CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02528968UK-PKUpdated Feb 22, 2018

National Study of a Pharmacokinetic-Focused Educational Package for Patients With Severe Haemophilia A

An interventional study of Educational Package in Hemophilia A, sponsored by Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. Completed at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to male participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-02-22.

Sponsored by Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
59
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

Prospective, interventional study of pharmacokinetic (PK)-focused FVIII dosing discussions delivered as part of a patient education package.

The study will capture severe haemophilia A patient reported outcome measures before and after PK-focused dosing discussions, including a standardised patient education package, that include personalised PK-guided dosing suggestions from a computational predictive device (myPKFiT®). The pragmatic study design recognises the CE marked myPKFiT® device is being implemented into routine care nationally and consequently only requires a single additional clinic visit for the purpose of consenting.

Read the detailed description

There is a paucity of patient reported outcome data documenting the impact of PK focused prophylaxis discussions. This prospective, multicentre UK-PK trial will coincide with the initiation of the myPKFiT® device in the context of an enhanced clinical review. This will include a standardised patient education package using a short animated film explaining PK and personalised prophylaxis, followed by modelling of the patient's own PK using the myPKFiT® device and discussing the dosing options with the patient. The aim of the PK educational package is to educate and engage patients and ensure that their treatment regimens meet their individual needs. In addition, the study will capture the prophylaxis dosing strategy agreed upon by patients and the clinical team where treatment decisions are made jointly between patients and the clinical team (concordance). Looking forward, haemophilia clinical care team members need a marker to judge or predict patient engagement with this personalising medicine process. Successful consultation strategies may differ if the team can anticipate how an individual person with haemophilia (PWH) might respond to discussions about potential change. The primary outcome measure is the Patient Activation Measure (PAM) which gauges the knowledge, skills and confidence essential to managing one's own health and healthcare. A PAM score can predict healthcare outcomes including medication adherence, healthcare utilisation and hospital visits. It is hypothesized that a more activated patient will be more receptive to changes in their treatment regimen, education and information about their health condition.

In addition to patient activation, the study will assess a range of patient reported outcomes and psychological factors using validated tools. These will include patients' Haemophilia-related quality of life (HAEMO-QoL-A), beliefs about medicines (BMQ), self-reported adherence (VERITAS-Pro) and activity levels. These tools will provide clear patient reported outcomes for the haemophilia community, with accompanying EQ5D data, enabling robust health economic evaluation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hemophilia A

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Pharmacokinetic dosing
  • Haemophilia
03

In context

Hemophilia A

866 studies on the registry are indexed under Hemophilia A; 137 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 59 is above the median of 28 across 512 interventional studies indexed under Hemophilia A.

Browse Hemophilia A studies →

Lead sponsor

Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust is the lead sponsor of 10 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Severe haemophilia A (FVIII:C \< 1IU/dL)
  • Prescribed regular prophylactic treatment (≥ 2 infusions/week) with Advate® for ≥ 6 months at the time of screening
  • Able to give informed consent and willing to participate in this study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age \<18 years
  • Non-severe haemophilia A (FVIII:C 1-40IU/dL)
  • Weight >120kg
  • Treatment with any other FVIII concentrate (recombinant or plasma-derived) during the study period or 6 months prior to screening.
  • Receiving on-demand or \<6 months of prescribed prophylaxis with Advate®
  • Current FVIII inhibitor (> 0.6BU/mL)
  • Current immune tolerance induction
  • Not able to give informed consent (incapacitated or vulnerable adults)
  • Patients with a life expectancy of less than one year
  • Already had personalized PK prediction using the myPKFiT®
  • Any inclusion criteria not met
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
59 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Educational Package

    Patients will receive a standardised PK focused educational package in the form of a short video film.

    Behavioral: Educational Package

Interventions

  • BehavioralEducational Package

    Patients will be invited to attend a PK educational session as part of the study protocol. This will form a discussion regarding clinical history and activity in the 6 months prior to study start, viewing of a short animated film giving additional detail on pharmacokinetics and prophylaxis in haemophilia A, followed by modelling of the patient's own PK and dose guidance based on 2 study blood samples.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Patient Activation Measures

    Change in the Patient Activation Measure (PAM) score over a 12 month time period.

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patients' perceptions of the PK educational package

    Perceived threat, message quality, message acceptance/derogation. This will be measured qualitatively.

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Health-related quality of life: EQ5D

    Time frame: 12 months

  3. Health-related quality of life: HAEMO-QoL-A

    Time frame: 12 months

  4. Self-reported adherence (VERITAS-pro)

    Time frame: 12 months

  5. Health-related quality of life: beliefs about medicines (BMQ)

    Time frame: 12 months

  6. Changes to participants' treatment regimen

    Change to amount of FVIII used

    Time frame: 12 months

  7. Changes to accuracy and timeliness of entries on treatment log (Haemtrack or alternative treatment log).

    Time frame: 12 months

  8. Changes to patient adherence to treatment regimen

    Actual changes as recorded on Haemtrack / equivalent.

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Barts and The Royal London Hospital
    London, E1 1BB, United Kingdom
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 22, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02528968
Lead sponsor
Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 19, 2015
Start date
Sep 2015
Primary completion
Nov 30, 2017
Completion
Nov 30, 2017
Last update
Feb 22, 2018

Study contacts

Daniel Hart
principal investigator · Barts & The London NHS Trust

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion