Centre is ideally situated to deliver these interventions. This is especially true due to their task of focusing on health promotion but also because they are set up to deliver low level interventions, meaning that it should be easy for everyone to access their services.
2,930 studies on the registry are indexed under Chronic Pain; 701 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 121 is above the median of 60 across 2,161 interventional studies indexed under Chronic Pain.
Browse Chronic Pain studies →Norwegian University of Science and Technology is the lead sponsor of 487 studies on the registry; 52 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
The self-management patient education has been developed at the Healthy Life Centre in Trondheim municipality based on cognitive behavioural theory and psychomotor physiotherapy. The intervention is developed in a health promotion framework focusing on salutogenesis aiming to improve the participants ability to activate their own resources for health behaviour changes .
Behavioral: Patient education
Physical activity once a week for a period of 6 weeks in form of walking and simple strength exercises outdoor in groups led by an instructor. .
Behavioral: Physical activity
Self-management patient education in groups once a week for 6 weeks. Each session include pain-related theory, group discussions and physical exercises focusing on posture and relaxation. Instructors with education in health promotion and behavioural change in addition to psychomotor physiotherapy.
Physical activity once a week for a period of 6 weeks in form of walking and simple strength exercises outdoor in groups led by an instructor. Each session has a duration of one hour. The instructor has education in physical activity.
Patient Activation Measure (PAM)- 13 items
Self-reported questionnaire at baseline, and 3- 6- 12 months after intervention. PAM-13 is an interval-level, uni-dimensional measure questionnaire with a four point scale with an additional not applicable option, giving a raw score from 13- 52, which is calibrated to a total score between 0 (less activated) to 100 (most activated).
Time frame: 1 year
Sense of Coherence (SOC) according to SOC-13 questionnaire
Self-reported questionnaire, The SOC-13, at baseline, and 3-6-12 months after intervention. The questionnaire consists of 13 items with seven options for answers, each with a scoring range from 1 to 7, giving a total score from 13 to 91.
Time frame: 1 year
Psychological distress on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Self-reported questionnaire, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at baseline, and 3-6-12 months after intervention. The questionnaire consists of 14 items producing a separate score for anxiety and depression. The instrument has a total range from 0 (best) to 42 (worst).
Time frame: 1 year
Pain severity in Brief Pain Questionnaire
Self-reported pain severity measured by 4 questions in the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) instrument. All items in BPI are scored using a numeric rating scale from 0 to 10. Measured at baseline, and 3-6-12 months after intervention.
Time frame: 1 year
Pain interference in Brief Pain Questionnaire
Self-reported pain interference measured by 7 questions in the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) instrument. All items in BPI are scored using a numeric rating scale from 0 to 10. Measured at baseline, and 3-6-12 months after intervention.
Time frame: 1 year
Pain intensity on a Visual Analogue Scale 100-mm
Self-reported experience of pain during the previous week using a one-item 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale at baseline, and 3-6-12 months after intervention. The anchoring points are "no pain" (0) and "intolerable pain" (100).
Time frame: 1 year
Quality of Life on EuroQoL (EQ-5D-5L) Instrument
Self-reported using the EQ-5 Dimensional instrument. Measured at baseline, and 3-6-12 months after intervention.
Time frame: 1 year
Well-being on Visual Analogue Self-Rating Scale 100-mm
Self-reported well-being measured by the Arizona Integrative Outcome Scale (AIOS) at baseline, and 3-6-12 months after intervention. This is a one-item 100 mm long Visual Analogue Self-Rating Scale followed by an instruction to reflect on the sense of well-being during the last month. The anchoring points are "worst you have ever been (0) and "best you ever been" (100).
Time frame: 1 year
Pain related self-efficacy according to Pain Self-efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ)
Self-reported pain self-efficacy using the instrument Pain Self-efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ) at baseline, and 3-6-12 months after intervention. The questionnaire consist of 10 items scored on a range from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating stronger self-efficacy beliefs.
Time frame: 1 year
Physical ability in 30-seconds chair-to-stand test.
The 30 seconds chair to stand test (30CST) performed at baseline, and 3-6-12 months after intervention.
Time frame: 1 year
This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Norwegian University of Science and Technology